Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

118

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

118 results for “spatial prediction”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo52/100

Predicted occurrence probability for ticks in Great Britain (2014 to 2021) at 1 km spatial resolution

<p>The dataset contains predictions of occurrence probability for ticks in Great Britain (2014 to 2021) at 1 km spatial resolution + all covariate layers used for modeling. Over seven million electronic health records (EHRs), among which 11,741 EHRs reported tick attachment, were used to evaluate climate, environmental and animal host factors affecting the risk of tick attachment in cats and dogs in Great Britain (GB). The tick presence/absence EHRs for dogs and cats were further overlaid with spatiotemporal time-series of climatic, vegetation, human influence, hydrological and terrain variables (slope, wetness index) to produce a spatiotemporal regression matrix; an Ensemble Machine Learning framework was used to fine-tune hyperparameters for Random Forest (classif.ranger), Gradient boosting (classif.xgboost) and GLM-net (classif.glmnet) algorithms, which were then used to produce a final ensemble meta-learner that predicts the probability of occurrence of ticks across GB with monthly intervals.</p> <ul> <li>gb1km_covariates.zip contains ALL covariate layers as GeoTIFFs (time-series) used for modeling ticks dynamics;</li> <li>data_1km_2014_M01.rds = contains all covariates for January 2014 prepared as SpatialGridDataFrame (R data object);</li> </ul> <p>Codes of files indicate e.g.:</p> <ul> <li>&quot;monthly.tick.prob_savsnet.mar_p_1km_s_2014_2021&quot; = monthly occurrence probability for January based on the training data from 2014 to 2021;</li> <li>&quot;monthly.tick.prob_savsnet.oct_md_1km_s_20211001_20211031&quot; = monthly prediction (model) error derived as the standard deviation from multiple base learners;</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is described in detail in the following publication:</p> <ul> <li>Arsevska, E., Hengl, T., Singelton, D. et al. (2023?) <strong>Risk factors for tick attachment in companion animals in Great Britain: a spatiotemporal analysis covering 2014&ndash;2021</strong>. Submitted to Parasites &amp; Vectors (in review).</li> </ul> <p>The model summary shows:</p> <pre><code>Call: stats::glm(formula = f, family = "binomial", data = getTaskData(.task, .subset), weights = .weights, model = FALSE) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.4749 -0.0557 -0.0471 -0.0430 3.7611 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(&gt;|z|) (Intercept) -7.64495 0.02095 -364.957 &lt; 2e-16 *** classif.ranger 4.95061 0.63615 7.782 7.13e-15 *** classif.xgboost 189.75543 5.53109 34.307 &lt; 2e-16 *** classif.glmnet 140.24208 5.05375 27.750 &lt; 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1) Null deviance: 170604 on 7303013 degrees of freedom Residual deviance: 162571 on 7303010 degrees of freedom AIC: 162579 Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 9</code></pre> <p><em>Acknowledgements</em>: We are grateful to data providers in veterinary practice (VetSolutions, Teleos, CVS, and other practitioners). We are grateful to the INRAE MIGALE bioinformatics facility (MIGALE, INRAE, 2020. Migale Bioinformatics Facility, doi: <a href="https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/dataverse/migale">10.15454/1.5572390655343293E12</a>) for providing computing resources. We are also grateful for<br> the help and support provided by <a href="https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/savsnet/">SAVSNET team members</a> Bethaney Brant, Susan Bolan and Steven Smyth.<br> This study was funded mainly by a grant from the <strong>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</strong>,<br> BB/NO19547/1 and <strong>British Small Animal Veterinary Association</strong> (BSAVA). The research was partly funded by the National Institute for <strong>Health Research Health Protection Research Unit</strong> (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at the <strong>University of Liverpool</strong> in partnership with <strong>Public Health England</strong> (PHE) and <strong>Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine</strong> (LSTM). This work has been partially funded by the <em>&ldquo;Monitoring outbreak events for disease surveillance in a data science context&quot;</em> (MOOD) project from the European Union&rsquo;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 874850 (<a href="https://mood-h2020.eu/">https://mood-h2020.eu/</a>). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo48/100

Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe

<p>The data in this repository were used to conduct the analysis outlined in the following bioRxiv preprint:</p> <ul> <li>Sarah Hayes, Joe Hilton, Joaquin Mould-Quevedo, Christl Donnelly, Matthew Baylis, Liam Brierley (2025) "Ecology and environment predict spatially stratified risk of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild birds across Europe" <em>bioRxiv</em> doi:10.1101/2024.07.17.603912</li> </ul> <p>The codes used for the analyses are available at https://github.com/sarahhayes/avian_flu_sdm/&nbsp;</p> <p>The following lookup table can be used to cross-reference between the variable descriptions in Tables 1 and 2 of the preprint and the files in this repository:</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <h3>&nbsp;Variable description&nbsp;</h3> </td> <td> <h3>&nbsp;Filename&nbsp;</h3> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Minimum elevation (metres above sea level)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;elevation_min_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Maximum elevation (metres above sea level)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;elevation_max_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Difference between minimum and maximum elevation&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;elevation_diff_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Modal elevation (metres above sea level)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;elevation_mode_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;ndvi_*_quart_2022_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Land cover&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;landcover_output_full_2022_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Distance to coast&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;dist_to_coast_10kres.csv&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Distance to inland water&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;dist_to_water_output_10kres.csv&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Relative humidity&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;mean_relative_humidity_q*_10kres_eco_quarts.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal weighted mean of the month-wise difference in&nbsp;the minimum temperature&nbsp;and maximum temperature (degrees Celsius) &nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;mean_diff_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal weighted mean of&nbsp;monthly mean temperatures (degrees Celsius) (Mean monthly temperature for each month calculated&nbsp;using: Mean temperature =&nbsp;Minimum temperature +&nbsp;diurnal range/2)</td> <td>&nbsp;mean_mean_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal temperature variation (degrees Celsius)<br>(Difference between the maximum and minimum of<br>mean monthly temperature&nbsp;values across months<br>majority-represented within the season)</td> <td>&nbsp;variation_in_quarterly_mean_temp_q*_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Precipitation&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;mean_prec_*_quart_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Seasonal mean of daily zero-degree isotherm (metres<br>above sea level)&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;isotherm_mean_q*_eco_rasts.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Number of days the zerodegree isotherm was below 1 metre at midday at Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;isotherm_midday_days_below1_q*_eco_quarts.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Chicken density&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;chicken_density_2010_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Duck density&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;duck_density_2010_10kres.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;<em>Anatinae</em> (dabbling ducks)&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;anatinae_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;<em>Anserinae</em> (swans and geese)&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;anserinae_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;<em>Ardeidae</em> (herons)&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;ardeidae_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;<em>Arenaria/Calidris</em> (turnstones and sandpipers)&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;arenaria_calidris_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;<em>Aythyini</em> (diving ducks)</td> <td>&nbsp;aythyini_rast_eco_bds.tif</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Laridae (gulls)&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;laridae_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Percentage time spent feeding within 2m of water surface&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;around_surf_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Percentage time spent feeding &gt;2m below water surface&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;below_surf_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Percentage diet plants&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;plant_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Percentage diet scavenging&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;scav_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Percentage diet endothermic vertebrates&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;vend_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Congregative&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;cong_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Migratory&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;migr_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Below threshold phylogenetic distance to known host species&nbsp;&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;host_dist_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;Species richness&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp; species_richness_rast_eco_bds.tif&nbsp;</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
zenodo44/100

Soil organic carbon stocks and trends (1984-2019) predicted at 30m spatial resolution for topsoil in natural areas of South Africa

<p>Link to scientific publication:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145384">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145384</a></p> <p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks (kg C m-2) are predicted over natural areas (excluding water, urban, and cultivated) of South Africa using a machine learning workflow driven by optical satellite data and other ancillary climatic, morphometric and biological covariates. The temporal scope covers 1984-2019. The spatial scope covers 0-30cm topsoil in South Africa natural land area (84% of the country). See methodology in linked publication for details. Data are provided here at 30m spatial resolution in GeoTIFF files. There is a dataset for the long-term average SOC and trend in SOC. Each dataset is split into four files (suffix *_1, *_2 etc.) covering separate regions of South Africa for ease of download. The raster&nbsp;files&nbsp;are:</p> <ul> <li>&quot;SOC_mean_30m...&quot; - average of annual SOC predictions between 1984 and 2019. Values are expressed in&nbsp;kg C m-2</li> <li>&quot;SOC_trend_30m...&quot; - long-term trend in SOC derived from the Sens slope (M) across annual SOC values between 1984 and 2019. Pixel values (Y)&nbsp;are expressed as a percentage change over the 35 years relative to the long-term mean (X). Y = M / X * 100 * 35 years</li> </ul> <p>NB: All files are scaled by *100 and converted to floating data point to save space. To back-convert to original values, simply divide the raster values by 100.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo44/100

Predicted times, spatial coordinates of bow shock crossings and shock geometry at Mars from the NASA/MAVEN mission, using spacecraft ephemerides and magnetic field data, with a predictor-corrector algorithm

<p><strong>CHARACTERISTICS</strong><br>Planet: <strong>Mars</strong><br>Radius: <strong>R<sub>M</sub> = 3389.5 km</strong> (volumetric mean planetary radius)<br>Spacecraft: <strong>NASA/Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN)</strong><br>Spacecraft coordinates system: <strong>Mars Solar Orbital (MSO)</strong> equivalent to <em>Sun-State </em>coordinate system:</p> <ul> <li>+<em>X<sub>MSO</sub></em>&nbsp;points towards the Sun from the planet&rsquo;s centre,</li> <li>+<em>Z<sub>MSO</sub></em>&nbsp;towards Mars&rsquo; North pole and perpendicular to the orbital plane defined as the&nbsp;<em>X<sub>MSO</sub></em>&ndash;<em>Y<sub>MSO</sub></em>&nbsp;plane passing through the centre of Mars,</li> <li><em>Y<sub>MSO</sub></em>&nbsp;completes the orthogonal system.</li> </ul> <p>Time span:&nbsp;<strong>01/11/2014 to 30/04/2024</strong> (Mars Years MY32 to MY36 included, part of MY37).<br>Total number N of candidate bow shock crossings in the database: <strong>N = 20107</strong></p> <p><strong>ORIGINAL DATASETS USED</strong><br>The original MAVEN/MAG data repository on which these algorithms&nbsp;were applied is available on NASA's Planetary Data System (PDS) at&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178">https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178</a>.&nbsp;For this study, 1-Hz magnetic field data was used.</p> <p><strong>METHOD</strong><br>To construct this database from the original datasets above, the&nbsp;predictor and predictor-corrector algorithms used are described in:<br>Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Beth, A., Mazelle, C.,&nbsp;M&ouml;stl, C., Halekas, J., Gruesbeck, J. and Rojas-Castillo, D.,&nbsp;(2022), A Fast Bow Shock Location Predictor-Estimator From 2D&nbsp;and 3D Analytical Models: Application to Mars and the MAVEN&nbsp;mission,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Geophysical Research</em>, <strong>127</strong>, 1-33,&nbsp;e2021JA029942,&nbsp;<a href="https://doi. org/10.1029/2021JA029942">https://doi. org/10.1029/2021JA029942</a>.&nbsp;</p> <p>Also available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507942.1">https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507942.1 </a>&nbsp;and as arXiv e-print:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.04366">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.04366</a></p> <p>These algorithms consist of two consecutive steps:&nbsp;</p> <ol> <li>Predictor geometric algorithm based on J. Gruesbeck's 3D model&nbsp;(<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025366">Gruesbeck et al. 2018</a>) for prediction of Mars bow shock&nbsp;position</li> <li>Corrector algorithm based on magnetic field measurements (magnitude and fluctuations).</li> </ol> <p><strong>REMARK ON VERSIONS</strong><br>From Version 3 onwards, we also provide the angle between the average Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) vector upstream of the shock and the shock normal, noted \(\theta_{Bn}\)(ThetaBn). Assuming a smooth shock surface and&nbsp;the 3D model of Gruesbeck et al. (2018, all points), this gives a&nbsp;first indication of the geometry of the shock, so that:</p> <ul> <li>45<sup>∘</sup>&lt;<em>&theta;</em><sub><em>B</em><em>n</em></sub>&lt;135<sup>∘</sup>: quasi-perpendicular shock condition</li> <li><em>&theta;</em><sub><em>B</em><em>n</em></sub>&le;45<sup>∘</sup> and <em>&theta;</em><sub><em>B</em><em>n</em></sub>&ge;135<sup>∘</sup>: quasi-parallel shock condition</li> </ul> <p>Uncertainty on these angles is estimated to be &plusmn; 5&ordm;.&nbsp;</p> <p>From Version 4 onwards, we also added the solar longitude Ls (in degrees).</p> <p>For details, see Simon Wedlund et al. (2022) above, &sect;2.3 pp. 10-12.&nbsp;Note that due to minor adjustments in the code, some of the&nbsp;ThetaBn angles calculated here for the examples of Fig. 6 in&nbsp;Simon Wedlund et al. (2022) may slightly differ from the values&nbsp;quoted in the paper.</p> <p><strong>VARIABLES DESCRIPTION</strong><br>This database contains the following ASCII variables:</p> <ul> <li>Bow shock times in MAVEN's database (1-s resolution): <em>T</em><sub>bs</sub></li> <li>Mars Solar Orbital coordinates of the shock, in&nbsp;units of Mars radius <em>R</em><sub><em>M</em>&nbsp;</sub>(<em>R<sub>M</sub></em> = 3389.5 km):<br><em>X<sub>MSO</sub></em>,<sub>&nbsp;</sub><em>Y<sub>MSO</sub></em>,&nbsp;<em>Z<sub>MSO</sub></em>&nbsp;and Euclidean&nbsp;distance&nbsp;\(R_{MSO} = \sqrt{X_{MSO}^2 + Y_{MSO}^2 + Z_{MSO}^2}\)&nbsp;(in&nbsp;<em>R<sub>M</sub></em>)</li> <li>Solar Zenith angle in degrees:&nbsp;<em>SZA</em> = \(\tan^{-1}{Y_{MSO}^2+Z_{MSO}^2 \over X_{MSO}^2}\)&nbsp;(in&nbsp;&ordm;)&nbsp;</li> <li>Angle between average B-field direction and&nbsp;shock&nbsp;normal assuming a smooth shock surface \(\theta_{Bn}\) (ThetaBn,&nbsp;in &ordm;) <ul> <li>45 &lt; ThetaBn &lt;&nbsp; 135 deg: quasi-&perp; shock</li> <li>ThetaBn &le;45 deg &amp; ThetaBn &ge; 135 deg: quasi-|| shock</li> </ul> </li> <li>Solar longitude Ls, in degrees.</li> <li>Flag for crossing: <ul> <li>sheath&nbsp;\(\longrightarrow\)&nbsp;solar wind, flag = 0.</li> <li>solar wind \(\longrightarrow\)&nbsp;sheath, flag = 1.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>WARNING</strong><br>This database is based on an automatic statistical&nbsp;geometrical estimate, further refined by constraints on magnetic&nbsp;field. It is aimed at giving a first approximation of the shock area times in the MAVEN data. It is particularly suited to&nbsp;statistical studies and region identification in the MAVEN&nbsp;datasets. As such, this database should be used as a <em>first&nbsp;indicator</em> of the shock location, and <em>with</em> <em>caution</em>: it <strong>CANNOT</strong>, and <strong>WILL NOT&nbsp;</strong>substitute, especially in case studies, for a careful analysis&nbsp;of the full magnetometer and plasma suite bow shock signatures.&nbsp;Moreover, the algorithm is optimised for detecting the first disturbance observed in&nbsp;the magnetic field immediately ahead of the shock's foot (in the foreshock area), and not for the detection of&nbsp;other structures in the shock, such as the shock ramp. The&nbsp;"shock"&nbsp;location is therefore given here with typical uncertainties of about 0.075 R<sub>M</sub>&nbsp;(with R<sub>M</sub>&nbsp;= 3389.5 km, i.e., about 250 km in the radial direction). Finally, for multiple shock crossings, the algorithm chooses the first occurrence of the shock starting from the undisturbed&nbsp;solar wind.</p> <p>Current formatting optimised for MATLAB.</p> <p><strong>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</strong><br>C. Simon Wedlund and M. Volwerk thank the Austrian Science Fund&nbsp;(FWF) project P32035-N36. C. M&ouml;stl thanks the Austrian Science&nbsp;Fund FWF projects P31659-N27, P31521-N27. A. Beth thanks the&nbsp;Swedish National Space Agency (SNSA) and its support with the&nbsp;grant 108/18.&nbsp;This database was notably used to add to the Helio4Cast database&nbsp;which monitors solar wind parameters in the solar system&nbsp;(<a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6356420">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6356420</a>). Helio4Cast is&nbsp;available at <a href="http://www.helioforecast.space/icmecat">www.helioforecast.space/icmeca</a>t and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.helioforecast.space/sircat">www.helioforecast.space/sircat</a>. &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>LICENSE AND RIGHTS</strong><br>This database is shared under a Creative Commons CC-BY-4.0 license.</p> <p>Version 1 (c) Cyril Simon Wedlund @ Space Research Institute of Graz (IWF),&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Austrian Academy of Sciences (&Ouml;AW), 2021-09-08<br>Version 2 (c) CSW @ &Ouml;AW/IWF, 2021-11-30 -- Addition of R_MSO and SZA<br>Version 3 (c) CSW @ &Ouml;AW/IWF, 2022-02-09 -- Addition of ThetaBn<br>Version 4 (c) CSW @ &Ouml;AW/IWF, 2025-03-20 -- Addition of Ls, Bx, By, Bz and Bt.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><br>Contact email: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cyril.simon.wedlund@gmail.com</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →
zenodo44/100

Data for: Crall et al., Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect

<p>Dataset for: Crall et al., Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect, in final revision for Nature Communications.</p> <p>Includes two files - one behavioral data from uniquely identified worker bumblebees, and the second containing metadata for the colonies from which these data were generated (including experimental treatments, locations, sizes, etc.).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →
zenodo44/100

Spatial predictions of the morpho-ecological state of Finnish palsa mires

<p>Spatial predictions of the probability of a good morpho-ecological state are provided for Finnish palsa mires as a TIFF file with a 10 m resolution, using the EUREF FIN TM35FIN coordinate system.</p> <p>These predictions were produced through spatial modeling that combined classified point data on the state of Finnish palsa mires (Ruuhij&auml;rvi et al., 2022) with high-resolution (10 m) environmental datasets. The predictions were computed for the extent of palsa mires (Tammilehto et al., 2024).&nbsp; Modelling was conducted in mgcv package (version 1.9.0; Wood, 2011) in R (version 4.3.2; R Core Team 2023). The predictions were developed during the preparation of the manuscript: <em>"The morpho-ecological state of palsa mires in sub-arctic Fennoscandia: insights from high-resolution spatial modelling"</em> (Leppiniemi et al., 2024, in-review).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Leppiniemi, O., Karjalainen, O., Aalto, J., Yletyinen., E., Luoto, M., &amp; Hjort, J. 2024. The morpho-ecological state of palsa mires in sub-arctic Fennoscandia: insights from high-resolution spatial modelling. (In-review).</p> <p>R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 14 October 2024).</p> <p>Ruuhij&auml;rvi, R., Salminen, P., &amp; Tuominen, S., 2022. Distribution range, morphological types, and state of palsa mires in Finland in the 2010s. <em>Suo</em> 73, 1&ndash;32. (In Finnish with English summary).</p> <p>Tammilehto, A., H&auml;rm&auml;, P., Kallio, M., T&ouml;rm&auml;, M., Saikkonen, A., Tuominen, S., Impi&ouml;, M., Heikkinen, M., Kervinen, M., Jussila, T., B&ouml;ttcher, K., P&auml;&auml;kk&ouml;, E., Kokko, A., M&auml;kel&auml;, K., &amp; Anttila, S., 2024. Yl&auml;-Lapin luonnon kaukokartoitus &ndash; Projektin loppuraportti osa 1 &ndash; Aineistot ja menetelm&auml;t. Vantaa. (In Finnish).</p> <p>Wood, S.N., 2011. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 73, 3&ndash;36. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9868.2010.00749.X</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo44/100

Spatial predictions of suitable environments for palsas and peat plateaus in the Northern Hemisphere for recent and future periods

<p>Here we provide raster files of suitable environments for palsas and peat plateaus in the Northern Hemisphere. These files are results of a scientific study by K&ouml;n&ouml;nen et al. (2022, preprint). Files are provided in TIFF-format, and they describe the occurrence probability of the suitable environments for palsas and peat plateaus.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>K&ouml;n&ouml;nen, O. H., Karjalainen, O., Aalto, J., Luoto, M., and Hjort, J.: Environmental spaces for palsas and peat plateaus are disappearing at a circumpolar scale, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-135, in review, 2022.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Predicting placenta transcriptional regulatory interactions based on spatial gene expression data and convolutional neural network

<p><strong>Aims:</strong> The dysfunction of placenta development is correlated to the defects of pregnancy and fetal growth. The detailed molecular mechanism of placenta development is not identified in human due to the lack of material in vivo. Image-based reconstructions of GRN are still very underdeveloped.</p> <p><strong>Methods and Results:</strong> In this study, first-trimester chorionic villus and decidua tissues were collected. Next, we present a machine-learning system to infer gene interaction networks of the human placenta from immunofluorescence images of trophoblast specific transcription factors obtained by a high-resolution scanner.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The experimental results show that deep learning models reveal regulatory roles that have not yet been fully recognized. The spatial expression data reveal new regulatory relationships that traditional experiments have failed to recognize, and has allowed the development of gene regulation networks based on the spatial distribution of gene expression. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in building networks using high-resolution images of the human placenta. Our analysis is of certain significance for further exploration of the development of the placenta and the occurrence of pregnancy-related diseases in the future. The datasets and analysis provide a useful source for the researchers in the field of the maternal-fetal interface and the establishment of pregnancy.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: A species' response to spatial climatic variation does not predict its response to climate change

<p>The dominant paradigm for assessing ecological responses to climate change assumes that future states of individuals and populations can be predicted by current, species-wide performance variation across spatial climatic gradients. However, if the fates of ecological systems are better predicted by past responses to <em>in situ</em> climatic variation through time, this current analytical paradigm may be severely misleading. Empirically testing whether spatial or temporal climate responses better predict how species respond to climate change has been elusive, largely due to restrictive data requirements. Here we leverage a newly collected network of ponderosa pine tree-ring time series to test whether statistically inferred responses to spatial versus temporal climatic variation better predict how trees have responded to recent climate change. When compared to observed tree growth responses to climate change since 1980, predictions derived from spatial climatic variation were wrong in both magnitude and direction. This was not the case for predictions derived from climatic variation through time, which were able to replicate observed responses well. Future climate scenarios through the end of the 21st century exacerbated these disparities. These results suggest that the currently dominant paradigm of forecasting the ecological impacts of climate change based on spatial climatic variation may be severely misleading over decadal to centennial timescales.</p>

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Four spatial prediction datasets of susceptibility to gully erosion, comparing machine learning models, in the Piraí drainage basin, southeastern Brazil

<p>The data in this repository refer to the article published in the journal Land, entitled: Machine Learning Models for the Spatial Prediction of Gully Erosion Susceptibility in the Pira&iacute; Drainage Basin, Para&iacute;ba do Sul Middle Valley, Southeast Brazil.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Multivariate Spatial Predictions of Air Pollutants with INLA

<p>Spatial predictions and uncertainty quantification for air pollutants: PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&minus;</sup>, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, EC, OC, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2&minus;&nbsp;</sup>, CO, NOx, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>&nbsp;covering the continental US for the period 2005&ndash;2014. The daily prediction is&nbsp;at 12km spatial resolution.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
dryad40/100

Data and code for: Spatial cell type enrichment predicts mouse brain connectivity

<p>A fundamental neuroscience topic is the link between the brain's molecular, cellular and cytoarchitectonic properties and structural connectivity (SC). Recent studies relate inter-regional connectivity to gene expression, but the relationship to regional cell-type distributions remains understudied. Here, we utilize whole-brain mapping of neuronal and non-neuronal subtypes via the Matrix Inversion and Subset Selection (MISS) algorithm to model inter-regional connectivity as a function of regional cell-type composition with machine learning. We deployed random forest algorithms for predicting connectivity from cell type densities, demonstrating surprisingly strong prediction accuracy of cell types in general and particular cells like oligodendrocytes. We found evidence of a strong distance-dependency in the cell-connectivity relationship, with layer-specific excitatory neurons contributing the most for long-range connectivity, while vascular and astroglia are salient for short-range connections. Our results demonstrate a link between cell types and connectivity, providing a roadmap for examining this relationship in other species, including humans.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Soil texture dataset from the publication: "Machine learning applied for Antarctic soil mapping: Spatial prediction of soil texture for Maritime Antarctica and Northern Antarctic Peninsula'

<p>Clay, silt and sand distribution in Antarctic soils&nbsp;modeled and predicted through Machine Learning approaches, legacy soil data and environmental covariates. The coefficient of variation and quantile&nbsp;data represent the spatial uncertainty of the predictions. For more information about the methodology used, users are referred to the article:&nbsp;</p> <p>Siqueira, R.G., Moquedace, C.M., Francelino, M.R., Schaefer, C.E.G.R., Fernandes-Filho, E.I., 2023. Machine learning applied for Antarctic soil mapping: Spatial prediction of soil texture for Maritime Antarctica and Northern Antarctic Peninsula. Geoderma 432, 116405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116405</p> <p>The .zip file has the following folders:</p> <p>1) soil_texture_antarctica: soil texture information containing clay, silt and sand contents</p> <p>2)&nbsp;soil_texture_coefficient_variation: uncertainty from the coefficient of variation of the soil texture prediction</p> <p>3) soil_texture_prediction_interval: uncertainty from the prediction interval 90% (Q95% - Q5%) of the soil texture prediction</p> <p>4) soil_texture_quantile05: quantile 5% of the soil texture prediction</p> <p>5) soil_texture_quantile95: quantile 95% of the soil texture prediction</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Data --- "Optimization of Convolutional Neural Network models for spatially coherent multi-site fire danger predictions"

<p>Data to reproduce the results of the manuscript entitled "Optimization of Convolutional Neural Network models for spatially coherent multi-site fire danger predictions" submitted to Geophysical Research Letters. The companion jupyter notebook can be found in DOI:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387558">10.5281/zenodo.8387558</a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
dryad40/100

Data and code for: Spatial cell type enrichment predicts mouse brain connectivity

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2023View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: A species' response to spatial climatic variation does not predict its response to climate change

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Microbial associations and spatial proximity predict North American moose (Alces alces) gastrointestinal community composition

<ol> <li>Microbial communities are increasingly recognised as crucial for animal health. However, our understanding of how microbial communities are structured across wildlife populations is poor. Mechanisms such as interspecific associations are important in structuring free-living communities, but we still lack an understanding of how important interspecific associations are in structuring gut microbial communities in comparison to other factors such as host characteristics or spatial proximity of hosts.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <ol> <li>Here we ask how gut microbial communities are structured in a population of North American moose (<i>Alces alces</i>). We identify key microbial interspecific associations within the moose gut and quantify how important they are relative to key host characteristics, such as body condition, for predicting microbial community composition.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <ol> <li>We sampled gut microbial communities from 55 moose in a population experiencing decline due to a myriad of factors, including pathogens and malnutrition. We examined microbial community dynamics in this population utilizing novel graphical network models that can explicitly incorporate spatial information.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <ol> <li>We found that interspecific associations were the most important mechanism structuring gut microbial communities in moose and detected both positive and negative associations. Models only accounting for associations between microbes had higher predictive value compared to models including moose sex, evidence of previous pathogen exposure, or body condition. Adding spatial information on moose location further strengthened our model and allowed us to predict microbe occurrences with ~90% accuracy.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <ol> <li>Collectively, our results suggest that microbial interspecific associations coupled with host spatial proximity are vital in shaping gut microbial communities in a large herbivore. In this case, previous pathogen exposure and moose body condition were not as important in predicting gut microbial community composition. The approach applied here can be used to quantify interspecific associations and gain a more nuanced understanding of the spatial and host factors shaping microbial communities in non-model hosts.</li> </ol>

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Abiotic proxies for predictive mapping of near-shore benthic assemblages: implications for marine spatial planning

Marine spatial planning (MSP) should assist managers in guiding human activities towards sustainable practices and in minimizing user-conflicts in our oceans. A necessary first step is to quantify spatial patterns of marine assemblages in order to understand the ecosystem's structure, function, and services. However, the large spatial scale, high economic value, and density of human activities in near-shore habitats often makes quantifying this component of marine ecosystems especially daunting. To address this challenge, we developed an assessment method that employs abiotic proxies to rapidly characterize marine assemblages in near-shore benthic environments with relatively high resolution. We evaluated this assessment method along 300 km of the State of Maine's coastal shelf (&lt; 100m depth)—a zone where high densities of buoyed lobster traps typically preclude extensive surveys by towed sampling gear (i.e., otter trawls). During the summer months of 2010-2013, we implemented a stratified-random survey using a small remotely operated vehicle that allowed us to work around lobster buoys and to quantify all benthic megafauna to species. Stratifying by substrate, depth, and coastal water masses, we found that abiotic variables explained a significant portion of variance (37- 59%) in benthic species composition, diversity, biomass and economic value. Generally, the density, diversity, and biomass of assemblages significantly increased with the substrate complexity (i.e., from sand-mud to ledge). The diversity, biomass and economic value of assemblages also decreased significantly with increasing depth. Lastly demersal fish densities, sessile invertebrate densities, species diversity, and assemblage biomass increased from east to west, while the abundance of mobile invertebrates and economic value decreased, corresponding mainly to the contrasting water-mass characteristics of the Maine Coastal Current system (i.e., summertime current direction, speed, and temperature). Integrating modeled predictions with existing GIS layers for abiotic conditions allowed us to scale up important assemblage attributes to define key foundational ecological principles of MSP and to find priority regions where some bottom-disturbing activities would have minimal impact to benthic assemblages. We conclude that abiotic proxies can be strong forcing functions for the assembly of marine communities and therefore useful tools for spatial extrapolations of marine assemblages in congested (heavily used) near-shore habitats.

opencc-zeroDec 2015View details →
zenodo36/100

The relation between crawling and non-crawling 9-month-old infants' visual prediction abilities in spatial object processing.

<p>The data set Kubicek et al._JECP_DataSet.sav containts the data of the paper from Kubicek, C., Jovanovic, B., &amp; Schwarzer, G. (2017). The relation between crawling and non-crawling 9-month-old infants' visual prediction abilities in spatial object processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 64–76.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →
zenodo36/100

Learning to resist distraction by spatially predictable luminance transients and color singletons: same or different mechanisms?

<p>The file contains the dataset related to the paper entitled "Learning to resist distraction by spatially predictable luminance transients and color singletons: same or different mechanisms?" to appear in Visual Cognition.</p><p>The folder contains a text file named README.txt that contains the explanation of the folder and file structure.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record