Retraction Watch, Research Integrity, and Peer Review

<p><strong>Episode Summary:</strong></p> <p>In this episode we are discussing a range of topics relating to the good and bad of research practices with our interview guest Ivan Oransky the co-founder of Retraction Watch. We will discuss the issue of paper retractions, and their wider implications for research integrity, peer review, and science journalism.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Links:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p><a href="https://retractionwatch.com/">Retraction Watch</a></p> <p><a href="https://grants.nih.gov/policy/research_integrity/what-is.htm">Research Integrity Information</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html">Article on Issues in Peer Review</a></p> <p><strong>Quotes:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p>&#39;I don&#39;t think it is great to cover single studies every week&#39;</p>