Skip to main content
zenodoopen

[IO Islamic 708] ديوان شوكت

<ul> <li>D&icirc;w&acirc;n-i-Shaukat</li> <li>This manuscript is now IO Islamic 1628 in the India Office collections.</li> <li>[metadata: Hermann Eth&eacute;, Catalogue of Persian Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, 2 vols. (Oxford: India Office, 1903): volume 1, number 708 here with notations and hyperlinks].</li> </ul> <p><span>Shaukat (Nos. 1628-1633).</span></p> <p><span>1628</span></p> <p><span>D&icirc;w&acirc;n-i-Shaukat (</span><span><span><span><span><span>ديوان شوكت</span></span></span></span></span><span>).</span></p> <p><span>Lyrical and epical poems by Maul&acirc;n&acirc; (khw&acirc;jah or Mull&acirc;) Mu</span><span>ḥammad Isḥaḳ (or Ab&ucirc; Isḥaḳ), or-according to others-Muḥammad Ibr&acirc;him, with the takhalluṣ Shaukat of Bukh&acirc;r&acirc;, who went, A.H. 1088 (A.D. 1677), to Har&acirc;t, later on to Mashhad, and finally settled in Iṣfah&acirc;n, where he died, A.H. 1107 (A.D. 1595, 1596). He collected his d&icirc;w&acirc;n in A.H. 1093 (A.D. 1682); comp. Bodleian Cat., Nos. 1145 and 1146; Khul&acirc;ṣat-alafk&acirc;r, No. 151 (ib., col. 307); Rieu ii. p. 698; W. Pertsch, Berlin Cat., p. 934; A. Sprenger, Catal., p. 568; Krafft, p. 69, etc. The statement of the Muntakhab-alash</span><span><span>&rsquo;</span></span><span>&acirc;r, No. 330 (col. 246 in the Bodleian Cat.) that he was a native of Iṣfah&acirc;n, went to India and was killed by a young Hind&ucirc;, is obviously wrong. Equally wrong are the data of his life both in G. Fl&uuml;gel i. pp. 588 and 589, where he is, on the authority of Ḥ</span><span>. Khalfa vi. p. 575, No. 14708, represented as a contemporary of Sh&acirc;h Isma</span><span><span>&rsquo;&icirc;</span></span><span>l II, and in the Ham&icirc;sha Bah&acirc;r (A. Sprenger, Catal., p. 124), where he is said to have been probably alive as late as A.H. 1136 (A.D. 1720, 1721). A Turkish commentary on Shaukat</span><span><span>&rsquo;</span></span><span>s d&icirc;w&acirc;n is noticed in G. </span><span>Fl&uuml;gel</span><span> i. p. 590.</span></p> <p><span>Contents:</span></p> <p><span>A large mystical mathnaw&icirc;, without any special heading, on fol. 2</span><sup><span>b</span></sup><span>, beginning:</span></p> <p><span><span><span><span><span>حمد و شكر اورا كه هر</span></span></span><span><span><span>چ</span></span></span><span><span><span>ه هست اوست</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><span>دام هستى حلقه از هاى و هوست</span></span></span></p> <p><span>The first page of this poem is repeated on fol. 1</span><sup><span>b</span></sup><span>; ff. 168 and 169 are misplaced, and must, as belonging to the lyrical portion of this MS., be inserted between ff. 187 and 188.</span></p> <p><span>Ghazals, intermixed with rub&acirc;</span><span><span>&rsquo;</span></span><span>&icirc;s, and fards, all in alphabetical order, on fol. 186</span><sup><span>b</span></sup><span>, beginning:</span></p> <p><span><span><span><span><span>خدايا رن</span></span></span><span><span><span>گ</span></span></span><span><span><span> تأثيرى كرامت كن فغانم را</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><span>بموج اشك بلبل آب ده تيغ زبانم را</span></span></span></p> <p><span>Dated the 2nd of Dh&ucirc;-alḥijjah, A.H. 1138 (A.D. 1726, Aug.</span><span> </span><span>1).</span></p> <p><span>No. 708, ff. 346, 2 coll., each ll. 12-14; written by at least three different hands on different paper in partly careful, partly careless Nasta&rsquo;l&icirc;ḳ; many pages greatly injured; size, 8&frac14; in. by 5&frac34; in. </span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
4
Engagement
0

Topics