Skip to main content
zenodorestricted

Dataset related to article "Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO)"

<p>Abstract</p> <p>INTRODUCTION:</p> <p>The prognosis of glioma is dismal, and almost all patients relapsed. At recurrence time, several treatment options are considered, but to date there is no a standard of care. The Neurooncology Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) collected clinical data regarding a large series of recurrent glioma patients who underwent re-irradiation (re-RT) in Italy.</p> <p>METHODS:</p> <p>Data regarding 300 recurrent glioma patients treated from May 2002 to November 2017, were analyzed. All patients underwent re-RT. Surgical resection, followed by re-RT with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by neurological examination and brain MRI performed, 1&nbsp;month after radiation therapy and then every 3&nbsp;months.</p> <p>RESULTS:</p> <p>Re-irradiation was performed at a median interval time (IT) of 16&nbsp;months from the first RT. Surgical resection before re-RT was performed in 19% of patients, concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) in 16.3%, and maintenance chemotherapy in 29%. Total doses ranged from 9&nbsp;Gy to 52.5&nbsp;Gy, with a median biological effective dose of 43&nbsp;Gy. The median, 1, 2&nbsp;year OS were 9.7&nbsp;months, 41% and 17.7%. Low grade glioma histology (p&nbsp;&thinsp;≪&thinsp;0.01), IT&thinsp;&gt;&thinsp;12&nbsp;months (p&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.001), KPS&thinsp;&gt;&thinsp;70 (p&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.004), younger age (p&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.001), high total doses delivered (p&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.04), and combined treatment performed (p&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.0008) were recorded as conditioning survival.</p> <p>CONCLUSION:</p> <p>our data underline re-RT as a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, and a combined ones as a better option for selected patients. The identification of a BED threshold able to obtain a greater benefit on OS, can help in designing future prospective studies.</p>

ShareScore

16/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
0
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
4

Topics