Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,042
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,042 results for “model species”
Evaluation of Mask R-CNN Model for Counting Reproductive Structures of Six Plant Species 1895-2018
Phenology––the timing of life-history events––is a key trait for understanding responses of organisms to climate. The digitization and online mobilization of herbarium specimens is rapidly advancing our understanding of plant phenological response to climate and climatic change. The current common practice of manually harvesting data from individual specimens greatly restricts our ability to scale data collection to entire collections. Recent investigations have demonstrated that machine-learning models can facilitate data collection from herbarium specimens. However, present attempts have focused largely on simplistic binary coding of reproductive phenology (e.g., flowering or not). Here, we use crowd-sourced phenological data of numbers of buds, flowers, and fruits of more than 3000 specimens of six common wildflower species of the eastern United States (Anemone canadensis, A. hepatica, A. quinquefolia, Trillium erectum, T. grandiflorum, and T. undulatum} to train a model using Mask R-CNN to segment and count phenological features. A single global model was able to automate the binary coding of reproductive stage with greater than 90% accuracy. Segmenting and counting features were also successful, but accuracy varied with phenological stage and taxon. Counting buds was significantly more accurate than flowers or fruits. Moreover, botanical experts provided more reliable data than either crowd-sourcers or our Mask R-CNN model, highlighting the importance of high-quality human training data. Finally, we also demonstrated the transferability of our model to automated phenophase detection and counting of the three Trillium species, which have large and conspicuously-shaped reproductive organs. These results highlight the promise of our two-phase crowd-sourcing and machine-learning pipeline to segment and count reproductive features of herbarium specimens, providing high-quality data with which to study responses of plants to ongoing climatic change.
Modeling Foundation Species in Food Webs
Foundation species are basal species that play an important role in determining community composition by physically structuring ecosystems and modulating ecosystem processes. Foundation species largely operate via non-trophic interactions, presenting a challenge to incorporating them into food-web models. Here, we used non-linear, bioenergetic predator-prey models to explore the role of foundation species and their non-trophic effects. We explored four types of models in which the foundation species reduced the metabolic rates of species in a specific trophic position. We examined the outcomes of each of these models for six metabolic rate “treatments” in which the foundation species altered the metabolic rates of associated species by one-tenth to ten times their allometric baseline metabolic rates. For each model simulation, we looked at how foundation species influenced food-web structure during community assembly and the subsequent change in food-web structure when the foundation species was removed. When a foundation species lowered the metabolic rate of only basal species the resultant webs were complex, species-rich, and robust to foundation species removals. On the other hand, when a foundation species lowered the metabolic rate of only consumer species, all species, or no species the resultant webs were species poor and the subsequent removal of the foundation species webs resulted in the further loss of species and complexity. This suggests that in nature we should look for foundation species to predominantly facilitate basal species.
Drainage reorganisation and species evolution: model sensitivity analysis data
<p>Data description:</p> <ul> <li><strong>‘trial_factor_values.csv’:</strong> The factor values for experiment trials were generated using a quasi-random Sobol sequence (Sobol, 1967). The table field, ‘initial_landscape_id’ is the identifier for unique combinations of the following factor values that controlled the landscape elevation in the initial conditions phase of the model: initial elevation seed, <span class="math-tex">\(U\)</span>, <span class="math-tex">\(K\)</span>, and <span class="math-tex">\(k_d\)</span>. The factors, <span class="math-tex">\(U\)</span>, <span class="math-tex">\(K\)</span>, <span class="math-tex">\(k_d\)</span>, <span class="math-tex">\(P_m\)</span>, and allopatric wait time varied logarithmically. The values of these factors in the file are the exponent of base 10.</li> <li><strong>‘trial_response_values_initial_conditions_phase.csv’:</strong> Topographic relief at steady state along with the model time to initial steady state are the trial model responses included in the file. Values are listed for each initial landscape ID rather than trial because many trials had the same combinations of the factors that controlled the topography of the initial landscape. </li> <li><strong>‘trial_response_values_perturb_phase_base_level_fall_scenario.csv’ and ‘trial_response_values_perturb_phase_fault_throw_scenario.csv’:</strong> Model responses of the perturb phase for base level fall and fault throw scenario along with the initial landscape ID, species count values, and the model time back to steady state.</li> <li><strong>The files beginning with `sobol`</strong>: the sensitivity analysis results output by the software, ‘SALib’ (Herman and Usher, 2017). ‘S1’, ‘S2’, and ‘ST’ in the file name indicates if the file contains data of the Sobol first, second, or total order effect, respectively.</li> </ul>
Species Distribution Modeling of Carnivorous Plants Worldwide
Forecasting how carnivorous plant species will respond to climatic change is a key issue in their conservation and management but presents a number of challenges. These challenges derive from interactions between the relatively simplistic statistical methods typically used to forecast species responses to climatic change, which to date have been limited mainly to species distribution models (“SDMs) and particular aspects of the ecology of carnivorous plants, including their rarity, habitat specialization, and limited dispersal ability. The small ranges and oftentimes low local abundance of carnivorous plants provide few occurrence records, which increase the potential for poorly or over-fitted SDMs and misspecification of relationships with their “optimal” environments. The unique habitats in which carnivorous plants often grow also are difficult to characterize using the basic temperature and precipitation data that often undergird SDMs. Rather, habitats in which carnivorous plants are common often are decoupled from broader climatic patterns (e.g., many retain high soil moisture even during seasonal drought) and may be associated with frequent disturbance. Last, dispersal limitation also may constrain range shifts of carnivorous plants as the climate changes. These three issues raise two related questions that are critical for understanding and forecasting the future of carnivorous plants. First, to what extent are current carnivorous plants distributions constrained by climate; and second, how readily, if at all, might carnivorous plants disperse to colonize new habitat as it becomes climatically suitable? We estimated the vulnerability of carnivorous plants to climatic change in light of challenges identified with SDMs in general and their particular application to these unique species. We combined two approaches: “ensembles of small models”, which attempt to deal with the challenges of fitting SDMs for data-limited species; and “bioclimatic velocity”, which is
Data for Marine Ecological Niche Models, for 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species
<p>Data for Ecological Niche Models: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species.</p>
Ecological Niche Models, in 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, of 1508 European Marine Species, developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Native ecological niche models of 1508 European species (894 fish and 614 non fish) developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines, for 2019 and under RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, at 0.5° spatial resolution.</p>
Global taxonomic occurrence grids using GBIF data for species distribution models.
<p>To achieve large geographic coverage, species occurrence databases that are composed of ad hoc species data collections such as that provided by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) are often used. A drawback to using these data is their geographic sampling bias, in which some regions are more intensively sampled than others, while other areas have very little to none reported sampling effort. Uneven sampling effort can mislead conclusions about biodiversity patterns and species distributions (Gotelli & Colwell, 2001; Lobo, 2008).</p> <p>Here we provide taxonomic occurrence grids to help mitigate the effects of sampling bias in species distribution modeling. These grids can be used to exclude areas of (a custom-defined) low sampling effort from the background when sampling for pseudo-absences’ (Phillips et al., 2009; Barbet-Massin et al.,2012). The occurrence grids have a 1 degree spatial resolution using WGS 84 as the geographic coordinate system. Each 1 degree grid cell contains the number of records present in GBIF corresponding to a specific taxonomic group: plants, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, birds and molluscs.</p> <p>To construct the occurrence grids, we used the 1- by 1-degree world latitude and longitude vector grid provided by ESRI (Redlands, California). It has a custom license which permits it reuse as long as ESRI is cited. It was downloaded from : <a href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7">https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f11bcdc5d484400fa926dcce68de3df7</a></p> <p>To map spatial sampling effort, the number of georeferenced occurrences corresponding to each taxonomic group contained by each 1- by 1-degree grid cell were counted. The grids were then converted to GeoTIFFs. The raster values correspond to the number of occurrences reported for the grid cells. For the purposes of the <a href="https://osf.io/7dpgr/">TrIAS project</a>, grid cells with fewer than 5 occurrences were removed. The TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids are used as inputs to the TrIAS risk modelling and mapping workflow: https://github.com/trias-project/risk-modelling-and-mapping. Full (with all grid cells containing at least one occurrence) taxonomic occurrence grids are also provided.</p> <p>GBIF data for each taxonomic group were downloaded using the following criteria: “Basis of Record”: Observation, Machine Observation, Human Observation, Specimen, Material sample, Literature Occurrence, Unknown evidence., "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "TaxonKey is Amphibia", "Year 1975-2005".</p> <p><strong>Raster Attributes</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Attribute</p> </td> <td> <p>Description</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>OID</p> </td> <td> <p>numeric row ID</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Value</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of records contained in the grid cell</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Count</p> </td> <td> <p>the number of times the value appears in the raster</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>The extent of each taxonomic occurrence grid:</p> <ul> <li> <p>longitude -180.0; latitude -90.0 (southwest corner)</p> </li> <li> <p>longitude 180.0; latitude 90.0 (northeast corner)</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Files:</strong></p> <p>TrIAS taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_min5.tif</p> <p> </p> <p>Raw taxonomic occurrence grids</p> <p>amphib_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>birds_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>mammals_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>molluscs_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p>reptiles_1deg_grid.tif</p> <p><br> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Biodiversity Index, in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European Marine Species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Biodiversity Index in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European marine species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution. The Index counts the number of species (among the 1508) potentially present in each 0.5° cell according to the ensemble models. For each ensemble model, a threshold of at least 3 models agreeing on species presence in the cell was used to indicate species presence.</p>
Ecological Niche Models of 96 European Marine Species, for 2019, developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines at 0.1° Resolution
<p>Native ecological niche models of 96 European marine species of particular commercial and conservation interest developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines, for 2019 at 0.1° spatial resolution.</p>
Ensemble Ecological Niche Models and Biodiversity Index for 2019 of 96 European Marine Species based on Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, AquaMaps, and Support Vector Machines at 0.1° Resolution
<p>Ensemble Ecological Niche Models for 2019 of 96 European marine species of particular commercial and conservation interest, based on Ecological Niche Models developed with (i) Artificial Neural Networks, (ii) Maximum Entropy, (iii) Support Vector Machines, and (iv) AquaMaps at 0.1° Resolution. The data report, for each 0.1° cell, how many models (from 0 to 4) overcome a model-specific decision threshold to assess species presence in the cell. A Biodiversity Index is also provided as the count of the number of species (among the 96) potentially present in each 0.1° cell according to the ensemble models. For each ensemble model, a threshold of at least 3 models agreeing on species presence in the cell was used to indicate species presence.</p>
Remote sensing based species distribution modelling based on GLCM and vegetation fractions for the city of Leipzig
<p>Modelling dataset and fractional vegetation cover dataset used in the study "Earth observation based indication for avian species distribution models using the spectral trait concept and machine learning in an urban setting" Wellmann et al. 2020.</p> <p> </p> <p>Reference:</p> <p></p> <p>Wellmann, T., Lausch, A., Scheuer, S., & Haase, D. (2020). Earth observation based indication for avian species distribution models using the spectral trait concept and machine learning in an urban setting. <em>Ecological Indicators</em>, <em>111</em>(April 2020), 106029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106029</p> <p></p>
Physiological parameters for three farm animal species (cattle, sheep, and swine) as the basis for the development of generic physiologically based kinetic models
<p><strong>IMPORTANT : PLEASE DISREGARD VERSION 1 OF THIS UPLOAD SINCE IT INCLUDES ERRONEOUS INFORMATION.</strong></p> <p>This excel file (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3433224) provides physiological parameters and their inter-individual variability (mean, coefficient of variation, sample size) for three farm animal species: cattle (<em>Bos taurus</em>), sheep (<em>Ovis aries</em>), and swine (<em>Sus scrofa domesticus</em>). These physiological parameters were estimated based on the results of extensive literature searches and specific experimental data described in Lautz et al., (2020). This file is associated with R codes (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3432796) for generic PBK models, partition coefficient Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models for each farm animal species and parameterisation of the model.</p> <p>The full data collection and implementation of the models using case studies are described in Lautz et al., 2020 (10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.10.008).</p>
Occurrence data used to create species distribution models and apply an evaluation method
<p>These two files containing a table with three columns: species names, longitude, latitude. Each row of the tables represents a georeferenced presence record for the corresponding species. The original presence data were downloaded from the GBIF database and after going through a cleaning process, we ended with these records that passed all the tests.</p> <p>These datasets were used to create species distribution models (SDMs) that were then used to apply a new method to evaluate the performance of different SDMs. Jiménez & Soberón (2020)</p>
Background data 'Effect of biotic dependencies in species distribution models: The future distribution of Thymallus thymallus under consideration of Allogamus auricollis'
<p>Background data of the paper 'Effect of biotic dependencies in species distribution models: The future distribution of Thymallus thymallus under consideration of Allogamus auricollis'</p>
Modelled relative abundance of bird species in Britain and Ireland 2007-2011
<p>This data package describes the modelled relative (not absolute) abundance of Carrion Crow (<em>Corvus corone</em>), Magpie (<em>Pica pica</em>), Buzzard (<em>Buteo buteo</em>), Kestrel (<em>Falco tinnunculus</em>) and Red Kite (<em>Milvus milvus</em>) in Britain and Ireland.</p> <p>This was used to produce Bird Atlas 2007-2011 <a href="https://app.bto.org/mapstore/StoreServlet" target="_blank" rel="noopener">maps</a> of relative abundance at a tetrad (2x2km) resolution. </p> <p>Acknowledgement: These data originate from the Bird Atlas 2007–11 project which was run by the BTO in partnership with BirdWatch Ireland and the Scottish Ornithologists’ Club. We are grateful to the thousands of volunteers who undertook and organised the fieldwork for the atlas.</p> <p>Please refer to the metadata for a more detailed description, and for information on dataset usage.</p> <p>v1.3 update: added Red Kite (<em>Milvus milvus</em>) and put the species lookup back in.</p> <p><em>If you would like access to this data for another species, please get in touch with BTO via email: datarequests@bto.org</em></p> <p>........................................................................................</p> <p>BTO would also greatly appreciate if you could fill out <a href="https://forms.gle/DCc58VXpdmqnTmTk8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this very short form</a> to tell us how you intend to use these data. Thanks in advance!</p>
Presence-Absence Points for Tree Species Distribution Modelling for Europe
<p>The dataset is a collection of presence and absence points for forest tree species for Europe. Each unique combination of longitude, latitude and year was considered as an independent sample. Presence data was obtained from the harmonized tree species occurrence dataset by <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/5524611">Heisig and Hengl (2020)</a> and absence data from the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas">LUCAS</a> (in-situ source) dataset.</p> <p>A set of <strong>50</strong> different forest tree species was selected from the harmonized tree species dataset and data lacking a temporal observation was overlaid with yearly forest masks derived from land cover maps produced by <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4725429">Parente et al. (2021)</a>. We overlaid the points with the probability maps for the classes:</p> <ul> <li>311: Broad-leaved forest,</li> <li>312: Coniferous forest,</li> <li>313: Mixed forest,</li> <li>323: Sclerophyllous forest,</li> <li>324: Transitional woodland-shrub,</li> <li>333: Sparsely vegetated area.</li> </ul> <p>Points were included in the dataset only if the probability value extracted for at least one of the above classes was <strong>≥ 50%</strong> for all the years considered. An additional quality flag was added to distinguish points coming from this operation and the points with original year of observation coming from source datasets.</p> <p>The final dataset contains <strong>4,359,999</strong> observations for and a total of <strong>630 </strong>columns. <br> <br> The first <strong>8 </strong>columns of the dataset contain metadata information used to uniquely identify the points:</p> <ul> <li><strong>id</strong>: unique point identifier,</li> <li><strong>year</strong>: year of observation,</li> <li><strong>postprocess</strong>: quality flag to identify if the temporal reference of an observation comes from the original dataset or is the result of spatiotemporal overlay with forest masks,</li> <li><strong>Tile_ID</strong>: contains the tile id from the eu_tiling_system (30 km grid),</li> <li><strong>easting</strong>: longitude coordinates in Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035),</li> <li><strong>northing</strong>: latitude coordinates in Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035),</li> <li><strong>Atlas_class</strong>: name of the tree species according to the European Atlas of Forest Tree Species or NULL in case of absence point,</li> <li><strong>lc1</strong>: contains original LUCAS land cover class or NULL if it's a presence point.</li> </ul> <p>The remaining columns contain the extracted values of a series of predictor variables (temperature, precipitation, elevation, topographical information, spectral reflectance) useful for species distribution modeling applications. These points were used to model the potential and realized distribution of a series of <strong>16 target species </strong>for the period 2000 - 2020. The approach involved training three ML models to predict probability of presence (<em>i.e.</em> <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010933404324">Random Forest</a>, <a href="http://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2939672.2939785">XGBoost</a>, <a href="https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/2344614">GLM</a>), which served as input to train a linear meta-model (<em>i.e.</em> <a href="http://papers.nips.cc/paper/2014/file/ede7e2b6d13a41ddf9f4bdef84fdc737-Paper.pdf">Logistic regression classifier</a>), responsible for predicting the final probability of presence for each species.</p> <p>The <em>RDS </em>file is created from a data.table object and suitable for fast reading in the R-programming environment. The <em>CSV.GZ</em> file contains records as a table with easting and northing in Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035) and can be fed in a GIS after being unzipped.</p> <p>We provide <em>RDS </em>files for a 30km tile as an example containing raster stacks at 30m resolution of all the covariates included in the regression matrix. You can find the specific geographical location of the tile in Europe using the attached <em>GeoPackage </em>("eu_tiling_system_30km"): open it in QGIS and filter by "ID".</p> <p>In our approach we considered both static and dynamic covariates: dynamic covariates are calculated as averages of a 4 years time window (example: 2004 contains averages from 2002 to 2006). To get the predictions for a specific year, covariates contained in the <em>static</em> RDS file need to be bound with the respective year.</p> <p>To access our predictions (probabilities and uncertainties) produced for the target species access:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Open Data Science Europe viewer: <a href="https://maps.opendatascience.eu">https://maps.opendatascience.eu</a></strong></li> <li>Check the <strong>Related identifiers </strong>section of this repository to access each species individually</li> </ul> <p>If you instead would like to know more about the creation of this dataset and the modeling:</p> <ul> <li><strong>watch</strong> the talk at Open Data Science Workshop 2021 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5446/55256">TIB AV-PORTAL</a>)</li> <li><strong>access </strong>the repository with our R/Python scripts and follow the instructions (<a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/tree/master/veg_tree.species_anv.pnv.eml">GitLab</a>)</li> </ul> <p>A publication describing, in detail, all processing steps, accuracy assessment and general analysis of species distribution maps is available on <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13728">PeerJ</a>. To suggest any improvement/fix use <a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues</a>.</p>
Model projection of the effect of climate change and fishing pressure on key species of the South East Asia Seas
<p>The dataset contain Projection from the Size-Spectra Bioclimatic Envelop Model (SS-DBEM), this work was part of the GCRF Blue communities Programme (www.blue-communities.org). The model provides distribution and abundance and/or biomass of fish and other species of commercial interest under climate change and fishing pressure. The model outputs are yearly abundance/biomass on a 0.5-by-0.5 degree grid, covering the period from 2000 to 2098. Further description of the model and relevant references are listed in the following file: Guide-fish-model-output-use.docx</p> <p>The model was run under two climate scenario: RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, with different combinations of fishing pressure expressed as the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) for the following values: 0 (no fishing, climate change alone will cause variation in fish biomass), 1 (sustainable fishing), 2, 3 (overfishing), and, 4 (overfishing with destructive practice). The intent is not to reproduce current fishing level but to provide a range of scenarios with which the future of fisheries can be explored.</p> <p>We projected fish species that were identified as key in the South East Asia seas region by our regional partners.The full list is provided in document: Fish-list-modelguide.xlsx</p> <p>There are 4 zip files that contain the model outputs of in either abundance (number of fish) or biomass grams of fish) for the two climate scenario. For example Biomass-RCP45.zip will contain model outputs in biomass for projections under RCP4.5 and all MSY. within the zip files are .csv files of the outputs for each species under the 5 MSY (0 to 4), the individual file names identify the species (identified by a 6digit code), the output provided (abundance or biomass), the RCP (8.5 or 4.5), and the MSY (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4). For example the file labelled 600107-Abundance-rcp85-msy4.csv contains the outputs for species 600107 (Skipjack tuna, <em>Katsuwonnus pelamis</em>), as abundance, under RCP8.5 with MSY4. Headers indicate what is in each column (latitude, longitude and year).</p> <p> </p> <p>Note: some knowledge of Python, R, or a similar software is recommended to ensure easy of use.</p>
SS-DBEM model results for main tuna commercial species
<p>Projected body size and potential biomass changes (in %) for the main commercial tuna species and swordfish by each RFMO by the mid- and the end-of-the-century. The changes have been estimated as the difference between the future and the reference period. A multi-species ecosystem model which integrates a species-based model (DBEM, Dynamic Bioclimatic Envelope Model) with the size-spectrum approach (SS) was used in this study. The code for the model is available <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7548113#.Y8kwxBfMKUk">here</a>.</p>
Landuse/Landcover predictors for invasive species distribution modelling in Europe.
<p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p>This data set contains a set of predictors characterizing land use/land cover derived from the CORINE dataset, anthropogenic pressure from the global terrestrial human footprint dataset, and the distance to the nearest waterbody, for continental Europe. All have been aligned with the 1 km<sup>2</sup> EEA Reference Grid. The climate variables based on historical (1976-2005) and future (2040-2070) scenarios are available from De Troch et al., 2020 also via Zenodo. These rasters represent the habitat and anthropogenic predictors needed in the Tracking Invasive Alien Species (TrIAS) workflow for invasive species distribution modelling (wiSDM).</p> <p><strong>Geographic coverage</strong></p> <p>Europe</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Land use classes were extracted from the CORINE06 100 m GeoTiff downloaded from Copernicus. The percentage of each 1 km<sup>2</sup> EEA Reference Grid cell occupied by coniferous forest, deciduous forest, wetlands, grasslands and agriculture was calculated. Multiple land use sub-classes were aggregated for the following categories: agriculture, wetlands, grasslands (Table 1). These data layers have been processed in R to replace all NAs that are within the European landmass, with zeros to distinguish them from the ocean, which remain NA, as in the CORINE dataset. In this context, a zero reflects the absence of a given land cover attribute. </p> <p>The mean anthropogenic pressure per 1km<sup>2 </sup>EEA Reference Grid cell was extracted from the global terrestrial human footprint dataset (Venter et al, 2016). Distance to the nearest waterbody within each 1km<sup>2</sup> EEA Reference Grid cell was calculated using the 2016 Surface Water Bodies shapefile available from the EEA (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/wise-wfd-spatial/surface-water-body). </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Land Use Class</td> <td>CORINE LABEL</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Agriculture</td> <td>Non-irrigated arable land (211), Rice fields (213),Vineyards (221),Fruit trees and berry plantations (222),Olive groves (223),Pastures (231),Annual crops associated with permanent crops (241),Complex cultivation patterns (242),Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation (243)</td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Coniferous forest</td> <td>Coniferous forest (312)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Deciduous forest</td> <td>Broad-leaved forest (311)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Grassland</td> <td>Natural grasslands (321), Moors and heathland, (322) Sclerophyllous vegetation (323)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Wetland</td> <td>Inland marshes (411), Peat bogs (412)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Table 1. How the the original land use/land cover types as labelled in CORINE were combined (or not).</p> <p><strong>Files</strong></p> <p>distance2water_EEA_1km.tif (distance to nearest waterbody)</p> <p>ESM1000m.tif (mean anthropogenic pressure)</p> <p>corine_perAgriculture.tif</p> <p>corine_perWetland.tif</p> <p>corine_pergrass.tif</p> <p>corine_perdeciduous.tif</p> <p>corine_perConiferous.tif</p> <p> </p>
Data from: Identifying priority areas for spatial management of mixed fisheries using ensemble of multi-species distribution models. Panzeri D. et al., 2023, Fish and Fisheries
<p>Panzeri D.<sup>1</sup>, Russo T., Arneri E., Carlucci R., Cossarini G., Isajlović I., Krstulović Šifner S., Manfredi C., Masnadi F., Reale M., Scarcella G., Solidoro C., Spedicato M.T., Vrgoč N., W. Zupa, Libralato S<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p><sup>1 </sup>dpanzeri@ogs.it<br> <sup>2 </sup>slibralato@ogs.it</p> <p>Spatial fisheries management is widely used to reduce overfishing, rebuild stocks, and protect biodiversity. However, the effectiveness and optimization of spatial measures depend on accurately identifying ecologically meaningful areas, which can be difficult in mixed fisheries. To apply a method generally to a range of target species, we developed an ensemble of species distribution models (e-SDM) that combines general additive models, generalized linear mixed models, random forest, and gradient-boosting machine methods in a training and testing protocol. The e-SDM was used to integrate density indices from two scientific bottom trawl surveys with the geopositional data, relevant oceanographic variables from the three-dimensional physical-biogeochemical operational model, and fishing effort from the vessel monitoring system. The determined best distributions for juveniles and adults are used to determine hot spots of aggregation based on single or multiple target species. We applied e-SDM to juvenile and adult stages of 10 marine demersal species representing 60% of the total demersal landings in the central areas of the Mediterranean Sea. Using the e-SDM results, hot spots of aggregation and grounds potentially more selective were identified for each species and for the target species group of otter trawl and beam trawl fisheries. The results confirm the ecological appropriateness of existing fishery restriction areas and support the identification of locations for new spatial management measures.</p> <p>Data (csv) for Panzeri et al. 2023</p> <p>1. <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/0b1b7af4-6a3b-481d-8d5f-57cf02d20eaa/Ensemble_density_F%26F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv">Ensemble_density_F&F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv: CSV file with density values (column pred) in terms of number of individuals (log N/km2) for each species (column sp) and life stage (column age) for each grid cell (X = longitude and Y = latitude).</a> </p> <p>2. <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/0b1b7af4-6a3b-481d-8d5f-57cf02d20eaa/Ensemble_density_F%26F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv">Getis_hotspot_F&F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv: CSV file with Getis ord Gi* values (column Gi) derived from the previous file 1, developed for each species and life stage for each grid cell (X = longitude and Y = latitude).</a></p> <p>3. <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/0b1b7af4-6a3b-481d-8d5f-57cf02d20eaa/Ensemble_density_F%26F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv">Multispecies_HotSpot_F&F_D.Panzeri_et_al_2023.csv: Frequency map expressed as the number of species for each grid cell (column freq) that has the hotspot (previous file 2) above the third quartile.</a></p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.