What factors influence the rediscovery of lost tetrapod species? Appendix F: Excluded species
<p>For the study associated with this dataset, we created a database of lost and rediscovered tetrapod species and identified patterns in their distribution and factors influencing rediscovery. Our lost species list included many of the species on another published list of lost species compiled by Re:wild (<a href="https://www.rewild.org/)">https://www.rewild.org/)</a> in collaboration with the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (<a href="https://www.iucn.org/">https://www.iucn.org/</a>). However, we did not include some of the species included on the Re:wild/IUCN list. This appendix provides a list of those species. It includes the following information for each species:</p> <ul> <li> <p>taxonomy - class, order, scientific name, common name;</p> </li> <li> <p>threat status (as published on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species);</p> </li> <li> <p>location - continent / island, range / country.</p> </li> </ul>
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 12
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 12