Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7 results for “vocal recognition”
Evidence for individual vocal recognition in a pair-bonding poison frog, Ranitomeya imitator
<p>Individually distinctive vocalizations are widespread in nature, although the ability of receivers to discriminate these signals has only been explored through limited taxonomic and social lenses. Here, we asked whether anuran advertisement calls, typically studied for their role in territory defense and mate attraction, facilitate recognition and preferential association with partners in a pair-bonding poison frog (<em>Ranitomeya imitator</em>). Combining no- and two-stimulus choice playback experiments, we evaluated behavioral responses of females to male acoustic stimuli. Virgin females oriented to and approached speakers broadcasting male calls independent of caller identity, implying that females are generally attracted to male acoustic stimuli outside the context of a pair bond. When pair-bonded females were presented with calls of a mate and a stranger, they showed significant preference for calls of their mate. Moreover, behavioral responses varied with breeding status: females with eggs were faster to approach stimuli than females that were pair-bonded but did not currently have eggs. Our study suggests a potential role for individual vocal recognition in the formation and maintenance of pair bonds in a poison frog and raises new questions about how acoustic signals are perceived in the context of monogamy and biparental care.</p>
Evidence for individual vocal recognition in a pair-bonding poison frog, Ranitomeya imitator
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
The EmoHI Test stimuli: Measuring vocal emotion recognition in hearing-impaired populations
<p>Before reading this file, make sure you have read the <strong>README.1.pdf</strong> file. That file also contains information about the <strong>license</strong> these materials are distributed under.</p> <p><em><strong>Versions</strong></em></p> <ul> <li><strong>Version 2</strong>: This is the current version. To cite this version specifically, use DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7997063. In this version we fixed some naming mistakes in the files (in 8 of the files the sentence was identified as <code>t2</code> instead of <code>s2</code>), and added two missing stimuli (<code>t5_neutral_t2_u04.wav</code> and <code>t5_sad_t1_u05.wav</code>).</li> <li><strong>Version 1</strong>: This was the initial version. To cite that version specifically, use DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3689710.</li> </ul> <p>The latest version of the EmoHI material can be downloaded from <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689709">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689709</a>. Please always check that you have the latest version, and that you comply with the current license requirements.</p> <p><em><strong>The EmoHI Test</strong></em></p> <p>The EmoHI Test was developed to measure the accuracy at which participants can recognize vocal emotions based on pseudospeech sentences that were produced in a happy, angry sad, or neutral manner. The EmoHI Test recordings are particularly suitable for testing hearing-impaired populations due to their high sound quality. All recordings, including the ones that were used in Nagels <em>et al.</em> (2020, <em>PeerJ</em>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8773">doi: 10.7717/peerj.8773</a>), are made available here.</p> <p>The stimuli were recorded in an anechoic room at a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz. The microphone was placed at a distance of approximately 30 cm (12 in) from the speaker. The recordings were made by connecting a standing Røde NT1 microphone to a Presonus TubePre V2 preamplifier and a TASCAM DR-100 portable digital recorder. The gain of the recordings was adjusted for each emotion production using the preamplifier to record the stimuli at an intensity level that was approximately the same across emotions to reduce large intensity differences between the recordings of different emotions. The files are not RMS equalized.</p> <p><em><strong>Citation</strong></em></p> <p>When using this repository in your research, please cite the repository itself. For this version:</p> <blockquote> <p>Nagels L., Gaudrain E., Hendriks P., & Başkent D. (2023, June 2). The EmoHI Test stimuli: Measuring vocal emotion recognition in hearing-impaired populations. Version 2. <em>Zenodo</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997063">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997063</a></p> </blockquote> <p>Also cite the PeerJ article that describes the material:</p> <blockquote> <p>Nagels L., Gaudrain E., Vickers D., Matos Lopes M., Hendriks P., Başkent D. (2020). Development of vocal emotion recognition in school-age children: The EmoHI test for hearing-impaired populations. <em>PeerJ</em> 8:e8773 <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8773">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8773</a></p> </blockquote> <p><em><strong>Sound file name structure</strong></em></p> <p>The sound files are named using the following convention:</p> <p><code>t[1-6]_{emotion}_s{1,2}_u[01-18].wav</code></p> <ul> <li><code>t[1-6]</code> represents the <strong>talker</strong> who produced the stimulus: <code>t1</code>, <code>t2</code>, <code>t3</code>, <code>t4</code>, <code>t5</code>, or <code>t6</code></li> <li><code>{emotion}</code> is the label of the <strong>emotion</strong> that was produced: <code>neutral</code>, <code>happy</code>, <code>angry</code>, or <code>sad</code></li> <li><code>s{1,2}</code> is the <strong>pseudospeech sentence</strong> that was used: <code>s1</code> for "Koun se mina lod belam." <code>s2</code> for "Nekal ibam soud molen."</li> <li><code>u[01-18]</code> is the <strong>utterance</strong> number: Number ranging from <code>u01</code> to <code>u18</code></li> </ul> <p>For instance, <code>t1_happy_s2_u01.wav</code> is utterance 1 of talker <code>t1</code> producing emotion "happy" using sentence 2.</p> <p><em><strong>Talker demographic information</strong></em></p> <p>The table below gives an overview of the voice characteristics from the talkers who produced the EmoHI test stimuli.</p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">Talker</th> <th scope="col">Age (years)</th> <th scope="col">Gender</th> <th scope="col">Height (m)</th> <th scope="col">Mean F0 (Hz)</th> <th scope="col">F0 range (Hz)</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>t1</td> <td>48</td> <td>f</td> <td>1.72</td> <td>253.14</td> <td>179.97 – 421.81</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t2</td> <td>36</td> <td>f</td> <td>1.68</td> <td>302.23</td> <td>200.71 – 437.38</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t3</td> <td>27</td> <td>m</td> <td>1.85</td> <td>166.92</td> <td>100.99 – 296.47</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t4</td> <td>45</td> <td>m</td> <td>1.90</td> <td>149.41</td> <td>96.97 – 274.72</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t5</td> <td>25</td> <td>f</td> <td>1.63</td> <td>282.89</td> <td>199.49 – 429.38</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t6</td> <td>24</td> <td>m</td> <td>1.75</td> <td>167.76</td> <td>87.46 – 285.79</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><em><strong>Supporting data</strong></em></p> <p>The behavioural data from the PeerJ article is accessible at <a href="https://doi.org/10.34894/BDMX6D">https://doi.org/10.34894/BDMX6D</a>.</p>
Vocal recognition suggests premating isolation between lineages of a lekking hummingbird
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Early postnatal individual vocal recognition in a highly colonial mammal species
<p>Dataset associated with the article entitled 'Early postnatal individual vocal recognition in a highly colonial mammal species'</p>
Data from: Individual recognition of opposite sex vocalizations in the zebra finch
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Artificial Intelligence and Benign Lesions of Vocal Folds Recognition
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05754606. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.