Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

22

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

22 results for β€œmultispecies coalescence model”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets β†—
dryad40/100

Supplementary material for: PhyloCoalSimulations: A simulator for network multispecies coalescent models, including a new extension for the inheritance of gene flow

<p>We consider the evolution of phylogenetic gene trees along phylogenetic species networks, according to the network multispecies coalescent process, and introduce a new network coalescent model with correlated inheritance of gene flow. This model generalizes two traditional versions of the network coalescent: with independent or common inheritance. At each reticulation, multiple lineages of a given locus are inherited from parental populations chosen at random, either independently across lineages, or with positive correlation according to a Dirichlet process. This process may account for locus-specific probabilities of inheritance, for example.</p> <p>We implemented the simulation of gene trees under these network coalescent models in the Julia package PhyloCoalSimulations, which depends on PhyloNetworks and its powerful network manipulation tools. Input species phylogenies can be read in extended Newick format, either in numbers of generations or in coalescent units. Simulated gene trees can be written in Newick format, and in a way that preserves information about their embedding within the species network. This embedding can be used for downstream purposes, such as to simulate species-specific processes like rate variation across species, or for other scenarios as illustrated in this note. This package should be useful for simulation studies and simulation-based inference methods. The software is available open source with documentation and a tutorial at <a href="https://github.com/cecileane/PhyloCoalSimulations.jl">https://github.com/cecileane/PhyloCoalSimulations.jl</a>.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2023View details β†’
dryad40/100

Hierarchical heuristic species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent model with migration

<p>The multispecies coalescent (MSC) model accommodates genealogical fluctuations across the genome and provides a natural framework for comparative analysis of genomic sequence data to infer the history of species divergence and gene flow. Given a set of populations, hypotheses of species delimitation (and species phylogeny) may be formulated as instances of MSC models (e.g., MSC for one species versus MSC for two species) and compared using Bayesian model selection. This approach, implemented in the program bpp, has been found to be prone to over-splitting. Alternatively, heuristic criteria based on population parameters under the MSC model (such as population/species divergence times, population sizes, and migration rates) estimated from genomic sequence data may be used to delimit species. Here we extend the approach of species delimitation using the genealogical divergence index (𝑔𝑑𝑖) to develop hierarchical merge and split algorithms for heuristic species delimitation and implement them in a python pipeline called hhsd. Applied to data simulated under a model of isolation by distance, the approach was able to recover the correct species delimitation, whereas model comparison by bpp failed. Analyses of empirical datasets suggest that the procedure may be less prone to over-splitting. We discuss possible strategies for accommodating paraphyletic species in the procedure, as well as the challenges of species delimitation based on heuristic criteria.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2023View details β†’
dryad40/100

Supplementary material for: PhyloCoalSimulations: A simulator for network multispecies coalescent models, including a new extension for the inheritance of gene flow

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2023View details β†’
dryad40/100

Data from: The multispecies coalescent model outperforms concatenation across diverse phylogenomic

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2020View details β†’
dryad40/100

Hierarchical heuristic species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent model with migration

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2024View details β†’
dryad40/100

Revisiting the multispecies coalescent model fit with an example from a complete molecular phylogeny of the Liolaemus wiegmannii species group (Squamata: Liolaemidae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2025View details β†’
dryad36/100

Data from: The multilocus multispecies coalescent: a flexible new model of gene family evolution

<p>Incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), the interaction between coalescence and speciation, can generate incongruence between gene trees and species trees, as can gene duplication (D), transfer (T) and loss (L). These processes are usually modelled independently, but in reality, ILS can affect gene copy number polymorphism, i.e., interfere with DTL. This has been previously recognised, but not treated in a satisfactory way, mainly because DTL events are naturally modelled forward-in-time, while ILS is naturally modelled backwards-in-time with the coalescent. Here we consider the joint action of ILS and DTL on the gene tree/species tree problem in all its complexity. In particular, we show that the interaction between ILS and duplications/transfers (without losses) can result in patterns usually interpreted as resulting from gene loss, and that the realised rate of D, T and L becomes non-homogeneous in time when ILS is taken into account. We introduce algorithmic solutions to these problems. Our new model, theΒ <em>multilocus multispecies coalescent</em>Β (MLMSC), which also accounts for any level of linkage between loci, generalises the multispecies coalescent model and offers a versatile, powerful framework for proper simulation and inference of gene family evolution.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2020View details β†’
dryad36/100

Phase resolution of heterozygous sites in diploid genomes is important to phylogenomic analysis under the multispecies coalescent model

<p>Genome sequencing projects routinely generate haploid consensus sequences from diploid genomes, which are effectively chimeric sequences with the phase at heterozygous sites resolved at random. The impact of phasing errors on phylogenomic analyses under the multispecies coalescent (MSC) model is largely unknown. Here we conduct a computer simulation to evaluate the performance of four phase-resolution strategies (the true phase resolution, the diploid analytical integration algorithm which averages over all phase resolutions, computational phase resolution using the program PHASE, and random resolution) on estimation of the species tree and evolutionary parameters in analysis of multi-locus genomic data under the MSC model. We found that species tree estimation is robust to phasing errors when species divergences were much older than average coalescent times but may be affected by phasing errors when the species tree is shallow. Estimation of parameters under the MSC model with and without introgression is affected by phasing errors. In particular, random phase resolution causes serious overestimation of population sizes for modern species and biased estimation of cross-species introgression probability. In general the impact of phasing errors is greater when the mutation rate is higher, the data include more samples per species, and the species tree is shallower with recent divergences. Use of phased sequences inferred by the PHASE program produced small biases in parameter estimates. We analyze two real datasets, one of East Asian brown frogs and another of Rocky Mountains chipmunks, to demonstrate that heterozygote phase-resolution strategies have similar impacts on practical data analyses. We suggest that genome sequencing projects should produce unphased diploid genotype sequences if fully phased data are too challenging to generate, and avoid haploid consensus sequences, which have heterozygous sites phased at random. In case the analytical integration algorithm is computationally unfeasible, computational phasing prior to population genomic analyses is an acceptable alternative.Β </p>

opencc-zeroOct 2020View details β†’
dryad36/100

Data from: The multilocus multispecies coalescent: a flexible new model of gene family evolution

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2021View details β†’
dryad36/100

Phase resolution of heterozygous sites in diploid genomes is important to phylogenomic analysis under the multispecies coalescent model

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2021View details β†’
dryad32/100

Data from: Impact of model violations on the inference of species boundaries under the multispecies coalescent

The use of genetic data for identifying species-level lineages across the tree of life has received increasing attention in the field of systematics over the past decade. The multispecies coalescent model provides a framework for understanding the process of lineage divergence, and has become widely adopted for delimiting species. However, because these studies lack an explicit assessment of model fit, in many cases, the accuracy of the inferred species boundaries are unknown. This is concerning given the large amount of empirical data and theory that highlight the complexity of the speciation process. Here, we seek to fill this gap by using simulation to characterize the sensitivity of inference under the multispecies coalescent to several violations of model assumptions thought to be common in empirical data. We also assess the fit of the multispecies coalescent model to empirical data in the context of species delimitation. Our results show substantial variation in model fit across datasets. Posterior predictive tests find the poorest model performance in datasets that were hypothesized to be impacted by model violations. We also show that while the inferences assuming the multispecies coalescent are robust to minor model violations, such inferences can be biased under some biologically plausible scenarios. Taken together, these results suggest that researchers can identify individual datasets in which species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent is likely to be problematic, thereby highlighting the cases where additional lines of evidence to identify species boundaries are particularly important to collect. Our study supports a growing body of work highlighting the importance of model checking in phylogenetics, and the usefulness of tailoring tests of model fit to assess the reliability of particular inferences.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 6 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 6. Habitus of Polyura bicolor and Polyura epigenes across the Solomon Islands. Pictures of the upperside (left half) and underside (right half) of the two sexes. All pictures taken by Bernard Turlin.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 4. Nuclear haplotype network and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction. The haplotype network reconstructed using the concatenated RPS5 and wingless alignments is presented on the left. The phylogenetic hypothesis inferred using the same data set in RAΓ—ML is presented at the top right. A table highlighting the nucleotide substitutions found between Polyura epigenes bicolor and Polyura epigenes* is presented at the bottom right.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 3. Comparison of species delimitation results. Graph showing the result of each analysis of species delimitation. The posterior probability of either Polyura bicolor or Polyura epigenes (including Polyura bicolor) as a valid species are shown.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 2. Molecular phylogeny and molecular species delimitation results. Bayesian phylogeny as recovered from MrBayes analyses. The nodal supports of both Bayesian-inference (BI) and maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses are shown, with colour coding as indicated in the figure. The cloudogram of the *BEAST analysis showing all posterior species trees is presented at the bottom left. Denser regions indicate a robust support for the inferred relationship.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 1. Map of the geographic range of Polyura epigenes in the Solomon Islands. Male habitus of the different subspecies are shown above the name of the taxon. The distribution of each taxa is indicated by a coloured dashed line. The colour of the line refers to the pastille on the side of the taxon name. All pictures were taken by Bernard Turlin. The map is from National Geographic's MapMaker Interactive.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Bayesian Poisson tree processes and multispecies coalescent models shed new light on the diversification of Nawab butterflies in the Solomon Islands (Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Polyura)

Figure 5. Divergence time estimates derived from the *BEAST analysis. Chronogram derived from the posterior trees of dating analysis conducted in BEAST. The 95% credibility intervals are shown at each node of the phylogeny. A map of the Solomon Islands with bathymetry is shown at the top of the figure. The island of Malaita is highlighted in violet. A picture of a female Polyura epigenes bicolor f. cinereus (orange morph) is presented. Picture taken by Bernard Turlin. T in time bar stands for Tarantian.

opennotspecifiedApr 2016View details β†’
dryad32/100

Data from: Impact of model violations on the inference of species boundaries under the multispecies coalescent

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2017View details β†’
dryad32/100

Data from: Probabilistic species tree distances: implementing the multispecies coalescent to compare species trees within the same model-based framework used to estimate them

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2019View details β†’
dryad28/100

Data from: A multispecies coalescent model for quantitative traits

We present a multispecies coalescent model for quantitative traits that allows for evolutionary inferences at micro- and macroevolutionary scales. A major advantage of this model is its ability to incorporate genealogical discordance underlying a quantitative trait. We show that discordance causes a decrease in the expected trait covariance between more closely related species relative to more distantly related species. If unaccounted for, this outcome can lead to an overestimation of a trait's evolutionary rate, to a decrease in its phylogenetic signal, and to errors when examining shifts in mean trait values. The number of loci controlling a quantitative trait appears to be irrelevant to all trends reported, and discordance also affected discrete, threshold traits. Our model and analyses point to the conditions under which different methods should fare better or worse, in addition to indicating current and future approaches that can mitigate the effects of discordance.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details β†’

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record