Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

21

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

21 results for “foraging mode”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad40/100

Data from: Foraging mode constrains the evolution of cephalic horns in lizards and snakes

<p>A phylogenetically diverse minority of snake and lizard species exhibit rostral and ocular appendages that substantially modify the shape of their heads. These cephalic horns have evolved multiple times in diverse squamate lineages, enabling comparative tests of hypotheses on the benefits and costs of these distinctive traits. Here, we demonstrate correlated evolution between the occurrence of horns and foraging mode. We argue that although horns may be beneficial for various functions (e.g., camouflage, defence) in animals that move infrequently, they make active foragers more conspicuous to prey and predators, and hence are maladaptive. We therefore expected horns to be more common in species that ambush prey (entailing low movement rates) rather than in actively searching (frequently moving) species. Consistent with that hypothesis, our phylogenetic comparative analysis of published data on 1,939 species reveals that cephalic horns occur almost exclusively in sit-and-wait predators. This finding underlines how foraging mode constrains the morphology of squamates and provides a compelling starting point for similar studies in other animal groups.</p>

opencc-zeroNov 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1. A in The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards

Figure 1. A, phylogenetic relationships among major lizard clades showing the evolution of foraging mode across squamates. The cladogram is based on Estes, de Queiroz &amp; Gauthier (1988). B, phylogenetic relationships among the taxa included in this study. Sit-and-wait foraging (black bars) is presumed to be the basal condition for both Meroles and Pedioplanis. See text for details. The cladogram is based on Arnold (1991).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2004View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards

Figure 3. Scatterplot of snout–vent length (mm) and bite force (Newtons). Without correcting for body size differences, P. namaquensis was significantly different from all other species and P. lineoocellata was significantly different from H. lugubris. After correcting for body size, H. lugubris was significantly different from the other species. The error bars represent standard error. Hl = H. lugubris, Ms = M. suborbitalis, Pl = P. lineoocellata, Pn = P. namaquensis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2004View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards

Figure 4. Phylogenetic mapping of skull morphology, biting performance, and foraging mode in four lacertid species. A, evolutionary transitions based on the analysis of the raw morphological and bite force data (Table 1, underlining). B, evolutionary changes based on the canonical variates analysis (boxes; Table 3) and size-corrected ANO- VAs (bars and circles; Table 1, lettering). Shared shading or symbols within the circles or boxes indicates no significant difference. The SW and WF species were expected to covary in morphology and biting performance; however, only sizecorrected head length and head width met those predictions. See text for details.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2004View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards

Figure 2. Three-dimensional plot of mean canonical scores of each lacertid species. Hl = Heliobolus lugubris (WF); Ms = Meroles suborbitalis (SW); Pl = Pedioplanis lineoocellata (SW); Pn = Pedioplanis namaquensis (WF).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2004View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Foraging mode constrains the evolution of cephalic horns in lizards and snakes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data for: The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive output in lizards

<p>Life-history theory suggests that the optimal reproductive output of an organism is affected by factors such as energy acquisition and predation risk. The observation that some organisms actively search for their prey and others ambush them creates the expectation of different energy needs and predation risk associated with each foraging behavior, the so-called "foraging-mode paradigm".  Although this paradigm has been around for decades, the empirical evidence consists of conflicting results derived from competing models based on different mechanisms. For instance, models within the foraging-mode paradigm suggest that widely-foraging females have evolved low reproductive output, because a heavy reproductive load decreases their ability to escape from predators. By contrast, a long-standing prediction of evolutionary theory indicates that organisms subject to high extrinsic mortality, should invest more in reproduction. Here, we present the first partial evidence that widely-foraging species have evolved greater reproductive output than have sit-and-wait species, which we attribute to a larger body size and greater mortality among mobile foragers. According to our findings, we propose a theoretical model that could explain the observed pattern in lizards, suggesting ways for evolutionary ecologists to test mechanistic hypotheses at the intraspecific level.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Data for: The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive output in lizards

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: From fine-scale foraging to home ranges: a semi-variance approach to identifying movement modes across spatiotemporal scales

Understanding animal movement is a key challenge in ecology and conservation biology. Relocation data often represent a complex mixture of different movement behaviors, and reliably decomposing this mix into its component parts is an unresolved problem in movement ecology. Traditional approaches, such as composite random walk models, require that the timescales characterizing the movement are all similar to the usually arbitrary data-sampling rate. Movement behaviors such as long-distance searching and fine-scale foraging, however, are often intermixed but operate on vastly different spatial and temporal scales. An approach that integrates the full sweep of movement behaviors across scales is currently lacking. Here we show how the semivariance function (SVF) of a stochastic movement process can both identify multiple movement modes and solve the sampling rate problem. We express a broad range of continuous-space, continuous-time stochastic movement models in terms of their SVFs, connect them to relocation data via variogram regression, and compare them using standard model selection techniques. We illustrate our approach using Mongolian gazelle relocation data and show that gazelle movement is characterized by ballistic foraging movements on a 6-h timescale, fast diffusive searching with a 10-week timescale, and asymptotic diffusion over longer timescales.

opencc-zeroDec 2012View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Foraging mode of Australolacerta rupicola (FitzSimons, 1933) (Sauria: Lacertidae): evidence of seasonal variation in an extremely active predator?

Figure 5. Australolacerta rupicola feeding on a spider (a) and a grasshopper (b). Credit: S. Kirchhof.

opennotspecifiedNov 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

F in The varied foraging mode of the subtropical eublepharid gecko Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis

F. 2. Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis #2, male with complete tail, on a small tree, about 1.5 m up from the ground, in the NW corner of the study site, Tokashikijima, on 7 September 1999, at 9.20 p.m. Substratum temperature 27.5°C, air temperature 1 m above ground 27.2°C. The gecko was observed there from 9.23 p.m. for 32 min with PTM=0, and again from 10.50 p.m. for 29 min with PTM=45.9, starting from the same place. This animal had previously been observed on 4 and 6 September on the ground.

opennotspecifiedOct 2004View details →
zenodo32/100

F in The varied foraging mode of the subtropical eublepharid gecko Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis

F. 1. The study site of Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis on Tokashikijima (7 September 1999). (A) General view of the front of the lot from the street (looking north); (B) part of the east boundary of the lot, showing the masonry wall of the adjacent house and trees, both used by the geckos.

opennotspecifiedOct 2004View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: From fine-scale foraging to home ranges: a semi-variance approach to identifying movement modes across spatiotemporal scales

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2013View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Social foragers adopt a riskier foraging mode in the centre of their groups

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Changes in foraging mode caused by a decline in prey size have major bioenergetic consequences for a small pelagic fish

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 in Foraging mode of Australolacerta rupicola (FitzSimons, 1933) (Sauria: Lacertidae): evidence of seasonal variation in an extremely active predator?

Figure 1. Typical microhabitat of Australolacerta rupicola in Sample Plot 1. Credit: S. Kirchhof.

opennotspecifiedNov 2010View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 in Foraging mode of Australolacerta rupicola (FitzSimons, 1933) (Sauria: Lacertidae): evidence of seasonal variation in an extremely active predator?

Figure 3. Typical microhabitat of Australolacerta rupicola in Sample Plot 3. Credit: S. Kirchhof.

opennotspecifiedNov 2010View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 in Foraging mode of Australolacerta rupicola (FitzSimons, 1933) (Sauria: Lacertidae): evidence of seasonal variation in an extremely active predator?

Figure 2. Typical microhabitat of Australolacerta rupicola in Sample Plot 2. Credit: S. Kirchhof.

opennotspecifiedNov 2010View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Foraging mode, relative prey size and diet breadth: a phylogenetically-explicit analysis of snake feeding ecology

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2019View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: Foraging mode of spiders affects risk of predation by birds

Avian insectivores are top predators of arboreal arthropods in different forest ecosystems. The selective effects of bird predation in relation to foraging behaviour in canopy-living spiders were studied in a 2-year field experiment using exclosures in a spruce forest in southern Sweden. Three different hunting strategies – free-hunting, two-dimensional web, three-dimensional web – were included in the analysis. Comparisons of bird predation rate (ratio ln (abundance net-enclosed branch/abundance control)) showed considerable variation between spider groups. Free-hunting spiders suffered most from avian insectivores and predation rate was significantly higher than in spiders with two-dimensional webs. Spiders with three-dimensional webs were exposed to a predation rate in between those of the two other hunting strategies. Generally, the experimental effect was significantly higher in spring samples than in autumn, suggesting a stronger predation pressure in winter. The high variation in susceptibility to predation by insectivores implies that selection on behaviour of spider individuals is strong. Web building in itself is probably part of the protective mechanism, suggesting that webs have dual functions. We conclude that the risk of bird predation is a selective force on foraging behaviour of spiders in a forest canopy system.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record