Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-sa-4.0Feb 2018View details →

Data from: Andriollo T., Ruedi M. (2018). Novel molecular tools to identify Plecotus bats in sympatry and a review of their distribution in Switzerland. Revue suisse de Zoologie 125(1)

Supporting data for: Andriollo T., Ruedi M. (2018). Novel molecular tools to identify Plecotus bats in sympatry. Revue suisse de Zoologie 125(1): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1196013

Fig. 8 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 8. PCA. Principal component scatter plot (PCA) conducted on the elliptic Fourier descriptions of denticles shapes using the first 10 harmonics; this figure shows the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2 are on the x and y-axes, respectively).

Fig. 9 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 9. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of Trichodina spp. using normalized elliptical Fourier descriptors. Percentages indicate the proportion of the trace captured in each LD component.

Fig. 4. Tree derived from a in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 4. Tree derived from a Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis. The bootstrap consensus tree bases on ML inferred from 500 replicates. Bootstrap values for ML are given above nodes.

Fig. 2 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic drawings of denticles of trichodinids. (A and B) Denticle of Trichodina bellotti n. sp. from Austrolebias bellottii. (C) Trichodina hypsilepis redrawn from Wellborn (1967). (D) Trichodina heterodentata redrawn from Duncan (1977). (E) Trichodina paraheterodentata redrawn from Tang and Zhao (2013). (F) Trichodina pseudoheterodentata redrawn from Tang et al. (2017).

Fig. 3 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on 18S rDNA sequences by Bayesian Inference, with the model Trn + I + G applied in Mrbayes v.3.2.1. The new sequenced forms are in bold. Numbers given at nodes of branches are the posterior probability value.

Fig. 5 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 5. Denticles silhouettes utilized on Fourier analysis. Trichodina bellottii n. sp., Trichodina heterodentata redrawn from Duncan (1977); Albaladejo and Arthur, 1989; Bondad-Reantaso and Arthur, 1989; Van As and Basson, 1989; Basson and Van As, 1994; Al Rasheid et al., 2000; Asmat, 2004; Dove and O'Donoghue, 2005; Dias et al., 2009; Martins et al., 2010; Benites de Pádua et al., 2012; Miranda et al., 2012; Valladão et al., 2014. Trichodina paraheterodentata redrawn from Tang and Zhao (2013). Trichodina pseudoheterodentata redrawn from Tang et al. (2017).

Fig. 1 in Geometric morphometric on a new species of Trichodinidae. A tool to discriminate trichodinid species combined with traditional morphology and molecular analysis

Fig. 1. Microphotographs of Trichodina bellottii n. sp. from Austrolebias bellottii. (A–D) Adhesive disc after dry silver impregnation. E) Ciliature. (F) Macronucleus with methylene-blue staining. Scale bars: 20 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →

Figure 2 in Molecular tool for monitoring the safety of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti Rockefeller rearing in arthropod containment facilities

Figure 2 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms sites distribution in Aedes aegypti haplotypes according to the ND5 molecular marker. A) Phylogenetic estimation using the UPGMA method. Aa Rock 1 to 22, A. aegypti Rockefeller sequences obtained from 22 laboratory-bred Rock strain individuals. Aa, A. aegypti sequences obtained from towns located in the southeast of Buenos Aires Province (Lezama (LEZ), Castelli (CAS), Dolores (DOL), San Clemente del Tuyú (SC), Chascomús (CHA), La Plata City (LP) and from Buenos Aires City (BA). H1 to H14, 14 haplotypes reported by Albrieu Llinás and Gardenal (2012) and Díaz-Nieto et al. (2016) Rock contig 1 to 14, Illumina-contigs (A. aegypti Rock_Contig 1 to 14). Aa LVP, sequence from mitochondrial genome of A. aegypti Liverpool strain (LVP_AGWG). LVPib, A. aegypti inbred sub-strain LVPib12 according to Table 1. B) Its distribution along South America. The map was drawn from free maps of the website of the National Geographic Institute http://www.ign.gob.ar/AreaServicios/Descargas/MapasEscolares. The areas on the map were colored using Adobe Illustrator CS6 program.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Fig. 4 in First record of Atherigona reversura Villeneuve (Diptera: Muscidae) feeding on Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon cv. Jiggs, Poaceae) in Brazil: morphological and molecular tools for identification

Fig. 4. Analysis using Bayesian posterior probabilities (values shown) using 10 COI sequences for seven species of Atherigona and Cyrtoneuropsis veniseta.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

Fig. 3 in First record of Atherigona reversura Villeneuve (Diptera: Muscidae) feeding on Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon cv. Jiggs, Poaceae) in Brazil: morphological and molecular tools for identification

Fig. 3. Atherigona (Atherigona) reversura: (A) trifoliate process, dorsal view; (B) trifoliate process, lateral view; (C) hypopygial prominence, lateral view.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Are molecular tools clarifying or confusing our understanding of the public health threat from zoonotic enteric protozoa in wildlife?

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships among genotypes of Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Encephalitozoon hellem and Encephalitozoon intestinalis based on: A) partial sequences of internal transcribed spacer gene (ITS), and B) partial sequences of polar tube protein gene (PTP). Numbers at the nodes represent the bootstrap values gaining more than 50% support based on 1000 replications. Phylogenetic trees were inferred by the Neighbour-Joining method with the A) Jukes-Cantor and B) Kimura 2- parameter models in MEGA6 software.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Are molecular tools clarifying or confusing our understanding of the public health threat from zoonotic enteric protozoa in wildlife?

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of the Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes identified in cervids. The phylogenetic tree was inferred with a neighbour-joining analysis of the E. bieneusi ITS sequences, based on distances calculated with the Kimura two-parameter model. Bootstrap values> 50% from 1,000 replicates are shown on the nodes. The E. bieneusi-ITS genotypes detected in cervids (more than one isolate) are shown, and those isolates that clustered into the same clade as those considered to be zoonotic are considered to be in Group 1, the "potentially zoonotic group".

Fig. 11 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 11. Projections of factor 1 (x-axis) and factor 2 (y-axis) in principal component analysis of A, cranial measurements and B, dental measurements of different diminutive species of Miniopterus from Madagascar, all of which were previously considered to be M. manavi, as well as M. petersoni. Loadings of variables on each axis are shown in table 6.

Fig. 10 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 10. Lateral views of skulls and mandibles of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; (below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_03d.)

Fig. 8 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 8. Dorsal views of skulls of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_01d.)

Fig. 7 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 7. Different views of skull and mandible of the holotype of Miniopterus mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197) collected in the Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa, 6.5 km NE Efoetse, near Mitoho Cave: (above, left) dorsal view of cranium; (above, right) ventral view of cranium; and (below) lateral view of cranium and mandible. (Photograph taken by John Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94487_05d.)

Fig. 6 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 6. Photograph of living Miniopterus mahafaliensis captured 6.5 km NE Efoetse, near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa (FMNH 173191), taken at the same locality as the holotype (FMNH 173197). Note the gray grizzled hair to the ventrum. (Photograph by Harald Schütz.)

Fig. 5 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 5. Different views of skull and mandible of the holotype of Miniopterus brachytragos (FMNH 175840) collected in the Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby, 26 km NW Andranomavo: (above, left) dorsal view of cranium; (above, right) ventral view of cranium; and (below) lateral view of cranium and mandible. (Photograph taken by John Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94486_05d.)

Fig. 9 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 9. Ventral views of skulls of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; (below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_02d.)