Skip to main content
zenodoopen

MITgcm model setup and output for "What determines the shape of the Pine-Island-like ice shelf?"

<p><strong>(Contents)</strong><br> Here it contains<br> <br> jim_run3 = CTRL (Similar to Jordan et al., 2018 but with smaller ocean)</p> <p>melt/run/ = IOCTRL, M(all)V(dyn)U(dyn)</p> <p>melt2/ = M( changing, see below ) V( dyn ) U( 0 )<br> &nbsp;melt2/run/ &nbsp;= M(all)V(dyn)U(0)<br> &nbsp;melt2/run2/ = M(20)V(dyn)U(0)<br> &nbsp;melt2/run3/ = M(GL10)V(dyn)U(0)<br> &nbsp;melt2/run4/ = M(GL20)V(dyn)U(0)</p> <p><br> melt3/ = M ( changing, see below ) V( changing ) U( 0 )<br> &nbsp;melt3/run5/ &nbsp;= M(all)V(2000)U(0)<br> &nbsp;melt3/run10/ = M(20)V(2000)U(0)</p> <p>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%<br> Input melt data for running ice only experiments<br> #data.streamice#<br> meltCTRL.bin &nbsp;= M(all) ... melt rate data of CTRL for every time steps&nbsp;<br> meltCTRL2.bin = M(GL10)<br> meltCTRL3.bin = M(20 m/a)<br> meltCTRL4.bin = M(GL20)</p> <p>Input velocity data for running ice only experiments&nbsp;<br> melt3/<br> uvel_ext4.bin = U(0 m/a)<br> vvel_ext5.bin = V(2000 m/a)</p> <p><strong>(How to compile and run)</strong><br> &nbsp;mkdir build<br> &nbsp;cd build/<br> &nbsp;module load intel/2021.2.0<br> &nbsp;module load impi/2021.2.0<br> &nbsp;export LANG=en_US.UTF-8<br> &nbsp;export LC_ALL=en_US.utf8<br> &nbsp;../../../tools/genmake2 -of ../../../tools/build_options/linux_amd64_ifort+mpi_ice_nas_tokyo3 -mpi -mods ../code/<br> &nbsp;make depend<br> &nbsp;export LANG=en_US.UTF-8<br> &nbsp;export LC_ALL=en_US.utf8<br> &nbsp;make -j 16</p> <p>&nbsp;mkdir ../run<br> &nbsp;cd ../run/<br> &nbsp;cp ../build/mitgcmuv .<br> &nbsp;cp ../input/* .<br> &nbsp;pjsub job*.pbs<br> <br> <strong>Other important links</strong><br> https://github.com/hgu784/MITgcm_67s<br> <br> For more info please send an email to Yoshihiro.Nakayama@lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp</p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0