Figure 79 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716

Figure 79 Vegetative morphology of SclerolobieaeAMoldenhawera nutans L.P. Queiroz, G.P. Lewis & Allkin shrubby individual in a Restinga sand dune field BDiptychandra aurantiaca (Mart.) Tul. tree in a Caatinga seasonally dry setting CArapatiella psilophylla (Harms) R.S. Cowan flowering tree DTachigali amplifolia (Ducke) Barneby large, buttressed tree EJacqueshuberia purpurea Ducke pinnate stipule F leaf G detail of a leaf HTachigali rugosa (Mart. ex Benth.) Zarucchi & Pipoly leaf with characteristic inversely symmetrical leaflets I, JTachigali sp. details of leaf domatia K, L variation in stipule shape. Photo credits A, C, E–L D Cardoso B RT Queiroz https://rubens-plantasdobrasil.blogspot.com/D I Huamantupa.