Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
666
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
666 results for “type locality”
Supplementary Material to "Partial melting of amphibole–clinozoisite eclogite at the pressure maximum (eclogite type locality, Eastern Alps, Austria)"
<p><span>Here we briefly describe the supplementary materials for the publication “Partial melting of amphibole–clinozoisite eclogite at the pressure maximum (eclogite type locality, Eastern Alps, Austria)” in the European Journal of Mineralogy, 35(5), 715-735 Schorn, S., Rogowitz, A., & Hauzenberger, C. A. (2023).</span></p>
Taxonomy, distribution and classification of ecosystem-types, integrating the recent IUCN function-based typology and local conceptualizations
<p>1. Introduction:</p> <p>This dataset is a work in progress. It compiles data gathered on ecosystem-types and their distribution based on a series of field studies led by the author, in Seychelles and West and Central Africa (Senterre 2014, Senterre & Wagner 2014, Senterre 2016, Senterre et al. 2017, 2019, 2020, 2021a, 2022). The aims of this dataset are:</p> <p>a. To share in an explicit and transparent way data on proposed taxonomies of ecosystems, i.e. conceptualizations of ecosystem-types, including explicit ecosystem names and management of synonymies.</p> <p>b. To develop ecosystem red listing based on transparent and falsifiable distribution raw data, combining distribution modeling (maps) and in situ observation of individual stand occurrences.</p> <p>c. To illustrate in detail how to deal with ecosystem data following the approach described in Senterre et al. (2021b) (i.e. "ecosystemology" approach).</p> <p>d. To integrate the above approach with the newly developed function-based typology of ecosystems (Keith et al. 2022), therefore contributing to bridging the persistent gap between the global and the local scales in ecosystem descriptions and classifications.</p> <p> </p> <p>2. Context and versions:</p> <p>This dataset was initially planned for publication on GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), as part of a project developed for the review of Key Biodiversity Areas in Seychelles: "Mainstreaming recent species and ecosystem distribution data into Key Biodiversity Areas assessments in Seychelles" (<a href="https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf">https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf</a>).</p> <p>In the first version of the GBIF dataset (<a href="https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf">https://www.gbif.org/dataset/f513fe98-b1c3-45ee-8e14-7f2a5b7890bf</a>), we proposed an analysis of the potential 'core' and 'extension' files available in GBIF for a publication of ecosystem-type names (and synonymies) and their corresponding occurrences recorded from field observations. This is an original analysis of taxonomic principles managed entirely at the scale of local observable objects, and their history of identifications or interpretations.</p> <p>Toward the end of the above-mentioned GBIF project, considering the limitations and gaps currently present in GBIF, it was decided to restrict the GBIF dataset to a simple 'metadata' entry and to publish the complete version of this dataset in Zenodo. This allows to include all tables needed, as well as all required fields without having to accommodate them within the limited GBIF structure (see metadata description on GBIF for more details). The fields of the tables published here are described in the GBIF metadata entry and in the ecosystemology paper (Senterre et al. 2021b).</p> <p> </p> <p>3. New development on typology aspects:</p> <p>In addition, considering that the new IUCN global typology of ecosystems is now published (Keith et al. 2022), we have reviewed in detail the possibility of integration of ecosystems conceptualized using our ecosystemology approach within the new IUCN typology. The result of this analysis is being considered for a publication, and this Zenodo dataset would then be published in full (i.e. including all typology aspects) as supplementary materials. In the meantime, I would be happy to discuss any of these aspects with whoever is interested.</p> <p> </p> <p>4. Access to ecosystem data for conservation actors:</p> <p>Finally, the actual data (published here) on ecosystem-types, their names, synonymies, classification, distribution, and red list status are compiled into a format that we designed to be useful to conservation actors in the form of interactive webpages (produced with R as shiny apps). This development is based on very limited resources, and the author is still quite new to R, so any help or feedback on ways to improve the scripts would be very much welcomed.</p> <p>The interactive page is available here (currently filtered to Seychelles' data only, although the dataset contains data beyond the Seychelles): https://shiny.bio.gov.sc/bioeco/</p> <p>The R scripts are available on Github: https://github.com/bsenterre/ecosystemology</p> <p> </p> <p>5. Tables contained in this dataset:</p> <p>a. Ecosystem taxonomy tables:</p> <p>ecoSpecies: Contains the list of all ecosystem-type names with their unique identifier.</p> <p>ecoOccurrences: Contains the list of individual stand occurrences, including ecosystem characters as standardized in Senterre et al. (2021b; i.e. virtual ecosystem specimen).</p> <p>ecoSpeciesProfiles: Contains basic metadata on ecosystem-types, such as their Red List evaluations.</p> <p>ecoIdentifications: Contains all the different interpretations/identifications (referring to the table ecoSpecies or to higher levels of classification, see below) made on the stands observed in the ecoOccurrences table.</p> <p> </p> <p>b. Ecosystem typology tables (TO BE ADDED LATER):</p> <p>IUCNL3: This is just a transcription, as is, of the IUCN global typology version 2.1.</p> <p>IUCNL3BIOCrossover: This table defines and comments correspondences between BIOL2 (the level 2 of the typology used by us) and the IUCN typology L3 (level 3).</p> <p>BIOL2: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 2.</p> <p>BIOL3: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 3.</p> <p>BIOL4: This is a variation based on the IUCN typology, here our level 4.</p> <p>ecoGenus: This is a general type of stand (thus excluding any regional ecosystem connotation), defined at a local scale and never combined with any geographic connotation (see ecosystemology paper: Senterre et al. 2021b).</p> <p>ecoFamily: This is a generalized version of the ecoGenus (i.e. still excluding any regional, sub-regional or geographic aspect).</p> <p>ecoOrder: This is a further generalized version of the ecoGenus (see also Senterre et al. 2020).</p> <p>lifeZone: This is a basic and incomplete list of life zones as defined following the Holdridge (1967) approach, with some additional elements proposed in Senterre et al. (2021b).</p> <p> </p> <p>6. Literature cited:</p> <p>Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.</p> <p>Keith, D. A., J. R. Ferrer-Paris, E. Nicholson, M. J. Bishop, B. A. Polidoro, E. Ramirez-Llodra, M. G. Tozer, J. L. Nel, R. Mac Nally, E. J. Gregr, K. E. Watermeyer, F. Essl, D. Faber-Langendoen, J. Franklin, C. E. R. Lehmann, A. Etter, D. J. Roux, J. S. Stark, J. A. Rowland, N. A. Brummitt, U. C. Fernandez-Arcaya, I. M. Suthers, S. K. Wiser, I. Donohue, L. J. Jackson, R. T. Pennington, T. M. Iliffe, V. Gerovasileiou, P. Giller, B. J. Robson, N. Pettorelli, A. Andrade, A. Lindgaard, T. Tahvanainen, A. Terauds, M. A. Chadwick, N. J. Murray, J. Moat, P. Pliscoff, I. Zager, and R. T. Kingsford. 2022. A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. . Nature 610:513–518. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4.</p> <p>Senterre, B. 2014. Mapping habitat-types within the Hummingbird site at Dugbe (Liberia, West Africa). Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden. P. 56. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32628.48003.</p> <p>Senterre, B. 2016. Habitat-type ground-truthing and assessment of ecosystem conservation value in the Bel Air Alufer mining site (Guinea, West Africa), with recommendations for improving the draft map of land cover types. Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden, A study conducted for Alufer Mining Limited. P. 54.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, and T. Stévart. 2019. Identification et évaluation des écosystèmes menacés du Mont Nimba. Rapport de consultance, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13242.93129.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, T. Stévart, and P. P. Lowry II. 2020. Assessment of Key Biodiversity Areas in the Lofa-Gola-Mano & Nimba complexes (West Africa) using ecosystem criteria. Final Report, Missouri Botanical Garden. P. 146. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17934.89924.</p> <p>Senterre, B., E. Bidault, T. Stévart, M. Wagner, and P. Lowry. 2017. Mapping habitat-types in south-east Kouilou (Republic of Congo). Consultancy Report, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. P. 163.</p> <p>Senterre, B., R. M. Bristol, G. Gendron, and E. Henriette. 2021a. Fine-tuning conservation priorities in Seychelles at the landscape scale, using global KBA guidelines with both species and ecosystem criteria. Consultancy Report, United Nations Development Programme, GOS/UNDP/GEF Programme Coordination Unit, Victoria, Seychelles.</p> <p>Senterre, B., P. P. Lowry II, E. Bidault, and T. Stévart. 2021b. Ecosystemology: a new approach toward a taxonomy of ecosystems. . Ecological Complexity 47:100945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100945.</p> <p>Senterre, B., A.-H. Paradis, E. Bidault, T. Stévart, and P. P. Lowry II. 2022. Qualité et distribution des savanes montagnardes du Nimba. Rapport de consultance, Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG), Africa and Madagascar Department. P. 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13433.34401.</p> <p>Senterre, B., and M. Wagner. 2014. Mapping Seychelles habitat-types on Mahé, Praslin, Silhouette, La Digue and Curieuse. Consultancy Report, Government of Seychelles, United Nations Development Programme, Victoria, Seychelles. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4558.6009.</p>
Figs 17–18. Type localities with Malaise traps. 17 in Description of three new species of Caledomina (Insecta, Trichoptera, Ecnomidae) from New Caledonia
Figs 17–18. Type localities with Malaise traps. 17. Type locality of Caledomina dorsospina sp. nov. 18. Type locality of Caledomina kohensis sp. nov.
Figure 5 in The type specimens and type localities of the orangutans, genus Pongo Lacépède, 1799 (Primates: Hominidae)
Figure 5. The nomenclature and geographic distribution of the subspecies of Pongo pygmaeus, (A) following Groves (2001), and (B) as revised in this paper
Figure 1 in Bombus rubriventris: type locality, different histories of bumblebees in the New World, and a likely invertebrate extinction
Figure 1. Dorsal aspect of the holotype female of Bombus rubriventris showing the 'St. Domingue.' label (photo: NHM photo unit). Scale divisions in mm.
FIGURES 27 – 29. Type localities. 27 in Three new species of Inseliellum (Diptera: Simuliidae) from Polynesia
FIGURES 27 – 29. Type localities. 27. Simulium adelaideae. Above Lac Vaihiria on crossTahiti road. Larva collected in denselyshaded portion of stream in background. 28. S. sublonckei. Second cascade on road to Maroto River barrage, Vaitamanu Valley, Papenoo River catchment. 29. S. englundi. Unnamed stream, Mohotani Island, Hiva Oa, Marquesas Islands. Photograph courtesy of R. Englund.
Fig. 6. A in On the date of original description and the type locality of Zygaena ampellophaga (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae: Procridinae)
Fig. 6. A page of the original description (Bayle-Barelle, 1809a) with the type locality of Zygaena ampellophaga Bayle-Barelle, 1809.
Fig. 4. A in On the date of original description and the type locality of Zygaena ampellophaga (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae: Procridinae)
Fig. 4. A cover of the journal with the original description (Bayle-Barelle, 1809a) of Zygaena ampellophaga Bayle-Barelle, 1809.
Fig. 1 in On the date of original description and the type locality of Zygaena ampellophaga (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae: Procridinae)
Fig. 1. Theresimima ampellophaga (Bayle-Barelle, 1809). a, male from Crimea, Miskhor, reared from ovo, 1998, K.A. Efetov leg. (photo by K.A. Efetov);b, female from Crimea, Alushta, Luchistoe (44°43′31.44″N, 034°25′31.62″E, 358 m a.s.l.), reared from larva, 23.V.2022, O.G. Gorbunov leg. (photo by O.G. Gorbunov).
Fig. 5 in On the date of original description and the type locality of Zygaena ampellophaga (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae: Procridinae)
Fig. 5. The first page of the original description (Bayle-Barelle, 1809a) of Zygaena ampellophaga Bayle-Barelle, 1809.
Data from: Landscape diversity and local temperature, but not climate, affect arthropod predation among habitat types
<p>Arthropod predators are relevant for top-down regulation of insect herbivores. Biotic and abiotic factors influence predator communities and their activity with consequences for the strength of top-down regulation ('arthropod predation'). Anthropogenic climate and land-use change urges a deeper understanding of the combined effects of potential drivers on arthropod predation. This study obtained arthropod predation rates on 113 plots of open herbaceous vegetation adjacent to different habitat types (forest, grassland, arable field, settlement) along climate and land-use gradients in Bavaria, Germany, using a standardized method of artificial caterpillars at ground level. Predation rates were analysed with regard to habitat characteristics (habitat type, plant species richness, local mean temperature and mean relative humidity during artificial caterpillar exposure), landscape diversity (0.5–3.0-km, six scales), climate (multi-annual mean temperature, 'MAT') and interactive effects of habitat type with other drivers. Arthropod predation rates did not substantially differ between the studied habitat types, related to plant species richness and across the Bavarian-wide climatic temperature gradient, and also no interactive effects were observed. However, arthropod predation rates were limited by low local mean temperatures, tended to decrease towards higher relative humidity and increased towards more diverse landscapes at a 2-km scale. Thus, high arthropod predation rates in open herbaceous vegetation are favoured by diverse landscapes independent of the dominant habitat in the vicinity. Diversifying landscapes may help to improve top-down control of herbivores, e.g. agricultural pests, but more research is needed to derive specific recommendations on landscape management. Little influence of MAT on predation rates suggests that moderate increases of MAT may not strongly alter this process in the near future.</p>
FIG. 8 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 8. — Discocyrtus cerayanus (Roewer, 1929) n. comb., MNRJ 7244†, male genitalia, distal part: A, dorsal view; B, lateral view; C, ventral view. Scale bars: A, 50 μm; B, C, 100 μm. Colored features are the genitalic macrosetae of VP: light blue, MS A; dark blue, MS B; magenta, MS C; yellow, MS D; green, MS E.
FIG. 6 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 6. — Habitus of Discocyrtus cerayanus (Roewer, 1929) n. comb., MNRJ 7244†, in alcohol, male from Caeté, Minas Gerais, Brazil: A, dorsal view; B, ventral view; C, lateral view; D, anterior view. Scale bars: 1 cm. Photos: R. Carvalho.
FIG. 1 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 1. — Previous state of knowledge of the Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 species composition between 1929-2020: A, B, Paradiscocyrtus neglectus Mello- Leitão, 1927 (male), in vivo, from Itatiaia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; C, Paradiscocyrtus neglectus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (female), in vivo, same locality; D, Discocyrtus cerayanus (Roewer, 1929) n. comb. [previously Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus] (male), MNRJ 7245†, in alcohol, from Caeté, Minas Gerais, Brazil; E, F, Bunopachylus orientalis (Roewer, 1913) [of which Paradiscocyrtus trochanteralis Roewer, 1929 is recognized as junior synomyn] (male), in vivo, from Águas Mornas, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Scale bar: 1 cm. Photos: A-C, A. Kury; D, R. Carvalho; E, F, M. Medrano.
FIG. 3 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 3. — Cladogram depicting proposed external and internal phylogenetic relationships of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927, with synapomorphies for each clade mapped using ACCTRAN. This is the most frequent topology (k-values = 5, 6, 10, 15 and 20) obtained by TNT. Blue squares, nonhomoplastic synapomorphies; white circles, homoplastic synapomorphies. Number of characters above and number of states below symbols.
FIG. 5 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 5. — Brazil, showing distribution of Discocyrtus cerayanus (Roewer, 1929) n. comb. and Paradiscocyrtus neglectus Mello-Leitão, 1927. In the main map: 1) shaded areas in the background represent the regionalization ("Provinces") of the Neotropics (Morrone 2014); 2) the red-checkered area shows the Brazilian state of Ceará, misinterpreted by Mello-Leitão (in Roewer 1931) as the real meaning of "Ceraya" (type locality of D. cerayanus n. comb.) recorded by Roewer (1929). Here, "Ceraya" is interpreted as "Serra do Caraça", a mountain range from the Minas Gerais state. The inset shows the areas of endemism of the Brazilian Atlantic Rain Forest used here follow the concept exposed by DaSilva et al. (2017).
FIG. 4 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 4. — Diagnostic character states of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (A, C, E) in contrast to Discocyrtus s. str. (B, D, F): A, B, stylus of glans (yellow); C, D, ocularium pair of spines (green); E, F, DS shape (gray), area III armature (blue), comparative shape between area IV posterior and DS posterior borders (red), Cx IV retrolateral apophysis (black); Tr IV prolateral medial apophysis (magenta, absent in Discocyrtus s. str.). Scale bars: A, B, 50 μm; C, D, E, F, 1 mm.
FIG. 7 in Review of Paradiscocyrtus Mello-Leitão, 1927 (Gonyleptidae, Opiliones), with the transfer of Paradiscocyrtus cerayanus Roewer, 1929 to Discocyrtus Holmberg, 1878 and a new interpretation of its type locality
FIG. 7. — Discocyrtus cerayanus (Roewer, 1929) n. comb., (SMF RII 996/53), male holotype, from "Ceraya" [Serra do Caraça, Minas Gerais], Brazil: A, habitus, dorsal view; B, same, lateral view; C, ocularium, anterior view; D, Cx IV, ventral view; E, right Tr-Fe IV, dorsal view; F, same, prolateral view; G, same, ventral view; H, same, retrolateral view; I, right Pa-Ti IV, prolateral view; J, same, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 cm.
Text-fig. 1. a: Simplified geological map of the Permo-Carboniferous Brive Basin (after Feys 1989) with marked localities L 1 (Brive, road D1089), L 2 (Lanteuil). b: Profile of the Brive Basin (modified from Feys 1989). c: Profile recorded by Guy and Maryse Chantepie in 2007 on the type locality Brive, road D1089. in New Actinopterygians From The Permian Of The Brive Basin, And The Ichthyofaunas Of The French Massif Central
Text-fig. 1. a: Simplified geological map of the Permo-Carboniferous Brive Basin (after Feys 1989) with marked localities L 1 (Brive, road D1089), L 2 (Lanteuil). b: Profile of the Brive Basin (modified from Feys 1989). c: Profile recorded by Guy and Maryse Chantepie in 2007 on the type locality Brive, road D1089.
Text-fig. 4. Type specimens of Magnolia allasoniae MARTINETTO sp. nov. from the Pliocene locality Ca' Viettone. a1–a4: Holotype (MGPT-PU141081) in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 5) in a black and white print (a1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (a2), ventral view (a3) and dorsal view (a4); b1–b4: Paratype MGPT-PU141082 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 4) in a black and white print (b1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (b2), ventral view (b3) and dorsal view (b4); c1–c4: Paratype MGPT-PU141083 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 6) in a black and white print (c1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (c2), ventral view (c3) and dorsal view (c4); d1–d4: Paratype MGPT-PU141084 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 7) in a black and white print (d1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (d2), ventral view (d3) and internal view (d4). Scale bars 1 mm. in Late Messinian Flora From The Post-Evaporitic Deposits Of The Piedmont Basin (Northwest Italy)
Text-fig. 4. Type specimens of Magnolia allasoniae MARTINETTO sp. nov. from the Pliocene locality Ca' Viettone. a1–a4: Holotype (MGPT-PU141081) in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 5) in a black and white print (a1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (a2), ventral view (a3) and dorsal view (a4); b1–b4: Paratype MGPT-PU141082 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 4) in a black and white print (b1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (b2), ventral view (b3) and dorsal view (b4); c1–c4: Paratype MGPT-PU141083 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 6) in a black and white print (c1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (c2), ventral view (c3) and dorsal view (c4); d1–d4: Paratype MGPT-PU141084 in different views, i.e., as originally figured in Martinetto (1995: pl. 1, fig. 7) in a black and white print (d1), in a new digital photograph in basal view (d2), ventral view (d3) and internal view (d4). Scale bars 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.