Method Comparison Analyzer

Passing-Bablok and Deming regression with Bland-Altman companion plot. Upload paired CSV data for complete method comparison. Data never leaves your browser.

Passing-BablokDeming RegressionBland-Altman

Try it out

Load example Method Comparison data to see the full workflow

Upload Paired Measurements

CSV with reference method (X) and test method (Y) columns.

Or paste CSV
  • Compare a new measurement method against an established reference method
  • Assess agreement (not just correlation) between two quantitative methods
  • Detect proportional or constant bias between methods using regression
  • Generate Bland-Altman plots with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement
  • Replace desktop tools like MedCalc or EP Evaluator for routine method comparison

Don't use for

  • Diagnostic accuracy with a binary gold standard — use the Diagnostic Test Calculator
  • Simple two-group comparison of means — use the General Stats Calculator
  • Correlation only (no agreement assessment needed) — Pearson r in the General Stats Calculator

Method Comparison Fundamentals

Method comparison studies assess whether a new measurement method agrees with an established reference method. The goal is NOT to test correlation (which can be high even with systematic bias) but to assess agreement.

Key analyses: • Passing-Bablok regression — non-parametric, robust to outliers • Deming regression — parametric, accounts for error in both methods • Bland-Altman plot — visualizes bias and limits of agreement
Common pitfalls: • Using Pearson correlation alone (high r does not mean agreement) • Using ordinary least squares (assumes X is error-free) • Ignoring proportional vs constant bias distinction

Frequently Asked Questions