Skip to main content
dryadopen

Molecular systematics of the tribe Physarieae (Brassicaceae) based on the nuclear ITS, LUMINIDEPENDENS, and chloroplast ndhF: Sequence alignments, trees, and supplemental figures

<p>Physarieae is a small tribe of herbaceous annual and woody perennial mustards that are mostly endemic to North America, with its members including a large amount of variation in floral, fruit and chromosomal variation. Building on a previous study of Physarieae based on morphology and <i>ndhF</i> plastid DNA, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of the tribe using new sequence data from two nuclear markers, and compared the new topologies against previously published cpDNA-based phylogenetic hypotheses. The novel analyses included ca. 420 new sequences of ITS and <i>LUMINIDEPENDENS</i> (<i>LD</i>) markers for 39 and 47 species, respectively, with sampling accounting for all seven genera of Physarieae, including nomenclatural type species, and 11 outgroup taxa. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses showed that these additional markers were largely consistent with the previous <i>ndh</i>F data that supported the monophyly of Physarieae and resolved two major clades within the tribe, i.e. DDNLS (<i>Dithyrea</i>, <i>Dimorphocarpa</i>, <i>Nerisyrenia</i>, <i>Lyrocarpa</i>, and <i>Synthlipsis</i>) and PP (<i>Paysonia</i> and <i>Physaria</i>). New analyses also increased internal resolution for some closely related species and lineages within both clades. The monophyly<i> </i>of <i>Dithyrea</i> and the sister relationship of <i>Paysonia</i> to <i>Physaria</i> was consistent in all trees, with the sister relationship of <i>Nerisyrenia </i>to <i>Lyrocarpa </i>supported by <i>ndhF</i> and <i>ITS</i>, and the positions of <i>Dimorphocarpa</i> and <i>Synthlipsis</i> shifted within the DDNLS Clade depending on the employed data set. Finally, using the strong, new phylogenetic framework of combined cpDNA + nDNA data, we discussed standing hypotheses of trichome evolution in the tribe suggested by <i>ndhF</i>.</p>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
4