Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15 results for “oceanic primary production”
Size-Fractionated Chlorophyll a, Primary Productivity, and Photosynthetic Physiological Parameters of Phytoplankton in the Cosmonaut Sea, Southern Ocean, During Summer 2022
This dataset provides vertical distribution profiles of size-fractionated phytoplankton parameters measured in the Cosmonaut Sea, a marginal ice zone in the Southern Ocean, during the austral summer of 2022. Sampling was conducted across multiple stations spanning latitudes from approximately 33°N to 60°N and longitudes from -62°E to -67°E, focusing on surface and subsurface waters up to depths of about 40 meters. The data capture key aspects of phytoplankton physiology and productivity in this dynamic polar environment, influenced by seasonal ice melt and nutrient availability. Parameters include chlorophyll a concentrations (Chl a), primary productivity indicators such as maximum photosynthetic rates (PBm), photosynthetic efficiency (α), saturation irradiance (Ek), and integrated gross primary productivity (IGPPeu), all differentiated by size fractions: net phytoplankton (>20 μm), nano- and pico-phytoplankton (<20 μm), and total community. Additional measurements encompass photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and mixed layer depths, providing context for light and stratification effects on phytoplankton dynamics. Data were derived from in situ incubations and fluorometric analyses, with values reported for discrete depths at each station to highlight vertical gradients in biomass and photosynthetic performance. This completed dataset is particularly valuable for studies on polar marine ecosystems, carbon cycling, and climate-driven changes in phytoplankton communities, offering insights into how size-structured assemblages respond to environmental gradients in the Southern Ocean. It does not include taxonomic details beyond general phytoplankton groupings but emphasizes physiological metrics for modeling primary production in ice-influenced regions.
Processing and Data for "Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats"
<p><strong>Description: </strong></p> <p>These files contain processed BGC-Argo float data, figure data, the radiocarbon productivity subset, bootstrapping results, and the associated Python/Matlab code to calculate net primary productivity from daily cycles of optical backscatter and dissolved oxygen.</p> <p>The raw float data used in this study are available from the Argo Global Data Assembly Centers in Brest, France (ftp://ftp.ifremer.fr/ifremer/argo/dac/coriolis) and Monterey, California (ftp://usgodae.org/pub/outgoing/argo/dac/coriolis). The raw MODIS satellite-based productivity data is available from the Oregon State University Ocean Productivity site (<a href="http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php">http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php</a>). The raw MODIS satellite-based euphotic depth estimates are available from the NASA L3 browser (<a href="https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/">https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/</a>). The original ship-based estimates of net primary productivity are available from the Pangaea (<a href="https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417">https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417</a>) and the British Oceanography Data Centre (<a href="https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803">https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803</a>).</p> <p><strong>Please cite as: </strong></p> <p>Stoer, A., and Fennel, K. 2022. Processing and Data for Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6977161.</p> <p><strong>Python/MATLAB Software Description: </strong></p> <p>dielFit_GOPeqCR.m: This code is from Johnson and Bif (2021). We have added outputs for standard errors for linear and PvE models and sunrise/sunset times. To run this code with the associated Python software a MATLAB engine needs to be installed. Please see: <a href="https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html">https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html</a></p> <p>argo_so_processing_20220815.py: This code is the first of two pieces of software for estimating net primary productivity from floats in the Southern Ocean. The program below obtains the data from the BGC Argo database (Argo, 2021) and processes it. Simple data quality control, interpolation, biogeochemical calculations, and data binning occur. The processed float data is located in the folder 'Processed Argo Transects'.</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. The code combines the float that meet the criteria of sampling at all local hours of the day throughout its lifetime. Then, it constructs diel cycles from this data by finding the median value of each hour and uses the code from Johnson and Bif (2021), which is a modified version from Barone et al. (2019). The algorithm used to convert particle backscatter to particulate organic carbon is from Graff et al. (2015). We assume that dissolved primary productivity accounts for 30% of total primary productivity (Moran et al., 2022).</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_bootstrap_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains co-located oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. This code is very similar to argo_daily_npp_20220815.py but randomly samples a subset of the co-located profiles at different sample sizes before calculating net primary productivity. Productivity is calculated at each sample size 1000 times. The results of this analysis is located in the folder 'Bootstrapped Results'. </p> <p>More details can be found in the code itself. </p> <p><strong>Data Descriptions: </strong></p> Data from 'Processed Argo Transects' Folder | Description for each variable <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Average depth of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Center of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>pressure</td> <td>Average pressure in depth bin</td> <td>dbar</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile number or index</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average longitude of profile</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average latitude of profile</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_time</td> <td>Average UTC time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_time</td> <td>Average local time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_hour</td> <td>The hour of the local timestamp</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>salinity</td> <td>Seawater salinity</td> <td>PSU</td> </tr> <tr> <td>temperature </td> <td>Seawater temperature</td> <td>degC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen</td> <td>Dissolved oxygen concentration</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_saturation</td> <td>Saturated dissolved oxygen concentration calculated from the Garcia and Gordon (1992) equation.</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>The difference between observed dissolved oxygen concentration and saturated oxygen </td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Optical backscatter coefficient at 470 nm. Particulate organic carbon is calculated in argo_daily_npp_20220815.py</td> <td>m-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>wmo</td> <td>WMO number of float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile index or profile number taken by float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average profile latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average profile longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>fod</td> <td>Fraction of day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_med</td> <td>Hourly median oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_med</td> <td>Hourly median particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N, co-located)</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N) </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Depth of profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>zeu</td> <td>1% euphotic depth from Lee et al. (2013) algorithm from NASA (2022) L3 satellite products. </td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_bpp</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_oxy</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_bbp</td> <td>Number of floats with backscatter measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_oxy</td> <td>Number of floats with oxygen measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sr</td> <td>The calculated sunrise time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_ss</td> <td>The calculated sunset time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp</td> <td>Gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> Data for Fig. S1 | Description for number_of_bbp_profiles_in_each_year.csv and number_of_oxy_profiles_in_each_year.csv <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>year</td> <td>Year</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Depth of NPP profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mean</td> <td>Mean volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>median</td> <td>Median volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>min</td> <td>Minimum volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>maximum</td> <td>Maximum volumetric 14C-NPP</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th><strong>Variable</strong></th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>subset</td> <td>Number of profiles randomly sampled from the co-located dataset</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_do</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_bbp</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>R-squared of the sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of oxygen anomaly</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_r2</td> <td>R-squared of sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of particulate organic carbon</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>ROSE</td> <td>Topographic (negative values are below sea level)</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_Y</td> <td>Latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_X</td> <td>Longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>database</td> <td>Database the data was extracted from</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Month</td> <td>Month of NPP measurement</td> <td>month of year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_14c</td> <td>Net primary productivity estimated from the radiocarbon method</td> <td>mmol m-3 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>depth of 14C-NPP measurement</td> <td>m</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table>
Model output for "Impact of intensifying nitrogen limitation of ocean net primary production is fingerprinted by nitrogen isotopes"
<p><strong>Description.</strong></p> <p>The data included in this repository is output of simulations performed with the NEMO-PISCESv2 global ocean-biogeochemical model. Simulations involved forcing the NEMO-PISCESv2 with global warming associated with historical and future emissions, as well as the historical and future trends in atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Future climate change was according to the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario (Dufresne et al., 2013; Riahi et al., 2011), which sees rapid warming during the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Historical and future atmospheric nitrogen deposition fields were created via linear interpolation of fields produced by Hauglustaine et al. (2014) at years 1850, 2000, 2030, 2050 and 2100. To represent the amplification of deposition since 1950 (Galloway 2014), 60 % of the increase between 1850 and 2000 occurred from 1950 onwards.</p> <p>In this study, we quantified the effect anthropogenic climate change and anthropogenic increases in atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the marine nitrogen cycle. The response of the marine nitrogen cycle to these combined stressors is highly uncertain, and we therefore employed this complex model with a strong representation of nitrogen cycling in an attempt to constrain the global behaviour of this important cycle. In addition, through the addition of nitrogen isotopes to the ocean-biogeochemical model, we also explored and described how the isotopes responded to these anthropogenic forcings, and if the isotopes uniquely fingerprinted the response for potential monitoring/detection purposes.</p> <p>Our abstract reads:</p> <p>“The open ocean nitrogen cycle is being altered by increases in anthropogenic atmospheric nitrogen deposition and climate change. How the nitrogen cycle responds will determine long-term trends in net primary production (NPP) in the nitrogen-limited low latitude ocean, but is poorly constrained by uncertainty in how the source-sink balance will evolve. Here we show that intensifying nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton, associated with near-term reductions in NPP, causes detectable declines in nitrogen isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N) and constitutes the primary perturbation of the 21<sup>st</sup> century nitrogen cycle. Model experiments show that ~75% of the low latitude twilight zone develops anomalously low δ<sup>15</sup>N by 2060, predominantly due to the effects of climate change that alter ocean circulation, with implications for the nitrogen sources-sink balance. Our results highlight that δ<sup>15</sup>N changes in the low latitude twilight zone may provide a useful constraint on emerging changes to nitrogen limitation and NPP over the 21<sup>st</sup> century.”</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Coordinates</strong></p> <p>Spatial resolution is global (90°S-90°N, 180°W-180°E, surface ocean to 5000 metres depth) and temporal resolution runs from years 1801 to 2100.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Citation.</strong></p> <p>Buchanan PJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Mahaffey C, and Tagliabue A (2021): An isotopic fingerprint of increasingly nitrogen-limited phytoplankton in a changing oceanic nitrogen cycle. Nature Communications.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Files provided.</strong></p> <p>The data files provided are those that are required to create the figures for this study and/or perform key analyses (i.e. the time of emergence calculations). In the following, each figure or analysis has an associated python script and we list the data files needed to run that script.</p> <p>Python scripts can be found the lead authors GitHub at <a href="https://github.com/pearseb/PISCESiso_Ncycle_analysis">https://github.com/pearseb/PISCESiso_Ncycle_analysis</a>. </p> <p> </p> <p>Put δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>NO3</sub> observations on model grid (<em>process-d15Nno3_observations_on_model_grid.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“RafterTuerena_watercolumn_d15N_no3.txt”</li> </ul> <p>Model assessment (<em>process-model_assessment.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ETOPO_spinup_d15Nno3.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ORCA2.0_Basins_float.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ORCA2.0.full_grid.nc”</li> <li>“RafterTuerena_watercolumn_d15N_no3_gridded.npz”</li> </ul> <p>Time of emergence calculations (<em>process-compute_toe.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_nst_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_d15n_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_d15n_pom_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_nst_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_d15n_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_d15n_pom_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_nst_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_d15n_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_d15n_pom_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_nst_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_d15n_no3_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_d15n_pom_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_temp_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_temp_ez_utz_ltz.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_npp.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_npp.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_npp.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_npp.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_1y_nfix.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_picontrol_ndep_1y_nfix.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_1y_nfix.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_future_ndep_1y_nfix.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Figure 1 (<em>fig-main1.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ncycle_changes.nc”</li> <li>“sources_and_sinks.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Figure 2 (<em>fig-main2.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure2D_ndep_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_ndep_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_cc_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_cc_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_picdep_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_picdep_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_futndep_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_fut_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_picndep_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“ToE_futndep_curves.txt”</li> <li>“ToE_fut_curves.txt”</li> <li>“ToE_picndep_curves.txt”</li> </ul> <p>Figure 3 (<em>fig-main3.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure2D_cc_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_fluxanalysis_results.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_cc_din_e15n.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Figure 4 (<em>fig-main4.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ETOPO_direct_indirect_effects.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 1 (<em>fig-supp1.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure_d15Nmaps.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 2 (<em>process-model_assessment.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>Produced by <em>process-model_assessment.py </em>(see data above)</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 3 (<em>fig-supp3.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“d15nstats.txt”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 4 (<em>fig-supp4.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ndep_Tg_yr.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 5 (<em>fig-supp5.py</em>):y</p> <ul> <li>“ncycle_changes_climatechangeonly.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 6 (<em>fig-supp6.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“ncycle_changes_ndeponly.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 7 (<em>fig-supp7.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure_depthzones.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 8 (<em>fig-supp8.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure2D_ndep_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_ndep_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_cc_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_cc_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_picdep_d15nno3_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“figure2D_picdep_d15npom_signal_usingPAR.nc”</li> <li>“BGCP_ETOPO_merged_alt.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_futndep_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_fut_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“ETOPO_ToE_picndep_depthzones.nc”</li> <li>“BGCP_ETOPO_merged_alt.nc”</li> <li>“ToE_fut_curves.txt”</li> <li>“ToE_futndep_curves.txt”</li> <li>“ToE_picndep_curves.txt”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 9 (<em>fig-supp9.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>“figure2D_ndep_no3_utz.nc”</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figures 10 and 11 (<em>process-0D_model_phyto_frac.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>Produced by <em>process-0D_model_phyto_frac.py</em> and no data required.</li> </ul> <p>Supp Figure 12 (<em>process-compute_toe.py</em>):</p> <ul> <li>Produced by <em>process-compute_toe.py </em>(see data above)</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>References.</strong></p> <p>Dufresne, J. L., Foujols, M. A., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O., et al. (2013). <em>Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5</em>. <em>Climate Dynamics</em> (Vol. 40). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1</p> <p>Galloway, J. N. (2014). The Global Nitrogen Cycle. In <em>Treatise on Geochemistry</em> (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 475–498). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00812-3</p> <p>Hauglustaine, D. A., Balkanski, Y., & Schulz, M. (2014). A global model simulation of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of climate. <em>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</em>, <em>14</em>(20), 11031–11063. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014</p> <p>Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., et al. (2011). RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. <em>Climatic Change</em>, <em>109</em>(1–2), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y</p>
Data For "Impact of dust and temperature on primary productivity in Late Miocene oceans"
<p><span>Impact of dust and temperature on primary productivity in Late Miocene oceans</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>This dataset contains marine biogeochemical outputs (NetCDF files) from modeling experiments with realistic late Miocene paleogeography, different CO2 levels and dust concentrations. The simulations focus on the evolution of primary productivity in response to aridification and global cooling. The simulations were carried out using the IPSL-CM5A2 general circulation model (Sepulchre et al. 2020 - IPSL-CM5A2 - an Earth system model designed for multimillennial climate simulations, GMD) and the PISCES-v2 biogeochemistry model (Aumont et al. 2015). It includes four simulations: Mio300Dust (300 ppm, dust concentration equal to pre-industrial level), Mio420Dust2 (420 ppm, dust concentration equal to pre-industrial level divided by 2), Mio420Dust10 (420 ppm, dust concentration equal to pre-industrial level divided by 10) and Mio420NoDust (420 ppm, dust concentration equal to pre-industrial level divided by 1000). The data are monthly averages over the last 100 years of the simulations. </span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>Contact: quentin.pillot@gmail.com</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>Experiments , see Pillot et al. (2024), Methods ans supplementary Informations for details.</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>INTPP : Vertically integrated primary production by phyto (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span>EPC100 : Export of carbon particles at 100 m (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span>LNlight : Light limitation term in Nanophyto (between 0 and 1)</span></p> <p><span>LNnut : Nutrient limitation term in Nanophyto (between 0 and 1)</span></p> <p><span>PPPHY : Primary production of nanophyto (mol/m3/s)</span></p> <p><span>PPPHY2 : Primary production of diatoms (mol/m3/s)</span></p> <p><span>Ndep : Nitrogen deposition from dust (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span>Pdep : Phosphorus deposition from dust (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span>Sidep : Silice deposition from dust (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span>Irondep : Iron deposition from dust (mol/m2/s)</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><span>Keywords: Late Miocene, marine primary productivity, aridification, dust, CO2, cooling, oceans, modelling, IPSL-CM5A2, PISCES-v2</span></p>
Sea-ice, primary productivity and ocean temperatures at the Antarctic marginal zone during late Pleistocene
<p>These data in excel refer to all proxies used to reconstruct late Quaternary sea ice and productivity in in cape Adare, Ross Sea, Antarctica, for the publication in Quaternary Science Reviews, for open access </p>
Seafloor primary production in a changing Arctic Ocean
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Time-series measurements of size fractionated primary production (>3 micron) in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean
<p>Filter size-fractionated (>3 μm) particulate 14C-based rates of primary production were measured at six discrete depths (5, 25, 45, 75, 100, and 125 m) throughout the euphotic zone. Seawater samples from each depth were subsampled into triplicate 30-mL polycarbonate centrifuge tubes from a pre-dawn cast, inoculated with 70 µL of NaH14CO3-, then incubated over the full photoperiod (~12-14 hours) on a floating in situ array at the corresponding depths where the water was collected. At the end of the incubation period (after sundown), 25 mL of each sample was vacuum-filtered first onto a 25-mm diameter 3-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane.</p>
Time-series measurements of size fractionated primary production (14C-assimilation) in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean
<p>Filter size-fractionated (>0.2-3 μm) particulate 14C-based rates of primary production were measured at six discrete depths (5, 25, 45, 75, 100, and 125 m) throughout the euphotic zone. Seawater samples from each depth were subsampled into triplicate 30-mL polycarbonate centrifuge tubes from a pre-dawn cast, inoculated with 70 µL of NaH14CO3-, then incubated over the full photoperiod (~12-14 hours) on a floating in situ array at the corresponding depths where the water was collected. At the end of the incubation period (after sundown), 25 mL of each sample was vacuum-filtered first onto a 25-mm diameter 3-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane, then the filtrate was vacuum-filtered onto a 25-mm diameter 0.2-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filter. The rates reported here are for the >0.2-3 μm size fraction.</p>
Time series measurements of 14C-based primary production (>0.2 um) in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean
<p>Over a 3-year period (April 2010-April 2013), we measured primary production from vertical profiles at near-monthly time scales in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Production measurements were based on <sup>14</sup>C-assimilation into >0.2 um plankton biomass. Seawater for the productivity measurements was collected from predawn CTD hydrocasts into acid-cleaned 500-ml polycarbonate bottles. A total of four replicate 500 ml bottles were subsampled per depth and each bottle was spiked with ~1.85 MBq <sup>14</sup>C-bicarbonate. One hundred milliliters from one replicate per depth was immediately vacuum filtered through a polycarbonate filter as a time zero blank. These filters were placed in 20 ml glass scintillation vials and stored at -20oC until shore-based laboratory processing. The remaining three bottles were hung on a free-drifting array, deployed before dawn, and incubated at their initial collection depths throughout the photoperiod (typically 11-13 hours). After sunset the array was recovered, and 100 ml subsamples of all bottles were filtered under gentle vacuum onto 0.2 um polycarbonate filters that were then placed in scintillation vials and frozen. The total radioactivity added to each sample bottle was determined by subsampling 250 µl aliquots into scintillation vials containing 500 µl of β-phenylethylamine. At the shore-based laboratory, filters were acidified, passively vented, and the resulting radioactivity was determined using liquid scintillation counting.</p>
Data from: Effects of sea ice cover on satellite-detected primary production in the Arctic Ocean
The influence of decreasing Arctic sea ice on net primary production (NPP) in the Arctic Ocean has been considered in multiple publications but is not well constrained owing to the potentially large errors in satellite algorithms. In particular, the Arctic Ocean is rich in coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM) that interferes in the detection of chlorophyll a concentration of the standard algorithm, which is the primary input to NPP models. We used the quasi-analytic algorithm (Lee et al. 2002 Appl. Opti. 41, 5755−5772. (doi:10.1364/AO.41.005755)) that separates absorption by phytoplankton from absorption by CDOM and detrital matter. We merged satellite data from multiple satellite sensors and created a 19 year time series (1997–2015) of NPP. During this period, both the estimated annual total and the summer monthly maximum pan-Arctic NPP increased by about 47%. Positive monthly anomalies in NPP are highly correlated with positive anomalies in open water area during the summer months. Following the earlier ice retreat, the start of the high-productivity season has become earlier, e.g. at a mean rate of −3.0 d yr−1 in the northern Barents Sea, and the length of the high-productivity period has increased from 15 days in 1998 to 62 days in 2015. While in some areas, the termination of the productive season has been extended, owing to delayed ice formation, the termination has also become earlier in other areas, likely owing to limited nutrients.
Zonal mean of primary production and carbon export in the Southern Ocean (Huang and Fassbender, 2023, Geophysical Research Letters)
<p>This dataset contains zonal means of primary production, export potential of distinct biogenic carbon pools, particle sinking flux, and particle export efficiency in the Southern Ocean. See more details in the relevant publication of Huang and Fassbender (2023, Geophysical Research Letters).</p> <p> </p>
Augmented Net Primary Production in Arctic Ocean Sustained by Increased Subarctic Inflow Water
<p>Developing an optical classification-based chlorophyll (Chla) retrieval algorithm for the Arctic Ocean by matching in situ and remote sensing data. The statistical relationship between mixed layer depth integrated primary productivity (NPP) and sea surface Chla was also regressed from a large field measurement data set. Through principal component analysis and correlation analysis, NPP environmental driving factors were analyzed. Data sets include remote sensing reflectance data used to invert NPP and environmental drivers of NPP changes.</p>
Comparison of primary production between different models and measurements in the Indian Ocean
<p>This data set contains the various cruises data of Chlorophyll, Primary Production, photic zone integrated chlorophyll and normalized chlorophyll in the Indian Ocean.</p> <p> </p>
Data from: Effects of sea ice cover on satellite-detected primary production in the Arctic Ocean
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Inversion and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Ocean Primary Productivity in Bohai Sea Based on improved DINEOF reconstructed MODIS Data
<p>his section of data is the raw data and experimental results of manuscript "Inversion and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Ocean Primary Productivity in Bohai Sea Based on improved DINEOF reconstructed MODIS Data".</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.