Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,867
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,867 results for “spatial data”
LAGOS-US GEO v1.0: Data module of lake geospatial ecological context at multiple spatial and temporal scales in the conterminous U.S.
The LAGOS-US GEO data package is one of the core data modules of LAGOS-US, an extensible research-ready platform designed to study the 479,950 lakes and reservoirs larger than or equal to 1 ha in the conterminous US (48 states plus the District of Columbia). The GEO module contains data on the geospatial and temporal ecological setting (e.g., land use, terrain, soils, climate, hydrology, atmospheric deposition, and human influence) quantified at multiple spatial divisions (e.g., equidistant buffers around lakes, watersheds, hydrologic basins, political boundaries, and ecoregions) relevant to the LAGOS-US lake population defined in the LAGOS-US LOCUS module. The database design that supports the LAGOS-US research platform was created based on several important design features: lakes are the fundamental unit of consideration, all lakes in the spatial extent above the minimum size must be represented, and most information is connected to individual lakes. The design is modular, interoperable (the modules can be used with each other), and extensible (future database modules can be developed and used in the LAGOS-US research platform by others). Users are encouraged to use the other two core data modules that are part of the LAGOS-US platform: LOCUS (location, identifiers, and physical characteristics of lakes and their watersheds) and LIMNO (in situ lake physical, chemical, and biological measurements through time) that are each found in their own data packages.
Cascade Project at North Temperate Lakes LTER – High-resolution Spatial Data for Whole Lake Experiments 2018 - 2019
Spatial measurements of water quality from Peter and Paul lakes in 2018 and 2019. In 2019, inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus were added to Peter Lake daily to cause an algal bloom while Paul Lake was an unmanipulated reference lake. In 2018, both lakes were sampled 1 time per week, while in 2019 lakes were sampled three times per week. Measurements were taken using the FLAMe sampling platform (Crawford et al. 2015, Environmental Science and Technology 49:442-450), which was driven in a grid pattern and recorded GPS coordinates and water measurements at 1Hz to create high resolution spatial maps.
Antarctic Ecosystem Inventory: Spatial data for Ice-free lands v1.0
<p>This is Antarctica’s first comprehensive ecosystem map of ice-free lands. The data comprise a spatially explicit 3-tiered hierarchical ecosystem classification with nine Major Environment Types (tier 1), 33 Habitat Complexes (tier 2) and 269 Bioregional Ecosystem Types (tier 3). These Bioregional Ecosystem Types are aligned with ‘level 4’ of the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology (Keith et al. 2022). </p> <p><br>The spatial data are available in raster format (TIF) at 100 m resolution in the Polar Stereographic Projected Coordinate System (GCS_WGS_1984) for all known ice-free areas south from latitude -57.330551 decimal degrees South (pdf map shows extent of ice-free areas in relation to terrestrial ice and ice shelves). A value attribute table (VAT) provides text fields containing codes and full names for each unit in each level of the classification hierarchy and the spatial extent of tier 3 units in hectares.</p> <p><br>Methods of development, source data and uses of the inventory are detailed by Tóth et al. (2025a). Descriptive profiles for tier 1 and 2 units are available in Tóth et al. (2025b).</p> <p><br>References<br>Keith, D.A., Ferrer-Paris, J.R., Nicholson, E., Bishop, M.J., Polidoro, B.A., Ramirez-Llodra, E., Tozer, M.G., Nel, J.L., Nally, R. Mac, Gregr, E.J., Watermeyer, K.E., Essl, F., Faber-Langendoen, D., Franklin, J., Lehmann, C.E.R., Etter, A., Roux, D.J., Stark, J.S., Rowland, J.A., Brummitt, N.A., Fernandez-Arcaya, U.C., Suthers, I.M., Wiser, S.K., Donohue, I., Jackson, L.J., Pennington, R.T., Iliffe, T.M., Gerovasileiou, V., Giller, P., Robson, B.J., Pettorelli, N., Andrade, A., Lindgaard, A., Tahvanainen, T., Terauds, A., Chadwick, M.A., Murray, N.J., Moat, J., Pliscoff, P., Zager, I. & Kingsford, R.T. (2022) A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. Nature 610, 513–518. [doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4].<br>Tóth, A.B., Terauds, A., Chown, S.L., Hughes, K.A., Convey, P., Hodgson, D.A., Cowan, D.A., Gibson, J., Leihy, R.I., Murray, N.J., Robinson, S.A., Shaw, J.D., Stark, J.S., Stevens, M.I., van den Hoff, J., Wasley, J. and Keith D.A. (2025a). A dataset of Antarctic ecosystems in ice-free lands: classification, descriptions, and maps. Scientific Data 12, 133. [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04424-y] <br>Tóth, A.B., Terauds, A., Chown, S.L., Hughes, K.A., Convey, P., Hodgson, D.A., Cowan, D.A., Gibson, J., Leihy, R.I., Murray, N.J., Robinson, S.A., Shaw, J.D., Stark, J.S., Stevens, M.I., van den Hoff, J., Wasley, J. & Keith D.A. (2025b). Antarctic Ecosystem Inventory: Descriptive profiles for ice-free lands v1.0. DOI: 110.5281/zenodo.14625890. Australian Antarctic Data Centre.</p>
MCR LTER: Coral Reef: Spatial portfolios in coral metapopulations are shaped by spatiotemporal asynchrony in environmental conditions; Data for Srednick et al., 2026 Ecology Letters
Using wavelet analyses of a 19-year coral community timeseries from Moorea, French Polynesia, we quantified timescale-specific population synchrony in four common coral genera and evaluated the predictors of spatial portfolio effects. We detected synchrony within genera associated with synchrony in degree heating days, diurnal temperature range (DTR), and macroalgal cover at different timescales. Synchrony in DTR and macroalgal cover was associated with lower synchrony of Pocillopora and Porites populations, respectively. Population (for three of four genera) and environmental synchrony were stronger within than among habitats across timescales, underscoring the role of habitat-specific conditions in driving spatial synchrony and spatial portfolios. These results describe how the spatial and temporal scales of heterogeneity in environmental and ecological conditions determine synchrony in coral population dynamics and support a spatial portfolio effect, which may buffer coral metapopulations from island-scale collapse. Data in support of analyses for: Spatial portfolios in coral metapopulations are shaped by spatiotemporal asynchrony in environmental conditions. Published in Ecology Letters 2026.
2007 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Lakes Assessment dataset plus derived data and additional spatially explicit ancillary environmental data.
Lake water quality is known to be affected by local and regional drivers, including lake physical characteristics, hydrology, landscape position, land cover, land use, geology, and climate. Here, we demonstrate the utility of hypothesis testing within the landscape limnology conceptual framework using a random forest algorithm on large, national-scale, spatially explicit dataset, the United States Environmental Protection Agency 2007 National Lakes Assessment. For 1026 lakes, we tested the relative importance of water quality drivers across spatial scales, the importance of hydrologic connectivity in mediating water quality drivers, and how the importance of both spatial scale and connectivity differ across response variables for five important in-lake water quality metrics (total phosphorus, total nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon, turbidity, and conductivity).
Data from: Spatial and host-related variation in prevalence and population density of wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella) cryptic genotypes in agricultural landscapes
<p><strong>Filename: coord.csv</strong></p> <p>Names of the sampling locations and their geographic coordinates.</p> <ol> <li>Name - sampling locality identifier</li> <li>Lat - latitude</li> <li>Long - longitude</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>Filename: lineages.csv</strong></p> <ol> <li>id.sample - sample identifier</li> <li>host - host species (Arrela=<em>Arrhenantherum elatius</em>, Avesat=<em>Avena sativa</em>, Broine=<em>Bromus inermis</em>, Elyres=<em>Elymus repens</em>, Horvul=<em>Hordeum vulgaris</em>, Seccer=<em>Secale cereale</em>, Triaes=<em>Triticum aestivum</em>, Tririm=<em>Triticale rimpaui</em></li> <li>x, y - geodetic coordinates</li> <li>stems - no. of stems in a sample</li> <li>leaves - no. of leaves in a sample</li> <li>MT.01 to MT.27 - no. of mites belonging to each genetic lineage</li> </ol>
Data files for figures in "Sensitivity of extreme precipitation to climate change inferred using artificial intelligence shows high spatial variability" by Bird et al.
<p>The data files for figures in <i>Sensitivity of extreme precipitation to climate change inferred using artificial intelligence shows high spatial variability</i> by Bird, Bodeker and Clem. The files required to create each figure in the paper and in the supplementary material are described in a readme.txt file which is also provided below:</p><p><strong>Figure 1</strong></p><p>The background image was obtained from the 'NaturalEarthFeature' function of the python Cartopy library (Figure1_background.png). The data required to generate the plots shown in Figure 1 are provided in the Figure1.nc file:</p><ul><li>The latitudes and longitudes for the 10,000 training sites are provided in Training_location_latitudes and Training_location_longitudes variables. </li><li>The latitudes and longitudes for the 8 sites used to demonstrate the ability of the CNN to generalise spatially are provided in the Validation_location_latitudes and Validation_location_longitudes variables. </li><li>The block maxima at each of the 8 sites are provided in the Location_1year_block_maxima variable.</li><li>The GEV fits at 0°C are provided in the GEV_fit_at_0.0C variable.</li><li>The GEV fits at 1.5°C are provided in the GEV_fit_at_1.5C variable.</li></ul><p><strong>Figure 2</strong></p><ul><li>The 1-in-100 year precipitation fields for values of T'Global from 0.0°C to 2.0°C in 0.1°C increments are provided in netCDF files named Figure2_<region>.nc where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</li><li>The ratios of the 1-in-100 year precipitation depths with respect to the long-term (20 years or more) average of the annual maximum 1-day precipitation are provided in text files named Figure2_Precipitation_mean_block_max_<region>.txt where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</li></ul><p><strong>Figure 3</strong></p><ul><li>The cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) shown in the lower four panels are provided as text files listing the ARI in years and the daily total precipitation depth in mm. These files are named CDF_<lat>_<long>.dat where <lat> is the latitude and <long> is the longitude. Files for each region are zipped into .7z files named Figure3_<region>.7z where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</li><li>The latitudes and longitudes for the upper panels can be inferred from the file names for each region.</li></ul><p><strong>Figure 4</strong></p><p>The data for each panel are provided in a netCDF file named Figure4_<region>.nc where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</p><p><strong>Figure 5</strong></p><p>The data are provided as text files named Figure5_<region> where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'. Each file lists the sensitivities at ARIs of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 years.</p><p><strong>Figure 6</strong></p><p>The data are provided as text files named Figure6_<region> where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'. Each file lists the precipitation depths and the sensitivities at ARIs of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 years. </p><p><strong>Figure 7</strong></p><p>The data for each panel are provided in a netCDF file named Figure7_<region>.nc where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</p><p><strong>Figure 8</strong></p><p>The data are provided as text files named Figure8_<region>.txt where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'. Each file lists the global surface temperature anomaly (°C) and the average negative log likelihood.</p><p><strong>Figure S1 and Figure S3</strong></p><p>The data are provided as text files named Figure_S1_and_S3_<region>.txt where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'. A header at the top of each file describes its contents.</p><p><strong>Figure S2</strong></p><ul><li>The 1-in-20 year precipitation fields for values of T'Global from 0.0°C to 2.0°C in 0.1°C increments are provided in netCDF files named FigureS2_<region>.nc where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</li><li>The ratios of the 1-in-20 year precipitation depths with respect to the long-term (20 years or more) average of the annual maximum 1-day precipitation are provided in text files named FigureS2_Precipitation_mean_block_max_<region>.txt where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'.</li></ul><p><strong>Figure S4</strong></p><ul><li>The block maxima for each site are provided in text files named FigureS4_blockmaxima_siteA.txt and FigureS4_blockmaxima_siteB.txt. A header at the top of each column described the column contents. </li><li>The GEV-derived curves for each site are provided in text files named FigureS4_gevcurves_siteA.txt and FigureS4_gevcurves_siteB.txt. A header at the top of each column described the column contents. </li></ul><p><strong>Figure S5</strong></p><p>There are no data associated with this figure. This figure was made using Microsoft Powerpoint.</p><p><strong>Figure S6</strong></p><p>The data are provided as text files named FigureS6_<region>.txt where <region> is either 'north_america', 'australia', 'europe', or 'new_zealand'. A header at the top of each file describes the files contents.</p>
Data: An experimental sound exposure study at sea: No spatial deterrence of free-ranging pelagic fish
<p>Data abstract:</p> <p>All data and scripts to replicate all plots and statistical results of the paper mentioned below. The data are sound recordings and processed echosounder data (raw echosounder data is available on request but > 100 GB in size and require specialized software).</p> <p> </p> <p>Paper reference:</p> <p>Jeroen Hubert<span>, </span>Jozefien M. Demuynck<span>, </span>M. Rafa Remmelzwaal<span>, </span>Carlota Muñiz<span>, </span>Elisabeth Debusschere<span>, </span>Benoit Berges<span>, </span>Hans Slabbekoorn; An experimental sound exposure study at sea: No spatial deterrence of free-ranging pelagic fish. <em>J. Acoust. Soc. Am.</em> 1 February 2024; 155 (2): 1151–1161. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0024720" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0024720</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Paper abstract:</p> <p>Acoustic deterrent devices are used to guide aquatic animals from danger or toward migration paths. At sea, moderate sounds can potentially be used to deter fish to prevent injury or death due to acoustic overexposure. In sound exposure studies, acoustic features can be compared to improve deterrence efficacy. In this study, we played 200–1600 Hz pulse trains from a drifting vessel and investigated changes in pelagic fish abundance and behavior by utilizing echosounders and hydrophones mounted to a transect of bottom-moored frames. We monitored fish presence and tracked individual fish. This revealed no changes in fish abundance or behavior, including swimming speed and direction of individuals, in response to the sound exposure. We did find significant changes in swimming depth of individually tracked fish, but this could not be linked to the sound exposures. Overall, the results clearly show that pelagic fish did not flee from the current sound exposures, and we found no clear changes in behavior due to the sound exposure. We cannot rule out that different sounds at higher levels elicit a deterrence response; however, it may be that pelagic fish are just more likely to respond to sound with (short-lasting) changes in school formation.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Programmable multi-photon quantum interference in a single spatial mode -- Data and code for simulations
<h2>Description of the data and file structure</h2> <p>This Dataset contains data files with experimental results for the manuscript "<strong>Programmable multi-photon quantum interference in a single spatial mode</strong>" (pre-print version at <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11157">https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11157</a>).</p> <p>The CSV files contain the measured output distributions of our time-bin interferometer, for the various experiments we run. In the first column is the number of counts detected and in the following columns the corresponding output modes. The counts were detected by post-processing the time-tags of the recorded single photon events (a detailed explanation can be found in the Supplementary Informations of the paper).The number of counts is reported for all possible combinations of output modes in order to reconstruct the entire output distribution of collisionless events.</p> <p>The text file contains the data points of the time-bin HOM histogram shown in the paper.</p> <p> </p> <h2>Code/Software</h2> <p>We also provide the Jupyter Notebook (LoopExperiment.ipynb) we used to simulate the experiments, developed by Dr. Tobias Guggemos.</p> <p>The Loop-based architecture is a photonic experiment, that allows scalable implementation of Boson Sampling and arbitrary unitaries on a photonic platform. It can be implemented as a single, sequenced or nested architecture.</p> <p>We use the python framework Perceval to simulate our experiments. We simulate the conversion of the time-bin encoded setup as path encoded photonic qubits.</p> <p>More details can be found in the Notebook.</p>
Data for the article "Computational micromagnetics based on normal modes: Bridging the gap between macrospin and full spatial discretization"
<p>Data for the article "Computational micromagnetics based on normal modes: Bridging the gap between macrospin and full spatial discretization".</p> <p>Link to publisher: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304885321009197</p> <p>Link to Arxiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08829</p>
Data for: What's in a game: Video game visual-spatial demand location exhibits a double dissociation with reading speed
<p>The aggregate data in these datasets were used in analyses for "What’s in a game: Video game visual-spatial demand location exhibits a double dissociation with reading speed".</p>
Soil bulk density [10x kg/m3] for continental Europe at 30 m spatial resolution for period 2000-2020: Open Soil Data Cube for Europe
<p>Predictions are based on the 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework, as implemented in the R environment for statistical computing (Hengl & MacMillan, 2019; Hengl, et al., 2021). For each pixel we provide prediction errors as 1 standard deviation in either log or the original variable scale.</p> <p>The short description of currently available soil properties: db_od = bulk density over dry [kg/m3 ⨉ 10];</p> <p>Soil properties were predicted at fixed depths:</p> <p> Surface soil = s0..0cm,<br> Subsoil 1 = s30..30cm,<br> Subsoil 2 = s60..60cm,<br> Subsoil 3 = s100..100cm.</p> <p>To produce estimates for depth intervals e.g. 0–30 cm, 0–100 cm best use the trapezoidal rule formula.</p> <p>Periods: 2000 (2000–2003), 2004 (2004–2007), 2008 (2008–2011), 2012 (2012–2015), 2016 (2016–2019), 2020;</p> <p>The bulk density maps are also provided in 10 kg / m-cubic to reduce total data size; to convert values to kg / m-cubic multiply by 10 e.g. 120 = 1200 kg / m-cubic = 1.2 t / m-cubic.</p>
Soil pH in H2O [-] for continental Europe at 30 m spatial resolution for period 2000-2020: Open Soil Data Cube for Europe
<p>Predictions are based on the 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework, as implemented in the R environment for statistical computing (Hengl & MacMillan, 2019; Hengl, et al., 2021). For each pixel we provide prediction errors as 1 standard deviation in either log or the original variable scale.</p> <p>The short description of currently available soil properties: soil pH in H2O;</p> <p>Soil properties were predicted at fixed depths:</p> <p> Surface soil = s0..0cm,<br> Subsoil 1 = s30..30cm,<br> Subsoil 2 = s60..60cm,<br> Subsoil 3 = s100..100cm.</p> <p>To produce estimates for depth intervals e.g. 0–30 cm, 0–100 cm best use the trapezoidal rule formula.</p> <p>Periods: 2000 (2000–2003), 2004 (2004–2007), 2008 (2008–2011), 2012 (2012–2015), 2016 (2016–2019), 2020;</p>
Soil organic carbon content [g/kg] for continental Europe at 30 m spatial resolution for period 2000-2020: Open Soil Data Cube for Europe
<p>Predictions are based on the 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework, as implemented in the R environment for statistical computing (Hengl & MacMillan, 2019; Hengl, et al., 2021). For each pixel we provide prediction errors as 1 standard deviation in either log or the original variable scale.</p> <p>The short description of currently available soil properties: log organic carbon [g/kg] to back-transform use exp(x/10)-1;</p> <p>Soil properties were predicted at fixed depths:</p> <p> Surface soil = s0..0cm,<br> Subsoil 1 = s30..30cm,<br> Subsoil 2 = s60..60cm,<br> Subsoil 3 = s100..100cm.</p> <p>To produce estimates for depth intervals e.g. 0–30 cm, 0–100 cm best use the trapezoidal rule formula.</p> <p>Periods: 2000 (2000–2003), 2004 (2004–2007), 2008 (2008–2011), 2012 (2012–2015), 2016 (2016–2019), 2020;</p> <p>To back-transform the log.oc maps use formula: exp(x/10)-1. These are examples of back-transformed values:</p> <p> log.oc = 15 → 0.3% SOC;<br> log.oc = 20 → 0.6% SOC;<br> log.oc = 25 → 1.1% SOC;<br> log.oc = 30 → 1.9% SOC;<br> log.oc = 35 → 3.2% SOC;<br> log.oc = 40 → 5.3% SOC;<br> log.oc = 50 → 14.8% SOC;</p>
Soil clay content [%] for continental Europe at 30 m spatial resolution for period 2000-2020: Open Soil Data Cube for Europe
<p>Predictions are based on the 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework, as implemented in the R environment for statistical computing (Hengl & MacMillan, 2019; Hengl, et al., 2021). For each pixel we provide prediction errors as 1 standard deviation in either log or the original variable scale.</p> <p>The short description of currently available soil properties: clay.tot = clay content [percent];</p> <p>Soil properties were predicted at fixed depths:</p> <p> Surface soil = s0..0cm,<br> Subsoil 1 = s30..30cm,<br> Subsoil 2 = s60..60cm,<br> Subsoil 3 = s100..100cm.</p> <p>To produce estimates for depth intervals e.g. 0–30 cm, 0–100 cm best use the trapezoidal rule formula.</p> <p>Periods: 2000 (2000–2003), 2004 (2004–2007), 2008 (2008–2011), 2012 (2012–2015), 2016 (2016–2019), 2020;</p>
Soil sand content [%] for continental Europe at 30 m spatial resolution for period 2000-2020: Open Soil Data Cube for Europe
<p>Predictions are based on the 3D Ensemble Machine Learning framework, as implemented in the R environment for statistical computing (Hengl & MacMillan, 2019; Hengl, et al., 2021). For each pixel we provide prediction errors as 1 standard deviation in either log or the original variable scale.</p> <p>The short description of currently available soil properties: sand.tot = sand content [percent];</p> <p>Soil properties were predicted at fixed depths:</p> <p> Surface soil = s0..0cm,<br> Subsoil 1 = s30..30cm,<br> Subsoil 2 = s60..60cm,<br> Subsoil 3 = s100..100cm.</p> <p>To produce estimates for depth intervals e.g. 0–30 cm, 0–100 cm best use the trapezoidal rule formula.</p> <p>Periods: 2000 (2000–2003), 2004 (2004–2007), 2008 (2008–2011), 2012 (2012–2015), 2016 (2016–2019), 2020;</p>
Selected data(s) from : Femtosecond direct laser writing of silver clusters in phosphate glasses for x-ray spatially-resolved dosimetry
<p>The data selected is based on the figures below, published in the linked article (see the doi).</p> <p><strong>- Figure 1.</strong> Microscopy fluorescence image of ARGOi glass sample (excitation at 365 nm) of laser-inscribed structures for the different writing irradiances at two different depths: (<strong>a</strong>) structures at 150 µm below the glass front surface, (<strong>b</strong>) structures at 550 µm below the glass front surface, and at 150 µm from the glass rear surface. <strong>(Only picture)</strong></p> <p>- <strong>Figure 2.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Transparent color before irradiation (ARGO glass sample), (<strong>b</strong>) yellow color after X-ray irradiation with 222 Gy (ARGO* glass sample). <strong>(Only picture)</strong></p> <p><strong>- </strong> <strong>Figure 3.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Absorption spectra of the ARGO and ARGO* glass sample after various X-ray doses and the difference absorption coefficient spectrum for 222 Gy vs. pristine. (<strong>b</strong>) Fit of the radiation-induced spectrum (difference between 222 Gy and pristine) considering Gaussian energy contributions for ARGO and ARGO*. (<strong>c</strong>) Absorption spectra for the GPN and GPN* glasses for X-ray doses from 5 mGy to 3 kGy [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>d</strong>) The difference absorption coefficient spectra between different doses conditions for GPN and GPN* [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure3_2022-03-03_V01. <strong>Figure 3</strong></li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure3_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>wavelength, effective absorption coefficient (cm-1)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 4.</strong> Micro-luminescence of GPN* glass performed on the optically polished glass side: (<strong>a</strong>) integrated fluorescence intensity at different depths, (<strong>b</strong>) normalized spectrum evolution with depth for the 500 Gy dose [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure4_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 4</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure4_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas</li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 5.</strong> Estimated depth-dependent profiles in absolute values of the linear absorption coefficient at 405 nm. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure5_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 5</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure5_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>sample depth (mm) ; scaled linear absorption coefficient profile at 405 nm (mm-1)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 6.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) X-ray energy spectra simulated by SpekPy for each irradiation facility, normalized by integral. (<strong>b</strong>) Geant4-simulated dose inside each sample, normalized by the surface dose; filled areas show uncertainties at 95% confidence. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure6_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 6</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure6_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>ARGO 100KV_dose ; GPN-20KV_dose ; GPN-32KV_dose</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 7.</strong> Radio-photoluminescence measurement of the GPNi* glass for the inscribed structure [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure7_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 7</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure7_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>wavelength ; relative intensity a.u.</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 8.</strong> Normalized RPL spectra excited at 325 nm: (<strong>a</strong>) for the ARGO (pristine—right axis) and ARGO* (X-ray irradiation at 222 Gy—left axis) glasses collected around 150 µm below the surface, (<strong>b</strong>,<strong>c</strong>) for the highest DLW irradiance structure for ARGOi and ARGOi* in the front- and the rear-inscribed surfaces, respectively. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure8_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 8</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure8_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>inscribed glass...</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 9.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Differential linear absorption coefficient of the laser-inscribed structures (11 TW/cm<sup>2</sup>) for the two planes after irradiation at 222 Gy X-ray dose in the ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>b</strong>) Average differential absorption of the inscribed structures for all DLW irradiance (as from <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#fig_body_display_chemosensors-10-00110-f009">Figure 9</a>a). (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure9_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 9</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure9_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>integrated differential linear absoprtion percentage ; irradiance (TW/cm2)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 10.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Phase image under white light illumination of the laser inscribed structure (11 TW/cm<sup>2</sup>) before irradiation. (<strong>b</strong>) Optical path difference determined from the phase image. (<strong>c</strong>) The refractive index modification Δ<em>n</em> as a function of laser irradiance before/after 222 Gy-dose for the two planes in ARGOi, ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure10_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 10</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure10_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>refractive index modification ; irradiance (TW/cm2), Error bar</strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 11.</strong> Comparison between calculated and measured Δ<em>n</em>ˆ after irradiation for a decrease in the initial value of <em>N</em><em>α</em>3 by 0.48%: (<strong>a</strong>,<strong>c</strong>) the real part Δ<em>n</em> for the front and rear surfaces, respectively; (<strong>b</strong>,<strong>d</strong>) their imaginary counterparts Δ<em>κ</em>, respectively. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure11_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 11</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure11_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>rear surface...</strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 12.</strong> Integrated measure of the amplitude of fluorescence intensity for the different laser irradiance before and after 222 Gy-dose for the two planes in ARGOi and ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure12_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 12</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure12_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>integrated measure of the amplitude of fluorescence intensity ; Irradiance (TW/cm2) ; Error bar </strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 13.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Composite FLIM and fluorescence intensity microscopy images of the laser-induced structure (11 TW/cm<sup>2</sup>) before and after irradiation for an emission at 425 nm from the front surface; the color-code represents the mean lifetime obtained by FAST-FLIM algorithm (color scale from 0 to 31 ns); inset: luminescence intensity only (grey-scale from 0 to 45 counts). (<strong>b</strong>) Same composite FLIM and luminescence intensity images for an emission at 510 nm. (<strong>c</strong>) Luminescence decays in arbitrary units for the emission at 425 nm of the same structure before and after irradiation for the two surfaces, and fitting curves thereof using three exponential decay functions. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure13_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 13</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure13_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>fluorescence intensity (arbitrary units) ; time (ms)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 14.</strong> Dose-dependent evolution of the amplitude ratio of extracted spectral bands for (<strong>a</strong>) the GPNi* glass sample for DLW irradiance of 13.4 TW/cm<sup>2</sup> at 160 µm below the glass surface, (<strong>b</strong>) the ARGOi and ARGOi* glass sample for DLW irradiance of 11 TW/cm<sup>2</sup> at 550 µm below the glass surface (rear surface). (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure14_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 14</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure14_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>ratio of amplitudes of spectral bands ; doses (gy)</strong>.</li> </ol>
Data and script for "On the emergence of ecosystem decay: a critical assessment of patch area effects across spatial scales"
<p>Data and R script necessary to replicate the results of Riva et al. 2024 ("On the emergence of ecosystem decay: a critical assessment of patch area effects across spatial scales"; minor revisions, Biological Conservation).</p>
Data to "Object visibility, not energy expenditure, accounts for spatial biases in human grasp selection"
<p>This record contains experimental and analysis scripts (written in Matlab) as well as raw and processed data to reproduce the results shown in:</p> <p><strong>Maiello, G</strong>.<sup> †</sup>, Paulun, V. C.<sup> †</sup>, Klein, L. K. , & Fleming, R. W. (2018) Object visibility, not energy expenditure, accounts for spatial biases in human grasp selection. <em>i-Perception,10</em>(1), 1–5. doi:10.1177/2041669519827608.</p> <p><sup>†</sup>co-first authors</p>
Data from: Spatial distribution of the potential forest biomass availability in Europe
<p>European forests are considered a crucial resource for supplying biomass to a growing bio-economy in Europe. This study aimed to assess the potential availability of forest biomass from European forests and its spatial distribution. We tried to answer the questions (i) how is the potential forest biomass availability spatially distributed across Europe and (ii) where are hotspots of potential forest biomass availability located?</p> <p>The spatial distribution of woody biomass potentials was assessed for 2020 for stemwood, residues (branches and harvest losses) and stumps for 39 European countries. Using the European Forest Information SCENario (EFISCEN) model and international forest statistics, we estimated the theoretical amount of biomass that could be available based on the current and future development of the forest age-structure, growing stock and increment and forest management regimes. We combined these estimates with a set of environmental (site productivity, soil and water protection and biodiversity protection) and technical (recovery rate, soil bearing capacity) constraints, which reduced the amount of woody biomass that could potentially be available. We mapped the potential biomass availability at the level of administrative units and at the 10 km × 10 km grid level to gain insight into the spatial distribution of the woody biomass potentials.</p> <p>According to our results, the total availability of forest biomass ranges between 357 and 551 Tg dry matter per year. The largest potential supply of woody biomass per unit of land can be found in northern Europe (southern Finland and Sweden, Estonia and Latvia), central Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, and southern Germany), Slovenia, southwest France and Portugal. However, large parts of these potentials are already used to produce materials and energy. The distribution of biomass potentials that are currently unused only partially coincides with regions that currently have high levels of wood production.</p> <p>Our study shows how the forest biomass potentials are spatially distributed across the European continent, thereby providing insight into where policies could focus on an increase of the supply of woody biomass from forests. Future research on potential biomass availability from European forests should also consider to what extent forest owners would be willing to mobilise additional biomass from their forests and at what costs the estimated potentials could be mobilised.</p> <p>This dataset contains the data of the map presented in Figure 2A: Estimated spatial distribution of forest biomass availability according to the BASE potential (ton dry matter ha-1 land yr-1) at the grid (10x10 km) level.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.