Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
726
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
726 results for “global model”
Sparse observations induce large biases in estimates of the global ocean CO2 sink: an ocean model subsampling experiment
<p>Dataset underlying the analysis in Hauck et al., 2023: Sparse observations induce large biases in estimates of the global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink - an ocean model subsampling experiment, Philosophical Transactions A</p> <p>Surface ocean partial pressure of CO<sub>2 </sub>(pCO<sub>2</sub>) and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux reconstructions, using two mapping methods (MPI-SOM-FFN, CarboScope) three different sampling masks: SOCAT, SOCAT+SOCCOM, IDEAL (based on bgcArgo, Roemmich et al., 2019).</p> <p>Also, all FESOM-REcoM output fields that were used in the reconstructions are provided.</p> <p>We further provide the three masks that were used for subsampling: SOCAT, SOCAT+SOCCOM, IDEAL (bgcArgo).</p> <p> </p>
Model simulation data used in "The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 2: Aviation" (Righi et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2016)
<p>This dataset contains the output of the EMAC global model simulations analysed and discussed in Righi et al. (<i>Atmos. Chem. Phys.</i>, 2016). For details see the README.md file.</p>
Model simulation data used in "The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 1: Land transport and shipping" (Righi et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2015)
<p>This dataset contains the output of the EMAC global model simulations analysed and discussed in Righi et al. (<i>Atmos. Chem. Phys.</i>, 2015). For details see the README.md file.</p>
Higher orders for cosmological phase transitions: a global study in a Yukawa model
<p>Data used in the article with preprint title: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02308">Higher orders for cosmological phase transitions: a global study in a Yukawa model by Oliver Gould and Cheng Xie</a></p><p>Contains file: dataPublishedExport.csv, which consists of the variable used in, and evaluations from the global parameter scan. More details of the content are specified in README.txt.</p>
Global 1km Land Surface Parameters for Kilometer-Scale Earth System Modeling (SAI_2016_2020)
<p>Earth system models (ESMs) are progressively advancing towards the kilometer scale (k-scale). However, the surface parameters for Land Surface Models (LSMs) within ESMs running at the k-scale are typically derived from coarse resolution and outdated datasets. This study aims to develop a new set of global land surface parameters with a resolution of 1 km for multiple years from 2001 to 2020, utilizing the latest and most accurate available datasets. Specifically, the datasets consist of parameters related to land use and land cover, vegetation, soil, and topography. Differences between the newly developed 1k land surface parameters and conventional parameters emphasize their potential for higher accuracy due to the incorporation of the most advanced and latest data sources. To demonstrate the capability of these new parameters, we conducted 1 km resolution simulations using the E3SM Land Model version 2 (ELM2) over the contiguous United States. Our results demonstrate that land surface parameters contribute to significant spatial heterogeneity in ELM2 simulations of soil moisture, latent heat, emitted longwave radiation, and absorbed shortwave radiation. On average, about 31% to 54% of spatial information is lost by upscaling the 1 km ELM2 simulations to a 12 km resolution. Using eXplainable Machine Learning (XML) methods, the influential factors driving the spatial variability and spatial information loss of ELM2 simulations were identified, highlighting the substantial impact of the spatial variability and information loss of various land surface parameters, as well as the mean climate conditions. The comparison against four benchmark datasets indicates that ELM generally performs well in simulating soil moisture and surface energy fluxes. The new land surface parameters are tailored to meet the emerging needs of k-scale LSMs and ESMs modeling with significant implications for advancing our understanding of water, carbon, and energy cycles under global change.</p> <p>This data repository is linked to <a href="../records/10815170" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815170</a></p>
Global 1km Land Surface Parameters for Kilometer-Scale Earth System Modeling
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: Earth system models (ESMs) are progressively advancing towards the kilometer scale (k-scale). However, the surface parameters for Land Surface Models (LSMs) within ESMs running at the k-scale are typically derived from coarse resolution and outdated datasets. This study aims to develop a new set of global land surface parameters with a resolution of 1 km for multiple years from 2001 to 2020, utilizing the latest and most accurate available datasets. Specifically, the datasets consist of parameters related to land use and land cover, vegetation, soil, and topography. Differences between the newly developed 1k land surface parameters and conventional parameters emphasize their potential for higher accuracy due to the incorporation of the most advanced and latest data sources. To demonstrate the capability of these new parameters, we conducted 1 km resolution simulations using the E3SM Land Model version 2 (ELM2) over the contiguous United States. Our results demonstrate that land surface parameters contribute to significant spatial heterogeneity in ELM2 simulations of soil moisture, latent heat, emitted longwave radiation, and absorbed shortwave radiation. On average, about 31% to 54% of spatial information is lost by upscaling the 1 km ELM2 simulations to a 12 km resolution. Using eXplainable Machine Learning (XML) methods, the influential factors driving the spatial variability and spatial information loss of ELM2 simulations were identified, highlighting the substantial impact of the spatial variability and information loss of various land surface parameters, as well as the mean climate conditions. The comparison against four benchmark datasets indicates that ELM generally performs well in simulating soil moisture and surface energy fluxes. The new land surface parameters are tailored to meet the emerging needs of k-scale LSMs and ESMs modeling with significant implications for advancing our understanding of water, carbon, and energy cycles under global change.</p> <p><br><strong>Format</strong>: NetCDF.<br><strong>Institution</strong>: Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory<br><strong>Contacts</strong>: Lingcheng Li (lingcheng.li@pnnl.gov; lingchengliwhu@gmail.com), Gautam Bisht (gautam.bisht@pnnl.gov)</p> <p><strong>Description</strong>: This dataset provides land surface parameters specifically designed for global kilometer scale earth system modeling.<br><strong>Spatial resolution</strong>: ~1 km, corresponding to 1/120 degree.<br><strong>Temporal resolution</strong>: includes yearly (2001-2020), monthly (2001-2020), and static data for different parameters.</p> <p><br><strong>Reference</strong>: <strong>Li, L., Bisht, G., Hao, D., and Leung, L.-Y. R.: Global 1km Land Surface Parameters for Kilometer-Scale Earth System Modeling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-242, Acceptance, 2023.</strong></p> <p>It includes four categories of parameters, Please refer to the readme file for details:<br>1. LULC: land use and land cover parameters<br>2. VEGE: vegetation paramertes<br>3. SOIL: soil parameters<br>4. TOPO: topography parameters</p> <p>Due to storage limitations, the LAI and SAI files are stored in the following repositories:</p> <p>1) LAI 2001-2005: <a href="../records/10815637" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815637</a>; 2) LAI 2006-2010: <a href="../records/10815649" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815649</a>; 3) LAI 2011-2015: <a href="../records/10815658" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815658</a>; 4) LAI 2016-2020: <a href="../records/10815662" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815662</a>;</p> <p>5) SAI 2001-2005: <a href="../records/10815623" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815623</a>; 6) SAI 2006-2010: <a href="../records/10815629" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10815629</a>; 7) SAI 2011-2015: <a href="../records/10790724" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10790724</a>; 8) SAI 2016-2020: <a href="../records/10790758" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/records/10790758</a></p>
Data for paper publication "Modelling emission and transport of key components of primary marine organic aerosol using the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3"
<p>The dataset presented here is related to the article by Leon-Marcos et al. 2025: "Modelling emission and transport of key components of primary marine organic aerosol using the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3" accepted for publication in GMD. It comprises global fields of the FESOM2.1-REcoM3 biogeochemistry model tracers employed to calculate the ocean biomolecule concentration that serve as input data for the aerosol model. Additionally, the ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 code of the marine aerosol implementation and the required scripts to run the model experiments are provided here. The aerosol-climate model simulation results of the marine aerosol emission, as well as the evaluation of the model results compared to observations, are also included. For further information, please refer to the attached data description. </p> <p> </p> <h2> </h2>
Data from 'Local Regions Associated With Interdecadal Global Temperature Variability in the Last Millennium Reanalysis and CMIP5 Models'
<p><strong>Abstract from '<em>Local Regions Associated With Interdecadal Global Temperature Variability in the Last Millennium Reanalysis and CMIP5 Models</em>':</strong></p> <p>Despite the importance of interdecadal climate variability, we have a limited understanding of which geographic regions are associated with global temperature variability at these timescales. The instrumental record tends to be too short to develop sample statistics to study interdecadal climate variability, and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5) climate models tend to disagree about which locations most strongly influence global mean interdecadal temperature variability. Here we use a new paleoclimate data assimilation product, the Last Millennium Reanalysis (LMR), to examine where local variability is associated with global mean temperature variability at interdecadal timescales. The LMR framework uses an ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation approach to combine the latest paleoclimate data and state-of-the-art model data to generate annually resolved field reconstructions of surface temperature, which allow us to explore the timing and dynamics of preinstrumental climate variability in new ways. The LMR consistently shows that the middle- to high-latitude north Pacific and the high-latitude North Atlantic tend to lead global temperature variability on interdecadal timescales. These findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of low-frequency climate variability in the preindustrial era.</p>
Global atmospheric simulation using the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model
<p>A 1-month subset from a global atmospheric simulation using the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model (SP-CAM), which implements the Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) described in Khairoutdinov and Randall (2001) and Khairoutdinov et al. (2005). The version of the SP-CAM used here is described in Marchand et al. (2009) and Ovtchinnikov et al (2006), and was run at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with DOE support. It is based on CAM 3.0 for the global atmospheric component, and uses the System for Atmospheric Modeling (SAM; Khairoutdinov and Randall 2003). This simulation is configured with CAM running the finite volume dynamical core on a 2x2.5 degree latitude-longitude grid with 26 vertical levels. The embedded CRM (SAM) is configured with 64 horizontal columns at 4 km grid spacing with 24 vertical levels (sharing the bottom 24 levels with the CAM grid), and single-moment microphysics. The simulation was initialized on 1 September 1997 and runs through June 2002, forced with observed monthly-mean sea surface temperatures. Only the month of July 2000 is uploaded here, which is what is required to reproduce the results in Hillman et al. (2018).</p>
Global Carbon Budget 2022, surface ocean fugactiy of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux of individual Global ocean biogechemical models and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products
<p><strong>Surface ocean fugacity of CO2 (fCO2) and air-sea CO2 flux data from individual Global Ocean Biogeochemistry Models (GOBMs) and surface ocean fCO2-based data-products (data-products).</strong><br> There are three types of files: (1) one file per fCO2-product with gridded fields and regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series, (2) one file per GOBM with gridded fields, and (3) one file with the regionally-integrated time-series for the GOBMs. </p> <p><strong>Note: </strong>These provided gridded outputs from fCO2-based data-products and GOBMs are regridded datasets, without adjustments. <strong>The best estimates of the annual global ocean carbon sink, based on the native grids of data-products and GOBMs and with the adjustments described in the Global Carbon Budget 2022 (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, section C3), are available in the Global Carbon Budget 2022 spreadsheet.</strong></p> <p>The regionally-integrated time-series are as provided by the contributing groups, i.e. integrated from their native grids. In order to reproduce Figure 13 of the Global Carbon Budget 2022 paper (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022), the river flux adjustment needs to be added to the CO2 flux estimated from the data-products (North: 0.17 GtC yr-1, Tropics: 0.16 GtC yr-1, South: 0.32 GtC yr-1, see GCB 2022 paper, section 2.4.1). The sum of the regional fluxes may differ from the global estimates as reported in the GCB spreadsheet, because adjustments were applied only for global fluxes.</p> <p><strong>What is in the files?</strong></p> <p>(1) The files for the fCO2-based data-products contain the following variables (temporal resolution: monthly):</p> <p><br> fgco2_reg: Regionally integrated air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), monthly, for regions: north, tropics, south<br> fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude<br> area_reg: Total surface ocean area covered by native grid, for global, north, tropics, south</p> <p>(2) The files for the GOBMs contain the following fields, for simulation A (‘contemporary simulation’, including effects of rising CO2, climate change and variability) and simulation B (‘control simulation’, constant CO2, no climate change and variability). Temporal resolution: monthly</p> <p>fgco2: Flux density of the total air-sea CO2 flux (positive downward), dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> sfco2: Surface ocean fCO2, dimensions: time, latitude, longitude<br> area: Area per pixel, dimensions: latitude, longitude</p> <p><br> (3) One file ‘GCB-2022_OceanModel_RegionalBreakdown_1959-2021.nc’ with the regionally-integrated CO2 flux time-series for all individual GOBMs, and for simulations A and B. Temporal resolution: annual.</p> <p><br> <strong>Fair data use statement:</strong><br> The data and model output provided on this site are freely available and were furnished by individual scientists who encourage their use.<br> <strong>Citation:</strong> Please cite the Global Carbon Budget 2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022, ESSD, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022) for all data. In addition, please also cite the corresponding original reference for each dataset that has been used - see Table 4 in Global Carbon Budget 2022 for references of all the individual Global Ocean Biogeochemical Models and fCO2-based data-products. Further, for an overview of the Global Ocean Biogeochemical Model output, you may find it useful to cite Hauck et al. (2020, Frontiers, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.571720).<br> <strong>Acknowledgement:</strong> Please add the following text in the acknowledgement of your paper: “We acknowledge the Global Carbon Project, which is responsible for the Global Carbon Budget and we thank the ocean modeling and fCO2-mapping groups for producing and making available their model and fCO2-product output.”<br> <strong>Co-authorship: </strong>An invitation of co-authorship to the contributing groups is encouraged if these data are the central data set of the publication.</p> <p><br> Besides the surface fCO2 and air-sea CO2 flux data that is made available open access, we make<strong> additional output</strong> from the Global Ocean Biogeochemical models (GCB-ocean) available upon request and with its own data policy. Please refer to the Global Carbon Budget website for these additional data: https://globalcarbonbudget.org/</p> <p> </p>
Datasets for greenhouse gasses emissions and removals from inventories and global models over Africa
<p>This file includes the data from Mostefaoui et al. (ESSD, under submission), for 54 countries African countries</p> <p> The data includes: </p> <p>(1) CO2 fluxes from global models - satellite inversions and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVM) -, and from a collection of national inventories for LULUCF, GFEDv4 and FAO data.</p> <p> DGVM values are the median of 14 models, consistent with the Global Carbon Budget 2020 (https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/12/3269/2020/) LULUCF UNFCCC corrected values are from Grassi <a href="https://priv-bx-myremote.tech.ec.europa.eu/preprints/essd-2022-104/,DanaInfo=.aetugDhuwm0xto76O48y,SSL+">https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2022-104/</a> </p> <p>(2) CH4 fluxes from global models consistent with the Global Methane Budget 2020 (https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1561/2020/)</p> <p>(3 N2O fluxes from global models (three inversions)</p> <p>For further methodological details, see Mostefaoui et al. (ESSD, under submission):</p> <p>Mounia Mostefaoui, Philippe Ciais, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Prabir Patra. Greenhouse gasses emissions and their trends over the last three decades across Africa, ESSD (under submission)</p>
Data for Marine Ecological Niche Models, for 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species
<p>Data for Ecological Niche Models: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species.</p>
Global taxonomic occurrence grids using GBIF data for species distribution models.
<p>To achieve large geographic coverage, species occurrence databases that are composed of ad hoc species data collections such as that provided by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) are often used. A drawback to using these data is their geographic sampling bias, in which some regions are more intensively sampled than others, while other areas have very little to none reported sampling effort. Uneven sampling effort can mislead conclusions about biodiversity patterns and species distributions (Gotelli & Colwell, 2001; Lobo, 2008).</p> <p>Here we provide taxonomic occurrence grids to help mitigate the effects of sampling bias in species distribution modeling. These grids can be used to exclude areas of (a custom-defined) low sampling effort from the background when sampling for pseudo-absences’ (Phillips et al., 2009; Barbet-Massin et al.,2012). The occurrence grids have a 1 degree spatial resolution using WGS 84 as the geographic coordinate system. Each 1 degree grid cell contains the number of records present in GBIF corresponding to a specific taxonomic group: plants, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds and molluscs.</p> <p>To construct the occurrence grids, we used the 1- by 1-degree world latitude and longitude vector grid provided by ESRI (Redlands, California). It has a custom license which permits it reuse as long as ESRI is cited. It was downloaded from : <a href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7">https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7</a></p> <p>To map spatial sampling effort, the number of georeferenced occurrences corresponding to each taxonomic group contained by each 1- by 1-degree grid cell were counted. The grids were then converted to GeoTIFFs. The raster values correspond to the number of occurrences reported for the grid cells. For the purposes of the <a href="https://osf.io/7dpgr/">TrIAS project</a>, grid cells with fewer than 5 occurrences were removed. The TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids are used as inputs to the TrIAS risk modelling and mapping workflow: https://github.com/trias-project/risk-modelling-and-mapping. Full (with all grid cells containing at least one occurrence) taxonomic occurrence grids are also provided.</p> <p>GBIF data for each taxonomic group were downloaded using the following criteria: “Basis of Record”: Observation, Machine Observation, Human Observation, Specimen, Material sample, Literature Occurrence, Unknown evidence., "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "TaxonKey is Amphibia", "Year 1975-2005".</p> <p><strong>Raster Attributes</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Attribute</p> </td> <td> <p>Description</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>OID</p> </td> <td> <p>numeric row ID</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Value</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of records contained in the grid cell</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Count</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of times the value appears in the raster</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>The extent of each taxonomic occurrence grid:</p> <ul> <li> <p>longitude -180.0; latitude -90.0 (southwest corner)</p> </li> <li> <p>longitude 180.0; latitude 90.0 (northeast corner)</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Files:</strong></p> <p>TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p> </p> <p>Raw taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p><br> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Comparison of high-resolution global canopy height maps and their applicability to biodiversity modelling - dataset
<p>This repository was created to provide datasets related with an article comparing high-resolution global canopy height maps and exploring their applicability to biodiversity modeling in temperate biomes.</p> <p>EBR stands for Entlebuch Biosphere Reserve, MRF stands for Mount Richmond Forest and TAW stands for Trinity Alps Wilderness.</p> <p>The original airborne laser scanning point clouds used for the generation of the canopy height models were sourced from the LINZ Data Service and OpenTopography, and licensed for reuse under the CC BY 4.0 licence (<a href="https://mcas-proxyweb.mcas.ms/certificate-checker?login=false&originalUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org.mcas.ms%2F10.5069%2FG97D2SB0%3FMcasTsid%3D20893&McasCSRF=cf3ae9aed6f2016d3ceedda452d422646f4f8e5a5e6270380b370aad4964323a">https://doi.org/10.5069/G97D2SB0</a>); Federal Office of Topography swisstopo (<a href="https://mcas-proxyweb.mcas.ms/certificate-checker?login=false&originalUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.swisstopo.admin.ch.mcas.ms%2Fen%2Fgeodata%2Fheight%2Fsurface3d.html%3FMcasTsid%3D20893&McasCSRF=cf3ae9aed6f2016d3ceedda452d422646f4f8e5a5e6270380b370aad4964323a">https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/geodata/height/surface3d.html</a>); and U.S. Geological Survey (<a href="https://mcas-proxyweb.mcas.ms/certificate-checker?login=false&originalUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fapps.nationalmap.gov.mcas.ms%2Fdownloader%2F%3FMcasTsid%3D20893&McasCSRF=cf3ae9aed6f2016d3ceedda452d422646f4f8e5a5e6270380b370aad4964323a">https://apps.nationalmap.gov/downloader/</a>).</p> <p>The Global Forest Canopy Height Map - GFCH (Potapov et al. 2021; https://glad.umd.edu/dataset/gedi) and the high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth - HRCH (Lang et al. 2022, https://langnico.github.io/globalcanopyheight/) are provided free of charge, without restriction of use under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Publications, models, and data products that make use of these datasets must include proper acknowledgement.</p> <p><em>P. Potapov, X. Li, A. Hernandez-Serna, A. Tyukavina, M.C. Hansen, A. Kommareddy, A. Pickens, S. Turubanova, H. Tang, C.E. Silva, J. Armston, R. Dubayah, J. B. Blair, M. Hofton (2021) Mapping and monitoring global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112165. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165</a></em></p> <p><em>Lang, N., Jetz, W., Schindler, K., & Wegner, J. D. (2022). A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08322.</em></p> <p>R scripts related with this datasets are available at Github (https://github.com/lukasgabor/Comparison-of-high-resolution-global-canopy-height-maps-and-their-applicability; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7332716">DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7332716</a>)</p> <p>In the previous version (1.0) the average was calculated for the canopy height. In this version (1.1), the maximum height is calculated for the canopy height.</p>
Towards Parameter Estimation in Global Hydrological Models
<p>The provided elementary effects are used in the publication J. Kupzig, R. Reinecke, F. Pianosi, M.Flörke and T. Wagener: Towards Parameter Estimation in Global Hydrological Models (submitted to Environmental Research Letters in Feb 2023).</p> <p>In a large sample study, the Morris Method (Morris 1991) application produces the provided elementary effects using a new lightweight version of the global hydrological model WaterGAP3: WaterGAPLite.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/elementary_effects.zip?versionId=e980e961-2334-41db-900a-637b2dcec119">elementary_effects.zip </a>: elementary effects for all 50 trajectories and all basins (each trajectory is the result of 18 model runs; used bounds of parameters can be found in the Supplement of the manuscript)</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/results_overview.xlsx?versionId=6f38c60f-9084-4376-907d-579414285506">results_overview.xlsx</a>: parameter ranks for each basin and different evaluation criteria based on the elementary effects.</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/MC_Sample.csv">MC_Sample.csv</a>: normalized parameter samples of the additional Monte-Carlo Simulation (used bounds of parameters are the same as for the Morris method)</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/MC_NSE.csv">MC_NSE.csv</a>: resulting NSE values of the Monte-Carlo simulation</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/better_performing_basins.csv">better_performing_basins.csv</a>: list of basins (using GRDC no.) where minimal NSE is greater than -1 within all Monte-Carlo runs</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/standard_calib.csv">standard_calib.csv</a>: calibrated gamma value for each basin and corresponding evaluation criteria, using the standard calibration for WaterGAP3 (fit to mean discharge)</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/d2ea2535-b6e2-4ca7-9f15-600a83a01dfb/standard_calib_mod.csv">standard_calib_mod.csv</a>: calibrated gamma value for each basin and corresponding evaluation criteria, using a modified version of the standard calibration for WaterGAP3 (maximizing the NSE)<br> </li> </ul>
Data for figures in the Publication "The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2"
<p>This repository contains the data to produce figures for the paper:</p> <p>"Lohmann, U. and Neubauer, D.: The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807–8828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018, 2018."</p> <p>Note that the scripts are to be found in the accompanying package (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8183412)</p>
Final models for "Global-Scale Full-Waveform Ambient Noise Inversion" by Sager et al. (2020)
<p>The exodus model contains the inverted structure model and the source distribution can be found in the HDF5 file. Both can be visualized in ParaView. For the source model, we recommend opening it with the correspoding XDMF file (select "XDMF Reader" in the dialogue box).</p>
Simulations from the LPJmL3.5 dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the LPJmL3.5 dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for each individual turnover-causing process in the model were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Simulations from the ORCHIDEE dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the ORCHIDEE dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for mortality, leaf phenological turnover and fine root phenological turnover were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Simulations from the JULES dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the JULES dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 1.875 x 1.25 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for each individual turnover-causing process in the model were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.