Decision problem for renewable energy planning in Turkey (Dataset). June 2019
<p>This dataset compromises the decision problem for renewable energy planning in Turkey, adopted from the literature (Kahraman and Kaya 2010; Erdogan and Kaya 2015; Mousavi et al. 2017).</p> <p>The decision problem consists in evaluating and selecting the most appropriate renewable energy alternative for Turkey, and includes:</p> <ul> <li>Five alternatives (<strong>Hydro, Wind, Solar, Biomass, and Geothermal</strong>).</li> <li>Five dimensions fo criteria (<strong>Technological, Technical, Economical, Environmental, and Socio-politic</strong>), with 31 sub-criteria.</li> <li>Weights of criteria.</li> <li>Direction of criteria: "max" if the sub-criterion needs to be maximized ("bigger is better”) and "min" if it needs to be minimized (”smaller is better”).</li> </ul> <p>The dataset is used in the following paper:</p> <p><em>Ezbakhe, F. and Pérez-Foguet, A. (2019) Decision analysis for sustainable development: the case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research. </em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.037">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.037</a></p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4