Aphid-induced phytochemicals in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. afflicting host preference and bionomics of Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)
<p>Bionomics of an insect and metabolic flux of the host plant are important tools to decipher the status of plant resistance against insect species. This study illuminates vital information on aphid-induced levels of phytochemicals in the siliquae<em> </em>of <em>Brassica juncea</em> cultivars and their effect on host selection and population growth parameters of <em>Lipaphis erysimi</em>. The current study unveiled that the siliquae preference, intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), gross reproductive rate (GRR) and net reproductive rate (R0) were significantly lower on Pusa Mustard 27, DRMR 150-35, RLC 3, NRCHB 101, Pusa Mustard 26 and Pusa Mustard 25. However, mean generation time (T) and doubling time (DT) of <em>L. erysimi</em> were significantly longer (P<0.001) in these genotypes. These cultivars were also found with elevated levels of aphid-induced phytochemicals and their associated enzymes, except in a few cases. Total antioxidants, FRAP, chlorophyll A, total chlorophyll, AO, catalase, PAL and myrosinase were found to contribute 49.18 to 85.30% variation for siliquae preference and bionomics of <em>L. erysimi</em> on the test <em>B. juncea</em> cultivars. The study revealed that phenols, antioxidants, chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, total carotenoids, AO, APX, PAL, TAL and myrosinase had significant and negative direct consequences on the siliquae preference and bionomics, thus can be exploited as biochemical markers to identify sources of resistance against <em>L. erysimi</em>. Further, DRMR 150-35, NRCHB 101, RLC 3, Pusa mustard 26, RH 749, and Pusa Mustard 27 were found with greater aphid-induced defence phytochemicals and detrimental effects on the host selection and bionomics of <em>L. erysimi</em>, thus can be deployed in <em>Brassica</em> improvement program.</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 12
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4