CheatsheetDysphagiaPrintable PDF

EAT-10 Dysphagia Screening — Scoring Cheatsheet

Printable scoring reference for the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Belafsky 2008) with the ≥3 abnormality cut and clinical severity interpretation.

Overview

The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is a 10-item patient-reported dysphagia symptom survey developed by Belafsky and colleagues at the University of California Davis Voice and Swallowing Center and published in 2008. It has since become the single most commonly used dysphagia screening instrument in US ENT clinics, inpatient rehabilitation, and post-stroke care. Patients rate ten items about swallowing difficulty on a 0–4 scale; the total (0–40) is the screening metric. Belafsky et al. established that a total ≥ 3 is abnormal — a value that subsequent validation studies in stroke, head-and-neck cancer, and older-adult populations have largely supported. This cheatsheet puts the scoring interval and the clinical interpretation on one printable sheet for intake use.

This cheatsheet is a static reference intended for clinical and educational use. Every page is rendered from a peer-reviewed source and cited below the printable sheet. Clinicians must adapt to the individual patient and to the current edition of any cited instrument manual before clinical use.

How to use this sheet

Hand the patient the EAT-10 form at intake — it takes ~2 minutes to complete. Sum the ten items for a total out of 40 and find the total on this cheatsheet. Any total ≥ 3 should trigger a clinical swallow evaluation; a total of 15 or higher is a strong signal for a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Report the total plus the severity band verbatim in the clinic note alongside the most weighted items — the item-level pattern often points to the type of dysphagia (e.g., solid-specific items high = mechanical stricture, liquid-specific items high = neurogenic). Do not use EAT-10 as a stand-alone diagnosis; it is a self-report screener, not an instrumental exam, and it cannot detect silent aspiration.

A stroke patient who scores 2/40 on the EAT-10 but coughs on thin liquids in the bedside evaluation is not "EAT-10 negative" — they are an anosognosic non-reporter. Always pair the EAT-10 with a bedside swallow exam.
EAT-10 cannot detect silent aspiration

Printable sheet

EAT-10 totalSeverity bandClinical interpretationRecommended next step
0 – 2Normal / within normal limitsNo self-reported swallowing difficulty.Document baseline; no active intervention
3 – 14Mild–moderate dysphagia symptomsSelf-reported difficulty present; warrants a full clinical swallow evaluation.Bedside swallow exam + modified diet trial
15 – 24Moderate–severe dysphagia symptomsSubstantial self-reported difficulty; high likelihood of aspiration risk.Request VFSS or FEES instrumental exam
25 – 40Severe dysphagia symptomsSevere self-reported swallowing impairment, often with weight loss and hydration concerns.Urgent VFSS/FEES; consider dietitian + PEG consult

Belafsky et al. (2008) EAT-10 scoring with follow-up severity interpretation; ≥3 is the published abnormality cut.

Common pitfalls

  • Treating the EAT-10 as a diagnostic test. It is a symptom screen — it cannot detect silent aspiration, which is the single highest-risk finding in neurogenic dysphagia.
  • Administering the EAT-10 to a patient with cognitive impairment or anosognosia without caregiver input. Self-report breaks down in those populations.
  • Ignoring item-level patterns. The item numbers (1–10) map to specific symptom classes and the pattern is as informative as the total.
  • Using EAT-10 in a paediatric patient. It is not validated under age 18 — use the PEDI-EAT-10 or a paediatric-specific screen instead.

Free tools paired with this cheatsheet

EAT-10 Dysphagia Screener

Free interactive Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) calculator for speech-language pathologists, otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and dysphagia clinics. Score the 10-item Belafsky et al. (2008) patient self-report instrument and get the total (0 - 40), the ≥ 3 abnormality flag, and a descriptive severity band (normal, mild, moderate, severe). Built for SLP and ENT dysphagia intake, voice clinic co-screening, head-and-neck cancer surveillance, stroke rehabilitation, neurodegenerative disease caseloads, older-adult home-health, and graduate dysphagia-assessment training. Mobile-friendly, client-side, no sign-up.

Open tool

Voice Handicap Index-10 Calculator

Free interactive Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) calculator for speech-language pathologists, otolaryngologists, and voice clinics. Score the 10-item Rosen et al. (2004) patient self-report instrument and get the total (0 - 40), the Arffa et al. (2012) clinical severity band (normal, mild, moderate, severe), and per-domain subtotals (Functional, Physical, Emotional). Built for SLP voice intake, otolaryngology clinics, occupational voice screening, pre / post phonosurgery comparison, and graduate voice-evaluation training. Mobile-friendly, client-side, no sign-up.

Open tool

CAPE-V Voice Rating

Free interactive CAPE-V (Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice) rating tool for speech-language pathologists, voice clinic laryngologists, and voice-therapy trainees. Rate the six perceptual parameters — Overall Severity, Roughness, Breathiness, Strain, Pitch, and Loudness — on the 100 mm visual analog scale as published by Kempster et al. (2009) and get instant severity classification (within normal limits, mild MI, moderate MO, severe SE) anchored to the Kempster printed-form bands. Built for voice clinic intake, voice therapy progress visits, pre- and post-laryngology surgical follow-up, and SLP graduate training in voice evaluation. Mobile-friendly, client-side, no sign-up.

Open tool

References

  1. Belafsky, P. C., Mouadeb, D. A., Rees, C. J., Pryor, J. C., Postma, G. N., Allen, J., & Leonard, R. J. (2008). Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 117(12), 919–924.
  2. Rofes, L., Arreola, V., Mukherjee, R., & Clavé, P. (2014). Sensitivity and specificity of the Eating Assessment Tool and the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 26(9), 1256–1265.
  3. Wilmskoetter, J., Bonilha, H., Hong, I., Hazelwood, R. J., Martin-Harris, B., & Velozo, C. (2019). Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(5), 549–559.