Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
17
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
17 results for “hind wing morphology”
Figures 815-826. Hind wings. 815 in Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
Figures 815-826. Hind wings. 815, Embates chaetopus, showing 1A and 1A defined near wing margin 1 2 and developed 3A merging with A; 816, Diorymerus lancifer, showing R3 forming a thin, sclerotized vein; 817, Cyrionyx camelus, showing reduced mst; 818, Solaria curtula, indicating absence of rm and showing developed mst; 819, Palmelampius heinrichi, showing reduced 3A; 820, Pycnotheantis sp., showing developed rm; 821, Telemus sp., showing R3 forming a thin, sclerotized vein, developed 3A merging with A, and 1A and 1A defined near wing margin; 822, Megabaris quadriguttata, showing R3 forming a thin, 1 2 sclerotized vein; 823, Zygobaris sp.; 824, Trachymeropsis palmipes, showing reduced 3A; 825, Cyrtepistomus castaneus, showing reduced pst, reduced mst, and developed 3A merging with A; 826, Cryptorhynchus lapathi, showing developed 3A.
Figures 827-840. Hind wings. 827 in Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
Figures 827-840. Hind wings. 827, Dryophthorus americanus; 828, Bagous transversus; 829, Cholus rana; 830, Cossonus impressifrons; 831, Curculio pardalis; 832, Hylurgops planirostris; 833, Testalthea sp.; 834, Pacomes distortus; 835, Trichodocerus sp.; 836, Coeliodes flavicaudis; 837, Mononychus vulpeculus; 838, Hypurus bertrandi; 839, Trigonocolus curvipes; 840, Mecopus trilineatus.
Figures 841-845. Hind wings. 841 in Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
Figures 841-845. Hind wings. 841, Cylindrocopturus adspersus; 842, Telephae oculata; 843, Balanogastris kolae; 844, Metialma signifera; 845, Cyllophorus fausciatus.
Figures 803-814. Hind wings. 803 in Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
Figures 803-814. Hind wings. 803, Centrinus curvirostris; 804, Optatus palmaris, showing 1A and 1A 1 2 defined near wing margin, developed mst, and R3 forming a white line due to loss of sclerotization; 805, Eutoxus sp., showing developed 3A; 806, Parasaldius sp., showing developed rm and 1A and 1A defined 1 2 near wing margin; 807, Buchananius sulcatus; 808, Haplostethops ellipsoidea, showing reduced mst; 809, Linogeraeus viduatus, showing reduced 3A; 810, Plocamus echidna, showing reduced pst; 811, Plocamus clavisetis; 812, Odontocorynus scutellumalbum; 813, Lipancylus brevirostris, showing 1A extending dorsally 2 and merging with A through a -a, developed rm, and developed 3A; 814, Orchidophilus aterrimus, indi1 2 cating absence of rm.
Fig. 2 in Phylogenomics and deep convergence in cockroach hind-wing morphology
Fig. 2 Oulopteryx illuminata sp. nov. is demonstrative of a typical species with an apical folded membrane, but having a rare method of concealment at rest (i.e., coiling, a feature shared among Oulopterygidae, Theganopteryx, Prosoplecta, and possibly a few others). Forewing (a, b) and hind-wing (c) morphology to scale with full body (f, g). Folding occurs alone dashed lines. Method of rolling the hind-wing apical field at rest shown (h). Genital morphology (d, e) of male holotype from posterior dorsal views (d) and dorsal view (e). Labels identify genital sclerites using the nomenclature of Klass (1997). See supplementary figures for more details. Wing venation (b, c) nomenclature based on Li et al. (2018) with modification. *Pcu not identified. See Schubnel et al. (2019) for a discussion of Pcu's identity among Blattodea.
Phylogenomics and deep convergence in cockroach hind-wing morphology
<p>Despite regular advances in Blattodea systematics, several relationships remain controversial or untested in formal phylogenetic reconstructions. This common situation for understudied metazoan groups limits our power to answer questions about phenotypic evolution. In this study, we infer the evolutionary history of Blattodea using newly sampled taxa that improve phylogenetic resolution while also illuminating the evolutionary history of an unusual phenotype—the apically folded hind-wing. Taxa newly sequenced include those with a hind-wing apical fold (<em>Anaplecta pulchella, A. pygmaea, A. </em>sp<em>. </em>cf<em>. malaysensis, Diplopterina parva, Prosoplecta semperi, Anaplectoidea klossi, </em>and<em> Oulopteryx illuminata</em> sp. nov. that we describe herein, including its male genitalia) and other rare taxa (<em>Dipteretrum</em> <em>hamstroemi</em>, <em>Duchailluia</em> <em>togoensis</em>, <em>Lauraesilpha</em> <em>mearetoi</em>, <em>Buboblatta</em> <em>vlasaki</em>). The phylogenetic design utilizes 41 genes over 91 species in total, analyzed in a maximum likelihood and coalescent framework. To quantify the phylogenetic uncertainty of the analysis, support for various topologies is assessed. We find unambiguous support for the surprising position of Neotropical <em>Oulopteryx</em> (Oulopterygidae) as sister to New Caledonian/Australian Tryonicidae. This, and other phylogenetic findings, reveal that the apically folded hind-wing may have arisen nine times in Blattodea. Further investigations are needed, notably with an increased taxonomic sampling, to demonstrate stronger support for the placement of rogue taxa (e.g., <em>Anaplecta</em>) and to investigate the evolutionary correlates of wing evolution.</p>
Phylogenomics and deep convergence in cockroach hind-wing morphology
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURE 5. Cratomelus armatus female. A. Tegmina. B. Hind wing. C. Terminalia axial view. D. Subgenital plate. E in Studies on chevron crickets: Morphological redescription of Chilean red cricket Cratomelus armatus Blanchard, 1851 (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)
FIGURE 5. Cratomelus armatus female. A. Tegmina. B. Hind wing. C. Terminalia axial view. D. Subgenital plate. E. Terminalia lateral view. (The white arrows in figures A and B, show the wing veins modification).
FIGURE 2. Ichneumonidae hind wing morphology and comparison with the wing fossil. A in The first Ichneumonid fossil from the Early Pleistocene of Madeira Island (Portugal)
FIGURE 2. Ichneumonidae hind wing morphology and comparison with the wing fossil. A, position and venation in Ichneumonidae (Ophion obscuratus Fabricius, 1798), figure adapted from Prehn & Raper (2016); B, Specimen UMad-P500a (part); C, Specimen UMad-P500b (counter-part); D, drawing interpretation of specimen UMad-P500a with venation nomenclature and cell numbers; arrows point to bulla.
Fig. 1 in Phylogenomics and deep convergence in cockroach hind-wing morphology
Fig. 1 Phylogeny of Blattodea (a) and wing morphology illustration (b). a The phylogeny presented is the final species tree resulting from a number of topology tests and inference methods (IQ-TREE and ASTRAL). Node support values represent bootstrap frequency (3000 replicates from concatenation analyses of all three modified alignments; left) and gene concordance factors among the 41 loci (right). Taxa in bold have hind wings with a very large apical folding area (b – i, and b – ii). The apical region in Diploptera may not be homologous to those of other taxa so we use another symbol and did not count them as addi-
Figure 2 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 2 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the genera of Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (74.39% of total variation) and PC2 (8.52% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each genus is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 5 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 5 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Themus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (32.87% of total variation) and PC2 (16.48% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 4 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 4 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Prothemus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (38.40% of total variation) and PC2 (15.88% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 3 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 3 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Lycocerus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (49.02% of total variation) and PC2 (14.92% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 6 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 6 - Comparisons of centroid size variables among different groups: A Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus B Lycocerus asperipennis, Lycocerus metallescens and Lycocerus orientalis; Prothemus chinensis, Prothemus kiukiangensis and Prothemus purpuripennis; Themus licenti, Themus coelestis and Themus impressipennis.
Figure 1 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 1 - Hind wing of Lycocerus asperipennis showing digitizing landmarks.
Figure 5. A–F, hind wing. G–L in Phylogenetic relationships in the tribe Oxyptilini (Lepidoptera, Pterophoridae, Pterophorinae) based on morphological data of adults
Figure 5. A–F, hind wing. G–L, head, lateral view. M, head, frontal view. N–P, head and thorax, dorsal view. Q, mid-tibia. R, abdomen. The numbers indicate the character and its state (character: character state) and arrows show the location of characters. The dashed line on the compound eye indicates the mid-transverse line. A, Capperia trichodactyla. B, G, M, N & Q, Geina didactyla. C, Diacrotricha fasciola. D, Capperia celeusi. E & I, Megalorhipida leucodactylus. F, Agdistis huemeri. H & O, Oxyptilus pilosellae. J, Stenodacma wahlbergi. K, Stenoptilia aridus. L, Emmelina monodactyla. P, Wheeleria phlomidis. R, Cosmoclostis pesseuta.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.