Skip to main content
dryadopen

Ivermectin as a potential treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 – A double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

<p><b>Objective:</b> Ivermectin has been suggested as a treatment for COVID-19.This randomised control trial was conducted to test the efficacy of Ivermectin in the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19.</p> <p><b>Design:</b> Parallel, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial</p> <p><b>Setting:</b> A tertiary care dedicated COVID-19 hospital in Bihar, India</p> <p><b>Participants:</b> Adult patients (&gt; 18 years) admitted with mild to moderate COVID 19 disease (saturation &gt; 90% on room air, respiratory rate &lt; 30 and no features of shock) with no contraindications to ivermectin and willing to participate in the study</p> <p><b>Intervention:</b> Patients in the intervention arm were given ivermectin 12 mg on day 1 and day 2 of admission. Patients in the placebo arm were given identical looking placebo tablets. Rest of the treatment was continued as per the existing protocol and the clinical judgment of the treating teams.</p> <p><b>Outcome Measures:</b> The primary outcome measure was a negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 on day 6 of admission. The secondary outcome measures were symptom status on day 6, discharge status on day 10, admission to ICU, need for invasive mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 115 patients were enrolled for the study of which 112 were included in the final analysis. Of them, 55 were randomised to the intervention arm while 57 were randomised to the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two arms. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome, i.e. negative RT-PCR status on day 6 between the two groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups in most of the secondary outcome measures, viz. symptom status on day 6, discharge status on day 10, admission to ICU, and need for invasive mechanical ventilation. However, while there was no in-hospital mortality in the intervention arm, there were 4 deaths in the placebo arm. As a result, all patients in the intervention arm (n=56) were successfully discharged as compared to 93.1% (n=54/58) in the placebo arm (RR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2, p=0.019).</p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> There was no difference in the primary outcome i.e. negative RT-PCR status on day 6 of admission with the use of ivermectin. However, a significantly higher proportion of patients were discharged alive from the hospital when they received ivermectin.</p>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
4

Dataset details

Repository
dryad
Published
January 10, 2021
License
cc-zero
DOI
10.5061/dryad.fttdz08rp

Scored with release 0.9.0

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.