The dataset of the paper titled "Context-Aware Code Change Embedding for Better Patch Correctness Assessment"
<p>The dataset of the paper titled "Context-Aware Code Change Embedding for Better Patch Correctness Assessment".</p> <p>This is the online repository of the paper "Context-Aware Code Change Embedding for Better Patch Correctness Assessment" under review by ASE2021. We release the source code of Cache, the patches used in our evaluation, as well as the experiment results.</p> <ul> <li> <p>Patches: Two patch benchmarks included in our study.</p> <ul> <li>Small: The 1,183 deduplicated patches from Tian's <a href="https://conf.researchr.org/details/ase-2020/ase-2020-papers/3/Evaluating-Representation-Learning-of-Code-Changes-for-Predicting-Patch-Correctness-i">ASE20</a> paper and Wang's <a href="https://conf.researchr.org/details/ase-2020/ase-2020-papers/54/Automated-Patch-Correctness-Assessment-How-Far-are-We-">ASE20</a> paper.</li> <li>Large: The patches collected by ourselves, which is consist of totally 49,694 patches from <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3338906.3338911">RepairThemAll</a> and <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3379597.3387491">ManySStuBs</a>.</li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Results</p> <ul> <li> <p>RQ1: The detailed result files in RQ1, which are named by the format of <em><code>[model]_[classifier].csv</code></em>. For example, the file named <em><code>BERT_DT.csv</code></em> in the folder <em><code>Small</code></em> means that this file is the result of patches from <strong>Small</strong> dataset embedded by <strong>BERT</strong> and classified by <strong>Decision Tree</strong>.</p> <ul> <li>Small: The detailed result files on Small dataset.</li> <li>Large: The detailed result files on Large dataset.</li> <li> <p>Cross: The detailed result files of representation learning techniques when training on Large dataset and testing on Small dataset.</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>RQ2: The detailed result files in RQ2.</p> <ul> <li>Wang_Cache.csv: The detailed result of Cache on the dataset from Wang's <a href="https://conf.researchr.org/details/ase-2020/ase-2020-papers/54/Automated-Patch-Correctness-Assessment-How-Far-are-We-">ASE20</a> paper.</li> <li> <p>ODS_Cache.csv: The datailed result of Cache on the dataset from Xiong's <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3180155.3180182">ICSE18</a> paper. We directly compare against the results reported by the authors of ODS on 139 patches from Xiong's paper since the data and source code of ODS is unavailable.</p> </li> <li> <p>Table_5_Effectiveness_APCA.xlsx: The detailed version of <strong>Table 5</strong> in the paper.</p> </li> <li> <p>Table_6_Effectiveness_ODS.xlsx: The detailed version of <strong>Table 6</strong> in the paper.</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Source: The source code and lib for running Cache. Guidance for replicating our study is available at <em><code>source/Readme.md</code></em>. We will build a homepage for Cache on GitHub upon acceptance.</li> </ul>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0