Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

13

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

13 results for “plant propagation”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo36/100

plant propagation method: plant-propagation-method

plant propagation method for all available taxa

opennotspecifiedAug 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

Fig. 2. The effect of MS medium salt concentrations, sucrose and PG on the germination of somatic embryos of L. montana. The results are expressed as the means with SE from five replicates per treatment. The data were recorded after 8 weeks of culture. Means ± SE followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level as determined by Duncan's multiple range test.

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 4 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

Fig. 4. TEM analyses of different developmental stages of somatic embryos of L. montana. Formation of cell with large vacuole (V), mitochondria (M), nucleus (N) and nucleolus (NU) in globular embryos (Bar, 0.5 μm) (A). More vacuolated with cytoplasmic organelles in SM regions of pear-shaped (Bar, 0.5 μm) (B) and early torpedo-shaped (Bar, 0.5 μm) (C) embryos. Development of cytoplasmic components with nucleus (N), nucleolus (NU), Golgi apparatuses (GA), mitochondria (M) and chloroplasts (CP) in SM regions of torpedo (Bar, 0.5 μm and 0.2 μm) (D) and cotyledonary embryos (Bar, 0.5 μm) (E). Large intercellular spaces (IS) and thick cell wall (CW) in connective regions of SM and RM of cotyledonary embryos (Bar, 0.5 μm and 0.2 μm) (F). Development of thick IS and CW with cytoplasmic components of mitochondria, starch grains (SG) and plastids (PS) in RMs of torpedo (Bar, 0.2 μm) (G) and cotyledonary (Bar, 0.5 μm and 0.2 μm) (H) embryos.

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

Fig. 1. In vitro plant regeneration from somatic embryos in cell suspension culture of L. montana: A. Production of FEC on solid MS medium plus 35 g L −1, 10 μM 2,4-D and 2 μM TDZ. B. Formation of white and soft embryo stages in MSL after 3 weeks of culture. C. Different developmental stages of somatic embryos on MSL medium plus 1 μM 2,4-D and 0.5 μM TDZ after 6 weeks of culture. D. Proliferation and germination of embryos on MSL containing 0.5 μM 2,4-D and 1 μM TDZ. E. Germination of SEs on MSL plus 1 μM 2,4-D and 2 μM TDZ. F. Germination of clustered SEs in solid MS medium containing 15 g L −1 sucrose and 10 μM PG. G. Germinated SEs on plant induction medium. H and I. Well-developed plantlets from plant induction medium. J. Acclimatized plants of L. montana in the greenhouse after 3 months.

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
dryad28/100

The origin and genetic variability of vegetatively propagated clones identified from old planted trees and plantations of Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondae in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan

<p class="Keywords"><span><a name="_Hlk10084612">Clonal plantations of <i>Thujopsis dolabrata</i> var. <i>hondae </i>have been established in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan, since at least the 1800s. Historical planting of the species has led to the development of vegetatively propagated local cultivars, which originated from 'donor' trees that have often been conserved in sacred groves or avenues at shrines and temples. These donor trees must have been selected from natural populations. In this study we estimated the origin and genetic variability of clones identified among old planted trees and clonal plantations of<i> T. dolabrata </i>var. <i>hondae</i>, using 19 microsatellite markers. We discovered 12 clones among old planted trees, including five identical to members of a set of 14 we previously identified in plantations (giving 21 clones in total). Based on analyses combining assignment and exclusion tests, we inferred origins of eight of those 21 clones: six may have originated from a natural population distributed in Ishikawa, one from Hokkaido &amp; Aomori, and the other from Iwate &amp; Yamagata, suggesting the clones constituting cultivars have multiple origins. The clones identified in plantations have significantly lower genetic variability, and higher relatedness, indicating that clones of cultivars have a much narrower genetic base than those of natural populations. We suggest new clones selected from natural populations</a> elsewhere, as well as Ishikawa, are needed for future breeding of <i>T. dolabrata</i> var. <i>hondae</i> to develop clonal forestry for this species.</span></p>

opencc-zeroOct 2019View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Using sensitivity analysis to identify key factors for the propagation of a plant epidemic

Identifying the key factors underlying the spread of a disease is an essential but challenging prerequisite to design management strategies. To tackle this issue, we propose an approach based on sensitivity analyses of a spatiotemporal stochastic model simulating the spread of a plant epidemic. This work is motivated by the spread of sharka, caused by Plum pox virus, in a real landscape. We first carried out a broad-range sensitivity analysis, ignoring any prior information on six epidemiological parameters, to assess their intrinsic influence on model behaviour. A second analysis benefited from the available knowledge on sharka epidemiology and was thus restricted to more realistic values. The broad-range analysis revealed that the mean duration of the latent period is the most influential parameter of the model, whereas the sharka-specific analysis uncovered the strong impact of the connectivity of the first infected orchard. In addition to demonstrating the interest of sensitivity analyses for a stochastic model, this study highlights the impact of variation ranges of target parameters on the outcome of a sensitivity analysis. With regard to sharka management, our results suggest that sharka surveillance may benefit from paying closer attention to highly-connected patches whose infection could trigger serious epidemics.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Table 2 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

<p><b>Table 2</b> Enhancement of somatic embryos and germination frequency in cell suspension culture from friable embryogenic callus (FEC) of L. montana.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Sucrose (g L <i>&minus;</i> 1) + PGR (&mu;M) in solid MS medium</th><th>PGR (&mu;M) in liquid MS medium</th><th>Liquid MS medium (MSL)</th><th>Number of SEs/SCV developmental stage</th><th>Germination (%)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>6 weeks of culture</th><td>4 weeks of culture</td><td>2 weeks of culture</td><td>Globular</td><td>Different stages of embryo*</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 picloram + 2 BA</th><td>1 picloram</td><td>MSL</td><td>10.0 e</td><td>6.4 e</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D</td><td>MSL</td><td>14.4 cd</td><td>9.0 cd</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 BA</td><td>MSL</td><td>15.0 cd</td><td>9.8 cd</td><td>7.2 e</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 <i>m</i> TR</td><td>MSL</td><td>7.8 f</td><td>6.0 e</td><td>8.6 de</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 TDZ</td><td>MSL</td><td>18.0 b</td><td>12.4 b</td><td>14.0 ab</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 2,4-D + 2 TDZ</th><td>1 picloram</td><td>MSL</td><td>6.8 fg</td><td>3.0 f</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D</td><td>MSL</td><td>16.0 cd</td><td>6.8 e</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 BA</td><td>MSL</td><td>18.4 b</td><td>10.0 c</td><td>11.4 c</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 <i>m</i> TR</td><td>MSL</td><td>10.2 e</td><td>6.8 e</td><td>14.3 ab</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 0.5 TDZ</td><td>MSL</td><td>21.4 a</td><td>14.6 a</td><td>15.2 a</td></tr></tbody></table><p>PGR = Plant growth regulator. <sub>MSL</sub> = Liquid MS medium.SEs = Somatic embryos.SCV = Settled cell volume.*Different stages of embryo = pear-shaped, early torpedo-shaped, torpedoshaped and cotyledonary-stage embryos. Values with the means derived from 5 replicate (each 500 mg FEC) with 1000 &mu;L SCV of embryogenic suspension cells per replicate. Mean values followed by same letters in each column are not significantly different according to the Duncan's multiple range test at 5% level.</p>

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Table 1 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

<p><b>Table 1</b> Effect of sucrose and growth regulators on friable embryogenic callus (FEC) production for somatic embryo (SE) development with 6 weeks of incubation in cell suspension culture of L. montana.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Sucrose (g L <i>&minus;</i> 1) + PGR (&mu;M) in solid MS medium</th><th>Number of SEs/SCV developmental stage</th><th>Germination (%)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>6 weeks of culture</th><td>Globular</td><td>Different stages of embryo*</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>30 + 10 2,4-D</th><td>4.0 ef</td><td>3.0 gh</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 2,4-D</th><td>6.2 de</td><td>4.6 ef</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>40 + 10 2,4-D</th><td>7.8 cd</td><td>6.4 de</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 2,4-D + 2 BA</th><td>9.4 c</td><td>8.0 c</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 2,4-D + 2 TDZ</th><td>14.8 ab</td><td>9.8 a</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>30 + 10 picloram</th><td>3.6 f</td><td>2.0 h</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 picloram</th><td>7.2 cd</td><td>5.0 ef</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>40 + 10 picloram</th><td>10.4 c</td><td>6.6 de</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 picloram + 2 BA</th><td>16.2 a</td><td>9.2 ab</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 picloram + 2 TDZ</th><td>9.8 c</td><td>7.0 cd</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table><p>FEC = Friable embryogenic callus. PGR = Plant growth regulator.SEs = Somatic embryos. SCV = Settled cell volume. *Different stages of embryo = pear-shaped, early torpedoshaped, torpedo-shaped and cotyledonary-stage embryos. Values with the means derived from 5 replicate (each 500 mg FEC) with 1000 &mu;L SCV of embryogenic suspension cells per replicate. Mean values followed by same letters in each column are not significantly different according to the Duncan's multiple range test at 5% level.</p>

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Using sensitivity analysis to identify key factors for the propagation of a plant epidemic

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2017View details →
dryad28/100

The origin and genetic variability of vegetatively propagated clones identified from old planted trees and plantations of Thujopsis dolabrata var. hondae in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2019View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: An individual-based model of seed and rhizome propagated perennial plant species and sustainable management of Sorghum halepense in soybean production systems in Argentina

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2019View details →
zenodo20/100

Fig. 3 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

Fig. 3. Histological (LS) analyses of different developmental stages of somatic embryos of L. montana. Globular embryo containing meristematic cellular ovate regions (MCO) with smaller to larger isodiametric cells, intense cell division with two celled (TC) and four celled (FC) with vacuolated and intercellular space (IS) (A). The bipolar structure with both shoot (SM) and root (RM) meristems of pear-shaped (B), early torpedo-shaped (C), torpedo-shaped (D) and cotyledonary stage (E) embryos. Epidermis (EP), procambial strands (PS) and vascular tissues (VT) in SM regions of early-torpedo (F) and cotyledonary stage (G) embryos.The torpedo-shaped embryo showing RM with xylem-like pattern and root cap (RC) (H). Cotyledonary stage embryo showing RM with root hair (RH), epidermis, cortex (C) and vascular cylinder (VC) in RM regions (I). Bar (A) 500 μm, (B–E) 500 μm and (F–I) 100 μm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →
zenodo20/100

Table 3 in Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana

<p><b>Table 3</b> Enhancement of somatic embryos (SEs) and germination frequency in cell suspension culture from friable embryogenic callus (FEC) of L. montana.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Sucrose (g L <i>&minus;</i> 1) + PGR (&mu;M) in solid MS medium</th><th>PGR (&mu;M) in liquid MS medium</th><th>Liquid MS medium (MSL)</th><th>Number of SEs/SCV developmental stage</th><th>Germination (%)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>6 weeks of culture</th><td>4 weeks of culture</td><td>2 weeks of culture</td><td>Globular</td><td>Different stages of embryo*</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>35 + 10 2,4-D + 2 TDZ</th><td>0.5 2,4-D + 1 BA</td><td>MSL</td><td>17.6 b</td><td>9.4 c</td><td>23.0 de</td></tr><tr><td>0.5 2,4-D + 1 <i>m</i> TR</td><td>MSL</td><td>13.2 cd</td><td>8.0 cd</td><td>22.6 e</td></tr><tr><td>0.5 2,4-D + 1 TDZ</td><td>MSL</td><td>26.0 a</td><td>19.4 a</td><td>24.2 d</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 1 BA</td><td>MSL</td><td>10.6 e</td><td>7.4 de</td><td>24.4 d</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 1 <i>m</i> TR</td><td>MSL</td><td>9.8 ef</td><td>6.2 e</td><td>23.7 de</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 1 TDZ</td><td>MSL</td><td>15.4 c</td><td>9.6 c</td><td>32.0 b</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 2 BA</td><td>MSL</td><td>7.0 gh</td><td>6.6 e</td><td>22.1 e</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 2 <i>m</i> TR</td><td>MSL</td><td>5.6 h</td><td>7.8 de</td><td>26.9 c</td></tr><tr><td>1 2,4-D + 2 TDZ</td><td>MSL</td><td>9.0 ef</td><td>11.8 b</td><td>34.7 a</td></tr></tbody></table><p>PGR = Plant growth regulator. <sub>MSL</sub> = Liquid MS medium. SEs = Somatic embryos. SCV = Settled cell volume. *Different stages of embryo = pear-shaped, early torpedo-shaped, torpedoshaped and cotyledonary-stage embryos. Values with the means derived from 5 replicate (each 500 mg FEC) with 1000 &mu;L SCV of embryogenic suspension cells per replicate.Mean values followed by same letters in each column are not significantly different according to the Duncan's multiple range test at 5% level.</p>

opennotspecifiedMar 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record