Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8 results for “genetic guideline”
Figure 1 in Why we should develop guidelines and quantitative standards for using genetic data to delimit subspecies for data-poor organisms like cetaceans
Figure 1. Depiction of the divergence of lineages with four times (T1–T4) chosen to illustrate different levels of biological organization. At T1 the yellow lineage is found across the distribution and although there are likely Demographically Independent Populations (DIPs) that differ in frequencies of the blue, yellow, and red lineages, there are no discontinuities. At T2 some lineages may be diagnosable but likely do not yet appear to be separate lineages. At T3 three groups (the blue/green, yellow, and orange/red lineages) meet the subspecies definition (they are diagnosable and appear to be diverging separately). The divergence level is not sufficient that reconvergence can be ruled out. Between T3 and T4, barriers to gene flow change such that the yellow lineage comes into contact with the blue/green and red-dominated lineages. Blue has diverged in a manner by which gene flow does not resume and the green/yellow lineage dies out. The yellow lineage reconverges and persists alongside the red lineage with a small level of gene flow (orange). At T4 the blue lineage is a species evolving separately from the yellow/red species. The yellow/red species has two subspecies that are both diagnosable and partially diverged.
Figure 3 in Guidelines and quantitative standards to improve consistency in cetacean subspecies and species delimitation relying on molecular genetic data
Figure 3. Flow diagram for subspecies delineation using combined quantitative and qualitative standards. The threshold values assume the user is evaluating a case relying on mtDNA control region data. Percent Diagnosable (PD) is the smallest strata-specific correct classification score in a given comparison (e.g., PD50 in two-strata comparisons in Archer et al. 2017). The second box in the second row (other evidence to meet subspecies definition) allows for subspecies delineation when both conditions are not met using mtDNA. This box could be used either for the case when one condition is met and one unmet or when both just barely miss meeting the standards. For example, consider the case with PD <95% and dA> 0.004. Diagnosability could be achieved with morphological data or nuclear data that are sufficient for subspecies but not for full species.
Figure 2. A in Guidelines and quantitative standards to improve consistency in cetacean subspecies and species delimitation relying on molecular genetic data
Figure 2. A comparison of the pairs of populations (red triangles), subspecies (green squares) and species (blue circles) estimated by Rosel et al. (2017a). Net nucleotide divergence (dA) is shown on a natural log scale to better illustrate differences between the pairwise comparisons at low levels of divergence. Bars show the central 95th-pecentile of the estimate distributions. The solid vertical line at dA = 0.020 delimits all but one species and correctly excludes all subspecies pairs. The vertical dashed line at dA = 0.004 delimits all populations from the higher taxonomic levels and correctly delimits seven of eleven subspecies. The horizontal dashed lines are two potential thresholds for percent diagnosable (80% and 95%) that are discussed in the text.
Figure 1 in Guidelines and quantitative standards to improve consistency in cetacean subspecies and species delimitation relying on molecular genetic data
Figure 1. Guidelines for studies of cetacean taxonomy based on genetic data.
Contact zone of two different chloroplast lineages and genetic guidelines for seed transfer in Quercus serrata and Q. crispula
<p>Within their natural distribution ranges, plant species exhibit genetic structure which has been created by global climate change and natural selection over long periods. To conserve local forests with different genetic structures, genetic guidelines for seed and seedling transfer in individual species are therefore necessary. Genetic guidelines have been published for 43 Japanese tree species using population genetic data; however, for practical use, more detailed genetic borders between important genetic lineages should be clarified to inform seed collection and planting. Thus, we investigated in detail the genetic borders between two important Japanese oak species, Quercus serrata and Q. crispula, in the Chubu region of Japan using chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers, and we discuss the factors that influenced border creation using the results of species distribution modelling (SDM). Two distinct cpDNA haplotypes were found for each species (northern and southern haplotype) within the Chubu region of Japan but the difference in nuclear DNA between northern and southern haplotype populations was very small both in Q. serrata and Q. crispula. The results of SDM showed that during the LGM Q. serrata was distributed mostly along the coastline but Q. crispula was distributed not only along the coast but also in mountainous areas further inland. The cpDNA genetic borders of these two oak species are complex and seem to have been influenced by topography and their distribution during the LGM. We propose and discuss genetic guidelines for these two oak species based on the results of this study.</p>
Contact zone of two different chloroplast lineages and genetic guidelines for seed transfer in Quercus serrata and Q. crispula
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Universal- Versus Guidelines-Directed Genetic Testing for Germline Pathogenic Variants Utilizing a Multi-Gene Panel for Inherited Cancers in Non-Western Society.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04920513. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Universal Genetic Testing Versus Guidelines-Directed Testing for Germline Pathogenic Variants Among Non-Western Patients With Breast Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04920656. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.