Bee species differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
<p><em>Premise of the study </em></p> <p>Pollinator foraging behavior can influence pollen dispersal and gene flow. In many plant species a pollinator trips a flower by applying pressure to release its sexual organs. We propose that differences in tripping rate among grooming pollinators could generate distinct pollen deposition curves, the pattern of pollen deposition over successive flowers visited. This study compares the pollen deposition curves of two grooming pollinators, a social bumble bee and a solitary leafcutting bee,<i> </i>with distinct tripping rates on <i>Medicago sativa</i> flowers. We predict a steeper deposition curve for pollen moved by leafcutting bees, the pollinator with the higher tripping rate.</p> <p><em>Methods</em> </p> <p><i>Medicago sativa</i> plants carrying a gene (GUS) whose product is easily detected by staining, were used as pollen donors. After visiting the GUS plants, a bee was released on a linear array of conventional <i>M. sativa</i> plants. The number of GUS pollen grains deposited over successive flowers visited or over cumulative distances were examined. Distinct mixed effect Poisson regression models, illustrating different rates of decay in pollen deposition, were fitted to the pollen data for each bee species.</p> <p><em>Key Results </em></p> <p>Pollen decay was steeper for leafcutting bees relative to bumble bees for both models of flowers visited and cumulative distance, as predicted by their higher tripping rate.</p> <p><em>Conclusions</em></p> <p>This is the first report of a difference in pollen deposition curves between two bee species, both grooming pollinators. Such differences could lead to distinct impacts of bee species on gene flow, genetic differentiation, introgression, and ultimately speciation.</p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 12
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 8