MLU-M

Mean Length of Utterance in Morphemes (MLU-M)

MLU-M is the average number of morphemes per utterance and remains the single most-used index of early grammatical development in English.

What MLU-M measures

Mean Length of Utterance in morphemes is calculated by dividing the total number of morphemes produced in a language sample by the total number of intelligible utterances. Brown introduced the metric in 1973 as a proxy for grammatical maturity in children up to roughly age 4, and it is now reported in almost every published language sample analysis. MLU counts bound morphemes such as plural -s, past tense -ed, and progressive -ing as separate units, which makes it more sensitive than a simple word count to early syntactic growth.

Formula

MLU-M = Σ morphemes ÷ number of complete and intelligible utterances

Normative ranges and benchmarks

  • Age 2;0 — mean 1.9 morphemes (range 1.4 – 2.4)
  • Age 3;0 — mean 3.2 morphemes (range 2.5 – 4.0)
  • Age 4;0 — mean 4.4 morphemes (range 3.6 – 5.3)
  • Age 5;0 — mean 5.2 morphemes (range 4.5 – 6.0)
  • Above age 5 MLU-M flattens and loses sensitivity — switch to subordination index and DSS

Normative bands are central estimates drawn from the cited literature. Individual variation is wide — always cross-reference against the source paper and your assessment's own manual before quoting a cut-score in a report.

Clinical use

MLU-M is the single most common quantitative marker in a pediatric language report because it is fast to compute, highly reliable between raters, and has decades of published norms. In clinic it carries two jobs: first, as a developmental snapshot against Brown stages, and second, as a sensitivity check for the rest of the language sample — a child whose MLU is two standard deviations below age expectation virtually always has other markers of language impairment to investigate. Its ceiling hits hard after age 4;6, however; by first grade it is barely sensitive to clinically meaningful differences. For school-age children, most clinicians rely on MLU only as a screening number and pivot to clause density or DSS for the diagnostic work.

MLU is the blood pressure of a preschool language sample. It is quick, boring, and almost useless in isolation — but if it is two SD below age expectation you already know the appointment is going to run long.
MLU is a vital sign, not a diagnosis

References

  1. Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Harvard University Press.
  2. Rice, M. L., Smolik, F., Perpich, D., Thompson, T., Rytting, N., & Blossom, M. (2010). Mean length of utterance levels in 6-month intervals for children 3 to 9 years with and without language impairments. JSLHR, 53(2), 333–349.
  3. Pavelko, S. L., & Owens, R. E. (2017). Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR): New normative values for language sample analysis measures. LSHSS, 48(3), 197–215.