Manhattan and QQ plots of GWAS on salt stress responses in root system architecture parameters of wild tomato (S. pimpinellifolium)
<p>The population of +/2 200 accessions of wild tomato was screened with the protocol described <a href="https://www.protocols.io/view/studying-root-system-architecture-changes-in-tomat-2mqgc5w">here</a> with the only exception that the plants were transferred 4 days after germination (rather than 3 - described in the protocol). The images were analyzed using the <a href="https://smartroot.github.io/">SmartRoot</a> for days 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 after transfer to treatment plates (0 or 100 mM NaCl, 1/4 MS, 0.5% sucrose, 0.1% MES, 1% Dashin agar). The data analysis was performed as described <a href="https://rpubs.com/mjulkowska/BIGpimp_RSA_salt">here</a>, while the pareto front calculations were done according to Chandrasekhar & Julkowska paper (<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.12.456185v1">preprint here</a>). The GWAS was performed using the ASReml script similar to <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tpj.15310">Awlia et al. (2021)</a>. The raw GWAS outputs can be found <a href="https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.5856310.svg">here</a>. This dataset represents Manhattan plots and QQ plots made out of the data. </p>
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0