Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

22

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

22 results for “striped bass”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi44/100

Counts of tagged striped bass at forty sites throughout Plum Island estuary conducted July-October 2009 using acoustic telemetry.

Manual survey data was collected to measure striped bass distribution in Plum Island Estuary during the time period that they are in New England during their summer foraging migration. Acoustic telemetry was used to tag and track individual fish and provide measures of abundance at sample sites distributed throughout the estuary.

openCustomJan 2020View details →
edi44/100

Daily presence of individual tagged striped bass as measured by stationary receiver detections in Plum Island Estuary in 2009

Stationary receiver data was collected to measure striped bass distribution in Plum Island Estuary during the time period that they are in New England during their summer foraging migration. Acoustic telemetry was used to tag and detect individual fish throughout the estuary.

openCustomJan 2020View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Multiple spawning run behavior and population consequences in migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis

<p>Multiple spawning runs cause different contingents within the same population to experience varying demographic fates that can stabilize populations through the portfolio effect. Multiple spawning runs are reported here for the first time for striped bass, an economically important coastal species, which is well known for plastic estuarine and shelf migration behaviors. Adult Hudson River Estuary striped bass (n=66) were tagged and tracked with acoustic transmitters from two known spawning reaches separated by 90 km. Biotelemetry recaptures for two years demonstrated that each reach was associated with separate spawning runs. Time series of spawning run trajectories were examined via nonparametric dynamic time warping and revealed two dominant time series centroids, each associated with the two spawning reaches. In 2017, the lower reach run occurred earlier than the higher reach run, but difference in timing was not observed in 2018. The majority (84%) of returning adults in 2018 showed the same run behaviors exhibited in 2017. The two spawning run may have been cued differently by temperatures, where warming lagged 1-week at the higher reach in comparison to the lower reach. The two spawning runs exhibited similar Atlantic shelf migration patterns with strong summer fidelity to Massachusetts Bay and winter migrations to the southern US Mid-Atlantic Bight. Still, in 2017, differing times of departure from spawning reaches into nearby shelf waters likely caused the early spawning run to experience substantially higher mortality than the later run. Anecdotal evidence suggests that higher fishing effort is exerted on the early-spawning run as it first enters shelf fisheries. Thus, as in salmon, multiple spawning runs by striped bass can lead to differential demographic outcomes, contributing to overall population dynamics.</p>

opencc-zeroJul 2020View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Multiple spawning run behavior and population consequences in migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2020View details →
edi40/100

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Adult Striped Bass Study, Sacramento-San Joaquin Watershed, California, 1969-2022

The Adult Striped Bass Study was operated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (previous Department of Fish and Game) between 1969 and 2022. The objective of this study was to generate estimates of adult striped bass harvest and abundance for use in managing the striped bass recreational fishery and tracking impacts of water management on the striped bass population. Striped bass and other species were captured using 20' length by 10' diameter fyke traps and 600' length by 21' depth surface-drift style gillnets with stretched mesh measurements of 4", 4.5", 5", and 5.5". The survey typically operated between April and June, with fyke traps deployed in the Sacramento River and gillnets deployed in the lower Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. A portion of adult or legal-sized striped bass were tagged with external 1/2" Petersen-disk tags for use in mark-recapture analyses. All external tags were individually coded, and a subset were assigned a reward value of 2 to 100 US dollars. Due to the targeted nature of this study, non-striped bass species and untagged striped bass were not recorded prior to 1996. In addition, effort data (aside from sampling day/event) are not available prior to 1994. Due to these and other limitations, the publishing authors recommend caution be exercised when attempting to quantify relative trends in abundance (i.e. CPUE) from these data.

openCC (other)Jan 2024View details →
edi40/100

Summary of the commercial and recreational striped bass fisheries conducted in Massachusetts from 1986 to present.

This dataset summarizes the commercial and recreational striped bass fisheries conducted in Massachusetts. Data sources used to characterize the state fisheries come from monitoring programs of the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (Marine Fisheries, the Division) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries), which are considered to be essential elements of the long-term management approach described in Section 3 of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) Fisheries Management Report No. 41 (Amendment #6 to the Interstate Fishery management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass (IFMP)). Fisheries data are compiled from four Massachusetts regions (Cape Cod Canal, Southern Massachusetts, Cape Cod Bay, Northern Massachusetts). Data begins with year 1986 and is updated to present years as data is made available.

openCustomJan 2020View details →
dryad36/100

Comparative migration ecology of striped bass and Atlantic sturgeon in the US Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight flyway

<p>Seasonal migrations are key to the production and persistence of marine fish populations but movements within shelf movement corridors or, "flyways", are poorly known. Atlantic sturgeon and striped bass, two anadromous species of concern, are known for their extensive migrations along the US Middle-Atlantic Bight. Seasonal patterns of habitat selection are well described within spawning rivers, estuaries, and shelf foraging habitats, but information on the location and timing of key coastal migrations is limited. Using a gradient-based array of acoustic telemetry receivers, we compared the seasonal incidence and movement behavior of these species in the near-shelf region of Maryland, USA. Atlantic sturgeon incidence was highest in the spring and fall and tended to be biased toward shallow regions, while striped bass had increased presence during spring and winter months and selected deeper waters. Incidence was transient (mean = ~2 d) for both species with a pattern of increased residency (&gt; 2 d) during autumn and winter, particularly for striped bass, with many individuals exhibiting prolonged presence on the outer shelf during winter. Flyways also differed spatially between northern and southern migrations for both species and were related to temperature: striped bass were more likely to occur in cool conditions while Atlantic sturgeon preferred warmer temperatures. Observed timing and spatial distribution within the Middle-Atlantic flyway were dynamic between years and sensitive to climate variables. As shelf ecosystems come under increasing maritime development, gridded telemetry designs represent a feasible approach to provide impact responses within key marine flyways like those that occur within the US Middle-Atlantic Bight. </p>

opencc-zeroFeb 2020View details →
dryad36/100

Comparing mixed models and Random Forest association tests using naturalGWAS and a Striped Bass SNP dataset

<p>In this study, we used the phenotype simulation package naturalGWAS to test the performance of Zhao's Random Forest method in comparison to an uncorrected Random Forest test, latent factor mixed models (LFMM), genome-wide efficient mixed models (GEMMA), and confounder adjusted linear regression (CATE). We created 400 sets of phenotypes, corresponding to five effect sizes and 2, 5, 15, or 30 causal loci, simulated from two empirical datasets containing SNPs from Striped Bass representing three and 13 populations. All association methods were evaluated for their ability to detect genotype-phenotype associations based on power, false discovery rates, and number of false positives. Genomic inflation was highest for uncorrected Random Forest and LFMM tests and lowest for Gemma and Zhao's Random Forest. All association tests had similar power to detect causal loci, and Zhao's Random Forest had the lowest false discovery rate in all scenarios. To measure the performance of association tests in small datasets with few loci surrounding a causal gene we also ran analyses again after removing causal loci from each dataset. All association tests were only able to find true positives, defined as loci located within 30k bp of a causal locus, in 3%–18% of simulations. In contrast, at least one false positive was found in 17%–44% of simulations. Zhao's Random Forest again identified the fewest false positives of all association tests studied. The ability to test the power of association tests for individual empirical datasets can be an extremely useful first step when designing a GWAS study.</p>

opencc-zeroAug 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Figure 1 in First record of F hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis × Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis ) in Kemer Dam Lake

Figure 1. Map of Kemer Dam Lake in the western part of Turkey.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2014View details →
dryad36/100

Comparative migration ecology of striped bass and Atlantic sturgeon in the US Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight flyway

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2020View details →
dryad36/100

A mesocosm comparison of laboratory‐based and on‐site eDNA solutions for detection and quantification of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in marine ecosystems

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2020View details →
dryad36/100

Comparing mixed models and Random Forest association tests using naturalGWAS and a Striped Bass SNP dataset

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Genomic population structure of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Cape Fear River

<p>Striped Bass, Morone saxatilis (Walbaum, 1792), is an anadromous fish species that supports fisheries throughout North America and is native to the North American Atlantic Coast. Due to long coastal migrations that span multiple jurisdictions, a detailed understanding of population genomics is required to untangle demographic patterns, understand local adaptation, and characterize population movements. This study used 1256 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci to investigate genetic structure of 477 Striped Bass sampled from 15 locations spanning the North American Atlantic coast from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada to the Cape Fear River, United States (US). We found striking differences in neutral divergence among Canadian sites, which were isolated from each other and US populations, compared with US populations that were much less isolated. Our SNP dataset was able to assign 99% of Striped Bass back to six reporting groups, a 39% improvement over previous genetic markers. Using this method, we found (1) evidence of admixture within Saint John River, indicating that migrants from the US and from Shubenacadie River occasionally spawn in the Saint John River; (2) Striped Bass collected in the Mira River, Cape Breton, Canada were found to be of both Miramichi River and US origin ; (3) juveniles in the newly restored Kennebec River population had small and nonsignificant differences from the Hudson River; and (4) tributaries within the Chesapeake Bay showed a mixture of homogeny and small differences among each other. This study introduces new hypotheses about the dynamic zoogeography of Striped Bass at its northern range and has important implications for the local and international management of this species.</p>

opencc-zeroApr 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Hypoxia tolerance is unrelated to swimming metabolism of wild, juvenile striped bass (Morone saxatilis)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Genomic population structure of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Cape Fear River

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Genetic population structure of U.S. Atlantic coastal striped bass (Morone saxatilis)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2013View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2. F in First record of F hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis × Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis ) in Kemer Dam Lake

Figure 2. F hybrid striped bass (M. chrysops ♀ × M. saxatilis ♂ × 2 M. chrysops ♀ × M. saxatilis ♂) specimens.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Differential migration in Chesapeake Bay striped bass

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2019View details →
geo24/100

Analysis of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and white bass (M. chrysops) spleen transcriptome following Streptococcus iniae infection

GEO Series GSE274010. Morone chrysops; Morone saxatilis. 48 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.

openGEO-OpenMar 2025View details →
geo24/100

Ovary transcriptome profiling via application of artificial intelligence predicts egg quality in striped bass

GEO Series GSE42804. Morone saxatilis. 16 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.

openGEO-OpenDec 2012View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record