Figure 99 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 99 Habit, bark and foliage of ErythrophleeaeAErythrophleum fordii Oliv. at Hùng Temple, Vietnam B bark of Erythrophleum couminga Baill. in Madagascar CPachyelasma tessmannii (Harms) Harms in Congolian rainforest D, E, HErythrophleum chlorostachys Baill. D rugous bark E tree in northern Australian savannas H foliage FErythrophleum lasianthum Corbishley foliage GErythrophleum suaveolens (Guill. & Perr.) Brenan foliage and terminal inflorescences, Ntumbachusi falls, Zambia. Photo credits A Hungda (https://tropical.theferns.info/image.php?id=Erythrophleum+fordii) B Solofo Eric Rakotoarisoa, iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/42581094) C Bart Wursten (https://www.flickr.com/photos/zimbart/8212743587/in/photolist-dvJsxn-dvJnwi) D, E, H G Mahajan (https://alchetron.com/Erythrophleum-chlorostachys) F JMK (https://wikiwand.com/en/Erythrophleum_lasianthum) G MG Bingham (https://malawiflora.com/speciesdata/image-display.php?species_id=126540&image_id=8).
ShareScore
28/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 0