Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
36
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
36 results for “emission scenarios”
Global ammonia emissions from CAMEO throughout the century for 3 scenarios (2000-2100)
<p><strong>Global ammonia emissions from the CAMEO process-based model </strong>(general model description and evaluation can be found in Beaudor et al., 2023, GMD; https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023).</p><p>Monthly files containing global NH3 emissions and Manure application rates in gN.m2.yr-1 (2.5° lon x 1.27° lat; IPSL-CM6A-LR Earth System Model resolution):</p><p>1) total agricultural emissions (TOT_AGRI; the sum of manure management and agricultural soil emissions)</p><p>2) manure management emissions (MANURE_MANAG.)</p><p>3) agricultural soil emissions (SOIL_AGRI)</p><p>4) natural soil emissions (SOIL_NAT) corrected for baresoil (excluding Sahara in this new version)</p><p>5) Fraction of continent (CONT_FRAC) from the model to use for CTM prescription or global budget calculation</p><p>6) TAN and non TAN applied to grassland from ruminants during grazing (tan_input_graz, nontan_input_graz)</p><p>7) TAN and non TAN applied to grassland from ruminants and considered as fertilizers (tan_input_manureApp_grass, nontan_input_manureApp_grass)</p><p>8) TAN and non TAN applied to cropland from all types of animal and considered as fertilizers (tan_input_manureApp_crop, nontan_input_manureApp_crop)</p><p>9) Grazing intensity (grazing_intensity, unitless)</p><p>10) Net Primary Production of grassland and grass biomass dedicated to livestock feed (NPP_grass, Cgrass_ingested in gC.m2.yr-1)</p><p>The four files correspond to a specific simulation using input4MIPs forcing files :</p><p>- Present-day simulation from 2000 to 2014 </p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-2.45</p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-4.34</p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-5.85</p><p>Note that these datasets have been prepared in the scope of a publication to be submitted.</p><p><i><strong>Beaudor, M., N. Vuichard, J. Lathière, D. Hauglustaine., Historical and future ammonia emissions database (2000-2100) from the CAMEO process-based model, in preparation.</strong></i></p>
Carbon Price Scenarios: Projecting prices for emission certificates
<p>This dataset consists of three different carbon price development scenarios. Each is represented by two growth rates which results in a total of 6 time series. The time frame is from 2020 to 2050. The units of the values are given in € / t CO₂. All values are nominal.</p> <p>Overall, it should be noted that an estimate of the development of CO2 prices in the german nEHS and EU-ETS is subject to great uncertainty due to the major influence of regulatory intervention, a less liquid market towards 2030 and a lack of markets after 2030.</p> <p>The data provided is delivered in frictionless data format (see 2024-03-25_metadata_carbon-price-scenarios.package.json) and can be accessed using the frictionless software (https://frictionlessdata.io/).</p>
COMPAIR carbon footprint calculations and greenhouse gas emissions reduction scenarios
<p>Citizens' carbon footprint calculation results and citizen-created scenarios on how Greenhouse Gas emissions can be reduced by 55% by 2030 are available that were gathered as part of the <a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101036563">EU Horizon2020 COMPAIR project</a> in Europe. The pilot cities/regions are Berlin, Athens, Sofia, Plovdiv, and Flanders.</p>
Country resolved combined emission and socio-economic pathways based on the RCP and SSP scenarios
<p><strong>Recommended citation</strong></p> <p>Article citation will be added once the article is available.</p> <p><strong>Content</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="#use-of-the-dataset-and-full-description">Use of the dataset and full description</a></li> <li><a href="#abstract">Abstract</a></li> <li><a href="#support">Support</a></li> <li><a href="#files-included-in-the-dataset">Files included in the dataset</a></li> <li><a href="#notes">Notes</a></li> <li><a href="#data-format-description-columns">Data format description (columns)</a></li> <li><a href="#data-sources">Data sources</a></li> <li><a href="#changelog">Changelog</a></li> <li><a href="#references">References</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Use of the dataset and full description</strong></p> <p>Before using the dataset, please read this document and the article describing the methodology, especially the "Discussion and limitations" section.</p> <p>The article will be referenced here as soon as it is published.</p> <p>Please notify us (johannes.guetschow@pik-potsdam.de) if you use the dataset so that we can keep track of how it is used and take that into consideration when updating and improving the dataset.</p> <p>When using this dataset or one of its updates, please cite the DOI of the precise version of the dataset used and also the data description article which this dataset is supplement to (see above). Please consider also citing the relevant original sources when using the RCP-SSP-dwn dataset. See the full citations in the References section further below.</p> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you encounter possible errors or other things that should be noted or need support in using the dataset or have any other questions regarding the dataset, please contact johannes.guetschow@pik-potsdam.de.</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This dataset provides country scenarios, downscaled from the RCP (Representative Concentration Pathways) and SSP (Shared Socio-Economic Pathways) scenario databases, using results from the SSP GDP (Gross Domestic Product) country model results as drivers for the downscaling process harmonized to and combined with up to date historical data.</p> <p><strong>Files included in the dataset</strong></p> <p>The repository comprises several datasets. Each dataset comes in a csv file. The file name is constructed from dataset properties as follows: <Source><Bunkers><Downscaling>.csv</p> <p><em><Source></em></p> <p>The "Source" flag indicates which input scenarios were used.</p> <ul> <li><strong>PMRCP:</strong> RCP scenarios downscaled using the SSPs: emissions and socio-economic data; scenarios are available both harmonized to historical data and non-harmonized.</li> <li><strong>PMSSP:</strong> Downscaled SSP IAM scenarios: emissions and socio-economic data; scenarios are available both harmonized to historical data and non-harmonized.</li> </ul> <p><em><Bunkers></em></p> <p>the "Bunkers" flag indicates if the input emissions scenarios have been corrected for emissions from international shipping and aviation (bunkers) before downscaling to country level or not. The flag is "B" for scenarios where emissions from bunkers have been removed before downscaling and "" (no flag) where they have not been removed.</p> <p><em><Downscaling></em></p> <p>The "Downscaling" flag indicates the downscaling technique used.</p> <ul> <li><strong>IE:</strong> Convergence downscaling with exponential convergence of emissions intensities and convergence before transition to negative emissions.</li> <li><strong>IC:</strong> Regional emission intensity growth rates for all countries.</li> <li><strong>CS:</strong> Constant emission shares as a reference case independent of the socio-economic scenario.</li> </ul> <p>All files contain data for all countries and variables. For detailed methodology descriptions we refer to the paper this dataset is a supplement to. A reference to the paper will be added as soon as it is published.</p> <p>Finally the data description including detailed references is included: RCP-SSP-dwn_v1.0_data_description.pdf.</p> <p><strong>Notes</strong></p> <p>If you encounter problems with the size of the csv files please let us know, so we can find solutions for future releases of the data.</p> <p><strong>Data format description (columns)</strong></p> <p><em>"source"</em></p> <p>For <em>PMRCP</em> files source values are</p> <ul> <li>RCPSSP<Bunkers><Downscaling>: unharmonized downscaled RCP SSP scenarios</li> <li>PMRCP<Bunkers><Downscaling>: downscaled RCP SSP scenarios harmonized to and combined with historical data</li> <li>PMRCPMISC<Bunkers><Downscaling>: GDP and population data harmonized to and combined with historical data</li> </ul> <p>For <em>PMSSP</em> files source values are</p> <ul> <li>SSPIAM<Bunkers><Downscaling>: unharmonized downscaled SSP IAM scenarios</li> <li>PMSSP<Bunkers><Downscaling>: downscaled SSP IAM scenarios harmonized to and combined with historical data</li> <li>PMSSPMISC<Bunkers><Downscaling>: GDP and population data harmonized to and combined with historical data</li> </ul> <p>For possible values of <Bunkers> and <Downscaling> please see section <a href="#files-included-in-the-dataset">Files included in the dataset</a> above.</p> <p><em>"scenario"</em></p> <p>For <em>PMRCP</em> files the scenarios have the format <RCP><SSP><group>, where</p> <ul> <li><RCP> denotes the RCP scenario. Values are RCP3PD, RCP45, RCP6, and RCP85.</li> <li><SSP> denotes the SSP scenario. Values are SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, SSP4, and SSP5.</li> <li><groups> denotes the SSP basic elements GDP modeling group. Values are IIASA, OECD, and PIK. Not all RCP SSP combinations exist as some SSP storylines are not compatible with all RCP emissions scenarios. For details we refer to the paper this dataset is a supplement to. A reference to the paper will be added as soon as it is published.</li> </ul> <p>For <em>PMSSP</em> files the scenarios have the format <SSP><forcing><model> where</p> <ul> <li><SSP> denotes the SSP scenario. Values are SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, SSP4, and SSP5.</li> <li><forcing> denotes the radiative forcing level of the scenario. Values are 19, 26, 34, 45, 60, 85, and BL where 19 stands for 1.9W/m<sup>2</sup> etc. and BL stands for baseline.</li> <li><model> denotes the Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) used to generate the scenario. Values can be found below</li> </ul> <p>Model codes in scenario names</p> <ul> <li>AIMCGE: AIM-CGE</li> <li>IMAGE: IMAGE</li> <li>GCAM4: GCAM</li> <li>MESGB: MESSAGE-GLOBIOM</li> <li>REMMP: REMIND-MAGPIE</li> <li>WITGB: WITCH-GLOBIOM</li> </ul> <p><em>"country"</em></p> <p>ISO 3166 three-letter country codes or custom codes for groups:</p> <p>Additional "country" codes for country groups.</p> <ul> <li>EARTH: Aggregated emissions for all countries</li> <li>ANNEXI: Annex I Parties to the UNFCCC</li> <li>NONANNEXI: Non-Annex I Parties to the UNFCCC</li> <li>AOSIS: Alliance of Small Island States</li> <li>BASIC: BASIC countries (Brazil, South Africa, India and China)</li> <li>EU28: European Union (still including the UK)</li> <li>LDC: Least Developed Countries</li> <li>UMBRELLA: Umbrella Group</li> </ul> <p><em>"category"</em></p> <p>Category descriptions.</p> <ul> <li>IPCM0EL: Emissions: National Total excluding LULUCF</li> <li>ECO: Economical data</li> <li>DEMOGR: Demographical data</li> </ul> <p><em>"entity"</em></p> <p>Gases and gas baskets using global warming potentials (GWP) from either Second Assessment Report (SAR) or Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).</p> <p>Gases / gas baskets and underlying global warming potentials</p> <ul> <li>CH4: Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>)</li> <li>CO2: Carbon Dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)</li> <li>N2O: Nitrous Oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O)</li> <li>FGASES: Fluorinated Gases (SAR): HFCs, PFCs, SF<sub>6</sub>, NF<sub>3</sub></li> <li>FGASESAR4: Fluorinated Gases (AR4): HFCs, PFCs, SF<sub>6</sub>, NF<sub>3</sub></li> <li>KYOTOGHG: Kyoto greenhouse gases (SAR)</li> <li>KYOTOGHGAR4: Kyoto greenhouse gases (AR4)</li> </ul> <p><em>"unit"</em></p> <p>The following units are used:</p> <ul> <li>Million2011GKD: Million 2011 international dollars</li> <li>ThousandPers: Thousand persons</li> <li>kt: kilotonnes</li> <li>Mt: Megatonnes</li> <li>Gg: Gigagrams</li> <li>MtCO2eq: Megatonnes of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents using the GWPs defined by "entity"</li> <li>GgCO2eq: Gigagrams of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents using the GWPs defined by "entity"</li> </ul> <p><em>Remaining columns</em></p> <p>Years from 1850-2100.</p> <p><strong>Data Sources</strong></p> <p>The following data sources were used during the generation of this dataset:</p> <p><em>Scenario data</em></p> <ul> <li><strong>RCP scenarios</strong> <a href="https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/RcpDb/">website/data</a></li> <li><strong>SSP basic elements</strong> <a href="https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb">website/data</a></li> <li><strong>SSP IAM scenarios</strong> <a href="https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb">website/data</a></li> <li><strong>SSP CMIP6 scenarios</strong> <a href="https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb">website/data</a></li> </ul> <p><em>Historical data</em></p> <ul> <li><strong>CDIAC</strong> <a href="http://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017">data</a></li> <li><strong>CEDS CMIP6 data</strong> <a href="https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/11/369/2018/">paper/data</a></li> <li><strong>EDGAR version 4.3.2:</strong> <a href="http://doi.org/10.2904/JRC_DATASET_EDGAR">data</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-79">paper</a></li> <li><strong>IMO GHG report</strong> <a href="http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Third%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Study/GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report.pdf">report</a></li> <li><strong>PRIMAP-hist v2.1</strong> <a href="http://www.earth-syst-sci-data.net/8/571/2016/">paper</a>, <a href="https://www.pik-potsdam.de/primap-live/primap-hist/">website</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.018">data</a></li> <li><strong>PRIMAP-hist SocioEco v2.1</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.019">data</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Changelog</strong></p> <p>For future versions</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>For full references we refer to the pdf version of the data description available in this repository and the list of related identifiers.</p>
Scenario emissions and temperature data for PROVIDE project
<p>Data for tier 1 and tier 2 PROVIDE scenarios. </p> <p>Tier 1 scenarios are mostly from integrated assessment models. Tier 2 scenarios are much more numerous and are kept in a separately zipped folder for temperatures and csv file for emissions data. The temperature folders contains the full set of FaIR runs for scenarios entirely defined by emissions. Summaries are much smaller files containing quantile info for each scenario, including the scenarios defined by combinations of emissions and temperature trends. </p> <ul> <li>10 Tier 1 scenarios until 2100</li> <li>15 Tier 1 scenarios defined until 2300, all of which are variations of the original 10</li> <li>Many Tier 2 scenarios, aiming to completely tile reasonable emissions space parameterised with 4 variables</li> </ul> <p><em>Several objectives of the PROVIDE project depend on a set of scenarios that can be modelled through either a ‘classical’ forward-looking approach or by a novel approach that ‘reverses the impact chain’. These scenarios are also key elements for the integration of PROVIDE findings in the outward-looking stakeholder Dashboard of the project. Here we describe the set of scenarios that has been developed and will be used within PROVIDE. In total, PROVIDE explores <strong>three complementary approaches</strong>:</em></p> <ol> <li><em>10 distinct tier 1 scenarios extending until 2100, mostly based on the existing literature, used for short-term assessments of impacts</em></li> <li><em>15 distinct tier 1 scenarios extending until 2300, based on different extensions of the 10 literature scenarios, used for assessing longer-run impacts and the geophysical impact of significant temperature overshoot</em></li> <li><em>~1350 distinct tier 2 scenarios, exploring several dimensions of emissions space systematically, such as CO<sub>2</sub> net zero date and relative methane intensity. This is used to explore which scenarios are compatible with given climate outcomes. These scenarios can be used to reverse the traditional impact chain, going from acceptable climate risks to descriptions of acceptable emissions. </em></li> </ol>
Model run and scenario data for study "Bioenergy-induced land-use change emissions with sectorally fragmented policies"
<p>This data archive contains model runs and data analysis files to the research article</p> <p><strong>Bioenergy-induced land-use change emissions with sectorally fragmented policies</strong></p> <p>by <em>Leon Merfort, Nico Bauer, Florian Humpenöder, David Klein, Jessica Strefler, Alexander Popp, Gunnar Luderer, Elmar Kriegler</em></p> <p>published in <em>Nature Climate Change </em>(2023).</p> <p><em><strong>ModelRuns_remind </strong></em>(directory) contains all REMIND model runs of the scenarios underlying the paper.</p> <p><em><strong>ModelRuns_magpie </strong></em>(directory) contains all MAgPIE model runs of the scenarios underlying the paper.</p> <p><em><strong>DataAnalysis </strong></em>(directory) contains an RStudio Project that was used for the data analysis and the generation of the figures of the paper. It additionally contains all figures and figure data that are shown in the paper.</p> <p><em><strong>ScenarioMapping.pdf</strong></em> contains the mapping from scenario names used in the paper to the model experiment names (in the model run directories).</p>
Scout Benchmark Scenarios for U.S. Building Energy and CO2 Emissions to 2050
<p><strong>Overview and Intended Use Cases</strong></p> <p>These scenarios establish a range of futures for U.S. buildings sector energy use and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to 2050 using <a href="https://scout-bto.readthedocs.io/en/latest/">Scout</a>, a reproducible and granular model of U.S. building energy use, emissions, and consumer costs developed by the U.S. national labs for the U.S. Department of Energy's Building Technologies Office (BTO).</p> <p>Scout benchmark scenario data are suitable for the following example use cases:</p> <ul> <li>Setting high-level policy goals for U.S. buildings sector energy use, electricity demand, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over both the near- and long-term (e.g., X% building CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reductions vs. 2005 levels by 2030, Y% reductions vs. 2005 levels by 2050);</li> <li>Exploring the effects of key deployment dynamics driving U.S. buildings sector energy and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to 2050 that could be affected by policy levers (e.g., raising minimum technology performance levels; improving market penetration of commercially available technologies; accelerating electrification and/or retrofit rates; introducing breakthrough technologies to the market);</li> <li>Determining priority segments (regions, building types, and end use/technology types) and sequencing of U.S. buildings sector energy and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reductions and/or changes in total consumption by fuel type to 2050 under a given set of assumptions;</li> <li>Identifying the energy and CO<sub>2</sub> impacts or cost effectiveness of specific technologies or operational approaches of interest—in isolation or after considering competition with other measures in a scenario portfolio; and/or</li> <li>Exploring the total cost of deploying different portfolios of building energy efficiency and end-use electrification measures, as well as the total consumer energy cost savings potential of those portfolios. </li> </ul> <p><strong>Scenario Summary</strong></p> <p>A total of 5 scenarios explore total building energy use, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and technology and energy costs from 2024–2050 under varying levels of demand-side deployment of building efficiency and electrification measures and parallel decarbonization of buildings’ electricity supply. Narrative descriptions of these scenarios are as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Stated Policies: </strong>Existing policies and regulations (mainly IRA for buildings) lead to modestly accelerated deployment of HPs/HPWHs but not other efficiency measures in the buildings sector. The power sector decarbonizes consistent with a “<a href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84916.pdf">Mid-case (with tax credit phaseout)</a>” scenario.</li> <li><strong>Mid: </strong>Policy makers rely mostly on market-based instruments to moderately increase deployment of efficient technology and fuel switching to heat pumps. The power sector decarbonizes consistent with a “Mid-case with 95% Decarbonization by 2050 (without tax credit phaseout)” scenario.</li> <li><strong>High: </strong>Policy makers use both regulations and market-based instruments to dramatically accelerate deployment of high efficiency technologies and fuel switching to heat pumps, though building technologies with breakthrough increases in performance at low cost do not materialize on the market. The power sector decarbonizes consistent with a “<a href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84916.pdf">Mid-case with 100% Decarbonization by 2035 (without tax credit phaseout)</a>” scenario.</li> <li><strong>Breakthrough: </strong>Research and innovation breakthroughs lead to market availability of cost-effective, high-performance building technologies by 2030; these, coupled with accelerated deployment of high efficiency technologies and fuel switching to heat pumps, lead to aggressive buildings sector transformation. The power sector decarbonizes consistent with a “<a href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84916.pdf">Mid-case with 100% Decarbonization by 2035 (without tax credit phaseout)</a>” scenario.</li> <li><strong>Inefficient Electrification Sensitivity: </strong>Policy makers use regulations and market-based instruments to encourage fuel switching but do not include provisions that require switching to efficient heat pumps, resulting in a substantial amount of switching to inefficient electric resistance heating and water heating technologies. The power sector decarbonizes consistent with a “<a href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84916.pdf">Mid-case (with tax credit phaseout)</a>” scenario.</li> </ul> <p>The key input dimensions that are varied to produce the above range of scenarios are as follows:</p> <ul> <li><u>Market-available technology performance range:</u> the energy performance levels of building technologies available for purchase by end use consumers, bounded by a minimum performance “floor” and maximum performance “ceiling”;</li> <li><u>Load electrification rate and efficiency:</u> the rate at which fossil-fired equipment is converted to electric service, and the efficiency level of the electric equipment; </li> <li><u>Early retrofits:</u> the fraction of consumers that choose to replace existing building equipment and/or envelope components before the end of their useful lifetimes; and</li> <li><u>Power grid decarbonization:</u> the annual average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions intensity of the electricity supplied to the buildings sector across the modeled time horizon (2024–2050), resolved by grid region. </li> </ul> <p>Refer to the attached “Scenario_Guide" PDF for further scenario details and results; instructions for reproducing scenario results are available in “Scenario_Execution” XLSX.</p> <p>Results data are reported as an annual time series (2024–2050) at both a national and regional (<a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/nerc_map.pdf">EMM grid region</a>) spatial resolution. While not reflected in this dataset, annual time series data may be further translated to a sub-annual, hourly resolution for integration with grid modeling—please contact the authors for more information.</p> <p><strong>What's New in This Version</strong></p> <p><strong><em>Note: v6.1 updates the file ./Results/Results_Summary.xlsx to reflect the latest scenario runs. Please disregard the outdated version of this file that was posted in v6.</em></strong></p> <p>This set of benchmark scenarios provides an update to <a href="../records/8087519">Version 5</a> of the Scout Benchmark Scenarios (June 2023) using the same scenario definitions but an updated set of baseline and measure input data alongside several minor methodological changes. </p> <p>The following scenario features are new in this dataset:</p> <ul> <li>Reference case data and energy use projections updated to <a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/">AEO 2023</a>, including updates to energy and stock and technology cost, performance, and lifetime data; updated site-source energy conversions, CO2 emissions intensities, and energy prices; and revised peak and take period definitions that are consistent with 2023 EMM projections.</li> <li>Integration of federal and state cost incentives from AEO 2023 (see <a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/IIF_IRA/pdf/IRA_IIF.pdf">AEO2023 Issues in Focus: Inflation Reduction Act Cases</a> in the AEO2023 for details); these incentives reduce the initial cost of upgrades for applicable measures.</li> <li>Revised method for allocating end use electricity baselines in AEO from census divisions to EMM regions and states by using <a href="https://www.nrel.gov/buildings/end-use-load-profiles.html">End Use Load Profiles</a> (EULP) data. EULP data now also underpin updated, EMM-resolved hourly load baseline shapes.</li> <li>Retail price projections for grid scenarios are updated to match those produced by NREL under the Department of Energy’s DECARB Initiative (these are similar to but differ in slight ways from NREL’s <a href="https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/standard-scenarios.html">Standard Scenarios</a>). Three scenarios are included: <ul> <li><em>Stated Policies</em>: includes moderate estimates for inputs such as technology costs, fuel prices, and demand growth with no nascent technologies and electric sector policies that match current federal laws and regulations (including IRA & BIL); achieves an 88% reduction in building site electricity emissions <em>intensity</em> (Mt CO2/quad site) from 2005 levels by 2050.</li> <li><em>Mid</em>: consistent with<em> Stated Policies</em> except achieves 97% reduction in building site electricity emissions intensity from 2005 levels by 2050.</li> <li><em>High:</em> includes low demand growth projections with advanced inputs for technology costs and allowance of transmission expansion between regions (without limitations based on historical build rates); federal policies are consistent with implemented laws (including IRA & BIL); building electricity is fully decarbonized after 2035.</li> <li>The previous version of the benchmark datasets used retail price data from EIA’s <a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/">Annual Energy Outlook</a> scenarios.</li> </ul> </li> <li>In contrast to <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8087519">Version 5</a>, measures in the “best available” measure tier are not deployed with load flexibility features. </li> </ul>
A SSP1-Low emission land use scenario based on LCM2019 for Scotland - Land Use Change only - baseline 2019 and scenario 2050 (nov22)
<p>This set of datasets contains a land use change scenario (2050) for Scotland within the scope of a SSP1 - Low emissions scenario (Shared Socio-Economic Pathways). For achieving a low-emission scenario, simulated land use change targeted woodland expansion (including silvo-arable and silvo-pastoral) and decreased grazing intensity, both land use changes also aimed at benefitting four aspects of ecosystem services: carbon storage through tree planting, emission reduction through deintensification, biodiversity enhancement through tree planting, and pollination to support food production.</p> <p>The baseline dataset is based on the Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020) aggregated at 100m resolution. Grazing intensity was added to it by using estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021). From the baseline dataset, the land use scenario map was created using the SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services based on the LandSFACTS model (Castellazzi et al, 2010). The attached land use scenario map for 2050 is not an optimised result, but it is only one possibility that meets all the constraints stipulated for the scenario.</p> <p><strong>For a detailed description of the scenario refer to the following web storymap : <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9</a></strong></p> <p>This analysis was conducted as part of the Land use Transformations (<a href="https://landusetransformations.hutton.ac.uk/">https://landusetransformations.hutton.ac.uk/</a>) project (JHI-C3-1) in the Scottish Government funded Strategic Research Programme 2022-27.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>This version of the datasets only includes 100m cells with land use change (14% of Scotland). The full dataset has a non-commercial version of the licence (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10927157">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10927157</a>).</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>-------------------------</strong></p> <p><strong>Datasets accessible here : <a href="https://openscience.hutton.ac.uk/dataset/low-emission-land-use-scenarios-land-use-change">SSP1-Low Emission Land Use Scenarios - land use change - Dataset - Natural Asset Register Data Portal (hutton.ac.uk)</a></strong></p> <p><strong>License</strong>: CC-BY-4.0 namely “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International“ <a name="_Hlk161153952"></a>(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)</p> <p><strong>Copyright to display of the datasets</strong>: <br>“Contains Data owned by UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology © Database Right/Copyright UKCEH. Based on Data from LPIS and JAC (Scottish Government, 2019).”</p> <p><strong>2 Main files :</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>SSP1LEonLCM19_LUC_2019.tif</strong> : original land uses (2019) on which the scenario is based on. This land use map, of a resolution of 100m, is based on the Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020), estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021). This version of the datasets only includes 100m cells with land use change (14% of Scotland).<br><br><strong>Contributions </strong>to the baseline dataset (SSP1LEonLCM19_LUC_2019.tif) : <ul> <li>100% of 100m cells: Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020)</li> <li>93.88% of 100m cells: the LCM 2019 was subdivided by grazing intensity using estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021). This impacts the grasslands, heathers, bogs and arable classes.</li> <li>Estimated overall contributions: 65% UKCEH, 35% JHI</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li><strong>SSP1LEonLCM19_LUC_2050.tif :</strong> land use scenario (2050), which is within the scope of a SSP1 - Low emissions scenario (Shared Scocio-Economic Pathways). The scenario was created using the SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services based on the LandSFACTS model (Castellazzi et al, 2010). For a detailed description of the scenario refer to the following web storymap : <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9</a><u>. </u>This version of the datasets only includes 100m cells with land use change (14% of Scotland).<br><br><strong>Contributions</strong> to the scenario dataset (SSP1LEonLCM19_LUC_2050.tif) : <ul> <li>cf. contribution to the baseline (above)</li> <li>100% of 100m cells: modelled land use change</li> <li>Estimated overall contributions: 50% UKCEH, 50% JHI</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Main references:</strong></p> <p>Morton, R. D., Marston, C. G., O’Neil, A. W., & Rowland, C. S. (2020). Land Cover Map 2019 (25m rasterised land parcels, GB) [Data set]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/F15289DA-6424-4A5E-BD92-48C4D9C830CC">https://doi.org/10.5285/F15289DA-6424-4A5E-BD92-48C4D9C830CC</a></p> <p>Wardell-Johnson, D. (2022) Stocking rates derived from IACS 2019 version 4. <br>Based on data from Land Parcel Information System (2019) courtesy of Rural Payments and Inspections Division, Scottish Government.<br>Based on data from the June Agricultural Census (2019) courtesy of Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services, Agricultural Statistics team, Scottish Government.</p> <p>Chapman, P. (2007) Conservation Grazing of Semi-natural Habitats. Technical note TN586. SAC tn586-conservation.pdf (sruc.ac.uk)</p> <p>FAS (2021) Practical Guide: Managing Peatlands and Upland Habitats. <a href="https://www.fas.scot/environment/biodiversity/protecting-scotlands-peatlands/practical-guide-managing-peatlands-and-upland-habitats/">https://www.fas.scot/environment/biodiversity/protecting-scotlands-peatlands/practical-guide-managing-peatlands-and-upland-habitats/ </a>(author: Paul Chapman)</p> <p>Castellazzi, M.S.; Gimona, A. (2021) SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services (arcgis toolbox and user manual included, part of RESAS Deliverable-O1.4.2ciiD27).</p> <p>Castellazzi, M.S., Matthews, J., Angevin, F., Sausse, C., Wood, G.A., Burgess, P.J., Brown I., Conrad, K.F., Perry J.N. (2010). Simulation scenarios of spatio-temporal arrangement of crops at the landscape scale . Environmental Modelling and Software 25, 1881-1889. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.006</a> </p> <p><a href="https://www.hutton.ac.uk/research/departments/information-and-computational-sciences/tools/landsfacts">https://www.hutton.ac.uk/research/departments/information-and-computational-sciences/tools/landsfacts</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Supplementary Datasets for "Oceanic enrichment of ammonium and its impacts on phytoplankton community composition under a high-emissions scenario"
<p>These are the four supplementary datasets used in the analysis and work presented in the publication </p> <p><strong><span>Oceanic enrichment of ammonium and its impacts on phytoplankton community composition under a high-emissions scenario</span></strong></p> <p> </p>
Canadian fossil fuel production and greenhouse gas emissions compared to predictions following the 2.0°C scenario
<p>This spreadsheet shows the amounts of coal, oil and natural gas produced in Canada from 2010 to 2020 using governmental sources. McGlade and Ekins (2015) proposed quotas for the production of each type of fossil fuel in order to provide a 67% chance to limit warming to 2.0°C by 2100. The proportion of each quota that is already spent is calculated. Emissions targets from 21 scenarios originating from five effort-sharing studies are compared with Canadian 2020 emissions to evaluate the difference. Carbon budgets from 18 scenarios originating from seven studies are compared with Canadian cumulative emissions to evaluate the percentage of the budgets already emitted within the 2010-2050 period. Emissions from five database are used in the calculations.</p>
Additional greenhouse gas emissions under different scenarios of permafrost melt'
<p>This dataset contains the underlying data for the following publication Significant implications of permafrost thawing for climate change control, Climatic Change, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1666-5. </p> <p>This data set contains the permafrost emissions used as inputs for the DICE model. These are estimates of the emissions release from permafrost under the RCP 2.6 scenario (GtCO 2 -eq y −1. Three inputs were used: the median, 16th percentile and 84th percentile pathway.</p>
Daily precipitation and temperature for 2021–2050 over China: multiple RCMs and emission scenarios corrected by a trend-preserving method
<p>The datasets with spatial resolution of 0.5˚×0.5˚ were corrected from CORDEX-EA regional climate models based on a trend–preserving bias correction method, including daily daily maximum and minimum temperature, and precipitation (Tmax, Tmin and Pre). The datasets cover the main land area of China and two periods, the historical period (from 1980 to 2005 ) and future period (from 2021 to 2050). The observations used in the correction were obtained from China Meteorological Administration (http://cdc.cma.gov.cn), and were derived from 2472 weather stations over China. The evaluation indicated that the corrected datasets are reliable for the investigations related to climate change across China.</p>
Net-zero CO2 emissions scenarios for Switzerland
<p>This dataset accompanies the relevant article in Communications Earth and Environment. It contains the key assumptions used in the energy system modelling with the Swiss TIMES energy systems model (STEM) for assessing net-zero carbon dioxide emissions scenarios for Switzerland. In addition, contains extensive results from STEM for each one of the core scenarios and variants assessed in the study. </p>
The international transfer of emission allowances scenario
<p>The model output data for the international transfer of emission allowances assessment.</p>
Antarctic Ice Sheet and emission scenario controls on 21st-century extreme sea-level changes
<p>These files accompany the paper: 'Antarctic Ice Sheet and emission scenario controls on 21st-century extreme sea-level changes'.</p> <p>Please cite the accompanying paper if you find this data useful.</p> <p><strong>Contents</strong><br> This dataset contains netCDF files with all the mean sea level scenarios and the accompanying uncertainties. The file 'esl_results.xlsx' contains the estimated GPD parameters for each tide-gauge site, as well as the estimated 100-year amplification factor and allowance. The files result_concise_table_af.pdf and result_concise_table_al.pdf contain easy-to-access overviews of the amplification factors and allowances sorted per station.<br> </p> <p>(c) 2019 California Institute of Technology. U.S. Government sponsorship acknowledged.<br> This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.</p>
Scenario data, model source code and plotting routine for manuscript: Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts
<p>This data archive contains REMIND model setup, results data and data analysis files for manuscript:<br><strong>Separating CO2 emission reduction from removal targets comes with limited cost impact.<br><br>plotting</strong>(directory) contains results data, manuscript specific data analysis and plotting routine scripts used to generate the figures of the manuscript.<br><strong>remind</strong>(directory) contains REMIND model source code and scenario set-up. Detailed scenario configurations are set in remind/config/scenario_config_SepMark.csv.<br><strong>remind2</strong>(directory) contains the slightly modified R-library package used for post-processing of REMIND output.<br><br>AMENDMENT<br><strong>Plots_SeparateMarkets_afterReviewProcess.Rmd</strong> After the review process, the new plotting script was added including the additional figures in the Supplementary Material. This file should replace the previous R-markdown file SepMark_essential/plotting/Plots_SeparateMarkets.Rmd.</p>
The international transfer of emission allowances scenario
<p>The model output data for the international transfer of emission allowances assessment.</p>
A SSP1-Low emission land use scenario based on LCM2019 for Scotland - baseline 2019 and scenario 2050 (nov22)
<p>This set of datasets contains a land use change scenario (2050) for Scotland within the scope of a SSP1 - Low emissions scenario (Shared Socio-Economic Pathways). For achieving a low-emission scenario, simulated land use change targeted woodland expansion (including silvo-arable and silvo-pastoral) and decreased grazing intensity, both land use changes also aimed at benefitting four aspects of ecosystem services: carbon storage through tree planting, emission reduction through deintensification, biodiversity enhancement through tree planting, and pollination to support food production.</p> <p>The baseline dataset is based on the Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020) aggregated at 100m resolution. Grazing intensity was added to it by using estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021). From the baseline dataset, the land use scenario map was created using the SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services based on the LandSFACTS model (Castellazzi et al, 2010). The attached land use scenario map for 2050 is not an optimised result, but it is only one possibility that meets all the constraints stipulated for the scenario.</p> <p><strong>For a detailed description of the scenario refer to the following web storymap : <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9</a></strong></p> <p>This analysis was conducted as part of the Land use Transformations (<a href="https://landusetransformations.hutton.ac.uk/">https://landusetransformations.hutton.ac.uk/</a>) project (JHI-C3-1) in the Scottish Government funded Strategic Research Programme 2022-27.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>-------------------------</strong></p> <p><strong>Datasets accessible here : <a href="https://openscience.hutton.ac.uk/dataset/low-emission-land-use-scenarios">SSP1-Low Emission Land Use Scenarios - Dataset - Natural Asset Register Data Portal (hutton.ac.uk)</a></strong></p> <p><strong>License</strong>: CC BY-NC 4.0 namely “Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International“ <a name="_Hlk161153952"></a>(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)</p> <p><strong>Copyright to display of the datasets</strong>: <br>“Contains Data owned by UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology © Database Right/Copyright UKCEH. Based on Data from LPIS and JAC (Scottish Government, 2019).”</p> <p><strong>2 Main files :</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>SSP1LEonLCM19_2019.tif </strong>: original land uses (2019) on which the scenario is based on. This land use map, of a resolution of 100m, is based on the Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020), estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021).<br><br><strong>Contributions </strong>to the baseline dataset (SSP1LEonLCM19_2019.tif) : <ul> <li>100% of 100m cells: Land Cover Map 2019 (Morton et al, 2020)</li> <li>66.84% of 100m cells: the LCM 2019 was subdivided by grazing intensity using estimations of stocking rates from IACS (Wardell-Johnson, 2022), and grazing conservation thresholds (Chapman, 2007; FAS, 2021). This impacts the grasslands, heathers, bogs and arable classes.</li> <li>Estimated overall contributions: 90% UKCEH, 10% JHI</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li><strong>SSP1LEonLCM19_2050.tif</strong> : land use scenario (2050), which is within the scope of a SSP1 - Low emissions scenario (Shared Scocio-Economic Pathways). The scenario was created using the SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services based on the LandSFACTS model (Castellazzi et al, 2010). For a detailed description of the scenario refer to the following web storymap : <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c3d3feff85f14460b6c973127089d6f9</a><br><br><strong>Contributions</strong> to the scenario dataset (SSP1LEonLCM19_2050.tif) : <ul> <li>cf. contribution to the baseline (above)</li> <li>14% of 100m cells: modelled land use change</li> <li>Estimated overall contributions: 85% UKCEH, 15% JHI</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Main references:</strong></p> <p>Morton, R. D., Marston, C. G., O’Neil, A. W., & Rowland, C. S. (2020). Land Cover Map 2019 (25m rasterised land parcels, GB) [Data set]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/F15289DA-6424-4A5E-BD92-48C4D9C830CC">https://doi.org/10.5285/F15289DA-6424-4A5E-BD92-48C4D9C830CC</a></p> <p>Wardell-Johnson, D. (2022) Stocking rates derived from IACS 2019 version 4. <br>Based on data from Land Parcel Information System (2019) courtesy of Rural Payments and Inspections Division, Scottish Government.<br>Based on data from the June Agricultural Census (2019) courtesy of Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services, Agricultural Statistics team, Scottish Government.</p> <p>Chapman, P. (2007) Conservation Grazing of Semi-natural Habitats. Technical note TN586. SAC tn586-conservation.pdf (sruc.ac.uk)</p> <p>FAS (2021) Practical Guide: Managing Peatlands and Upland Habitats. <a href="https://www.fas.scot/environment/biodiversity/protecting-scotlands-peatlands/practical-guide-managing-peatlands-and-upland-habitats/">https://www.fas.scot/environment/biodiversity/protecting-scotlands-peatlands/practical-guide-managing-peatlands-and-upland-habitats/ </a>(author: Paul Chapman)</p> <p>Castellazzi, M.S.; Gimona, A. (2021) SLM-OptionsTool, a land use change tool for Ecosystem Services (arcgis toolbox and user manual included, part of RESAS Deliverable-O1.4.2ciiD27).</p> <p>Castellazzi, M.S., Matthews, J., Angevin, F., Sausse, C., Wood, G.A., Burgess, P.J., Brown I., Conrad, K.F., Perry J.N. (2010). Simulation scenarios of spatio-temporal arrangement of crops at the landscape scale . Environmental Modelling and Software 25, 1881-1889. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.006</a> </p> <p><a href="https://www.hutton.ac.uk/research/departments/information-and-computational-sciences/tools/landsfacts">https://www.hutton.ac.uk/research/departments/information-and-computational-sciences/tools/landsfacts</a></p>
Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low emission scenarios - Scenario Data
<p>This data archive contains model runs and data analysis files to the research article</p> <p><strong>Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low emission scenarios</strong></p> <p>by<br> <em>Gunnar Luderer, Silvia Madeddu, Leon Merfort, Falko Ueckerdt, Michaja Pehl, Robert Pietzcker, Marianna Rottoli, Felix Schreyer, Nico Bauer, Lavinia Baumstark, Christoph Bertram, Alois Dirnaichner, Florian Humpenöder, Antoine Levesque, Alexander Popp, Renato Rodrigues, Jessica Strefler, Elmar Kriegler</em></p> <p>forthcoming in <em>Nature Energy (2021).</em></p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>ModelRuns </strong></em>(directory) contains all model runs of the scenarios underlying the paper.</p> <p><em><strong>DataAnalysis </strong></em>(directory) contains all RMarkDown-Notebooks that were used for the data analysis and the generation of the figures of the paper.</p> <p><em><strong>ScenarioNames.pdf</strong></em> contains the mapping from scenario names used in the paper to the model experiment names (in the directory ModelRuns).<br> <br> <em><strong>ScenarioData_IAMC_Format.xlsx </strong></em>contains the scenario output date in the generic IAMC-format (https://data.ene.iiasa.ac.at/database/) as submitted to the IPCC-AR6-database (https://iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/Energy/200513_IPCCwebinar.html)</p>
Emission Scenarios used for: Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020
<p>CH<sub>4</sub> emission scenarios, based on bottom-up emission estimates (Chandra et al., CEE, 2024; Fig 2) for simulating the long-term trends and latitudinal gradients of CH<sub>4</sub> and <em>δ</em><sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>. The details can be found at </p> <p>Chandra, N., Patra, P.K., Fujita, R. <em>et al.</em> Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020. <em>Commun Earth Environ</em> <strong>5</strong>, 147 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.