Skip to main content
zenodoopen

TABLE 6 in Carabus of Subgenus Cathoplius C. G. Thomson, 1875, with description of their life-way, life-cycle and pre-imaginal morphology (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

<p><b>TABLE 6.</b> Results of the hybridization experiments: <i>Carabus asperatus</i> x <i>C. stenocephalus stenocephalus</i>, <i>C. stenocephalus ifniensis</i> x <i>C. stenocephalus susicus</i> and <i>C. stenocephalus ifniensis</i> x <i>C. stenocephalus aliai</i>.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Parent species (acronym of combination)</th><th>No. of breeders</th><th>Oviposition period</th><th>No. of hatched larvae / No. of emerged imagoes</th><th>No. of viable imagoes after 30 days from emersion (no. &male;&male;, &female;&female;)</th><th>Survival rate</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>&male; <i>C. asperatus</i> x &female; <i>C. s. stenocephalus</i> (ASTEN1)</th><td>2&male;&male; &amp; 2&female;&female;</td><td>From 23/4/09 to 15/6/09</td><td>199/79</td><td>75 (45&male;&male;, 30&female;&female;)</td><td>37.7%</td></tr><tr><th>&male; F1 ASTEN1 x &female; F1 ASTEN1</th><td>3&male;&male; &amp; 3&female;&female;</td><td>From 7/9/09 to 2/11/09</td><td>91/5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>&male; <i>C. s. stenocephalus</i> x &female; <i>C. asperatus</i> (ASTEN2)</th><td>2&male;&male; &amp; 2&female;&female;</td><td>From 5/4/09 to 16/6/09</td><td>221/87</td><td>80 (35&male;&male;, 45&female;&female;)</td><td>36.2%</td></tr><tr><th>&male; F1 ASTEN2 x &female; F1 ASTEN2</th><td>3&male;&male; &amp; 3&female;&female;</td><td>From 13/9/09 to 17/11/09</td><td>127/8</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>&male; <i>C. s. ifniensis</i> x &female; <i>C. s. susicus</i> (IFSU)</th><td>1&male; &amp; 1&female;</td><td>From 05/12/08 to 15/01/09</td><td>480/298</td><td>308 (190&male;&male;, 195&female;&female;)</td><td>64.2%</td></tr><tr><th>&male; <i>C. s. aliai</i> x &female; <i>C. s. ifniensis</i> (AIF1)</th><td>1&male; &amp; 2&female;&female;</td><td>From 30/12/10 to 12/3/11</td><td>187/72</td><td>67 (33&male;&male;, 34&female;&female;)</td><td>35.8%</td></tr><tr><th>&male; F1 AIF1 x &female; F1 AIF1</th><td>2&male;&male; &amp; 2&female;&female;</td><td>From 8/9/11 to 3/10/11</td><td>56/0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>&male; <i>C. s. ifniensis</i> x &female; <i>C. s. aliai</i> (AIF2)</th><td>2&male;&male; &amp; 4&female;&female;</td><td>From 16/5/11 to 21/7/11</td><td>196/75</td><td>69 (37 &male;&male;, 32 &female;&female;)</td><td>35.2%</td></tr><tr><th>&male; F1 AIF2 x &female; F1 AIF2</th><td>2&male;&male; &amp; 2&female;&female;</td><td>From 4/10/11 to 11/11/11</td><td>87/0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
8
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics