ToolsConductScience tool
% CorrectFree in-browser calculator

T-Maze Percent Correct Calculator.

Enter per-trial choices and rewarded side schedule. Get % correct per block, learning curves, trials to criterion, and reversal learning analysis.

PrivateData stays in your browser
LiveNo sign-up required
Validated2026-04-05
CitableMethods and citation included

Calculator

Results update in place

Try it out

Load example T-Maze data to see the full workflow

Configuration

Criterion = 8/10 correct

Add Trial

When to use

  • Compute % correct per block from per-trial left/right choice data in a T-maze position discrimination task
  • Track learning curves across blocks during acquisition and reversal phases
  • Determine trials to criterion for each animal and compare between groups
  • Analyze reversal learning by switching the rewarded side after criterion is reached
  • Compute mean choice latency per block as a secondary decision-making measure
  • Compare acquisition and reversal performance between treatment groups (e.g., WT vs. KO)
  • Export per-animal and group summary results to CSV for further statistical analysis

Do not use for

  • Spontaneous alternation (Y-maze or continuous T-maze without discrete trials) — use a spontaneous alternation calculator instead
  • Radial arm maze tasks with more than 2 choice arms — use a radial maze error calculator
  • Water maze or Barnes maze spatial reference memory — different paradigm, different metrics

Control for odor cues between trials

Rodents have exceptional olfactory ability. If the maze is not cleaned between trials, animals may use odor trails from previous runs rather than learning the spatial rule. Wipe the maze with 70% ethanol or rotate maze arms between trials. Failure to control odor cues can produce artificially high percent correct that does not reflect spatial learning.

Use pseudo-random reward schedules to prevent side biases

If the rewarded side is always left, some animals develop a position habit rather than learning the discrimination. Use a pseudo-random sequence (e.g., Gellermann series) where each block has equal left and right rewarded trials with no more than 3 consecutive same-side rewards. This calculator allows you to set the rewarded side per trial or per block.

Report block size and criterion explicitly

Trials to criterion depends entirely on block size and criterion threshold. A criterion of 8/10 in blocks of 10 is standard, but some labs use 9/10 or require 2 consecutive blocks at criterion. Always report these parameters. This calculator lets you configure both.

Distinguish perseverative from random errors in reversal

During reversal, early errors are typically perseverative (the animal continues choosing the previously correct side). Later errors may be random. Perseverative errors in the first reversal block are a specific index of cognitive inflexibility. This calculator tracks per-block accuracy so you can see whether the initial reversal block shows below-chance performance (perseveration) before recovery.

Ensure food restriction is consistent across groups

T-maze performance depends on motivation. Animals must be food-restricted (typically to 85-90% of free-feeding weight) and maintained at stable weights throughout testing. Differential food restriction between groups can confound choice accuracy and latency differences.

1

Method

Each trial is scored as correct (choice matches rewarded side) or incorrect. Percent correct per block equals correct trials in the block divided by block size, multiplied by 100. Trials to criterion is the cumulative trial count at the end of the first block where percent correct meets or exceeds the criterion threshold. For reversal analysis, the rewarded side flips after criterion and a new learning curve begins. Mean choice latency per block is the arithmetic mean of per-trial latencies within each block. Group statistics use sample standard deviation (n-1 denominator) for SEM computation. All computation is client-side — no data leaves your browser.

2

Validated

Last validated 2026-04-05. Calculations are designed for planning and documentation support; verify procurement decisions against manufacturer specifications or institutional SOPs.

3

How to cite

How to Cite

ConductScience T-Maze Percent Correct Calculator (v1.0). ConductScience, Inc. 2026. Available at: https://conductscience.com/tools/t-maze-percent-correct-calculator

This tool performs mathematical calculations on user-provided data. It does not replace scientific judgment regarding experimental design, exclusion criteria, or statistical analysis.

What Is the T-Maze?

The T-maze is one of the oldest and most straightforward maze paradigms in behavioral neuroscience, first used systematically in the early 20th century. Its simplicity — a start arm leading to a binary left/right choice — makes it ideal for studying position discrimination, spatial reference memory, working memory (in delayed alternation variants), and reward-guided decision-making. The apparatus can be constructed with opaque walls and removable barriers or guillotine doors to control access. In the rewarded position discrimination task, one goal arm consistently contains a food reward, and the animal must learn to choose the correct side across multiple trials. The T-maze is widely used in mice and rats, with well-established normative data for various strains. Its simplicity also makes it suitable for high-throughput phenotyping, pharmacological screening, and lesion studies, particularly for hippocampal and prefrontal cortex function.

The Discrete-Trial Procedure

In the discrete-trial T-maze task, each trial is a single decision event. The animal starts in the start arm behind a closed door. When the door opens, the animal runs forward and enters either the left or right goal arm. If the animal chooses the rewarded arm, it consumes the food reward (typically a small pellet or sweetened condensed milk well). If it chooses the unrewarded arm, it encounters an empty well and is removed after a brief confinement period. The animal is then returned to a holding cage for an inter-trial interval (ITI), typically 15-30 seconds. Trials are grouped into blocks, commonly 10 trials per block, and sessions typically consist of 1-4 blocks (10-40 trials) depending on the protocol. Key experimental controls include: (1) pseudo-random reward schedules to prevent side biases (e.g., no more than 3 consecutive rewarded-left trials), (2) cleaning the maze between trials to eliminate odor cues, and (3) consistent handling procedures. The primary outcome is percent correct per block. Secondary outcomes include choice latency (time from door opening to arm entry) and errors of commission vs. omission.

Reversal Learning in the T-Maze

Reversal learning is a critical extension of the basic T-maze position discrimination task. Once the animal reaches a predetermined learning criterion (e.g., 80% correct for one block) on the initial acquisition, the contingencies are reversed: the previously unrewarded arm now contains the reward, and the previously correct arm is now empty. The animal must inhibit the previously learned response and acquire the new rule. This dissociation is experimentally powerful because initial acquisition depends primarily on the hippocampus and dorsal striatum, while reversal learning additionally recruits the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Animals with OFC lesions or serotonergic depletion typically show normal acquisition but impaired reversal — they perseverate on the previously correct side for more trials. The key metrics for reversal learning are: (1) trials to criterion on reversal (compared to acquisition), (2) the number of perseverative errors (choosing the previously correct, now incorrect, side) in the first reversal block, and (3) the shape of the reversal learning curve, which typically shows an initial dip below chance (perseveration) followed by recovery. Comparing acquisition trials-to-criterion with reversal trials-to-criterion quantifies cognitive flexibility.

Frequently asked

325
Free tools
1,200+
Institutions
100%
Client-side
0
Uploads required