Method Comparison Analyzer

Passing-Bablok and Deming regression with Bland-Altman companion plot. Upload paired CSV data for complete method comparison. Data never leaves your browser.

Passing-BablokDeming RegressionBland-Altman
Tool details, related tools, and citation

Try it out

Load example Method Comparison data to see the full workflow

Upload Paired Measurements

CSV with reference method (X) and test method (Y) columns.

Or paste CSV
  • Compare a new measurement method against an established reference method
  • Assess agreement (not just correlation) between two quantitative methods
  • Detect proportional or constant bias between methods using regression
  • Generate Bland-Altman plots with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement
  • Replace desktop tools like MedCalc or EP Evaluator for routine method comparison

Don't use for

  • Diagnostic accuracy with a binary gold standard — use the Diagnostic Test Calculator
  • Simple two-group comparison of means — use the General Stats Calculator
  • Correlation only (no agreement assessment needed) — Pearson r in the General Stats Calculator

Method Comparison Fundamentals

Method comparison studies assess whether a new measurement method agrees with an established reference method. The goal is NOT to test correlation (which can be high even with systematic bias) but to assess agreement.

Key analyses: • Passing-Bablok regression — non-parametric, robust to outliers • Deming regression — parametric, accounts for error in both methods • Bland-Altman plot — visualizes bias and limits of agreement
Common pitfalls: • Using Pearson correlation alone (high r does not mean agreement) • Using ordinary least squares (assumes X is error-free) • Ignoring proportional vs constant bias distinction

Frequently Asked Questions