Figure 36 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 36 Fruits of CaesalpinieaeAHererolandia pearsonii (L. Bolus) Gagnon & G.P. Lewis, Namibia, Sesriem Canyon BHaematoxylum brasiletto H. Karst., Mexico (Lewis 2057) CLophocarpinia aculeatifolia (Burkart) Burkart, Paraguay, (Fortunato 8650) DHoffmannseggia arequipensis Ulibarri, Peru, Arequipa, (Hughes et al. 2342) EBalsamocarpon brevifolium Clos, Chile (Baxter et al. DCI 1859) FZuccagnia punctata Cav., Argentina, Mendoza GCordeauxia edulis Hemsl., Somalia HErythrostemon coccineus (G.P. Lewis & J.L. Contr.) Gagnon & G.P. Lewis, Mexico, Oaxaca (Lewis et al. 1802) IPaubrasilia echinata (Lam.) Gagnon, H.C. Lima & G.P. Lewis, Brazil JLibidibia paraguariensis (Parodi) G.P. Lewis, Bolivia, Santa Cruz (Hughes 2475) KCoulteria mollis Kunth, Guatemala (Lewis et al. 1714) LCenostigma pluviosum var. cabralianum (G.P. Lewis) Gagnon & G.P. Lewis, Brazil (Lewis et al. 2019) MPomaria jamesii (Torr. & A. Gray) Walp., USA. Photo credits A AA Dreyer B, I, K, L GP Lewis C RH Fortunato D, H, J CE Hughes E P Baxter F Italo Specogna, Flora mendocina (http://www.floramendocina.com.ar/clase_3/zuccagnia_punctata_p9558.html) G M Thulin M P Alexander, SEINet Arizona Chapter (https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/imagelib/imgdetails.php?imgid=253949).
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0