Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
20
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
20 results for “open source development”
OpenFOAM cases of the paper "Development and validation of an open-source CFD model for the efficiency assessment of data centers"
<p>This dataset contains the<em> underling data</em> for the paper "Development and validation of an open-source CFD model for the efficiency assessment of data centers”, submitted for the consideration and open review in Open Research Europe (ORE).</p> <p><strong>Validation1.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of flow and thermal structures in an enclosed environment (Wang and Chen, 2009).</p> <p><em>Wang, Miao; Chen, Qingyan (2009). Assessment of Various Turbulence Models for Transitional Flows in an Enclosed Environment (RP-1271). HVAC&R Research, 15(6), 1099–1119. doi:10.1080/10789669.2009.10390881</em></p> <p><strong>Validation2-kOmegaSSTModel.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of forced convection in a room (Zhang et al. 2007) using k-omega SST turbulence model. </p> <p><em>Zhao Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhiqiang John Zhai & Qingyan Yan Chen (2007) Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature, HVAC&R Research, 13:6, 871-886, DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460</em></p> <p><strong>Validation2-RNGkEpsilonModel.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of forced convection in a room (Zhang et al. 2007) using RNG k-epsilon turbulence model. </p> <p><em>Zhao Zhang, Wei Zhang, Zhiqiang John Zhai & Qingyan Yan Chen (2007) Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature, HVAC&R Research, 13:6, 871-886, DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460</em></p> <p><strong>Validation3.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of strong natural convection in a model fire room (Murakami et al. 1995).</p> <p><em>Murakami, S., S. Kato, and R. Yoshie. 1995. Measurement of turbulence statistics in a model fire room by LDV. ASHRAE Transactions 101(2):287–301.</em></p> <p><strong>Validation4.tar.xz:</strong> OpenFOAM files and scripts for the simulation of thermal distribution in an open-aisle data center (Abdelmaksoud et al. 2013).</p> <p><em>W.A. Abdelmaksoud, T.Q. Dang, H. Ezzat Khalifa, R.R. Schmidt Improved computational fluid dynamics model for open-aisle air-cooled data center simulations J. Electron. Packag., 135 (2013), pp. 030901-30913</em></p> <p><strong>Results_Validation1.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 1.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation2.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 2.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation3.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 3.</p> <p><strong>Results_Validation4.tar.xz:</strong> Simulation results of the Validation case 4.</p> <p><strong>layout.csv:</strong> Input file for the Validation case 4.</p>
C2D2: An Open-Source, Pan-European, Harmonised Crop Development Database for Use in Regulatory Pesticide Exposure Modelling and Risk Assessment.
<p>There is a regulatory need for crop development dates to assess current default values used within chemical exposure assessments as well as to justify refinements within risk assessments. However, a readily available pan-European crop phenology database covering key FOCUS (FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe) crops and scenarios to meet this need is not currently available. Therefore, we describe the development of a harmonised, pan-European, CropLife Europe Crop Development Database, C2D2, that is fully aligned with this regulatory requirement utilising efficacy trials data generated for regulatory submissions when registering plant protection products under Regulation (EU) 1107/2009. Evaluation of C2D2 against an independent dataset showed good agreement for equivalent time periods, crop growth stages and geographical regions. We illustrate how this database can be used to evaluate existing default crop development dates mandated by regulatory agencies for use within exposure assessments. Despite the large dataset compiled and the geographical coverage of C2D2, not all FOCUSsw/gw scenarios have sufficient data to facilitate comparison, with less significant scenarios, like FOCUSgw Porto, being under-represented. For those scenarios with sufficient data, clear differences between C2D2 and crop development dates assumed in the FOCUS modelling framework (using the AppDate tool) are often indicated over some/many growth stages suggesting that amendment of the existing representation of crop development within the risk assessment process may be required. C2D2 is freely available under a Creative Commons licence to facilitate innovation in exposure science to allow for more accurate and realistic risk assessment leading to enhanced crop and environmental protection.</p>
Dataset of Open-Source Software Developers Labeled by their Experience Level and Associated with their Software Metrics
<p>This dataset contains 703 anonymized developers extracted from 17 open-source projects from GitHub. Projects were chosen because they use:</p> <ul> <li>the Java programming language</li> <li>the <a href="https://spring.io/projects/spring-framework">Spring framework</a></li> <li><a href="https://maven.apache.org/">Maven</a> / <a href="https://gradle.org/">Gradle</a> build tools</li> </ul> <p>For all these developers, 23 software metrics were calculated for each project to which they contribute. These metrics are either calculated by analyzing the source code or relative to project management metadata. Each of these developers then have been manually annotated. To do this, developers have been searched for in professionnal social media such as:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/">Linkedin</a></li> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/">Twitter</a></li> <li><a href="https://github.com/">Github</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>This dataset is published in the following journal article: </strong></p> <p><strong>Dataset of Open-Source Software Developers Labeled by their Experience Level in the Project and their Associated Software Metrics, Q. Perez, C. Urtado and </strong><strong>S. Vauttier, Data In Brief, </strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340922010459">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340922010459</a></p>
Open Source Development Services Company - Global Web Seller
<p><a href="http://globalwebseller.com/open-source-customization.html"><strong>Open Source Development</strong></a> - is very demandable from the customer point of view. Open source development consists of various web development technologies and very user-friendly and also the best option for a client with respect to its customization and cost too. So, I would like to introduce a leading and specialized <a href="http://globalwebseller.com/"><strong>Web development company</strong></a> Global Web Seller an ISO 9001:2008 certified for prior web development service for open source. </p> <p>They provide the following open source development services - </p> <p>1. Joomla</p> <p>2. PHP</p> <p>3. Wordpress</p> <p>4. OsCommerce</p> <p>5. Drupal</p> <p>6. Magento</p> <p>7. Laravel</p> <p>8. Java</p> <p>9. Zend Framework etc.</p> <p>So, here you can avail of complete web designing and development with the best pricing option. All their web developers are highly experienced and capable to provide an innovative and custom eCommerce website, matrimonial portal, real estate portal development, a shopping website and a lot more. </p> <p>Get in touch - </p> <p>Contact Information:</p> <p>01204380622, +91-9818460005, +91-9650657773</p> <p>Write email to your query - sales@globalwebseller.com</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Survey on Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects
<p>Results of a survey of 180 GitHub developers and 44 authors of research papers concerning the ethics of performing experiments on open source projects.</p>
An Online Integrated Development Environment for Automated Programming Assessment Systems Open Source Data
<p>This dataset accompanies the paper <em>"An Online Integrated Development Environment for Automated Programming Assessment Systems"</em>. It contains data from the usability evaluation of a feature-rich online IDE designed for integration into Automated Programming Assessment Systems (APASs). The dataset includes survey responses from 27 participants based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), performance metrics such as memory usage, and qualitative user feedback. The study highlights challenges in integrating online IDEs with APASs, such as memory efficiency, load balancing, and user experience. The dataset supports further research in developing scalable, effective, and user-friendly programming education tools.<br><br>Here you can find the code changes required for the online IDE in Artemis: <a href="https://github.com/ls1intum/Artemis/pull/6706/files" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Github</a></p>
Replication Package for ICSE'21 paper - Representation of Developer Expertise in Open Source Software
<p>Replication package for ICSE'21 paper: Representation of Developer Expertise in Open Source Software.</p> <p>See README for details.</p>
Code & Data from: Development of a low cost open-source ultrasonic device for plant height measurements
<p>We here provide code and data for the study "Development of a low cost open-source ultrasonic device for plant height measurements"</p> <p>Code:<br> - Arduino code (management of the electronic circuit): "Arduino_ultrasonic_sensor.ino"<br> - OpenSCAD code (3D-printing): "3DShells_ultrasonic_sensor.scad"<br> - R code (statistical analysis of field test): "Statistical_analysis.R"</p> <p>Data:<br> - "manual_vs_sensor_controlled.csv": this file contains the comparison between the ultrasonic device and the ruler in standardized laboratory conditions. It has three columns: "manual_value", the height value measured manually; "sensor_value", the height value obtained from the ultrasonic device; "height_range", the interval to which the height value belongs (we worked with 25 cm intervals).<br> - "manual_vs_ruler_field.csv": this file contains the comparison between the ultrasonic device and the ruler in field conditions. Plant height measurements were performed on 26 sorghum genotypes. The file has four columns: "Genotype", the id of the measured genotype; "rep" the replicate (3 plants were measured for each genotype); "manual_value", the height value measured manually; "sensor_value", the height value obtained from the ultrasonic device. When using the ruler, the operator spent 15 min and 23 s to complete all measurements in the field, and 3 min and 27 s to enter all data manually in a digital file. When using the sensor, the operator spent 10 min and 52 s to complete all measurements in the field, and manual transcription was not needed since all measurements are instantaneously saved on an SD card.</p> <p>More details on the experimental data can be found in the article "Development of a low cost open-source ultrasonic device for plant height measurements".</p> <p>We also provide a tutorial to explain how to build the ultrasonic-sensor ("tutorial.docx")</p>
Refactoring Test Smells: A Perspective from Open-Source Developers
<p>Presentation video for the <strong>5th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing (SAST)</strong>, during the <strong>11th Brazilian Conference on Software: Practice and Theory (CBSoft 2020)</strong></p>
Underrepresented Groups in Open Source Software Development
<p>This repository contains the artifacts generated when researching minority groups in open source software development, which aimed to analyze knowledge about minority groups in OSS projects. This set of artifacts consists of two main components:</p> <p><strong>Research Protocol (PDF):</strong></p> <p>The protocol in PDF format provides a detailed overview of the research design, methodology, and objectives of the study. It describes the scope of the research, research questions, and data collection approach. This protocol is a fundamental reference for researchers interested in understanding how the study was designed.</p> <p><strong>Search Data (CSV):</strong></p> <p>The CSV file contains the raw data collected during the research. The data includes results returned by each database, articles considered in each phase of the study, and the set of seed articles. The XLSX spreadsheet is a source for analyzing the data used in the research.</p> <p>This repository aims to promote a more transparent understanding of the process that guided this research. Researchers and the open source developer community can utilize this dataset for academic studies, replications, and informed decision-making to promote equity and representation in open source projects.</p>
[Dataset] Expanding the Number of Reviewers in Open-Source Projects by Recommending Appropriate Developers
<p>A rich collection of review and development data, including information about reviewers, developers and their<br> commits within five large ASF projects and four Gerrit communities.</p>
The Evolving Nature of Developers' Contributions in Open Source Projects
<p>Vídeo com a apresentação do artigo The Evolving Nature of Developers’ Contributions in Open Source Projects</p> <p>Autores: Talita Orfanó, Mariza Bigonha, Kecia Ferreira</p>
Supplementary Material for The Impact of COVID-19 on Open Source Development Activities: A Multi-Method Study
<p><strong>Context:</strong> The social isolation measures resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak changed work practices in various sectors, especially with the shift to working from home. However, it is still unclear the implications of the pandemic on the maintenance and evolution of open-source software (OSS). Objective: In this study, we analyze the effects of COVID-19 on the development activity of OSS and how social isolation changed the productivity and emotional state of OSS contributors. <strong>Method:</strong><br>To investigate this issue, we have conducted a multi-method study. We first quantitatively investigated how the COVID-19 outbreak impacted the development activity of open-source projects by mining the development history of 155 open-source projects. We then qualitatively investigated the perceptions of open-source core developers about the impact of COVID-19 on their activities, using a survey as an instrument. <strong>Results:</strong> Our results indicate that the pandemic led to some effect on the development<br>activity of OSS repositories, especially in the early days of the outbreak. For instance although we observe an increase in the number of pull requests accepted, our results also indicate a sudden increase in the turnover rate of core developers. However, a few months after the declaration of the current pandemic, our results suggest stabilization in these metrics. Other effects were more far-reaching, such as a decrease in newcomers throughout the observed period after the pandemic was declared. Some findings are supported by the results of our qualitative study, whose results indicate that most of the respondents of our survey consider that COVID-19 did not change their productivity substantially. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our findings can help practitioners and researchers to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on the software engineering field.</p>
Open source and open hardware: developing tools that are accessible and customisable
<p><strong>The following video describes how ROMI uses open source hardware to support communities through customisation and adaptation. Funded by EU Grant 773875.</strong></p> <p><em>Videos are available in:</em></p> <ul> <li>Hi-res (1080p Apple ProRes)</li> <li>Mid-res (1080p H265)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Video script:</strong></p> <p>(MINCHIN) A key aspect and component of the ROMI project is that it should be open source so there is no proprietary software there's no ownership over the designs in fact it's created to be hacked customised and adapted to any farm.<br> <br> (HANAPPE) One of the aspects of the ROMI project is open hardware and we started from scratch like buying a motor buying a motor-controller programming the motor controller and which is maybe different than many of the projects you might see more industrial projects who might rely more on say high-end standard components from from the industry but i think there's a real advantage in trying to build everything up is that first you understand everything you can explain everything you can fix anything you can you know document anything for you know DIY farmers that they you know if they want to replace one motor with another and understanding that all allows you to quickly experiment stuff without having to depend on someone else who's working with say a closed source component and it allows you to be quite reactive and of course in the end allows you to be fairly cost effective.<br> <br> (BAORI) One of the things we set out to do with this project was to make it accessible and the idea is that at the end of the project everything will be open source so from the frame to the software the designs the cad everything will be open source so if you're a maker if you're somebody who is an engineer and wants to build one of these robots yourself you'll be able to download everything including the software to be able to make it run and because we wanted it to be accessible we started out with one thought that was everything that we put into this rover should also be accessible.<br> <br> (CAMPRODON) So we are trying to bring that philosophy that is embedded within Fab Labs slash (/) maker movement at large the open hardware movement, of how you design for distributed manufacturing. Which means that you take design decisions on the way that you build things which are meant for others replicated in new laboratories using new machines and you do that on top of a network such as a Fab Lab network which is a robust yet heterogeneous.<br> <br> (BARBERAN) It seems like someone tinkered with it. The idea when we design this is to constrain ourselves to do it in a way that anyone else can build it easily. So we try to keep the type and the complexity of the tools we use as small and simple as we can, so we use 3d printers that today are really accessible, we use CNC machines that's maybe the the most complex machine we use but it was it was needed because we need to build something that can stand the weather in a harsh environment in a farm. So we use aluminium and plastic and the rest of the components are mostly commercial components so the the process of designing it is a common go between the computer and the farm and the fab lab we tried here with the cable on the office to hang the first versions of the of the cable bot then we come back to redesign the pieces and then we adjust the sizes of the pulleys and the springs and then we do another model. And so this ability to reiterate so fast is also provided by the simplicity of the tools we use. Using a really simple 3d printer to build a robot is allows you to do in one month several versions and iterations of the same robot.<br> <br> (HANAPPE) In the end our goal is sustainability it's not technology, and what is the best way for whatever we build to have an impact on on say farmers in Europe or wider, and if if what we do is good then we would like them to have access to these tools, and there's some sort of a confidence that then there will be some financing flowing back to us.<br> <br> (MINCHIN) When we open source this knowledge and these tools it allows for an abundance of researchers of practitioners to come together to find the solutions, we don't have to depend on a small development team so the the library of tools that are developed are really a public library for others to to use and to adapt.<br> <br> (BARBERAN) At the end I think the the most important part that we don't even realise because we just do it because we are on the on the inertia of doing it is that we are setting rocks for the future. At the end we are not making right now the the the best robot the best tool what we are doing is setting ground to build on the future the best robot and the best thing built by people not by us because we don't we are not farmers we are not going to design the best robot and we are not a big company with resources as crazy to to make the ultra high-tech thing. But we are able to do something to share with people and a lot of heads think better than a couple of heads you know. The the model that that linux a lot of people in the linux community use is we are dumber than them but we are hundreds of thousands. Hundreds of thousands of heads think better than 10 heads so being able to share that knowledge and to include people in in the development of their own tools i think is the best part on a mid and long term way of seeing this.</p>
Replication package for the paper - "Balanced Knowledge Distribution among Software Development Teams - Observations from Open-Source and Closed-Source Software Development"
<p>Replication package for the paper - "Balanced Knowledge Distribution among Software Development Teams - Observations from Open-Source and Closed-Source Software Development".</p>
Need for Tweet: How Open Source Developers Talk About Their GitHub Work on Twitter
<p>This dataset contains 70,427 cross-linked Twitter-[GHTorrent](http://ghtorrent.org) user pairs identified as likely belonging to the same users. The dataset accompanies our research paper:</p> <p>@inproceedings{fang2020tweet,</p> <p> author = {Fang, Hongbo and Klug, Daniel and Lamba, Hemank and Herbsleb, James and Vasilescu, Bogdan},</p> <p> title = {Need for Tweet: How Open Source Developers Talk About Their GitHub Work on Twitter},</p> <p> booktitle = {International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)},</p> <p> year = {2020},</p> <p> pages = {to appear},</p> <p> publisher = {ACM},</p> <p>}</p> <p> </p> <p>The data <strong>cannot</strong> be used for any purpose other than conducting research. </p> <p>Due to privacy concerns, we only release the user IDs in Twitter and GHTorrent, respectively. We expect that users of this dataset will be able to collect other data using the Twitter API and GHTorrent, as needed. Please see below for an example.</p> <p>To query the Twitter API for a given user_id, you can:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Apply for Twitter developer account <a href="https://developer.twitter.com/en/apply-for-access">here</a>.</p> </li> <li> <p>Create an APP with your Twitter developer account, and create “API key” and “API secret key”.</p> </li> <li> <p>Obtain an access token. Given the previous <API key>:<API secret key>, run: </p> </li> </ul> <p>curl -u "<API key>:<API secret key>" --data "grant_type=client_credentials" "https://api.twitter.com/oauth2/token"</p> <p>The response looks like this: {"token_type":"bearer","access_token":"<...>"} </p> <p>Copy the "access_token".</p> <ul> <li> <p>Given the previous access token, run:</p> </li> </ul> <p>curl --request GET --url "https://api.twitter.com/1.1/users/show.json?user_id=<user_id>" --header "authorization: Bearer <access_token>"</p> <p>The GHTorrent user ids map to the users table in the MySQL version of GHTorrent. To use GHTorrent, please follow instructions on the <a href="https://ghtorrent.org">GHTorrent website</a>.</p>
Supplementary Data and Scripts for the Paper "Synchronous Development in Open-Source Projects: A Higher-Level Perspective"
<p>Anonymized data and scripts used to produce the results of the paper "Synchronous Development in Open-Source Projects: A Higher-Level Perspective".</p>
Development and validation of an open-source, disposable, 3D-printed in vitro environmental exposure system for Transwell® culture inserts
GEO Series GSE161139. Homo sapiens. 10 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.
An Exploratory Study on Developers Opinions about Influence in Open Source Software Ecosystems
<p>Vídeo para Backup do SBES 2020</p>
Dataset from "What do developers talk about open source software licensing? " - SEAA2020
<p>This is the dataset used in the respective research work. The abstract is available below.</p> <p>If you want to cite this work, please use:</p> <p> </p> <p>Georgia M. Kapitsaki, Maria Papoutsoglou, Daniel German and Lefteris Angelis, What do developers talk about open source software licensing?, to appear in the Proceedings of the Euromicro Conference on <a href="https://dsd-seaa2020.um.si/seaa/index.html">Software Engineering and Advanced Applications</a>, SEAA 2020.</p> <p>Free and open source software has gained a lot of momentum in the industry and the research community. Open source<br> licenses determine the rules, under which the open source software can be further used and distributed. Previous works<br> have examined the usage of open source licenses in the framework of specific projects or online social coding platforms, examining developers specific licensing views for specific software. However, the questions practitioners ask about licenses and licensing as captured in Question and Answer websites also constitute an important aspect toward understanding practitioners general licenses and licensing concerns. In this paper, we investigate open source license discussions using data from the Software Engineering, Open Source and Law Stack Exchange sites that contain relevant data. We describe the process used for the data collection and analysis, and discuss the main results. Our results indicate that clarifications about specific licenses and specific license terms are required. The results can be useful for developers, educators and license authors.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.