Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
294
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
294 results for “paradigms”
EEG: Electrophysiological biomarkers of behavioral dimensions from cross-species paradigms
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set of two dual-task paradigms to measure listening effort in cochlear implant users
<p>This data set presents the data from the paper by Hendrikse, Dingemanse, & Goedegebure (2022). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using listening effort to measure relatively small differences in SNR, as would arise from different hearing-device settings. Listening effort was chosen, because there are indications in literature that listening effort may be more sensitive to differences between hearing-device settings than established speech intelligibility measures. Two behavioral listening effort tests were performed at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) where the intelligibility was high. A sentence final word identification and recall test (SWIRT), and a sentence verification test (SVT) were compared with a group of 18 Dutch CI users. SWIRT measured the ability to recall the final words of sentences after a list of five or seven sentences was presented. The SVT measured the ability and reaction time to determine whether a sentence was true or false. Both tests were conducted in background noise at SNRs +4 dB and +8 dB above the 50% speech perception threshold. The structure of the data files is explained in the README file.</p>
Data for "Quantum combinatorial optimization beyond the variational paradigm: simple schedules for hard problems"
<p>Contains instances of combinatorial optimizations problems (Sherrington-Kirkpatrick and MAX 2-SAT) as well as further results and plotting notebooks for the paper "Quantum combinatorial optimization beyond the variational paradigm: simple schedules for hard problems".</p>
Extracting interpretable rules with Bayesian Networks. A case study of intrinsic human hazardous properties of silver nanoforms for the Safety Dimension of Safe and Sustainable by design paradigm.
<p>Three different datasets: toxicological attributes in i) lung and ii) intestinal cell line along with system dependent features and iii) system independent pchem properties) were merged. Each row represents one set of experimental testing conditions and related system dependent nanodescriptors based on the exposure dose and NFs pre-treatment (for intestinal assessments). The system independent inputs are NF specific and independent of experimental conditions. Data is captured via FAIR principles where the reader can find the origin (institution) of each data, the responsible data creators (experimentalists), the raw measurements, the protocols followed and the instrumentations used for each experiment. .</p>
Assesment of the visual stimuli properties in P300 paradigm
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A Counterion-Directed Approach to the Diels-Alder Paradigm: Cascade Synthesis of Tricyclic Fused Cyclopropanes
<p>An approach to the intramolecular Diels–Alder reaction has led to a cascade synthesis of complex carbocycles composed of three fused rings and up to five stereocenters with complete stereocontrol. Computational analysis reveals that the reaction proceeds by a Michael/Michael/cyclopropanation/epimerization cascade in which size and coordination of the counterion is key.</p> <p>This date set contains DFT optimised structures as described in the title paper. </p>
PsPM-BAER: Skin conductance fluctuations in a public speaking paradigm with a repeated-measures design
<p>This dataset contains four skin conductance response (SCR) measurements of 60 s duration from each of 40 healthy male university students (18-35 years) who participated in a public speaking anticipatory anxiety paradigm with a repeated-measures factorial design.</p>
PsPM-NK: Skin conductance fluctuations in a public speaking paradigm with a between-subjects design
<p>This dataset includes four skin conductance response (SCR) measurements of 60 s duration for each of 32 healthy female university students (19-29 years) who participated in a public speaking anticipatory anxiety paradigm with a between-subjects design. Half of the participants were to deliver a public speech, and the other half a speech without an audience.</p>
Classical Tibetan Verbal Paradigms
<p>This is a collection of verb paradigms in Classical Tibetan (Written Tibetan), conforming to the Paralex (https://www.paralex-standard.org) standard. The metadata conforms to the Frictionless (https://frictionlessdata.io/) standard. Datafiles are encoded as csv files.</p>
Bridging the Gap between Autonomous and Predetermined Paradigms: The Role of Sampling in Evaluative Learning
<p>While most evaluative learning paradigms remove participants’ autonomy over the information they receive, other research traditions have demonstrated that information sampling has an important role in learning. We investigate the impact of information sampling on a central evaluative learning paradigm: evaluative conditioning. We compare a traditional evaluative conditioning paradigm with a paradigm in which participants have autonomy over the stimulus pairings they receive. Participants in the high-autonomy condition show a strong preference for positively paired CSs. Nevertheless, the strength of evaluative conditioning effects was independent of autonomy. Moreover, high-autonomy participants, but not their low-autonomy counterparts, demonstrate a relationship between sampling frequency and evaluations, in line with the interpretation that sampled stimuli become more positive, whereas ignored stimuli become more negative over the course of the learning phase. The present research provides a cornerstone for integrating several research traditions within and beyond the evaluative learning literature, providing a foundation for new insights and more comprehensive theories of evaluative learning.</p>
Data for Ecology Letters paper: Jack-of-all-trades paradigm meets long-term data: generalist herbivores are more widespread and locally less abundant.
<p>Data, R-code, and meta-data document for a 2022 paper in Ecology Letters that examines assumptions about associations between local abundance and dietary specialization using an 18-year dataset of caterpillar-plant interactions in Ecuador. </p>
Replication package for "An Exploratory Study on the Predominant Programming Paradigms in Python Code"
<p>This dataset includes scripts and data files used to generate all analysis and results from the paper. A README.md file is included for details on using the scripts - though all of the data the scripts generate should already be cached and none of the scripts actually need run.</p> <p>It also includes a spreadsheet containing the human judgements from Table 4 of the paper.</p> <p>Always current source for the scripts is available on GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/psybers/python-paradigms">https://github.com/psybers/python-paradigms</a></p>
Data used for the article "Global evaluation of the dry gets drier and wet gets wetter paradigm from terrestrial water storage changes perspective".
<p>This is the data used in the HESS paper "Global evaluation of the dry gets drier and wet gets wetter paradigm from terrestrial water storage changes perspective".</p>
The TU Delft Urbanism Integrated Knowledge Paradigm
<p>TU Delft Urbanism Integrated Knowledge Paradigm Model</p> <p>Logics of inquiry are underlying epistemological frameworks or approaches researchers adopt when conducting their studies (Stainton-Rogers, 2006). They represent different perspectives on how we acquire, justify, and evaluate knowledge. This speaks to the importance of <strong>interdisciplinary knowledge</strong> in addressing complex urban challenges.</p> <p>At the Delft University of Technology (and in the Netherlands more broadly), <strong>Urbanism</strong> is an interdisciplinary activity that involves planning and designing sustainable, inclusive urban spaces through the integration of design, social sciences, and physical sciences (Rocco et al., 2009).</p> <p>The<strong> Physical Sciences</strong> (Positivist paradigm) address the environmental and technical aspects of urbanism. They involve the application of principles from disciplines such as geography, ecology, and engineering to understand and manage the physical underpinnings of urban spaces (Rosenberg, 2005).</p> <p>The <strong>Social Sciences</strong> (Constructivist or critical paradigm) entail understanding the human and societal factors that shape urban environments. They include the study of social dynamics, governance, policy-making, and the economic and cultural contexts of urban development (Giddens, 1993). </p> <p>Finally, the <strong>Design</strong> Paradigm (Pragmatic or Creative paradigm) speaks to the creative and practical aspects of urban planning and design that are propositional and future-oriented. It involves the conceptualisation and visualisation of spatial interventions and processes to improve urban environments (Biggs et al., 2009; Biggs & Büchler, 2008; Roggema, 2017).</p> <p>These logics of inquiry reflect diverse philosophical orientations and worldviews, leading researchers to formulate research questions and choose methodologies that align with their chosen approach. For example, let us look at these three different research questions stemming from the canals of Amsterdam:</p> <p>1. ”How can the efficiency of water management in the canals of Amsterdam be improved to better serve the city's flood prevention needs?” (Positivist/ Pragmatic)</p> <p>2. "How does the municipality of Amsterdam organise the governance of its canals, and who are the main stakeholders involved?” (Constructivist)</p> <p>3. “What are competing claims over the canals of Amsterdam in terms of mobility, water management, leisure and identity? How can urban planning and policy address these competing claims?” (Critical)</p> <p>It is obvious that each of the Research Questions stems from a different logic of inquiry and that they consequently require different methods to be answered. This connection between logic of enquiry, research questions and methods employed to answer them is absolutely crucial.</p> <p><strong>Positivism</strong> is the prevalent logic of enquiry in engineering (Romero et al., 2013). It is rooted in the belief that objective knowledge can be obtained through empirical observation and quantitative methods. Research under this logic inquiry aims to identify causal relationships and generalisable patterns in the data. Quantitative methods such as surveys, experiments and statistical analyses are commonly employed to collect and analyse data in a controlled manner (Rosenberg, 2005). The critique of the positivist logic of inquiry centres on its pretence neutrality (Bird, 2018). Positivism generally assumes a single “universal” perspective (male, Eurocentric, patriarchal). The positivist paradigm pretends culture, gender, values, and politics don’t influence real-world issues, hiding biases & conflict under the guise of “neutrality” (Okasha, 2002). Positivism generally doesn’t take alternative ways of knowing into account (feminist/ black/ queer/Indigenous/anti-capitalist/migrant, etc.). As a consequence, it commonly disdains non-expert knowledge.</p> <p>The<strong> Constructivist </strong>logic of inquiry is prevalent in the political sciences, economics, governance studies and, more recently, in the understanding of socio-technical systems that address the interrelationships between actors, institutions and technologies (Giddens, 1993; Okasha, 2002; Shannon-Baker, 2023). In this perspective, knowledge is actively constructed by individuals and influenced by their experiences and interpretations. It resonates with understanding the complex interplay between actors, institutions, spaces, and technologies. From this perspective, research explores how individuals and societies conceive, interact with, and shape real-world issues. This perspective commonly uses qualitative methods, case studies, and narrative analysis. It often emphasises stakeholders' expectations, behaviours, skills, and perspectives (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007). Critics point out that constructivists often pay insufficient attention to causality and may underestimate the power of technology to shape behaviour.</p> <p>The <strong>Critical</strong> logic of inquiry draws heavily from sociology, ethnography, and political economy, as well as from critical theory (Hartimo et al., 2019). This perspective seeks to uncover and challenge prevailing social arrangements, structures, and institutions. This paradigm addresses issues of power, governance, and justice (Giddens, 1993). It utilises qualitative methods, critical discourse analysis, and participatory action research. It prioritises addressing social and spatial inequalities through changes in process, governance, and political action<strong>. </strong>The main critique of this logic of inquiry is that it may remain in the diagnosis phase, often failing to advance solutions (Stainton-Rogers, 2006).</p> <p>The <strong>Pragmatic</strong> logic of inquiry is expressed in design and engineering disciplines (Duram, 2010). It emphasises practical problem-solving and seeks suitable methods for addressing real-world issues. It deals with understanding and managing systems, including their interrelationships and the impacts of human activities. It commonly uses a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods (surveys, modelling, and interdisciplinary approaches integrating natural and social sciences) and makes ample use of case studies. Issues with the pragmatic logic of inquiry involve the common overlooking of culture, governance and values, with little concern for real-world implementation to which a constructivist approach would contribute (Biggs & Buchler, 2008).</p> <p>It is beyond the scope of this exercise to define <strong>Design</strong>, as it involves a wide variety of activities and areas of application (urban design being only one of them) (Biggs & Büchler, 2008; Jong & Duin, 2002; Marchand & Walker, 2009; Oosterhuis, 2009). <strong>Design</strong> can be understood in its broader conceptualisation as not only the physical design of artefacts or spaces but also process design, institutional design, user interface design, service design and more. A common characteristic of all areas of design is being future-oriented, problem-solving, and propositional</p> <p>For the purpose of the discussion here, I will define design as the creative process of conceptualising and creating solutions that address specific needs or challenges based on evidence and research, integrating functionality, aesthetics, and usability within cultural, social, and environmental contexts (Biggs et al., 2009).</p> <p>Design could be said to be creative and pragmatic, often going from problem to solution (sometimes too quickly). However, a "good" design (and there are many conceptions of "good" we could employ) can be said to address all the logics of enquiry mentioned here. "Good" design is technically sound, functional and rooted in data (Positivism). "Good" design is concerned with the material chains necessary for the production of the design and its reuse, recycling, upcycling and the overall ethical and political implications of its production, use, and discharge (Critical). It is also informed by the rich array of human experiences, perspectives and cultures (Constructivist). "Good" design addresses real-world issues and is environmentally sustainable (Pragmatic). "Good" design is innovative, creative, and often aesthetically attractive (Creative). Urban design, for instance, aims to transform urban spaces into more equitable, sustainable, and livable environments (Pragmatic+Critical+Constructivist) (Roggema, 2017).</p> <p>The <strong>Creative</strong> paradigm or logic of inquiry, particularly in the context of design disciplines, propels design forward due to its inherent flexibility and capacity for innovation. It allows for the integration of diverse perspectives, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration that can lead to holistic and innovative solutions to complex challenges. This paradigm encourages thinking outside of the box, enabling the exploration of novel ideas and approaches that are both practical and forward-thinking. It values the synthesis of functionality, aesthetics, and usability, ensuring that solutions are not only effective but also culturally and contextually relevant (Rocco et al., 2009).</p> <p>However, this creative approach is also deeply challenging from a scientific perspective (DeWitt, 2004). Its emphasis on rapid problem-solving and future-oriented solutions can sometimes lead to a superficial understanding of underlying issues, bypassing thorough empirical analysis and theoretical rigour . This rush to solutions may overlook the nuances of cultural, social, and environmental contexts, potentially leading to interventions that are not sustainable or that fail to address root causes. Moreover, the subjective nature of creative processes can introduce biases, making it challenging to ensure replicability and objectivity, which are core tenets of scientific inquiry. Thus, while the creative paradigm fosters innovation and practical application, it must be balanced with rigorous empirical methods and a critical approach to ensure comprehensive and scientifically sound outcomes (Stainton-Rogers, 2006). This is not for nothing; this is the very point of the model proposed here.</p> <p>These challenges are particularly pronounced when these processes are solitary, leading to solutions that reflect a single perspective rather than a collective, plural and comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand (Biggs et al., 2010). Such an approach can result in irrational confidence in the effectiveness of designs, neglecting the complexity and diversity of real-world contexts. To address this shortcoming, designers can integrate rigorous research methods and embrace co-design practices.</p> <p>Co-design, also known as participatory design, involves collaborating with stakeholders, including users, community members, and other relevant parties, throughout the design process (Roggema, 2017). This approach ensures that multiple perspectives are considered, leading to more inclusive and contextually appropriate solutions. By engaging in co-design, designers can mitigate the risk of one-sided solutions, fostering a more democratic and effective design process that values the input and experiences of all participants. This collaborative effort not only enhances the relevance and sustainability of design outcomes but also builds trust and empowerment among stakeholders, making the design process more transparent and accountable.</p> <p><strong>Note</strong>:</p> <p>I owe an awful lot to the <a href="https://www.delftdesignforvalues.nl/"><em>Delft Design for Values Institute</em></a> and the Section of Ethics and Philosophy of Technology in my conceptualisation of "good design". I realise the discussion in this text was very brief, but scholars like Ibo van de Poel, Stefan Koller, and Peter Kroes have thought long and hard about these issues and have produced scholarship that helps us discuss what "good design" is.</p> <p>The issue of the academisation of design practice is ongoing, but advances have been made in the last decades, especially in England, Sweden and other countries where there is an established community of reflective design practitioners. I had the honour to integrate the <strong>Research Into Practice</strong> group at Hertfordshire University in the UK under the leadership of Professor Michael Biggs and Daniela Buchler, where these issues were discussed in depth. Please have a look at the references for some of the scholarship produced.</p> <p>References: </p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Biggs, M., & Buchler, D. (2008). Eight Criteria for practice-based research in the creative and cultural industries. <em>Art, Design and Education in Higher Education</em>,<em> 7</em>(1), 5-18. <a href="https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1386/adch.7.1.5_1">https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.7.1.5_1</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Biggs, M., Buchler, D., & Rocco, R. (2009). Design Practice and Research: Interconnections and the criterion-based approach. European Academy of Design: Design Connexity, Aberdeen.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Biggs, M., Buchler, D., Rocco, R., & Schjerven, C. (2010, 15-17 November 2010). The production of academic research and some barriers to academicisation in the creative and performing arts. ICERI 2010, Madrid.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Biggs, M. A. R., & Büchler, D. (2008). Architectural Practice and Academic Research. <em>Nordic Journal of Architectural Research</em>,<em> 20</em>(1), 83-94. <a href="https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1640258.pdf">https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1640258.pdf</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Bird, A. (2018). <em>Thomas Kuhn</em>. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 10 January 2025 from <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). <em>Designing and conducting mixed methods research</em>. SAGE. <a href="http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0610/2006008436.html">http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0610/2006008436.html</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">DeWitt, R. (2004). <em>Worldviews : an introduction to the history and philosophy of science</em>. Blackwell Pub. <a href="http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip047/2003018208.html">http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip047/2003018208.html</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Duram, L. A. (2010). Pragmatic Study. In <em>Encyclopedia of Research Design</em> (pp. 1073-1075). SAGE. <a href="https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n326">https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n326</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Giddens, A. (1993). <em>New rules of sociological method : a positive critique of interpretative sociologies</em> (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Hartimo, M., Kjosavik, F., & Linnebo, Ø. (2019). Introduction to special issue on ‘critical views of logic’. <em>Inquiry</em>,<em> 65</em>(6), 631-637. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651077">https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651077</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Jong, T. M. d., & Duin, L. v. (2002). Design research. In T. M. D. Jong & D. J. M. Voordt (Eds.), <em>Ways to study and research</em>. DUP Science. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Marchand, A., & Walker, S. (2009). Designing in Design Research: From solving problems to exploring issues. European Academy of Design: Design Connexity, Aberdeen.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Okasha, S. (2002). <em>Philosophy of science : a very short introduction</em>. Oxford University Press. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Oosterhuis, R. (2009). <em>The role of design in planning</em>. TU Delft, Urbanism. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Rocco, R., Biggs, M., & Buchler, D. (2009, 2009). A Pedagogical Proposal in an Area of Epistemological Uncertainty. PROJETAR, Sao Paulo.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Roggema, R. (2017). Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach. <em>Urban Science</em>,<em> 1</em>(2), 1-19. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Romero, P., Rojas, K., & Rojas, C. (2013). Postpositivism, Positivist and Engineering. <em>International Journal of Engineering Research and Development</em>,<em> 9</em>(1), 05-06. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Rosenberg, A. (2005). <em>Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction</em>. Routledge. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Shannon-Baker, P. (2023). Philosophical underpinnings of mixed methods research in education. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), <em>International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition)</em> (pp. 380-389). Elsevier. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11037-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11037-1</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Stainton-Rogers, W. (2006). Logics of Enquiry. In S. Potter (Ed.), <em>Doing Postgraduate Research, Volume 13</em> (pp. 73-91). Sage. </span></p> <p> </p>
Datasets of the paper "Retrieval-Mediated Directed Forgetting in the Item-Method Paradigm: The Effect of Semantic Cues"
<p>Data sets and analyses scripts of the paper "Retrieval-Mediated Directed Forgetting in the Item-Method Paradigm: The Effect of Semantic Cues".</p>
Steady states using PARADIGM for 8 cell lines from CCLE
<p>This dataset has the input data + result dataset (steady states per cell line) that was the product of using the CLSS rbbt workflow (that uses the PARADIGM tool) for 8 cell lines from CCLE. A CASCADE-derived pathway file was used as input for PARADIGM.</p>
Eesthetic: Estonian Paradigms in Phonemic Notation
<p>Eesthetic is a collection of Estonian verbal and nominal paradigms, in phonemic and orthographic notation. They are suited for both computational and manual analysis. The dataset conforms to the Paralex standard</p>
Data from: The comparative biogeography of Philippine geckos challenges predictions from a paradigm of climate-driven vicariant diversification across an island archipelago
A primary goal of biogeography is to understand how large-scale environmental processes, like climate change, affect diversification. One often-invoked but seldom tested process is the so-called ''species-pump'' model, in which repeated bouts of co-speciation is driven by oscillating climate-induced habitat connectivity cycles. For example, over the past three million years, the landscape of the Philippine Islands has repeatedly coalesced and fragmented due to sea-level changes associated with the glacial cycles. This repeated climate-driven vicariance has been proposed as a model of speciation across evolutionary lineages codistributed throughout the islands. This model predicts speciation times that are temporally clustered around the times when interglacial rises in sea level fragmented the islands. Given the significance and conceptual impact the model has shown, surprisingly few tests of this prediction have been provided. We collected comparative genomic data from 16 pairs of insular gecko populations to test the prediction of temporally clustered divergences. Specifically, we analyze these data in a full-likelihood, Bayesian model-choice framework to test for shared divergence times among the pairs. Our results provide support against the species-pump model prediction in favor of an alternative interpretation, namely that each pair of gecko populations diverged independently. These results suggest the repeated bouts of climate-driven landscape fragmentation has not been an important mechanism of speciation for gekkonid lizards on the Philippine Islands. Interpretations of shared mechanisms of diversification historically have been pervasive in biogeography, often advanced on the basis of taxonomy-based depictions of species distributions. Our results call for possible re-evaluation of other, classic co-diversification studies in a variety of geographic systems.
Figure 3 in The origin of mammalian endothermy: a paradigm for the evolution of complex biological structure
Figure 3. The interrelationships of the structures and functions responsible for or affected by endothermic temperature physiology of a mammal.
Figure 2 in The origin of mammalian endothermy: a paradigm for the evolution of complex biological structure
Figure 2. The proposed effect of a small increase in the number of mitochondria per cell on several functions of endothermy.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.