ToolsConductScience tool
Passing-BablokFree in-browser calculator

Method Comparison Analyzer.

Passing-Bablok and Deming regression with Bland-Altman companion plot. Upload paired CSV data for complete method comparison. Data never leaves your browser.

PrivateData stays in your browser
LiveNo sign-up required
Validated2026-04-05
CitableMethods and citation included

Calculator

Results update in place

Try it out

Load example Method Comparison data to see the full workflow

Upload Paired Measurements

CSV with reference method (X) and test method (Y) columns.

Or paste CSV

When to use

  • Compare a new measurement method against an established reference method
  • Assess agreement (not just correlation) between two quantitative methods
  • Detect proportional or constant bias between methods using regression
  • Generate Bland-Altman plots with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement
  • Replace desktop tools like MedCalc or EP Evaluator for routine method comparison

Do not use for

  • Diagnostic accuracy with a binary gold standard — use the Diagnostic Test Calculator
  • Simple two-group comparison of means — use the General Stats Calculator
  • Correlation only (no agreement assessment needed) — Pearson r in the General Stats Calculator

High correlation does not mean agreement

Two methods can have Pearson r = 0.99 and still disagree systematically (e.g., one reads 10% higher). Correlation measures linear association, not agreement. Always use Passing-Bablok or Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis — never Pearson r alone.

Ordinary least squares is wrong for method comparison

OLS assumes the X variable (reference method) is measured without error. In method comparison, both methods have measurement error. Passing-Bablok and Deming regression account for error in both variables.

Check both proportional and constant bias

Slope CI excluding 1 indicates proportional bias (one method reads higher by a percentage). Intercept CI excluding 0 indicates constant bias (one method reads higher by a fixed amount). These are independent issues — a method can have one, both, or neither.

Use Passing-Bablok when in doubt

Passing-Bablok is non-parametric and robust to outliers. Deming regression requires approximately normal residuals and a known error variance ratio. When assumptions are uncertain, Passing-Bablok is the safer default. Report both when possible.

1

Method

Passing-Bablok regression computes slope and intercept from the median of all pairwise slopes, providing a non-parametric, outlier-robust estimate. Deming regression minimizes perpendicular distances to the regression line, accounting for measurement error in both methods (default lambda = 1). Bland-Altman analysis plots the difference (Y−X) vs. the mean ((X+Y)/2) with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement (mean ±\pm 1.96 SD). All calculations run client-side; uploaded data never leaves the browser.

2

Validated

Last validated 2026-04-05. Calculations are designed for planning and documentation support; verify procurement decisions against manufacturer specifications or institutional SOPs.

3

How to cite

How to Cite

ConductScience Method Comparison Analyzer (v1.0). ConductScience, Inc. 2026. Available at: https://conductscience.com/tools/method-comparison-analyzer

Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21(11):709-720. doi:10.1515/cclm.1983.21.11.709

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307-310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

Method Comparison Fundamentals

Method comparison studies assess whether a new measurement method agrees with an established reference method. The goal is NOT to test correlation (which can be high even with systematic bias) but to assess agreement.

Key analyses: • Passing-Bablok regression — non-parametric, robust to outliers • Deming regression — parametric, accounts for error in both methods • Bland-Altman plot — visualizes bias and limits of agreement
Common pitfalls: • Using Pearson correlation alone (high r does not mean agreement) • Using ordinary least squares (assumes X is error-free) • Ignoring proportional vs constant bias distinction

Frequently asked

325
Free tools
1,200+
Institutions
100%
Client-side
0
Uploads required