Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

25

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

25 results for “groundwater invertebrates”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Data from: Invertebrate diversity in groundwater filled lava caves is influenced by both neutral and niche-based processes

<p><strong>Aim</strong>: Understanding which factors shape and maintain biodiversity is essential to understand how ecosystems respond to crises. Biodiversity in ecological communities is a result of the interaction of various factors which can be classified as neutral or niche-based. The importance of these processes has been debated, but many scientists believe that both processes are important. Here we examined the importance of neutral vs. niche-based factors for shaping invertebrate communities. We hypothesized that if neutral processes are the main drivers of community structure we would not see any clear relationship between the structure of community and ecological factors. If niche-based processes are important we should see clear relationships between community structure and variation in ecological variables.</p> <p><strong>Location</strong>: Groundwater-filled lava caves near Lake Mývatn, Iceland.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: We collected various ecological variables from these caves. Invertebrate communities were collected on the hard bottom using stone scrubbing and from epibenthic traps. Results: Both communities were species-poor, with low densities of invertebrates, showing the resource-limited and oligotrophic nature of these systems. Unusually for Icelandic freshwater ecosystems, the benthic communities were not dominated by Chironomidae (Diptera) larvae, but rather by crustaceans, mainly Cladocera. The epibenthic communities were not shaped by environmental variables, suggesting that they may be structured primarily by neutral processes. The benthic communities were shaped by the availability of energy, and to some extent pH, suggesting that niche-based processes were important drivers of community structure, although neutral processes may still be relevant. </p> <p><strong>Main conclusions</strong>: The results suggest that both processes are important for invertebrate communities in freshwater, and research should focus on understanding both of these processes. The ponds we studied are representative of a number of freshwater ecosystems that are extremely vulnerable to human disturbance, making it even more important to understand how their biodiversity is shaped and maintained.</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Invertebrate diversity in groundwater filled lava caves is influenced by both neutral and niche-based processes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Invertebrate biodiversity in cold groundwater fissures in Iceland

Iceland has an abundance of fissures that are parallel to the Mid-Atlantic ridge where bedrock cracks as a result of continental rifting. Some fissures penetrate the aquifer and expose the groundwater within the bedrock, becoming springs. As such, groundwater fissures have uniform and constant physical and chemical environment but they can differ greatly in morphology. In addition, there is often great variation in depth within fissures and substrate types contrast between vertical rock wall and more heterogenous horizontal bottom. The variation in morphological environment may create dissimilar habitats with unique characteristics and/or influence distribution of resources. Our objective was to study macrozoobenthos communities in cold groundwater fissures in Iceland in relation to physical habitat by comparing invertebrate diversity and density both between fissures with different morphological characteristics as well as between substrate types and depths within fissures. Samples were collected in two fissures in SW Iceland, Silfra and Flosagjá. Assemblages were similar between fissures except for higher densities of cladocerans in Flosagjá fissure. Within fissures, there was significant difference in Shannon diversity between substrate types in Flosgjá and ostracods were found in significantly higher densities on bottom. The distribution of all other taxa groups was homogenous in both fissures regardless of depth gradient and substrate. Invertebrates were found to be living within and around a biofilm that covered the entire substrate. These biofilm mats are made from Cyanobacteria and benthic diatoms, which are successful under low light conditions and may minimize any effect of the heterogeneous habitat creating a uniform and suitable microhabitat for invertebrates regardless of depth and substrate type.

opencc-zeroDec 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Biogeography of undescribed families and/or genera of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. : Explanation note: This dataset contains a supplementary table of undescribed families and/or genera of groundwater invertebrates by higher rank in each subregion of Queensland, Australia.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Biogeography of described families and genera of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. : Explanation note: This dataset contains a supplementary table of described families and genera of groundwater invertebrates by higher rank in each subregion of Queensland, Australia.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Knight L, Brancelj A, Hänfling B, Cheney C (2015) The groundwater invertebrate fauna of the Channel Islands. Subterranean Biology 15: 69-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.15.4792

Table 2: Invertebrate taxa recorded from wells and boreholes on Jersey: Explanation note: List of taxa recorded on Jersey.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 4 from: Knight L, Brancelj A, Hänfling B, Cheney C (2015) The groundwater invertebrate fauna of the Channel Islands. Subterranean Biology 15: 69-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.15.4792

Table 5: Invertebrate taxa recorded from wells and boreholes on Sark: Explanation note: List of taxa recorded on Sark.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Knight L, Brancelj A, Hänfling B, Cheney C (2015) The groundwater invertebrate fauna of the Channel Islands. Subterranean Biology 15: 69-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.15.4792

Table 4: Invertebrate taxa recorded from wells and boreholes on Alderney: Explanation note: List of taxa recorded on Alderney.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Knight L, Brancelj A, Hänfling B, Cheney C (2015) The groundwater invertebrate fauna of the Channel Islands. Subterranean Biology 15: 69-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.15.4792

Table 3: Invertebrate taxa recorded from wells, boreholes and springs on Guernsey: Explanation note: List of taxa recorded on Guernsey.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Invertebrate biodiversity in cold groundwater fissures in Iceland

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Knight L, Brancelj A, Hänfling B, Cheney C (2015) The groundwater invertebrate fauna of the Channel Islands. Subterranean Biology 15: 69-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.15.4792

Figure 1 - The location of the Channel Islands in the English Channel (map from Robins et al. 2012).

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 10 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 10 - Scatterplots showing the relationship between stygofauna taxon richness per sample and different physico-chemical variables; In Figure 10 the scatterplots presented are based on available data in the Queensland Subterranean Aquatic Fauna database where: depth to groundwater is available for 113 samples in meters below ground level (mbgl); electrical conductivity is available for 137 samples in microSiemens per centimetre (μS/cm); pH is available for 130 samples; and temperature is available for 77 samples in degrees Celsius (°C).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 5 - Biogeography of described families in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 5 the total number of subregions a described family has been recorded inhabiting is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 4 - Stygofauna discovery rates by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 4 the discovery rate of stygofauna is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns, the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis, and the average stygofauna discovery rate (28%) is plotted as a grey, dashed line.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 8 - Distribution of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 8 the total number of lithologies is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 7 - Diversity of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 7 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 6 - Diversity of described families in different IBRA subregions in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 6 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 9 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 9 - Comparison of systemic composition of described families from Australia and the World Average; In Figure 9 the systemic composition of described stygofauna families is compared between the Pilbara region (Western Australia, Australia) derived from Eberhard et al. (2005), Queensland (Australia), and the World Average derived from Eberhard et al. (2005).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 3 - Distribution of stygofauna sampling effort by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 3 the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the percentage of samples is indicated by numerical figures along the x-axis.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542

Figure 2 - Outline map of Queensland, Australia highlighting the location of stygofauna sampling sites and other localities; In Figure 2 an outline map shows the location of all 582 stygofauna sampling sites and other key localities mentioned in the text (e.g. Bowen Basin, Murray–Darling Basin, Proserpine–Sarina Lowlands IBRA region).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record