Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
50
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
50 results for “root-knot nematodes”
Figure 7 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 7: Hemp plant dry weights (g) two hemp cultivars (Eletta Campana = fiber, Cherry Blossom x T1 = CBD) exposed to two RKN species, M. enterolobii and M. hapla. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD where P ≤ 0.05. PCBxT1 = Cherry Blossom x T1, PEC = Eletta (Trial 5).
Figure 3 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 3: Hemp plant dry weights (g) with a mixed population of root-knot species and 11 hemp cultivars; all plants were inoculated with 10,000 RKN eggs. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 2).
Figure 2 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 2: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for inoculated (+) and uninoculated (-) plants with a mixed population of root-knot species and six European hemp cultivars. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 1).
Figure 1 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 1: Root galls caused by RKN (M. javanica and M. incognita mixed population) on hemp roots (cv. Carmagnola Selezionata, left) compared to cucumber roots (cv. Dasher II, middle) (Trial 1) and cv. Cherry Blossom x T1 (right; Trial 2) (Photos J. Coburn).
Figure 5 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 5: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for two cannabigerol (CBG) hemp cultivars and a nematicide in naturally RKN-infested soil. P values (P ≤ 0.05) represent significant differences between cultivars by treatment (PG = Gold, PP= Panacea; NA = naturally infested soil, V = Velum, ST = steamed soil.). Velum was applied at 0.48 kg a.i./Ha. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 4).
Figure 6 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 6: Cannabis sativa (cv. Panacea) 60 days after planting in RKN-infested field soil. (Left) naturally infested soil, (middle) nematicide-treated (fluopyram) soil, (right) steamed soil (Photo J. Coburn).
Figure 4 in Host status and susceptibility of Cannabis sativa cultivars to root-knot nematodes
Figure 4: Hemp plant dry weights (g) for RKN inoculated (+) and uninoculated (-) plants with two CBD and two Chinese fiber hemp cultivars. Factor levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different according to Tukey's HSD with P ≤ 0.05 (Trial 3).
Figure 2 in First report of northern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne hapla (Chitwood, 1949) on strawberry in Turkey
Figure 2: PCR product at 440 bp using species-specific SCAR primers (JMV1, JMV2 and JMVhapla). M: 100 bp molecular size marker, 1,2 and 3: larvae from field infected samples. +k: positive control and –k: negative control.
Figure 3 in Characterization of root-knot nematodes infecting mulberry in Southern China
Figure 3: Phylogenetic relationships within root-knot nematodes on mulberry as inferred from Bayesian analysis of the D2-D3 region of the 28S gene sequences. Posterior probability values more than 70% are given on appropriate clades.
Figure 1 in Characterization of root-knot nematodes infecting mulberry in Southern China
Figure 1: Representative morphological characteristics of M. enterolobii. (A, whole female; B, C, female head; D, E, female perineal pattern; F, male entire; G, male head and tail; H, male posture; I, head of G second instar larva; J, middle of second instar larva; K, tail of second instar larva).
Figure 2 in Characterization of root-knot nematodes infecting mulberry in Southern China
Figure 2: Phylogenetic relationships within root-knot nematodes on mulberry as inferred from Bayesian analysis of the rDNA-ITS gene sequences. Posterior probability values more than 70% are given on appropriate clades.
Figure 2 in New Hosts and Records in Portugal for the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne luci
Figure 2: Phylogenetic relationship of MelOidOgyne spp. sequences based on the alignment of sequences of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (A) and cytochrome oxidase subunit II (B) of mitochondrial DNA with available sequences of other MelOidOgyne species. The phylogenetic tree was generated in MEGA7 using the Neighbour-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated MelOidOgyne spp. clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 5% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position. *Recently, reclassified as M. lUCi, according to Stare et al. (2017).
Figure 1 in New Hosts and Records in Portugal for the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne luci
Figure 1: Esterase phenotypes of protein homogenates from five egglaying females of MelOidOgyne species isolates. C – M. lUCi (positive control); 1 – M. ethiOpiCa isolate from Brazil; J3 – M. jaVaniCa (reference isolate); 2 – M. lUCi (COrdyline aUStraliS); 3 – M. lUCi (SOlanUM lyCOperSiCUM) and 4 – M. lUCi (OXaliS COrniCUlata).
Figure. 2 in First Report of the Peach Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne floridensis Infecting Almond on Root-Knot Nematode Resistant´Hansen 536µ and´Brightµs Hybrid 5µ Rootstocks in California, USA
Figure. 2: Meloidogyne floridensis. (A–C) Anterior region of J2s; (D and E) Head region of males; (F–H) Posterior region of J2s; (I and J) Posterior region of males; (K) Lateral field of male; (L–N) Perineal patterns of females. Scale = 10 μm for A–J and 20 μm for L–N.
Figure. 1 in First Report of the Peach Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne floridensis Infecting Almond on Root-Knot Nematode Resistant´Hansen 536µ and´Brightµs Hybrid 5µ Rootstocks in California, USA
Figure. 1: (A) Root galls on 'Hansen 536' rootstock of almond trees (Prunus dulcis) as scion; (B) Almond tree infected tree with Meloidogyne floridensis; (C) Almond tree, healthy.
Figure 2 in Evaluation of root-knot nematode resistance assays for sugarcane accession lines in Australia
Figure 2: Regressions to show the relationship between root biomass and ln(eggs per g roots+1) in eight nematode trials.
Figure 1 in Evaluation of root-knot nematode resistance assays for sugarcane accession lines in Australia
Figure 1: Examples of root-knot nematode gall ratings for sugarcane based on percentage of root system with galls. 1 = ≤1 to 2%, 2 = 2 to 25%, 3 = 25 to 50%, 4 = 51 to 75%, 5 ≥ 75% (modified from Shepherd 1979).
Figure 6 in Identification of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) from greenhouses in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey
Figure 6. Amplification products (502 bp) with SEC 1F/1R primers on Meloidogyne populations from the Middle Black Sea Region. Sa: Samsun populations, Si: Sinop populations, Or: Ordu populations, Am: Amasya populations, C: control population, W: water, M: molecular marker with 100 bp.
Figure 2 in Identification of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) from greenhouses in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey
Figure 2. Perineal pattern variability observed in Meloidogyne ethiopica from a single egg mass population (bar: 10 µm).
Figure 1 in Identification of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) from greenhouses in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey
Figure 1. Perineal patterns of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, and M. javanica from the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey (bar: 10 µm).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.