Location-based augmented reality (LBAR) spatial data test
<p>This repository gathers video data (screen capture) collected on a field test conducted on the 11th of May 2022, at the HEIG-VD in Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.<br> <br> The goal of the test was to submit LBAR interfaces to different sources of spatial data. The 5 conditions compared were:<br> <br> 1) ARCore interface (visual odometry) fed with position and orientation data provided by the mobile device’s embedded Inertial Measurment Unit (IMU) and GNSS measurment unit.<br> 2) ARCore interface (visual odometry) fed with orientation data provided by the mobile device’s embedded Inertial Measurment Unit (IMU), and with position data provided by an external REDcatch GNSS/RTK measurment unit.<br> 3) A-Frame + LBAR.js interface fed with position and orientation data provided by the mobile device’s embedded Inertial Measurment Unit (IMU) and GNSS measurment unit.<br> 4) A-Frame + LBAR.js interface fed with orientation data provided by the mobile device’s embedded Inertial Measurment Unit (IMU), and with position data provided by an external REDcatch GNSS/RTK measurment unit.<br> 5) A-Frame + LBAR.js interface fed with position and orientation data provided by an external Inertial Navigation Station Xsens MTi-680g (IMU + GNSS/RTK).</p>
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4