Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
28,480
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
28,480 results for “group”
Plant community responses to functional group and species removals along biodiversity experiment vegetation transects at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 1997-2002
This dataset contains vegetative cover data of plots that have had various plant functional groups or species experimentally removed at the Jornada Basin LTER site in southern New Mexico, USA. This data was collected with the objective to distinguish the differential effects of plant community biomass, functional groups, and biodiversity within functional groups on ecosystem and plant community function. To make these distinctions, treatments were established by the selective removal of plant species or functional groups within experimental plots. There are eight treatments: control (C, no removals); four functional group removal treatments (PG, perennial grass removed; S, shrubs removed; SSh, subshrubs removed; Succ, succulents removed), and three species richness manipulation treatments. Richness manipulations included a simplified treatment (Simp), where only the single most abundant species of each growth form is preserved and all other species in the growth form are removed, a reduced‐Larrea treatment (rL), where the Larrea is assumed to be the dominant and is removed while minority components remain, and a reduced-Prosopsis treatment (rP), where Prosopis rather than Larrea is removed as the shrub dominant. Following treatments, vegetative data was collected by sampling each plot along three transects twice a year (Spring and Fall) for 5 years from 1997-2002 (no data collected in 1998). This data set consists of the date of collection, plot number, treatment type, transect number, quadrat number, species codes, two diameters, height, condition, count, record IDs, and error codes. This study is complete.
Plant species-level responses to functional group and species removals in biodiversity experiment plots at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 1999
This dataset contains individual species size data in vegetation plots that have had various plant functional groups or species experimentally removed at the Jornada Basin LTER site in southern New Mexico, USA. This data was collected with the objective to distinguish the differential effects of plant community biomass, functional groups, and biodiversity within functional groups on ecosystem and plant community function. To make these distinctions, treatments were established by the selective removal of plant species or functional groups within experimental plots. There are eight treatments: control (C, no removals); four functional group removal treatments (PG, perennial grass removed; S, shrubs removed; SSh, subshrubs removed; Succ, succulents removed), and three species richness manipulation treatments. Richness manipulations included a simplified treatment (Simp), where only the single most abundant species of each growth form is preserved and all other species in the growth form are removed, a reduced‐Larrea treatment (rL), where the Larrea is assumed to be the dominant and is removed while minority components remain, and a reduced-Prosopsis treatment (rP), where Prosopis rather than Larrea is removed as the shrub dominant. In 1999, this pilot study attempted to assess individual species responses of representative individuals in these treatments. Ten randomly selected individuals of eight plant species were measured in each experimental plot, and this dataset reports volumetric data (diameters and height) for each. The study was designed as an individual-based complement to the transect data in EDI dataset knb-lter-jrn.210121001 but was not continued past 1999. This dataset is complete.
Indicative distribution maps for Ecosystem Functional Groups - Level 3 of IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology
<p>This dataset includes the current version of the indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>Ecosystem Functional Groups</strong> - Level 3 of IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology (v2.1). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) and Keith et al. (2022).</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes for each functional group of ecosystems to enable any ecosystem type to be assigned to a group.</p> <p>Maps are indicative of global distribution patterns and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Most maps were prepared using a coarse-scale template (e.g. ecoregions), but some were compiled from higher resolution spatial data where available (see details in profiles). Higher resolution mapping is planned in future publications.</p> <p>We emphasise that spatial representation of Ecosystem Functional Groups does not follow higher-order groupings described in respective ecoregion classifications. Consequently, when Ecosystem Functional Groups are aggregated into<strong> functional biomes</strong> (Level 2 of the Global Ecosystem Typology), spatial patterns may differ from those of biogeographic biomes. Differences reflect the distinctions between functional and biogeographic interpretations of the term, “biome”.</p>
Time-series of high-frequency profiles of fluorescence-based phytoplankton spectral groups in Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Falling Creek Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, and Spring Hollow Reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA 2014-2025
Depth profiles of fluorescence-based phytoplankton biomass were sampled using a bbe Moldaenke FluoroProbe (Schwentinental, Germany) during 2014 to 2025 in five drinking water reservoirs in southwestern Virginia, USA. These reservoirs are: Beaverdam Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Carvins Cove Reservoir (Roanoke, Virginia), Falling Creek Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Gatewood Reservoir (Pulaski, Virginia), and Spring Hollow Reservoir (Salem, Virginia). Beaverdam, Carvins Cove, Falling Creek, and Spring Hollow Reservoirs are owned and operated by the Western Virginia Water Authority as primary or secondary drinking water sources for Roanoke, Virginia, and Gatewood Reservoir is a drinking water source for the town of Pulaski, Virginia. The dataset consists of depth profiles of fluorescence-based phytoplankton biomass measured at the deepest site of each reservoir adjacent to the dam, except in Falling Creek Reservoir, where depth profiles were also taken at four upstream sites ranging from the riverine to the lacustrine zone during 2016-2019 and 2024-2025. Casts were taken approximately weekly from May-October and monthly from November-April. Casts were collected at Beaverdam and Falling Creek Reservoirs during all years (2014-2025); casts were collected at Carvins Cove Reservoir during 2014-2016, 2018-2023, and 2025; casts were collected at Spring Hollow Reservoir during 2014-2016 and 2019; and casts were collected at Gatewood Reservoir in 2015-2016. A sensor maintenance log and quality assurance/quality control analysis script accompanies the data package.
Annual Aboveground Net Primary Productivity by plant functional groups across grassland-shrubland ecotones at 3 sites in the Jornada Basin, 2006-ongoing
The objective of this ongoing study is to investigate how pulses of precipitation translate into pulses of plant aboveground net primary productivity (NPP) across grassland to shrubland ecotones in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. This dataset consists of annual aboveground net primary productivity estimates by plant functional groups in three habitat vegetation zones (grassland, ecotone, and shrubland) at three grassland-to-shrubland ecotone sites in the Jornada Basin, Dona Ana County, New Mexico, USA. The annual ANPP estimates are derived from plant cover measurements (see methods). Due to its growth form, Yucca elata (YUEL), in the leaf succulent functional group, has been found to produce large errors in interyear biomass estimates. This data package separates biomass estimates for YUEL and non-YUEL leaf succulents so that users can decide whether to combine them or keep them separate. In general, the authors recommend against using the YUEL estimates for most purposes. Data collection is ongoing with new observations in spring and fall of each year; data from both annual sampling times are required to estimate annual ANPP.
MCR LTER: Coral Reef: Modeling the effects of selectively fishing key functional groups of herbivores on coral resilience; data for Cook et al., 2023 Ecosphere
These data and code were generated in support of the manuscript: Cook DT, Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ, and HV Moeller, Ecosphere. To investigate the impacts of selectively harvesting functional groups of herbivorous fishes on coral resilience, we used a dynamic model that is grounded by the coral reef system in Moorea, French Polynesia. Our model simulates the fraction of a reef occupied through time by classes of key benthic spaceholders (coral, two stages of macroalgae, and turf). Benthic and fishing dynamics are linked through the harvesting of two functional groups of herbivorous fishes. We utilize data collected on the abundance of fishes on the reef and in the catch in Moorea, French Polynesia to inform our model and to empirically explore patterns of fishing selectivity. These data and code were published in Ecosphere and were a part of the thesis of D. Cook (2023). This manuscript uses data collected by the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF) Moorea Coral Reef Long Term Ecological Research (MCR LTER) site under Grant No. OCE 2224354 (and earlier awards). Additional financial support to the MCR LTER site was provided through a generous gift from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Research was completed under permits issued by the French Polynesian Government (Délégation à la Recherche) and the Haut-commissariat de la République en Polynésie Francaise (DTRT) (Protocole d'Accueil 2005-2023).
Two sessions of resting state with closed eyes for patients with depression in treatment course (NFB, CBT or No treatment groups)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group MT2.2 Large seabird and pinniped colonies
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>MT2.2 Large seabird and pinniped colonies</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.1). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) and Keith <em>et al.</em> (2022) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group F2.10 Subglacial lakes
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>F2.10 Subglacial lakes</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.1). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) and Keith <em>et al.</em> (2022) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
iEEG Data for "Functional Group Bridge for Simultaneous Regression and Support Estimation"
<p>The repository contains analysis scripts and data used in Wang Z, Magnotti J, Beauchamp MS, Li M. Functional Group Bridge for Simultaneous Regression and Support Estimation, 2020. The data contains high-gamma brain responses across 8 subjects from "congruency" audio-visual experiment.</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group M1.10 Rhodolith/Maërl beds
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>M1.10 Rhodolith/Maërl beds</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.1). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) and Keith <em>et al.</em> (2022) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Gaviota Fire Perimeter (Santa Barbara County, CA), June 9, 2004 - From Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC)
The Gaviota Fire burned from 2004-06-05 to 2004-06-12, 15 miles west of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County. Approximately 7440 acres were burned (information per http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov). This dataset contains a KML polygon showing the extent of the fire on 2004-06-09, and was acquired by request from the Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC, http://www.geomac.gov). These data are based upon input from incident intelligence sources, Global Positioning System (GPS) data, and infrared (IR) imagery. See methods for more information.
Tea Fire Perimeter (Santa Barbara County, CA), November 15, 2008 - From Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC)
The Tea Fire burned from 2008-11-13 to 2008-11-17, Montecito, Cold Springs Creek and Hot Springs Road, Santa Barbara County. Approximately 1940 acres were burned (information per http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov). This dataset contains a KML polygon showing the extent of the fire on 2008-11-15, and was acquired by request from the Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC, http://www.geomac.gov). These data are based upon input from incident intelligence sources, Global Positioning System (GPS) data, and infrared (IR) imagery. See methods for more information.
Jesusita Fire Perimeter (Santa Barbara County, CA), May 10, 2009 - From Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC)
The Jesusita Fire burned from 2008-05-05 to 2008-05-18, Northwest of Mission Canyon and Santa Barbara City, Santa Barbara County. Approximately 8733 acres were burned (information per http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov). This dataset contains a KML polygon showing the extent of the fire on 2008-05-10, and was acquired by request from the Geospatial Multi-Agency Coordination Group (GeoMAC, http://www.geomac.gov). These data are based upon input from incident intelligence sources, Global Positioning System (GPS) data, and infrared (IR) imagery. See methods for more information.
CETAF-DiSSCo/COVID19-TAF biodiversity-related knowledge hub working group: indexed biotic interactions and review summary
<p>This data publication originated as part of developing a biodiversity-related knowledge hub on COVID-19 via COVID19-TAF - Communities Taking Action (https://cetaf.org/covid19-taf-communities-taking-action), a community-rooted initiative raised jointly by the Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilitaties (CETAF, https://cetaf.org) and Distributed Systems of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo, https://www.dissco.eu/).</p> <p>This archive contains the biodiversity datasets of interest identified in period 14 April-6 October 2020 through COVID19-TAF activities and subsequently indexed by Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI, https://globalbioticinteractions.org). GloBI provides open access to finding species interaction data (e.g., predator-prey, pollinator-plant, virus-host, parasite-host) by combining existing open datasets using open source software.</p> <p>These identified datasets (see references and reviews below) add to a growing collection of open species interaction datasets already indexed by GloBI. So, this data publication only includes a small subset of indexed datasets and include only datasets that were added as a direct consequence of COVID19-TAF activities of the biodiversity-related knowledge hub working group.</p> <p>If you have questions or comments about this publication, please open an issue at https://github.com/ParasiteTracker/tpt-reporting or contact the authors by email.</p> <p>Funding:<br> The creation of this archive was made possible in part by reporting software developed as part of the National Science Foundation award "Collaborative Research: Digitization TCN: Digitizing collections to trace parasite-host associations and predict the spread of vector-borne disease," Award numbers DBI:1901932 and DBI:1901926 . Also, this material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DGE-1545433 .</p> <p>References:<br> Jorrit H. Poelen, James D. Simons and Chris J. Mungall. (2014). Global Biotic Interactions: An open infrastructure to share and analyze species-interaction datasets. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.005.</p> <p>GloBI Data Review Report</p> <p>Datasets under review:<br> - Geiselman, Cullen K. & Sarah Younger. 2020. Bat Eco-Interactions Database. www.batbase.org accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/batbase/archive/9c65cfeee1a054f9db8cd8bf6892017fd1b3c840.zip on 2020-10-04T22:53:45.576Z<br> - Geiselman, Cullen K. and Tuli I. Defex. 2015. Bat Eco-Interactions Database. www.batplant.org accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/batplant/archive/a2e1b57052244d5251d17e96ea61f58bea88975e.zip on 2020-10-04T22:54:28.727Z<br> - Daniel Becker, Gregory F Albery, Anna R Sjodin, Timothee Poisot, Tad Dallas, Evan A. Eskew, Maxwell J. Farrell, Sarah Guth, Barbara A Han, Nancy B Simmons, Colin J Carlson. 2020. Predicting wildlife hosts of betacoronaviruses for SARS-CoV-2 sampling prioritization. bioRxiv 2020.05.22.111344; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.111344 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/becker2020/archive/47c6ad28e1c5058f3c13ca69a59fdf21229e8d7f.zip on 2020-10-04T22:54:46.723Z<br> - Chen L, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q, 2014. DBatVir: the database of bat-associated viruses. Database (Oxford). 2014:bau021. doi:10.1093/database/bau021 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/dbatvir/archive/a906d76e362484d3ca1edbe9683f672838ab70b0.zip on 2020-10-04T22:56:13.913Z<br> - Chen L, Liu B, Wu Z, Jin Q, Yang J, 2017. DRodVir: A resource for exploring the virome diversity in rodents. J Genet Genomics. 44(5):259-264. accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/drodvir/archive/0346c0e8d4d66c6400e9965bd6a6aeed24cd7586.zip on 2020-10-04T23:06:04.368Z<br> - Agosti, Donat. 2020. Transcription of Linné, C. von, 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 . accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/linnaeus1758/archive/a818060080fa04a88dac6df1ae5b897304ae8877.zip on 2020-10-05T00:46:04.852Z<br> - Mollentze, Nardus, & Streicker, Daniel G. (2019). Viral zoonotic risk is homogenous among taxonomic orders of mammalian and avian reservoir hosts (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3516613 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/mollentze2019/archive/ad12dc74d03c3d992618f16c37cafb7f7ffd9d01.zip on 2020-10-05T00:50:55.878Z<br> - Eneida L. Hatcher, Sergey A. Zhdanov, Yiming Bao, Olga Blinkova, Eric P. Nawrocki, Yuri Ostapchuck, Alejandro A. Schäffer, J. Rodney Brister, Virus Variation Resource – improved response to emergent viral outbreaks, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 45, Issue D1, January 2017, Pages D482–D490, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1065 . accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/ncbi-virus/archive/531a8d743d7adcf1153a19087e5d3c5b76750e3e.zip on 2020-10-05T00:53:53.646Z<br> - Olival, K. J., Hosseini, P. R., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Ross, N., Bogich, T. L., & Daszak, P. (2017). Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals. Nature, 546(7660), 646–650. doi:10.1038/nature22975 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/olival2017/archive/f61070a5339d0e6c6e76d7eb4e2102decb52317d.zip on 2020-10-05T00:56:43.356Z<br> - Pensoft Darwin Core Archives with associateTaxa columns accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/pensoft-dwca/archive/ee8831a2a391203f4fa8c05a0ddd927202b234bf.zip on 2020-10-05T00:56:51.868Z<br> - Pensoft Darwin Core Archives available via Integrated Publication Toolkit accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/pensoft-ipt/archive/4ad4b47978324681289e36f8c2b247b1bcc97b1a.zip on 2020-10-05T00:58:01.912Z<br> - De Rojas M, Doña J, Dimov I (2020) A comprehensive survey of Rhinonyssid mites (Mesostigmata: Rhinonyssidae) in Northwest Russia: New mite-host associations and prevalence data. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e49535. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e49535 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/pensoft-table/archive/3488e0397ca4e083d5eca6949951e426a75713e3.zip on 2020-10-05T00:58:03.647Z<br> - Marcus Guidoti, Tatiana Ruschel, Donat Agosti. 2020. Corona virus related biotic associations manually extracted from literature. Plazi. accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/plazi-covid19/archive/326578b0d9f974760dcd2e962d86636a6487a6c0.zip on 2020-10-05T00:58:08.025Z<br> - Shaw, LP, Wang, AD, Dylus, D, et al. The phylogenetic range of bacterial and viral pathogens of vertebrates. Mol Ecol. 2020; 29: 3361– 3379. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15463 accessed via https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/shaw2020/archive/bb9ab857b7fdbb4e931752d01b43d37b3ada77cf.zip on 2020-10-05T01:05:23.554Z<br> - OpenBiodiv. 2020. Annotated biotic interaction tables from Pensoft publications. accessed via https://github.com/pensoft/pensoft-interaction-tables/archive/bb7d1dc9f2eba220a61502e06e6114053fd30788.zip on 2020-10-05T03:03:23.372Z<br> - Quentin J. Groom. 2020. Bat interation data manually extracted from literature. accessed via https://github.com/qgroom/batinterations/archive/70108945f9014aa0ac1db920191867f7e151c793.zip on 2020-10-05T03:04:11.533Z</p> <p>Generated on:<br> 2020-10-06</p> <p>by:<br> GloBI's Elton 0.10.2<br> (see https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/elton).</p> <p> </p> <p>Note that all files ending with .tsv are files formatted<br> as UTF8 encoded tab-separated values files.</p> <p>https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/tab-separated-values</p> <p><br> Included in this review archive are:</p> <p>README:<br> This file.</p> <p>review_summary.tsv:<br> Summary across all reviewed collections of total number of distinct review comments.</p> <p>review_summary_by_collection.tsv:<br> Summary by reviewed collection of total number of distinct review comments.</p> <p>indexed_interactions_by_collection.tsv:<br> Summary of number of indexed interaction records by institutionCode and collectionCode.</p> <p>review_comments.tsv.gz:<br> All review comments by collection.</p> <p>indexed_interactions_full.tsv.gz:<br> All indexed interactions for all reviewed collections.</p> <p>indexed_interactions_simple.tsv.gz:<br> All indexed interactions for all reviewed collections selecting only sourceInstitutionCode, sourceCollectionCode, sourceCatalogNumber, sourceTaxonName, interactionTypeName and targetTaxonName.</p> <p>datasets_under_review.tsv:<br> Details on the datasets under review.</p> <p>elton.jar:<br> Program used to update datasets and generate the review reports and associated indexed interactions.</p> <p><br> datasets.zip:<br> source datasets collected by elton in process of executing the generate_report.sh script.</p> <p>generate_report.sh:<br> program used to generate the report</p> <p>generate_report.log:<br> log file generated as part of running the generate_report.sh script</p>
Measuring individual and group flow in collaborative improvisational dance.
<p>Flow is a state of being fully absorbed and experiencing feelings of energised focus, deep involvement, and success in the process of doing things. Flow plays a vital role in innovation and creativity, as all such processes require high intrinsic motivation to break through to a new level of complexity of thoughts and ideas, while the social environment rarely provides sufficient extrinsic rewards to motivate people to extensive creative work. Meanwhile, the vast majority of creative activities have a primarily social character: e.g. theatre making, music, and dancing. Thus, group flow became central in group creativity research.</p> <p>Group flow shares many aspects with individual flow, but inevitably has differences, due to its collaborative nature. In this study, we compare individual and group flow in dance improvisation, to explore the cognitive processes and strategies underlying group improvisation and their relation to flow experience; in particular, those that might support the aspects of group flow that are dependent upon understanding the other group members’ states and intentions.</p> <p>To assess flow experience, we used a video-stimulated recall method, <em>Flow </em>(Łucznik, Loesche, 2017), which allowed participants to mark on the video-recording of the activity those moments when they remembered experiencing flow. We identified group flow as the moments when then the majority of a group declared themselves as being in flow.</p> <p>This dataset consists of the data and analysis used in the 'Measuring individual and group flow in collaborative improvisational dance.' article (in press).</p>
Research data for "Hutters in the Zamoyski Family Entail - history of an environmentally conditioned social group"
<p>Research data for "Hutters in the Zamoyski Family Entail - history of an environmentally conditioned social group" (v1_2024)</p>
Carbon Sequestration Capacity Groups
<p>Marginal Lands (MLs) as detected by MaiL Project were classified in Carbon Sequestration Capacity (CSC) Groups. The methodology based on multicriteria GIS analysis with data including tree species maps (Brus et al., 2011), land cover maps (Malinowski, et al., 2020) and Aboveground Biomass maps (Spawn, Sullivan, Lark, & Gibbs, 2020). The aim was to estimate potential suitable species for afforestation for each Marginal Land as well species’ Above Ground Biomass Carbon (AGBC) and proceed to classification into CSC groups.<br> In order to estimate CSC for MLs and classify in CSC groups, it is crucial to estimate potential suitable species for afforestation and their Aboveground Biomass Carbon. The MLs as calculated on Task 2.3 of MAIL project is the basemap, where the most frequent species from neighbor forested areas, both dominant 1 and 2 species, and species’ Aboveground Biomass Carbon values are assigned. Dominant 1 and 2 species of neighbor forested areas are adapted to the ecological and climatological conditions and therefore are considered to be the most suitable for afforestation projects. Through classification into CSC groups, we get a better understanding regarding the relative interconnections between groups and each one's potential trend.The frequency distribution of the formula’s results is presented in a histogram. Classification into CSC groups was done by manually defining classes ranges, in such a way so each class to cover approximately the same area across Europe, with the exception of higher and lower sequestration groups, Group A and Group E respectively. Group A represents higher sequestration MLs, covering 5% of Europe’s total MLs and on the other side Group E represents lower sequestration MLs covering 31% of Europe’s MLs.</p>
Calix[6]arenes with halogen bond donor groups as selective and efficient anion transporters
<p>Dataset for the publication: <strong>Calix[6]arenes with halogen bond donor groups as selective and efficient anion transporters</strong> by A. Singh, A. Torres-Huerta, T. Vanderlinden, N. Renier, L. Martínez-Crespo, N. Tumanov, J. Wouters, K. Bartik, I. Jabin, H. Valkenier, <em>Chem. Commun.</em> <strong>2022</strong>, doi:10.1039/D2CC008472E,</p> <p>containing:</p> <ul> <li>A file with the structures of compounds <strong>1</strong>-<strong>5</strong> (PDF)</li> <li>NMR spectra for the characterisation of compounds <strong>1a</strong>, <strong>1b</strong>, <strong>1c</strong>, <strong>2</strong>, and <strong>3</strong> (Mestrenova files)</li> <li>NMR spectra for the titration experiments with compounds <strong>1</strong><strong>-5</strong> in different solvents (Mestrenova files)</li> <li>Concentrations of Host and Guests in the various titration experiments (Excel file)</li> <li>Transport data in the lucigenin assay (Excel file)</li> <li>Transport data in the HPTS assay (Excel file)</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
Data for: Increasing plant group productivity through latent genetic variation for cooperation
<p>Historic yield advances in the major crops have to a large extent been achieved by selection for improved productivity of groups of plant individuals such as high-density stands. Research suggests that such improved group productivity depends on “cooperative” traits (e.g., erect leaves, short stems) that – while beneficial to the group – decrease individual fitness under competition. This poses a problem for some traditional breeding approaches, especially when selection occurs at the level of individuals, because “selfish” traits will be selected for and reduce yield in high-density monocultures. One approach, therefore, has been to select individuals based on ideotypes with traits expected to promote group productivity. However, this approach is limited to architectural and physiological traits whose effects on growth and competition are relatively easy to anticipate.</p> <p>Here, we developed a general and simple method for the discovery of alleles promoting cooperation in plant stands. Our method is based on the game-theoretical premise that alleles increasing cooperation benefit the monoculture group but are disadvantageous to the individual when facing non-cooperative neighbors. Testing the approach using the model plant <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em><em>, </em>we found a major effect locus where the rarer allele was associated with increased cooperation and productivity in high-density stands. The allele likely affects a pleiotropic gene, since we find that it is also associated with reduced root competition but higher resistance against disease. Thus, even though cooperation is considered evolutionarily unstable except under special circumstances, conflicting selective forces acting on a pleiotropic gene might maintain latent genetic variation for cooperation in nature. Such variation, once identified in a crop, could rapidly be leveraged in modern breeding programs and provide efficient routes to increase yields.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.