Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,477
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,477 results for “type species”
Bee species abundance and composition in three ecosystem types at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico, USA
This study was designed to examine community- or population-level fluctuations in bee species at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, both intra- and inter-annually. From 2002 to 2019, passive funnel traps were used to collect bees at three sites, each representing a different ecosystem type of the southwestern U.S. (Plains grassland, Chihuahuan Desert grassland, and Chihuahuan Desert shrubland). Bees were collected during each month from March through October, and were identified to species by taxonomic experts.
Block summaries of biomass, carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus allocation among tissue types, species, and plant functional types from Arctic LTER 1981 Moist Acidic Tussock (MAT81) long-term experiment harvests: 2000 and 2015, Toolik Lake Field Station, Alaska.
A complete accounting of biomass, C, N, and P allocation both among tissue types (leaves, stems, rhizomes, roots) and among species and plant functional types from Arctic LTER 1981 Moist Acidic Tussock (MAT81) long-term experiment’s untreated control plots and plots that were fertilized annually, harvested after 20 and 35 years, near Toolik Lake Field Station, Alaska. Data are gram per meter squared summarized by block.
Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Relations of the O-horizon with canopy tree species and hydropedologic soil types, 2021
As the interface between plants and soil, the organic horizon is the foundation of forest ecosystems. Two potential predictors of O-layer properties, vegetation and mineral soil type, are difficult to separate because they typically covary. We conducted a factorial study involving four canopy tree species and two soil types with distinctly different hydrology and topographic position to parse patterns in chemistry and microbiota of the O-layer in a north-temperate deciduous forest. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
Cover and frequency of biological soil crust community types, moss species, vascular plants, and abiotic land surface features, on gypsum & non-gypsum soils from the Chihuahuan and Mojave Deserts in 2023
This dataset contains raw and calculated percent cover and frequency data for biological soil crust (hereafter biocrust) functional groups, vascular plant functional groups, and abiotic land surface features on and off gypsum soils in the northern Chihuahuan and eastern Mojave Deserts. Abundance data were obtained from 20 study sites total, 10 located on soils derived from gypsum parent material and 10 located on soils derived from non-gypsum parent materials. Sites were grouped into 10 pairs, in which every gypsum site was partnered with a non-gypsum site located in the same region. Apart from soil type, partnered-site characteristics (topography, climate, elevation, slope, aspect, and presence of biocrusts) were held relatively constant. At each site, cover and frequency assessments were made using the line-point intercept method (LPI) and frequency quadrats (1.0 m^2), respectively. Biocrust functional groups included the following crusts: lichen, moss, incipient algal, light algal, dark algal, unknown photosynthetic crust, and vagrant cyanobacteria. Vascular plant categories included: perennial forbs, perennial graminoids, annual forbs, annual graminoids, subshrub, shrub, Yucca, and cacti. Abiotic land surface features included: woody litter, herbaceous litter, bare soil, rock, bedrock, and animal feces. Moss crusts identified within cover and frequency analyses were sampled, and classified to species level via microscopy. The resulting percent cover and frequency data was used to understand differences in biocrust and moss species abundance and diversity on and off gypsum soils; furthermore, how biocrust and moss species abundance was associated with the measured environmental variables. Soil physical and chemical data from this study can be accessed at knb-lter-jrn.210616002. This study and dataset are complete.
Seedling emergence and biomass data of nine dryland plant species characterizing the impact of soil residual auxin herbicide across two soil types and water pulse events on greenhouse growth; Las Cruces, New Mexico, Spring 2021.
Synthetic-auxin herbicides are often used to control woody plants and aid in grassland restoration. Seed-based restoration is common alongside herbicide applications and there may be unintended effects of these herbicides on dryland plant species at the seed and seedling stages. Additionally, abiotic conditions at the time of herbicide application may influence herbicide-soil-plant interactions. We conducted a greenhouse study to examine the effects of a common shrub-control herbicide mix and its interaction with soil type and a post-herbicide water pulse on common desert plant seeds and seedlings. In this greenhouse study, we found that a subset of species responded negatively to soil residual herbicide activity of a mixture of aminopyralid, clopyralid, and triclopyr at the seed and seedling stages. Species sensitive to soil herbicide residues were primarily shrub and forb species that are often the target species of herbicide applications for woody plant control, such as Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) and Larrea tridentata (creosote bush). However, two shrub species (Atriplex canescens [four-wing saltbush] and Yucca elata [soaptree yucca]) and one perennial grass species (Digitaria californica [Arizona cottontop]), which are used in dryland restoration projects, were found to be particularly sensitive to soil residual herbicide activity. Thus, if using these herbicides to control woody plants and restore herbaceous vegetation via active seeding or relying on the in situ seed bank, considerations should be given to what species are used in the seed mix, what species are already present in the soil seed bank, and other details of the circumstances of herbicide application.
Biomass totals and root biomass (partitioned by percent of total leaf area) for species, tissue type, and functional group for the Arctic LTER experimental 1981 mesic acidic tussock tundra (MAT81) for the 2000 and 2015 harvests, Toolik Field Station, Alaska.
Whole plant biomass totals and root biomass (partitioned by percent of total leaf area) for species, tissue type, and functional group for the Arctic LTER experimental 1981 mesic acidic tussock tundra (MAT81) for the 2000 and 2015 harvests. Because most of the root biomass could not be identified to species in either 2000 or 2015, the calculation of root biomass and element content for roots not identified to species was estimated by the proportion of those species’ contributions to total leaf area. Specific Leaf Area (SLA = leaf area per gram leaf, centimeter squared per gram) values were available from several previous harvests of this experiment; in the present study, we used measurements from the 1995 harvest (Shaver et al. 2001).
Figs 1–4 in A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub
Figs 1–4. Schematic maps of Emil Holub's journeys in southern Africa. 1–3 – First journey (1872–1879): 1 – arrival / departure (1872 / 1878–79, yellow, ship route marked by a dashed line) and 1st expedition (1873, red); 2 – 2nd expedition (1873–74); 3 – 3rd expedition (1875–76). 4 – Second journey (1883–1887, train route marked by a dashed line). Based on Holub's original maps (HOLUB 1880a,b, 1881a,b, 1890a,b), MLÍKOVSKÝ et al. (2011) and ŠÁMAL (2013).
Figs 38–49 in A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub
Figs 38–49. Habitus and labels of type specimens. 38–40 – Niamia angulosa Horváth, 1893, ♀, syntype; 41–43 – Cryptacrus princeps Horváth, 1893 [= C. comes comes (Fabricius, 1803)], ♀, syntype; 44–45 – Polytodes ochraceus Horváth, 1893 [= Polytes tigrinus (Vollenhoven, 1868)],?sex, holotype; 46–49 – Dinidor vicarius Horváth, 1893 [= D. impicticollis Stål, 1870], ♀, holotype. Scale bars in mm. (Photo: 38–43, 46–49 – D. Rédei, 44–45 – Ch. Marshall).
Figs 5–22 in A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub
Figs 5–22. Habitus and labels of type specimens. 5–7 – Coranopsis vittata Horváth, 1893, ♀, syntype; 8–11 – Cosmolestes fulvus Horváth, 1893, ♀, holotype; 12–15 – Edocla albipennis Horváth, 1893,, holotype; 16–18 – Harpactor dudae Horváth, 1893 [= Rhynocoris dudae],, syntype; 19–22 – Oncocephalus angustatus Horváth, 1893, ♀, syntype. Scale bars in mm. (Photo: D. Rédei).
Figure 2. D in Neotypification of Drawida hattamimizu Hatai, 1930 (Annelida, Oligochaeta, Megadrili, Moniligastridae) as a model linking mtDNA (COI) sequences to an earthworm type, with a response to the 'Can of Worms' theory of cryptic species
Figure 2. D. hattamimizu unscaled habitus (from Watanabe, 2005, fig. 1 after Hatai's 1931 original).
Fig. 8. General Charipinae features. A in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 8. General Charipinae features. A. Closed radial cell (Alloxysta brevis). B. Partially open radial cell (A. macrophadna). C. Open radial cell (A. medinae). D. Pronotal carinae absent (A. brevis). E. Pronotal carinae present (A. citripes). F. Propodeal carinae absent (A. victrix). G. Propodeal carinae present (A. castanea).
Fig. 7. Alloxysta semiaperta Fergusson, 1986. A. Fore wing. B in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 7. Alloxysta semiaperta Fergusson, 1986. A. Fore wing. B. Fore wing radial cell (arrow indicates that the radial cell is partially open). C. Antenna, ♂. D. Antenna, ♀. E. Propodeum. F. Lateral habitus, ♀. G. Pronotum (arrow indicates presence of pronotal carinae).
Fig. 6 in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 6. Alloxysta pleuralis (Cameron, 1879). A. Fore wing. B. Pronotum (arrows indicate pronotal carinae). C. Antenna, ♂. D. Antenna, ♀. E. Propodeum.
Fig. 3 in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 3. Alloxysta crassa (Cameron, 1889). A. Fore wing. B. Antenna, ♀. C. Fore wing radial cell (arrow illustrates that the radial cell is completely open). D. Pronotum. E. Lateral habitus, ♀. F. Propodeum.
Fig. 4 in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 4. Alloxysta mullensis (Cameron, 1883). A. Fore wing. B. Fore wing radial cell. C. Pronotum. D. Propodeum. E. Antenna, ♀. F. Lateral habitus, ♀.
Fig. 5 in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 5. Alloxysta piceomaculata (Cameron, 1883). A. Fore wing. B. Fore wing radial cell. C. Propodeum. D. Antenna, ♀. E. Lateral habitus, ♀. F. Pronotum.
Fig. 1. Alloxysta abdera Fergusson, 1986. A. Fore wing. B in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 1. Alloxysta abdera Fergusson, 1986. A. Fore wing. B. Pronotum (arrows indicate pronotal carinae). C. Antenna, ♀. D. Antenna, ♂ (arrow shows curved F2). E. Propodeum. F. Fore wing radial cell (arrow indicates that the radial cell is completely open). G. Lateral habitus, ♀.
Fig. 2 in Revision of the types of species of Alloxysta described by Cameron and Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) and deposited in the Natural History Museum (London), including a key to the fauna of Great Britain
Fig. 2. Alloxysta basimacula (Cameron, 1886). A. Fore wing. B. Fore wing radial cell (arrow indicates that the radial cell is completely open). C. Pronotum. D. Antenna, ♀. E. Propodeum. F. Lateral habitus, ♀.
Figs 41–48 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors
Figs 41–48. Anastatus shichengensis, ♀. 41–46. Holotype. 41. Body, lateral view. 42. Head, frontal view. 43. Body, dorsal view. 44. Head, lateral view. 45. Mesosoma, dorsal view. 46. Head, frontolateral view. – 47–48. Paratype. 47. Front leg (the tooth is arrowed). 48. Apex of mesotibia and mesotarsus.
Figs 34–40 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors
Figs 34–40. Anastatus meilingensis Sheng & Yu, 1998. 34–36, 39. Holotype, ♀. 37, 38, 40. Paratype, ♀. – 34. Body, dorsal view. 35. Head, frontodorsal view. 36. Body, lateral view. 37. Head, frontal view. 38. Mesonotum, dorsal view. 39. Antenna. 40. Head, dorsal view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.