Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Irish Grass Clover Dataset (VistaMilk)

<p>Irish grass clover dataset<br>Overview</p> <p><br>The Irish Grass Clover Dataset, collected in Ireland by a group of researchers working at the &nbsp;VistaMilk Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre , comprises high-resolution images of herbage biomass. The dataset includes ground-truth annotations for herbage mass (kg DM/ha) and post-cutting herbage height (cm), capturing the composition percentages of grass, weed, and clover. This document provides details about the dataset, including collection methods, image specifications, and associated ground-truth data.</p> <p><br>Dataset description</p> <p><br>The dataset contains multiple subsets of data collected using a tripod mounted camera, a handheld phone or a drone. The dataset can be divided into two main subsets: the Camera &amp; Phone Images subset and the Drone Images subset.&nbsp;</p> <p><br>Camera &amp; Phone Images:</p> <p><br>This dataset was gathered in 2020 in Ireland using both a high-resolution Canon camera (Canon EOS 90D Camera - Canon Europe) and a smartphone camera (iPhone 6). All the images were collected at Moorepark Farm managed by Teagasc, aiming to capture the biomass composition comprising grass, weeds and clover. Each image corresponded to a 0.5&times;0.5 m quadrat with 5-6 images taken for each of the 26 plots.<br>Ground truth (GT) is provided for a subset of these images while other images are collected without GT. The herbage within quadrats for which GT was collected was harvested at 2-4 cm above ground level using Gardena hand shears (Accu 60, Gardena International GmbH, Ulm, Germany) immediately after image capture. Fresh weight was recorded and the harvested herbage was separated, oven-dried for 16 hours and weighed to give dry matter yield.</p> <p><br>For each of the &nbsp;GT images the following labels are provided: total dry herbage mass (kg DM/ha), dry grass biomass percentage (%), dry clover biomass percentage (%), dry weed biomass percentage (%), fresh grass biomass percentage (%), fresh clover biomass percentage (%), fresh weed biomass percentage (%), and sward height post-cutting (cm). Additional views were taken using the smartphone for validation and generalisation purposes. All labelled phone images were collected at the exact same quadrats/locations where some of the camera images were taken, therefore they share the same GT values. A larger number of unlabeled camera &amp; phone images were also collected at random locations across the same plots where the labelled images were collected.</p> <p><br>The contents of this subset can be summarised as:<br>* 525 GT camera images divided into 418 train set labelled images and 107 &nbsp;validation set labelled images.<br>* 124 GT phone &nbsp;images divided into 17 train set labelled images and 107 &nbsp;validation set labelled images.<br>* 1072 unlabelled camera images&nbsp;<br>* 1112 unlabelled phone images&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><br>Drone Images</p> <p><br>An extension of the Camera &amp; Phone Images subset was created in late Autumn of 2021 where drone images were collected in the same 23 herbage paddocks originally studied with camera &amp; phone images. At each paddock between 7 to 36 drone images at an altitude between 6 and 12 metres were captured. The drone used is the DJI Mavic 2 Pro 1 with its default camera, taking pictures at a resolution of 5472 &times; 3648.<br>A total of 331 drone images with their associated altitude were obtained. Because of the huge areas covered by drone images, the ground-truth we collect is limited to the dry herbage mass at the paddock level and we omit the grass height and biomass percentage information. Two ground-truth estimation methods were utilised for the drone images: the first is a visual estimation performed on site at the time of the image collection by two human experts, the second is following the protocol of Egan et al. [1], where two 1.2 &times; 8 metres strips in the paddocks are cut at 4 cm above ground level (typical cow grazing height) using an Etesia lawn mower (Etesia UK. Ltd., Warwick, UK). A 100 grams sample is collected from the cut material and dried at 95&deg;C for 16 hours to obtain the dry herbage mass.</p> <p><br>Structure</p> <p><br>The file structure for this repository is as follows:</p> <p><br>irish_dataset_all/<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_README.md<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_camera<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_train.csv // training images (filenames and GT annotations)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_train_red.csv // a smaller training subset of 52 images &nbsp; &nbsp; names and annotations<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_val.csv // validation images names and annotations<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_images/ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;// The training and test camera images<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_phone<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_phone_gt_train.csv // training images (filenames and GT annotations)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_phone_gt_train.csv // validation images (filenames and annotations)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_images/ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;// training and test phone images<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_camera_unlab &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; // unlabeled Camera images<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_phone_unlab &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; // unlabeled Phone images<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |_drone &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_images &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; // Drone images, organized by paddock<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_labels.csv &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; // image filenames and associated paddock level herbage mass ground truth (including visually estimated)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|_paddock_gt.csv &nbsp; &nbsp; // paddock level herbage mass ground truth (including visually estimated)</p> <p>License:</p> <p>This dataset is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).&nbsp;<br>This means you are free to:<br>Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.<br>Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material.</p> <p>However, these permissions are subject to the following terms:<br>Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.<br>Non-Commercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.<br>ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.<br>By using this dataset, you agree to abide by these terms. For more details about the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/.</p> <p>Acknowledgements and fair use:</p> <p>Please cite us if our work and data helps your research !</p> <p><br>@inproceedings{albert2021semi,<br>&nbsp; title={Semi-supervised dry herbage mass estimation using automatic data and synthetic images},<br>&nbsp; author={Albert, Paul and Saadeldin, Mohamed and Narayanan, Badri and Mac Namee, Brian and Hennessy, Deirdre and O'Connor, Aisling and O'Connor, Noel and McGuinness, Kevin},<br>&nbsp; booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},<br>&nbsp; pages={1284--1293},<br>&nbsp; year={2021}<br>}</p> <p><br>@inproceedings{albert2022unsupervised,<br>&nbsp; title={Unsupervised domain adaptation and super resolution on drone images for autonomous dry herbage biomass estimation},<br>&nbsp; author={Albert, Paul and Saadeldin, Mohamed and Narayanan, Badri and Mac Namee, Brian and Hennessy, Deirdre and O'Connor, Noel E and McGuinness, Kevin},<br>&nbsp; booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},<br>&nbsp; pages={1636--1646},<br>&nbsp; year={2022}<br>}</p> <p><br>@article{albert2022utilizing,<br>&nbsp; title={Utilizing unsupervised learning to improve sward content prediction and herbage mass estimation},<br>&nbsp; author={Albert, Paul and Saadeldin, Mohamed and Narayanan, Badri and Mac Namee, Brian and Hennessy, Deirdre and O'Connor, Aisling H and O'Connor, Noel E and McGuinness, Kevin},<br>&nbsp; journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.09343},<br>&nbsp; year={2022}<br>}</p> <p><br>References<br>[1] Egan, Michael, Norann Galvin, and Deirdre Hennessy. "Incorporating white clover (Trifolium repens L.) into perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) swards receiving varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer: Effects on milk and herbage production." Journal of Dairy Science 101, no. 4 (2018): 3412-3427<br>[a]Get license added here.</p>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
0