Supplementary material (individual data set): Egeler, G.-A. & Baur, P. (2020). Menüwahl in der Hochschulmensa: Fleisch oder Vegi? Ergebnisse eines 12-wöchigen Feldexperiments (NOVANIMAL Working Paper No. 5). ZHAW. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1405
<p><strong>Meal choice at two university canteens in a field experiment during 12 weeks: anonymised individual menu sales data</strong></p> <p>How do canteen visitors respond to a revised offer of meat-based and plant-based meals? Selected innovations were simultaneously implemented and tested in a trans­disciplinary field experiment in two university canteens over a 12-week period in the autumn semester 2017. Throughout this time, the meat dishes and ‘veg-meals’ (ovo-lacto-vegetarian and vegan meals) were randomly distributed among the three menu lines, the veg-meals were not marketed and advertised as such and the previous vegetarian menu line was abolished. Weeks where the usual number of meat dishes were on offer (the ‘base weeks’) alternated with weeks where the share of veg-meals was increased (the ‘intervention weeks’). </p> <p>The field experiment did not have a negative impact on the number of meals sold or the turnover compared to the two previous years. Women choose meat dishes less often than men. This connection applies in the base weeks and intervention weeks, in all age groups, among both students and among staff. Remarkably, the share of (non-labelled) vegan dishes is comparable for women and men over all age groups, independent of university affiliation (student, staff). Authentic vegan dishes were particularly welcome. Veg-meals could also be sold on the more expensive menu line. There was a better correlation between meal choice, eating habits and attitudes (health, environment, animal welfare, social aspects) than expected. </p> <p><strong>The dataset the dataset contains over <em>21'000</em> anonymised individual menu sales. The analyses and results are summarized in the working paper No. 5 <a href="https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1405">https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1405</a></strong></p> <p>The corresponding scripts are: </p> <p>- <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034686">10.5281/zenodo.4034686</a></p> <p>- <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034698">10.5281/zenodo.4034698</a></p> <p>- <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4244258">10.5281/zenodo.4244258</a> (newer Version)</p> <p>For more information visit the <a href="http://novanimal.ch">novanimal.ch</a> website.</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4