Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
291
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
291 results for “monophyletic”
FIG. 3 in Redescription and phylogenetic assessment of Helicometra antarcticae Holloway & Bier, 1968 (Trematoda, Opecoelidae), with evidence of non-monophyletic status of the genus Helicometra Odhner, 1902
FIG. 3.. — Helicometra fasciata (Rudolphi, 1819) Odhner, 1902 sensu lato from intestine of black scorpionfish, Scorpaena porcus Linnaeus, 1758, Black Sea; whole mount, ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
FIG. 2 in Redescription and phylogenetic assessment of Helicometra antarcticae Holloway & Bier, 1968 (Trematoda, Opecoelidae), with evidence of non-monophyletic status of the genus Helicometra Odhner, 1902
FIG. 2. — Helicometra sp. from intestine of tawnystripe eelpout, Lycodes cf. brunneofasciatus Suvorov, 1935, Northwest Pacific; whole mount, ventral view. Scale bar: 1 mm.
FIG. 1 in Redescription and phylogenetic assessment of Helicometra antarcticae Holloway & Bier, 1968 (Trematoda, Opecoelidae), with evidence of non-monophyletic status of the genus Helicometra Odhner, 1902
FIG. 1. — Helicometra antarcticae Holloway & Bier, 1968 from intestine of the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni Norman, 1937, Ross Sea: A, whole mount, ventral view; B, terminal genitalia, lateral view; C, ovarian complex, ventral view. Abbreviations: С, cirrus everted through genital atrium; ej, ejaculatory duct; ga, genital atrium; isv, internal seminal vesicle; lc, Laurer's canal; mg, Mehlis' gland cells; mt, metraterm; oc, ovicapt; oo, oÖtype; ov, ovary; pc, prostatic cells; pp, pars prostatica; sr, seminal receptacle; vr, common vitelline reservoir. Scale bars: A, 1 mm; B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.08 mm.
Figure 3. The 50 in Is the subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) monophyletic?
Figure 3. The 50% majority-rule consensus tree from the ML analysis combining sequences from 2 mitochondrial genes (COI and COII) and 2 nuclear genes (EF-1α and LWO). Nodal support values were omitted. Note the comb-like topology.
Figure 1 in Is the subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) monophyletic?
Figure 1. Previous phylogenetic hypotheses for the Eriosomatinae: a) Zhang and Chen (1999), based on morphology; b) Moran and von Dohlen (2000), based on 12S, partial topology, 8 sampled species; c) Ortiz-Rivas et al. (2010), based on LWO combined with other genes, partial topology, 10 sampled species; d) Zhang and Qiao (2008), based on EF-1α, 25 sampled species, but only 2 species in Eriosomatini.
Figure 4 in Is the subfamily Eriosomatinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) monophyletic?
Figure 4. The Bayesian tree of Eriosomatinae combining sequences from 2 mitochondrial genes (COI and COII) and 2 nuclear genes (EF-1α and LWO). Nodes in Table 3 are marked as P = Pemphigini, E = Eriosomatini, F = Fordini, M = Melaphidina, and O = out-group. Nodal supports from different algorithms are listed in the order BI/ML/MP; the sample IDs are presented after the species names.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/a2afe874-9ec7-4101-8f63-da98506a340b">https://bionomia.net/dataset/a2afe874-9ec7-4101-8f63-da98506a340b</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/a2afe874-9ec7-4101-8f63-da98506a340b">https://gbif.org/dataset/a2afe874-9ec7-4101-8f63-da98506a340b</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Fig. 4 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 4. Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree of the full combined nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (accD-psaI, matK, trnS-trnG) datasets for Phyllanthus and related genera; posterior probabilities (PP) are displayed at the nodes; infrageneric classification follows Bouman & al. (2018a); subgenera are given above colored clades, sections to the right. Outgroups and some ingroup genera are collapsed (see full tree in suppl. Fig. S10). Manuscript names of new undescribed species are indicated with an asterisk.
Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 3. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of tribe Phyllantheae, simplified from Fig. 4 showing genera and subgenera. Colouring of clades follows Fig. 4, and paraphyly is highlighted with a red-white triangle (). Several morphological characters and character states are shown: B, branching non-phyllanthoid (), sub-phyllanthoid () or phyllanthoid (); D, disc present (), absent () or when both variations occur in the clade (); A, androphore filaments free (), fused () or when both are present (), whorled stamens (); F, fruit capsules (), berries (), or when both are present (); S, average stamens number.
Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 2. Schematic design for the marker PHYC (A), accD-psaI (B) and trnS-trnG (C) spacer with newly designed primers indicated by arrowheads. Number behind primer names indicates approximate nucleotide position within the marker including insertions in the matrix. PHYC figure adapted from Samuel & al. (2005).
Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 1. Major characters of Phyllanthus and the related genera Breynia and Glochidion. A, Habit of the herbaceous P. tenellus (P. subg. Tenellanthus); B, Habit of P. watsonii (P. subg. Eriococcus); C, Habit and fruits of P. emblica (P. subg. Emblica); D, Non-phyllanthoid branching in P. myrtellus; note the leaves subtending lateral branches (P. subg. Macraea); E, Sub-phyllanthoid branching in a young plant of P. glaucus, lateral branches are deciduous (P. subg. Kirganelia); F, Phyllanthoid branching and phylloclades in P. arbucula (P. subg. Xylophylla); G, Young capsules of P. myrtellus (P. subg. Macraea); H, Dehisced capsule of P. juglandifolius (P. subg. Xylophylla); I, Berries on a specialized leafless branchlet of P. microcarpus (P. subg. Kirganelia); J, Capsules of G. eriocarpum with orange arillate seeds exposed in some (Glochidion); K, Staminate flowers of P. pulcher (P. subg. Eriococcus); L, Pistillate flowers of P. pulcher (P. subg. Eriococcus); M, Flowers of P. mimosoides (P. subg. Xylophylla); N, Flowers of P. arbuscula (P. subg. Xylophylla); O, Staminate flower of P. cf. poilanei (P. subg. Phyllanthodendron); P, Pistillate flower of B. androgyna (Breynia). — Photos: A, C–G, I–M & O by R.W. Bouman; B © R.-Y. Yu; H by J.S. Strijk; N © M.S. Nuraliev.
FIGURES 14–22. 14–15 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 14–22. 14–15. Female pronotum in dorsal-oblique view: 14. Mb. apicalipennis; 15. Mt. analis. 16–18. Female mesosoma in lateral view: 16. Mb. apicalipennis; 17. Mt. dimidiata; 18. Mt. nigriceps. 19–22. Female mesosoma in dorsal view: 19. Mb. apicalipennis; 20. Mt. analis; 21. Mt. dimidiata; 22. Mt. nigriceps. Scale bars for 14–15 = 1 mm; 16–18 and 22 = 1 mm; 19–21 = 2 mm.
FIGURES 42–47. Monobia goiana. 42–43 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 42–47. Monobia goiana. 42–43. Habitus: 42. Female; 43. Male. 44. Female mesosoma in dorsal view. 45–46. Head in frontal view: 45. Female; 46. Male. 47. Female metasoma in dorsal view. Scale bars for 42–43 = 3 mm; 44, 47 = 1 mm; 45–46 = 2 mm.
FIGURES 33–41. 33–36 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 33–41. 33–36. Male paramere and volsella (digitus and cuspis) in lateral inner view: 33. Mb. quadridens; 34. Mt. analis; 35. Mt. azurescens; 36. Mt. brethesi. 37–40. Male aedeagus in lateral view: 37. Mb. quadridens; 38. Mt. analis; 39. Mt. azurescens; 40. Mt. brethesi. 41. Sketchy representation of the digitus of Mb. quadridens and Mt. analis: da = basal dorsal angle of digitus; va = basal ventral angle of digitus. Scale bars for 33–35 = 1 mm; figs. 36–39 = 1 mm; 40 = 0.5 mm.
FIGURES 48–53. 48–50 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 48–53. 48–50. Mb. insueta, female: 48. Pronotum and mesoscutum in dorsal view; 49. Terga I–II in dorsal view; 50. Sterna I–VI in ventral view. 51–52. Mb. trifasciata, female: 51. Head and pronotum in dorsal view; 52. Head and mesosoma in lateral view. 53. Mb. goiana, female head and pronotum in dorsal view. Scale bars for 48–49 = 1 mm; 50, 52 = 2 mm; 51, 53 = 1 mm.
FIGURES 5–13. 5–9 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 5–13. 5–9. Female head in frontal view: 5. Mb. apicalipennis; 6. Mb. schrottkyi; 7. Mt. analis; 8. Mt. dimidiata; 9. Mt. infernalis. 10–13. Female head in dorsal view: 10. Mb. apicalipennis; 11. Mt. dimidiata; 12. Mb. funebris; 13. Mt. analis. Scale bars for 5–9 = 2 mm; 10–11 = 1 mm; 12–13 = 0.5 mm.
FIGURES 23–32. 23–24 in Are Monobia and Montezumia Monophyletic? A Cladistic Analysis of Their Species Groups Based on Morphological Data (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae)
FIGURES 23–32. 23–24. Female metanotum in posterior view: 23. Mt. azurescens; 24. Mt. nigriceps. 25–26. Female propodeum in posterior view: 25. Mb. angulosa; 26. Mt. azurescens. 27–28. Female lower propodeum in lateral view: 27. Mt. nigriceps; 28. Mt. coeruleorufa. 29–30. Female tergum I in lateral view: 29. Mb. quadridens; 30. Mt. azurescens. 31–32. Female sternum I in ventral view: 31. Mb. schrottkyi; 32. Mt. azurescens. Scale bars for 23 = 0.3 mm; 24 = 0.5 mm; 25–26, 30–31 = 1 mm; 27–28 = 0.5 mm; 29, 32 = 1 mm.
Fig. 8 in A New Species of Bush-Warbler from Bougainville Island and a Monophyletic Origin for Southwest Pacific Cettia
Fig. 8. Distribution of Cettia haddeni and relatives in the southwest Pacific. The distribution of sampled species and the putative close relatives C. carolinae and C. seebohmi are shown by circled islands or island groups, and the maximum likelihood relationships among sampled forms are superimposed. Although resolved, support for relationships among the island forms is poor (fig. 7).
Fig. 6 in A New Species of Bush-Warbler from Bougainville Island and a Monophyletic Origin for Southwest Pacific Cettia
Fig. 6. Strict consensus of nine equally parsimonious trees (L 5 1287 steps, CI 5 0.664, RI 5 0.557) obtained from analysis of partial RAG1 sequences from Cettia haddeni and putative sylvioid relatives (Beresford et al., 2005). Numbers below branches indicate bootstrap values $ 50% (see text).
Fig. 4 in A New Species of Bush-Warbler from Bougainville Island and a Monophyletic Origin for Southwest Pacific Cettia
Fig. 4. Scatterplots of individual Cettia on the first and second (A) and third and fourth (B) principal components derived from analysis of five external measurements (tables 1 and 4).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.