TABLE 3 in Hidden treasures of Camamu Bay, Bahia, Brazil: New records and two new species of Raspailiidae (Porifera, Demospongiae)
<p><b>TABLE 3.</b> Comparisons of shape and dimensions of the spicules with an overview of geographic and depth distribution of <i>Thrinacophora</i> Ridley, 1885. Measured spicules of each category (micrometers, μm) expressed as follows: minimum-mean-maximum length/width.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Species</b></th><th><b>Distribution / Depth (m)</b></th><th><b>Strongyles</b></th><th><b>Oxeas/anisoxeas</b></th><th><b>Styles I</b></th><th><b>Styles II</b></th><th><b>Styles III</b></th><th><b>Trichodragma</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora melae</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th><td>Bahia, Brazil / 2 – 3</td><td>310–461.7–850 x 7.5–9.8–15</td><td>Absent</td><td>875–1177.5–1400 x 7.5–11.3–17.5</td><td>250–776–1350 x 2.5–4.3–10</td><td>92.5–153.4–177.5 x 5–7.8–10</td><td>Raphides 250–344.3–450 x 1–1.6–3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora cervicornis</i> Ridley & Dendy, 1886</th><td>Philippines Arafura Sea and Northwest Shelf Western Atlantic, Pacific / 8 – 83</td><td>Absent</td><td>212–279.3–325 x 9–14.8–19</td><td>288–473.1–608 x 0.5–2.8–5.5</td><td>51–66.3–96 x 6–8.3–10</td><td>Absent</td><td>5–66.3–96 x 6–8.3–10</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora dubia</i> Brøndsted, 1924</th><td>Auckland and Campbell Islands, Pacific / shallow-water</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Styles,varying through subtylostyles to tylostyles 90–2000 x 14</td><td>Absent</td><td>100–160 x 4–5</td><td>Raphides 400 x 3–1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora funiformis</i> Ridley & Dendy, 1886</th><td>Guyana Shelf, NE Brazil / 33</td><td>Absent</td><td>324–406–482 x 13–19.7–23</td><td>538–992–1398 x 16–25.1–32</td><td>Cladostyles 267–370–439 x 3.5–5.2–7</td><td>Absent</td><td>Raphides in trichodragma 105–118–129 x 7–8.4–10</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora incrustans</i> Kieschnick, 1896</th><td>Ternate, Indonesia</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Styles</td><td>Amphioxes, Cladostrongyles</td><td>Absent</td><td>Trichodragma</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora murrayi</i> Arnesen, 1920</th><td>Cape Bojador (St.37), Saara Ocidental, Western Sahara, Morocco / 39</td><td>Absent</td><td>296–407.6 x 18.5</td><td>Styles choanosome two size 273x18.5 592x18.5</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>40x10</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora rhaphidophora</i> (Hentschel, 1912)</th><td>Ilhas Aru, norte de Penambulai, Arafura Sea / 8</td><td>Absent</td><td>Amphioxes (styles and amphistrongyles) 2224–320 x 11–13</td><td>Styles and Amphistrongyles 1600–1920 x 20 μ</td><td>Styles Amphistrongyles 448–600 x 5 μ</td><td>Absent</td><td>Raphides about 100 μ</td></tr><tr><th><i>Thrinacophora spinosa</i> Wilson, 1902</th><td>Off Punta Melones (stn 6072), Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico / 74</td><td>Absent</td><td>Oxeas big 250x8 small 200x6</td><td>Styles big 1100x10–12 small 800x8</td><td>Styles very slender 800–1100x5 smaller forms 400x3–5</td><td>Absent</td><td>About 120 μ</td></tr></tbody></table>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 8
- Access
- 8
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0