TABLE 2 in Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae)
<p><b>TABLE 2.</b> Comparison of the new species with their Indian Ocean congeners and two closely similar species from western Pacific Ocean. Those cells with overlapped values of new species are shaded in gray. Data sources: A: this study. B. Shcherbachev (1993). C. Paulin (1989).</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxon</th><th>InV-LO/</th><th>LO/</th><th>Scale</th><th><b>Pelvic-</b></th><th><b>Dorsal-</b></th><th><b>Anal-</b></th><th><b>Pectoral-</b></th><th><b>Vertebrae</b></th><th><b>Gill</b></th><th><b>1st</b></th><th><b>Other characters</b></th><th><b>Data</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>InV-af (%)</td><td>InV-af (%)</td><td>series</td><td><b>fin rays</b></td><td><b>fin rays</b></td><td><b>fin rays</b></td><td><b>fin rays</b></td><td></td><td><b>rakers</b></td><td><b>Dorsal-fin</b></td><td></td><td><b>sources</b></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>(2</b> <b>nd</b><b>)</b></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>height</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>(% HL)</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>P. indicus</i></th><td>18.6­‒29.0</td><td>6­.4‒12.0</td><td>90‒102</td><td>7</td><td>56­‒6­0</td><td>55‒6­0</td><td>~22</td><td>52</td><td>12‒13</td><td>25.1‒39.1</td><td>Teeth equal in size;</td><td>A</td></tr><tr><th>sp. nov.</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>snout scaled</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>P. lakshadeepa</i> 24.4‒29.0 6­.0‒9.6­ 84‒95 7 51‒59 53‒59 ~18 49 14‒17 51.7‒6­2.8 <b>Teeth equal in size; A sp. nov. snout scaled</b></p><p><i>P. capensis</i> 19.0‒19.7 15.1‒15.8 98‒110 7 54‒57 6­0‒6­2 26­‒28 49‒50 12‒13 53.5‒6­1.6­ Jaw teeth in a B 20.4‒30.6­ 5.4‒10.0 105‒110 53‒6­2 58‒6­5 24‒25 48‒51 2‒3+9 graded series; snout C</p><p>naked.</p><p><i>P. andriashevi</i> 21.0‒28.4 11.9‒18.2 124‒140 5 72‒80 73‒80 21‒23 59‒6­0 13‒18 26­.7‒38.1 B</p><p><i>P. rhodopinnis</i> 24.3‒26­.7 11.2‒16­.4 120‒130 5 71‒76­ 76­‒79 23 57‒58 11‒14 34.9‒36­.3 B (Indo-W Pacific) 21.3‒27.2 10.1‒15.9 120‒140 6­8‒76­ 70‒80 53‒56­ 3‒4+7‒12 C</p><p><i>P. argyropastus</i> 31.7‒41.7 9.2‒14.1 93‒99 6­‒7 55‒6­1 6­0‒6­7 21‒24 50‒54 14‒19 33.1‒51.1 B</p><p>23.0‒36­.0 4.6­‒9.8 ca. 56­‒6­0 58‒6­5 53‒56­ 2‒3+9‒11 C</p><p>90‒95</p><p><i>P. marisrubri</i> 31.4‒38.0 12.9‒15.2 75‒80 5 58‒6­3 6­2‒6­8 21‒25 52‒53 22‒24 41.8‒44.6­ B</p><p>32.9‒36­.9 8.0‒8.9 ca. 80 58‒6­3 6­3‒6­8 55 5+12‒14 C</p><p><i>P. normani</i> 39.0‒39.1 7.6­‒11.0 86­‒97 5 59‒6­6­ 6­4‒70 23‒24 50‒53 10‒12 30.4 Jaw teeth in a B 34.9‒38.2 7.1‒9.4 86­‒95 6­0‒6­3 6­7‒70 51 2‒3+8‒9 graded series; snout C</p><p>naked</p><p><i>P. nielseni</i> 39.1 10.80 105 5 6­5+ 6­4+ 24 48+ 12‒14 30.5 Snout naked B</p><p><i>P. fedorovi</i> [‒8.5] 25.7 126 7 62 68 23‒24 52 10‒11 35.1 B</p><p><i>P. dalwigkii</i> 0.0‒2.4 17.5‒20.0 119‒126­ 6­3‒6­8 6­6­‒75 / 52‒55 2‒3+7‒9 Jaw teeth in a C 7.0‒9.4 14.4‒24.5 127‒135 5 6­4‒6­5 6­8‒71 24‒26­ 56 10‒13 39.4‒40.6­ graded series B</p><p>......continued on the next page</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 8
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0