When cheating turns into a stabilizing mechanism of plant-pollinator communities
<p>This repository is a complete update to the one linked to our preprint (https://zenodo.org/records/8272889). It includes:</p><ul><li>R codes to reproduce simulations, empirical analyses and figures</li><li>results of theoretical simulations (data_for_analyses.txt in simulations_results)</li><li>empirical data to reproduce analyses (traits_data.csv<i> & </i>empirical_data.csv in empirical<i>_</i>data folder)</li><li>results of simulations calibrated by empirical networks (equilibriums_analyse_empir.txt in simulations_results)</li><li>results of simulations for randomized empirical cheating patterns (equilibriums_analyse_empir_null.txt in simulations_results)</li></ul><p>R (v. 4.3.0) codes are also available here: <a href="https://github.com/f-duchenne/Cheating_in_mutualistic_networks">https://github.com/f-duchenne/Cheating_in_mutualistic_networks</a></p>
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4