Supplementary files and data Files for "Discordance between mitochondrial, nuclear, and symbiont genomes in aphid phylogenetics: who is telling the truth?" Zoological journal of the Linnean society, 2024, vol 1, issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae098
<p>This repository comprises</p> <ul> <li>a file with all supplementary Tables (<strong>Supplementary_Tables</strong>). Table S1: Collection details and voucher ID for aphid samples from the CBGP-Inrae collection, data origin is given for other specimens. Table S2: Amplification success of long range DNA fragments from mitochondrial genomes . Table S3: Primers used for fluidigm aplification of nuclear genes and sequencing success. Table S4. Genomic features of newly sequenced Buchnera aphidicola with aphid taxonomic affiliation. Table S5: Summary of models used for each ML analysis and corresponding log-likelihood score of the best tree.Table S6: Output of RERConverge analyses.</li> <li>two Supplementary figures: Figure S1: Workflow of phylogenetic analyses as implemented on each dataset. Figure S2: Plot depicting the genome-wide pattern of molecular evolution (dN/dS) between disymbiotic (n = 15) and monosymbiotic aphid (n = 45) branches across the ML phylogeny (horizontal bars indicate 95% CI of the means). <em>P</em> value was calculated by using Wilcoxon Rank test.</li> <li>a word file (Text S1) with : Details of protocol for obtaining mitochondrial genomes through long-range DNA amplifications and Illumina sequencing, and two-step PCR protocole.</li> <li>an archive (archive1) with the mitochondrial AA and DNA matrices and alternative phylogenetic trees under ML and Bayesian analyses ; </li> </ul> <ul> <li>an archive (archive2) with the nuclear AA and DNA matrices and alternative phylogenetic trees under ML and Bayesian analyses</li> <li>an archive (archive 3) with the twelve new <em>Buchnera</em> genome drafts.</li> <li> an archive (archive4) with the <em>Buchnera</em> AA matrices and alternative topologies </li> </ul> <p> </p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4